Should i train mage or ranged?

[Chaz]

i'm 35 on both but i dunno what to train :/

( i have 900k to spend)

[Bielby2ooo]

Range is faster to get up and cheaper

Mage takes ages and is real expensive

[Chaz]

Thx i think i will ;)

[Mr.Kylee]

If you're poor range otherwise mage. True mage takes longer and costs more but in the end mage owns range :rolleyes:

[:Jamie]

Get them both up :P

[JonJon]

Range owns Mage....
But mage owns warrior.
Warriors spend more money on armor. Killing them will get you their armor, if they dont run out the wildy like noobs. Then sell the armor, buy more mage stuff.
Plus, mage is more useful, you can make Ammys of Glory, Rings of Weatlh and so on...

[:Jamie]

mage is more useful, you can make Ammys of Glory, Rings of Weatlh and so on...

You can only enchant them from dragonstone amulets and rings you still need a high crafting and smithing lvl to make them. So you cant make them using mage you only enchant them.

[Sly]

Range, its cheeper

[JonJon]

And that...

I suppose to get money of range, you need good fletching, woodcutting, smithing, crafting, and <MAGE>

[Sly]

And that...

I suppose to get money of range, you need good fletching, woodcutting, smithing, crafting, and <MAGE>


Huh?