Moutain Dew!

[Lubricant]

I was stumbling along this american soda site and saw that the moutain dew on there was cheap so I thought I would get some and it's just the best lol. Used to drink when I went on holidays to america. They should sell it here. It could out sell coca cola =P

[issaa.]

ITS GAWJUSSS <333 OMG I WANT SOME. miss it <//3

[superkat]

Sperm Murderers.

[Lubricant]

Sperm Murderers.

It decreases the amount of sperm you produce? =OO

[superkat]

It does indeed sorry to tell you.

[James!]

It's illegal to sell it over here..

From wikipedia.org

A version of the drink was marketed for three years in the UK during the late 1990s. Many believe the urban legend that Mountain Dew is illegal (in its American formulation) to sell in the UK due to its high caffeine content and excessive artificial ingredients. However, the version sold in the UK was a lurid green color and contained far more caffeine, synthetic sugars, and artificial colorings than the American version. It even discolored the teeth and tongue of its drinkers for several hours after consumption.

[Webhamster]

I love Mountain Dew, I only tried it once after I'd seen it on habbo. I adore it, wish they had it in the UK.

[Lubricant]

Omg =[. Why can't prune juice do that? Why Moutain Dew? It's just cruel. I thought they would stop making it or find out whats doing that and remove it.
I can't believe there is a price for enjoying some american soda.=/

[James!]

What was the site you ordered it off?

[issaa.]

It's illegal to sell it over here..

From wikipedia.org

A version of the drink was marketed for three years in the UK during the late 1990s. Many believe the urban legend that Mountain Dew is illegal (in its American formulation) to sell in the UK due to its high caffeine content and excessive artificial ingredients. However, the version sold in the UK was a lurid green color and contained far more caffeine, synthetic sugars, and artificial colorings than the American version. It even discolored the teeth and tongue of its drinkers for several hours after consumption.
Wow, never knew that.

[James!]

Wow, never knew that. Yeah, I tried smuggling some back from Florida.. never got them back at customs.. :eusa_wall:eusa_wall

[eggd2]

I was stumbling along this american soda site and saw that the moutain dew on there was cheap so I thought I would get some and it's just the best lol. Used to drink when I went on holidays to america. They should sell it here. It could out sell coca cola =P
its sometimes at asda because wal-mart send it over

[Lubricant]

I ordered it off AmericanSoda.co.uk
My tongue went kinda green after one can this morning. I had a small headache so I assumed it was from that.

[DMB-Hosting]

hmmm never tried it - proabaly wouldnt like ti if it was full of sugar

[James!]

Yeah, it's pretty much the same as sprite.. -.-

£15.95, is that just for one can?

[Lubricant]

Yeah, it's pretty much the same as sprite.. -.-

£15.95, is that just for one can?

Lol No. 24 cans. I wouldn't spend £15 on one can.

[issaa.]

Yeah, I tried smuggling some back from Florida.. never got them back at customs.. :eusa_wall:eusa_wall

:o Didn't know it was that strict.

[Lubricant]

Does this mean American Soda.co.uk are selling this illegaly? If so i'm not buying from them again.

[HUGECOOL]

Oh my. So many myths about Mountain Dew, lol. From spermicides to teeth decoloration. :l

First off- Mountain Dew isn't a "sperm killer", otherwise the US population would have hit an all time low seeing as most people drink that. It would be illegal for a company in the US to sell a mainstream soft drink to the public knowing it's harmful. Perhaps the bootleg version of Mountain Dew can cause those issues, but no the original. About the decoloration bit- Any caffeinated beverage can do that, not just Mountain Dew. Teeth stain, so you clean them. :\

[Lubricant]

Oh my. So many myths about Mountain Dew, lol. From spermicides to teeth decoloration. :l

First off- Mountain Dew isn't a "sperm killer", otherwise the US population would have hit an all time low seeing as most people drink that. It would be illegal for a company in the US to sell a mainstream soft drink to the public knowing it's harmful. Perhaps the bootleg version of Mountain Dew can cause those issues, but no the original. About the decoloration bit- Any caffeinated beverage can do that, not just Mountain Dew. Teeth stain, so you clean them. :\

Thanks for clearing things up =]

[Charlie]

:o I love mountain dew. I also love the mountain dew slushies and the code red version. I want some nows. :(

[Bielby2ooo]

OMG

I've allways wanted to taste it

ALLWAYS ever since i used to get it on habbo :(

Im so craving it now

When parents wake up im going to force them to buy me some xD

[Colourful™]

Never tried it but it looks nice! :o

[Billabong]

Me n my mate wannu try some

:( Uk sukks for drinks lol

[H.bubbly]

i've never had it , Looks nice , seen it advertised , It's only in the Usa though right ? =/

[Lubricant]

It's in a few countries by not in UK =[.

[H.bubbly]

Darn , next time i go to america Again i'll have to bring some back with me ^^

[Lubricant]

I bought mine from a american soda site. You sometimes get it taken off you at airports.

[Mentor]

I hate the stuff, i dont get the obesseion, its just a crapy drink, that tastes like stagent pond water more than anything else... the colour may have been a warning "/

[HUGECOOL]

I hate the stuff, i dont get the obesseion, its just a crapy drink, that tastes like stagent pond water more than anything else... the colour may have been a warning "/ Sorry, we wouldn't know. Very few of us have tried stagnant pond water. :rolleyes:

[superkat]

Sorry, we wouldn't know. Very few of us have tried stagnant pond water. :rolleyes:


rofl@that + repppp

[Mentor]

Sorry, we wouldn't know. Very few of us have tried stagnant pond water. :rolleyes:

How nice, but that both failes to disprove what i said, while also being negated by the fact if you have tasted mounin due then you have tasted it...

Were you going for the most moronic comment of the week award or somthing? or are you just that moronic you dont understand how simple deduive empircal logic works "/

[RedStratocas]

It does indeed sorry to tell you.

Rumor. A woman told us in health it was untrue. How would that even be possible?

Also, I live in the US. Its over-rated. Most people in the US (even though the world-wide knowlage of Coca-Cola says otherwise) love Dr. Pepper. People only drink Mountain Dew when they want to stay awake, and now that there is Red Bull being sold EVERYWHERE, I havent even seen a MD can in ages. No offence to you guys, but I think you are a bit sidetracked by the fact it's illegal and to get your hands on one is great.

I know its an opinion of taste, but its just really strong Sprite. Nothing more.

[Mentor]

Its not illgal, it just tastes discusting. Id prefer a spirte/7up anyday, plus redbull keeps me as awake as i need to be "/

[-Wolverine]

I don't see why everyone thinks MD is so fascinating?

It's basically Sprite/7up but a much stronger version of it.

[HUGECOOL]

How nice, but that both failes to disprove what i said, while also being negated by the fact if you have tasted mounin due then you have tasted it...

Were you going for the most moronic comment of the week award or somthing? or are you just that moronic you dont understand how simple deduive empircal logic works "/
Hah, I see you never let an idea interrupt the flow of your thoughts.

It's impossible to know how something tastes like without having experienced it in the first place. How does that not disprove your feeble attempt at metaphoricity?

Lol! Now you contradict yourself by first giving a metaphorical statement, then saying its empirical logic! I don't mind at all being critiqued, but when you don't know what you're talking about in the first place, then it's just pathetic. Oh, and spell check is nice once in a while- dyslexic or not. Most repair manuals are far more interesting than you, and far less tedious to read.

How was I going for the most moronic comment of the week when you're the one tap-dancing around the idea of my argument. :/ You did nothing to defend your original idea and actually contradicted it without taking in consideration that it was flawed in the first place. Seriously, I've come across decomposing dog carcases that are less offensive to the senses than you are.

Keep typing. Maybe, someday, you'll randomly type something and it'll make sense to both you and everyone else.

[Mentor]

[COLOR="Black"]
Hah, I see you never let an idea interrupt the flow of your thoughts.

It's impossible to know how something tastes like without having experienced it in the first place. How does that not disprove your feeble attempt at metaphoricity?
Is there some website im unaware of informing you of everything i tasted?
As i find that doubful, and yourtherefor makeing the clame on an asumtion, which is inhernty false, i can now liken the above to crap.



Lol! Now you contradict yourself by first giving a metaphorical statement, then saying its empirical logic!
OK, Empircal and logic are oppsits, empircal logic is a contracdition. Metaphorica and empircal have nothing to do with each other, you cant have a metaphical exsample without it being empircaly based...


I don't mind at all being critiqued, but when you don't know what you're talking about in the first place, then it's just pathetic. Oh, and spell check is nice once in a while- dyslexic or not. Most repair manuals are far more interesting than you, and far less tedious to read.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
And you insult my logic :rolleyes:



How was I going for the most moronic comment of the week when you're the one tap-dancing around the idea of my argument. :/ You did nothing to defend your original idea and actually contradicted it without taking in consideration that it was flawed in the first place. Seriously, I've come across decomposing dog carcases that are less offensive to the senses than you are.
I already exsplained this previosly so wont do again. The contradiction you found was just you being ignorat of the words i was useing, and my argument stands clean.
I have the empircal knolage, therefor can make the assertion twards the likeness of the two tastes. Becuse you lack the sence impressions needed to make that same assertion obviosly does not invalidate what i said previosly, hence being a stupid comment as it failed compleaty in disproveing or even remotly effecting what i said.


Keep typing. Maybe, someday, you'll randomly type something and it'll make sense to both you and everyone else.

It makes perfect sence, not being able to understand it becuse its to complex for you, isnt realy my problem "/

[Uwe]

omg. I had this for the first time a week ago, and Im addicted!

[RedStratocas]

omg. I had this for the first time a week ago, and Im addicted!

I know I dont taste for you, but it isnt that good. Try sprite, its the same thing but not urine colored and as strong.

[HUGECOOL]

Just when I think, "Surely this person has reached and encapsulates the limits of Internet tedium" you go and push the boundary even further. Let’s try to make sense out of your barely coherent writing piece.

Is there some website im unaware of informing you of everything i tasted?
As i find that doubful, and yourtherefor makeing the clame on an asumtion, which is inhernty false, i can now liken the above to crap.
So, in short, you’re denying my claim that you haven’t tasted pond water meaning you have. Would that explain your paralytic state from the neck up? I take it dyslexia was a side effect. Then again, you’re idiocy can be all-natural.



OK, Empircal and logic are oppsits, empircal logic is a contracdition. Metaphorica and empircal have nothing to do with each other, you cant have a metaphical exsample without it being empircaly based...
If empirical logic is a contradiction, then I’m right. You said I didn’t understand empirical logic, which implied that your post was composed of it.
No, not really. Metaphors are based on similarities through your senses, while empirical is a more in-depth observation based on experience.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
And you insult my logic
Once again, you fail. My paragraph you posted was not an ad hominem argument. Why? Well, because I was not defending the issue at the time, only insulting you, which, may I say, is fairly easy to do. In fact, this argument proves your lack of basic reasoning. :/
And no, I don’t insult your logic since I’m not sure you even posses one.



I already exsplained this previosly so wont do again. The contradiction you found was just you being ignorat of the words i was useing, and my argument stands clean.
I have the empircal knolage, therefor can make the assertion twards the likeness of the two tastes. Becuse you lack the sence impressions needed to make that same assertion obviosly does not invalidate what i said previosly, hence being a stupid comment as it failed compleaty in disproveing or even remotly effecting what i said.
My contradiction? It’s actually a mutual contradiction. Take this excerpt from a study in epistemology.
“Similarly, two people can believe things that are mutually contradictory, but they cannot know (unequivocally) things that are mutually contradictory. For example, Jeff can believe the bridge safe, while Jenny believes it unsafe. But Jeff cannot know the bridge is safe and Jenny cannot know that the bridge is unsafe simultaneously. Two people cannot know contradictory things.” Theory of Knowledge 101 can explain the rest.

You never actually present a point- you parade around an idea, but never give a decent rebuttal. If there's an idea in your head, it's in solitary confinement. “/ (This short paragraph is, too, not an ad hominem argument, in case you were incapable of deriving to that conclusion for another 10 minutes.)



It makes perfect sence, not being able to understand it becuse its to complex for you, isnt realy my problem "
The word is too, and no, it isn’t complex as you think it to be. Face it- You have no argument, and you’re bringing up mediocre excuses to count as a rebuttal. Not only is it amusing to see, but it’s laughable as well. I take pride in my knowledge and it will take more than a mentally crippled idiot to even put a dent in such foundation. You are a waste of time, flesh, oxygen, and the ****** you were born from. Go outside once in a while and breathe, before your brain starts to rot from all that festering stagnation and cognitive dysfunction. But of course, you’re probably too late already.

*Sorry for derailing the thread everyone. ;p

[Scriptermone]

Mountain dew 0wnz..., and btw +rep to both of you...

and is it ok if I pm a mod to move it to the debates section! :P

and Mentor, I know you like to but can you please stop doing "/ at the end lol
its really annoying me :(

[Mentor]

[COLOR="Black"]Just when I think, "Surely this person has reached and encapsulates the limits of Internet tedium" you go and push the boundary even further. Let’s try to make sense out of your barely coherent writing piece.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Einstine was right when he said the only thing that is truly infinte is human stupidty...



So, in short, you’re denying my claim that you haven’t tasted pond water meaning you have. Would that explain your paralytic state from the neck up? I take it dyslexia was a side effect. Then again, you’re idiocy can be all-natural.
1. pond water is more aless the same thing thats in a resivar, now guess where the water in your taps come from.
2. stagnet pond water is pretty harmless to anyone who has any hint of an immune system.
3. Wth are you on about with the paralised ramble ?
4. Dislexica is caused by certain nural pathways in the brain being inactive, causeing me to perseave space 3 dimanty insted of 2 dinimentionaly, Due to this the brain often has to remap certain parts to achive the same effect, reading and writeing may be harder, but it usealy also reuslts in dislexics being way above average in terms of intalengce, so useing diselexica as a way to call someone stupid shows your ignorance, the fact you thing dislexica is a condiation you can "catch" or get later in life, proves that point...


If empirical logic is a contradiction, then I’m right. You said I didn’t understand empirical logic, which implied that your post was composed of it.
Ok... learn words, then you wont sound like such an idiot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empiricism
See wikipeida is your friend.


No, not really. Metaphors are based on similarities through your senses, while empirical is a more in-depth observation based on experience.
So you can create a metiphor without any emprical basis? as its usealy quite hard without some a posteriori information first "/



Once again, you fail. My paragraph you posted was not an ad hominem argument. Why? Well, because I was not defending the issue at the time, only insulting you, which, may I say, is fairly easy to do. In fact, this argument proves your lack of basic reasoning. :/
And no, I don’t insult your logic since I’m not sure you even posses one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Ever wonder why you were insulting me? oh yes, becuse your probaly to stupid to win the argument by actaly defineing it in itself.



My contradiction? It’s actually a mutual contradiction. Take this excerpt from a study in epistemology.
“Similarly, two people can believe things that are mutually contradictory, but they cannot know (unequivocally) things that are mutually contradictory. For example, Jeff can believe the bridge safe, while Jenny believes it unsafe. But Jeff cannot know the bridge is safe and Jenny cannot know that the bridge is unsafe simultaneously. Two people cannot know contradictory things.” Theory of Knowledge 101 can explain the rest.
Well whomever you copyed and pasted that off must have failed quite badly, You cannot know somthing unless it is true, you can only belive it. Belife does not make knolage...
I KNOW, becuse i have tasted it. You DONT know, but belive it so, even thogh you have not.
But knolage is truth, belife is not.

Maybe you should try leanring some of the underliying princeable or estimeogy before yet makeing yourself sound even stupider "/



You never actually present a point- you parade around an idea, but never give a decent rebuttal. If there's an idea in your head, it's in solitary confinement. “/ (This short paragraph is, too, not an ad hominem argument, in case you were incapable of deriving to that conclusion for another 10 minutes.)
*pats*
Point: Mountian due tastes like stagnet pond water.
your rebuttle: no it doesnt, not many people have tasted stagnet pond water.
My conunter rebuttle: i have, and it does.

The logical flaw in your counter i was trying tio point out can also be seen on wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_the_majority

You realy do like your logical falisys, in your attempts to misunderstand what ive said i think you also may have compleated this one to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance



The word is too, and no, it isn’t complex as you think it to be. Face it- You have no argument, and you’re bringing up mediocre excuses to count as a rebuttal. Not only is it amusing to see, but it’s laughable as well. I take pride in my knowledge and it will take more than a mentally crippled idiot to even put a dent in such foundation. You are a waste of time, flesh, oxygen, and the ****** you were born from. Go outside once in a while and breathe, before your brain starts to rot from all that festering stagnation and cognitive dysfunction. But of course, you’re probably too late already.

*Sorry for derailing the thread everyone. ;p
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

You know, its quite obvios when someone has lost an argument and just cant admit it, rather than deffence points or make them, they simply try and insult you.
You have proven that point well :)

[Arth]

lol last week I went on a holiday to canada and i love it :)

[emo...]

oh yeah I had some! It is like! OMG! THE BEST DRINK IN THE WORLD! SO much more ace than Coke!

[dollzATTAK~~~]

Mountain Dew is definitely the best soft drink out there.

[RedStratocas]

http://www.piedmont.k12.ca.us/pms/studentlife/food1/sprite_can.gif+http://www.cooldrinks.com/Images/MistCan.gif+http://www.varsitydrinks.com/ithaca/images/mountaindew-can.jpg= THE SAME THING

Its basic math.

All green and yellow cans? Coincidence? NO. They are all the same taste, the color of mountain dew is pee colored, thats it.

[iluvben]

Sperm Murderers.
Thats just a myth , it's been proven wrong , lols i love mentors cleverness :P and lucozade is so much better then mountain dew i had 1 can and never again :(

[Mentor]

http://www.piedmont.k12.ca.us/pms/studentlife/food1/sprite_can.gif+http://www.cooldrinks.com/Images/MistCan.gif+http://www.varsitydrinks.com/ithaca/images/mountaindew-can.jpg= THE SAME THING

Its basic math.

All green and yellow cans? Coincidence? NO. They are all the same taste, the color of mountain dew is pee colored, thats it.
Spirte, 7up lemonade etc are all the same, mnt due tastes sweeter and skankyer thogh, no where near as nice. althogh possibly mt due uses the same flavor, the differnces is that in mt due the entire drink is the flavoring without any of the other ingrediance "/


Thats just a myth , it's been proven wrong , lols i love mentors cleverness :P and lucozade is so much better then mountain dew i had 1 can and never again :(
Lucozade does rule admitely, althogh i only like the orgnal flavor ones, the taste of the variantes aint to nice IMO

[Lyca]

It decreases the amount of sperm you produce? =OO
-Puts can down-

[RedStratocas]

-Puts can down-

It isnt true.

[--ss--]

It does indeed sorry to tell you.


O.o really ? i feel sorry for the mountdeolics :P

[Lyca]

It isnt true.
Phew :eusa_danc

[Dodevu23]

Yeah, I love mountain dew, same when I go holiday to America.

[HUGECOOL]

Since the argument, or lack thereof, is getting repetitive and pretty boring, and you’ve once again failed to provide new content to the table, there’s no solid issue to discuss. A basic summary of your previous post would be:

“Oh no, insult”- *ad hominem article*
- Reiteration of past thoughts, but phrased differently.

What the hell is your tactic, to say things over again until you bore me to death? You almost sound like President Bush, except his spelling is most likely better.


Well whomever you copyed and pasted that off must have failed quite badly, You cannot know somthing unless it is true, you can only belive it. Belife does not make knolage...
I KNOW, becuse i have tasted it. You DONT know, but belive it so, even thogh you have not.
But knolage is truth, belife is not.

Oh, guess what? I got this excerpt from your beloved Wikipedia which, may I add, can be edited by anyone. Search for Epistemology and read away. The basis of epistemology is that knowledge lies in between truth and belief, but that is irrelevant now that I just noticed something- You interpreted my post incorrectly.

Should I surprise? Not at all- it’s you we’re talking about, after all.

What I actually said was, “Well, we wouldn’t know. Not many of us have tried stagnant pond water.” = We (people in the thread and/or forum) have not acquired a taste for pond water; therefore, we are unaware of what it tastes like. However, you once again, failed by misinterpreting information and portraying the post as though I was implying that you have tasted it, which I didn’t. So, this whole little spat has been completely obsolete. Maybe if you didn’t read like such a mentally challenged halfwit, we wouldn’t even be discussing this. Ah, the many wonders of Habbox Forum- the short-bus of the Internet.

Only 66 spelling errors in your post? Going for a personal best, I see.

[Mentor]

Since the argument, or lack thereof, is getting repetitive and pretty boring, and you’ve once again failed to provide new content to the table, there’s no solid issue to discuss. A basic summary of your previous post would be:

“Oh no, insult”- *ad hominem article*
- Reiteration of past thoughts, but phrased differently.

What the hell is your tactic, to say things over again until you bore me to death? You almost sound like President Bush, except his spelling is most likely better.



Oh, guess what? I got this excerpt from your beloved Wikipedia which, may I add, can be edited by anyone. Search for Epistemology and read away. The basis of epistemology is that knowledge lies in between truth and belief, but that is irrelevant now that I just noticed something- You interpreted my post incorrectly.

Should I surprise? Not at all- it’s you we’re talking about, after all.

What I actually said was, “Well, we wouldn’t know. Not many of us have tried stagnant pond water.” = We (people in the thread and/or forum) have not acquired a taste for pond water; therefore, we are unaware of what it tastes like. However, you once again, failed by misinterpreting information and portraying the post as though I was implying that you have tasted it, which I didn’t. So, this whole little spat has been completely obsolete. Maybe if you didn’t read like such a mentally challenged halfwit, we wouldn’t even be discussing this. Ah, the many wonders of Habbox Forum- the short-bus of the Internet.

Only 66 spelling errors in your post? Going for a personal best, I see.


Well Ive pointed out the logical falisy your useing enogh times already, if your to far up your own **** or just to stupid to understand the point i cant see much use in pointing it out any more.

If "You" or "we" or what ever grouping or person you wish to name hasnt tasted it, Then you have no way of saying what it does or does not taste like.
Hence why you cannot use that to say i am incorrect in my verdict on what it does or does not taste like.

Your orignal coment was implying that becuse you haddent tasted in and found this likeness i must be wrong. Althogh i may have simply been giveing you to much credit on the abilty to utalise inplications and had therefor infered somthing that wasnt there. Which would basicly sum up to the second point of my orgnal counter.
The Post was Pointless and stupid, it was Spam, it made no differentaion eather way.
It did not add any point or peace of informtaion, attack or deffend a point, Just raw spam.

Since you have more aless confimed it as spam, i shall accept its spam, and you can accept your presuose mountin due tastes the same as pond water.

Argument over, ok. If you want to counter this, you would have to admit my first assumtion was right which simply proves you have no grasp on simple logic and are as you seem to be showing a compleat and utter idiot.

Now, You can insult me all you like, you wrong, i right, you ****ed of, i dont cair. Have a nice day :)

ps. I must truely pitty you, if you seriosly have nothing better to do in your time than count my spelling mistakes lol

[HUGECOOL]

Well Ive pointed out the logical falisy your useing enogh times already, if your to far up your own **** or just to stupid to understand the point i cant see much use in pointing it out any more.

If "You" or "we" or what ever grouping or person you wish to name hasnt tasted it, Then you have no way of saying what it does or does not taste like.
Hence why you cannot use that to say i am incorrect in my verdict on what it does or does not taste like.

Your orignal coment was implying that becuse you haddent tasted in and found this likeness i must be wrong. Althogh i may have simply been giveing you to much credit on the abilty to utalise inplications and had therefor infered somthing that wasnt there. Which would basicly sum up to the second point of my orgnal counter.
The Post was Pointless and stupid, it was Spam, it made no differentaion eather way.
It did not add any point or peace of informtaion, attack or deffend a point, Just raw spam.

Since you have more aless confimed it as spam, i shall accept its spam, and you can accept your presuose mountin due tastes the same as pond water.

Argument over, ok. If you want to counter this, you would have to admit my first assumtion was right which simply proves you have no grasp on simple logic and are as you seem to be showing a compleat and utter idiot.

Now, You can insult me all you like, you wrong, i right, you ****ed of, i dont cair. Have a nice day :)

ps. I must truely pitty you, if you seriosly have nothing better to do in your time than count my spelling mistakes lol Lol! There you go again with your equivocatory argument. My argument hadno logical fallacy because you interpreted it incorrectly.

·
If "You" or "we" or what ever grouping or person you wish to name hasnt tasted it, Then you have no way of saying what it does or does not taste like.. That’s what I’ve been trying to tell you, idiot! Because we have not tasted it, we have no way of telling what pond water tastes like. Are you following so far?
·
Hence why you cannot use that to say i am incorrect in my verdict on what it does or does not taste like I never denied that you had not tasted pond water. NOT being key word.




Your orignal coment was implying that becuse you haddent tasted in and found this likeness i must be wrong. No, it was not implying anything, and you victimized yourself in vain. My only goal with my original comment was to get a point across to you that we have no knowledge whatsoever of what pond water tastes like, not that you were unaware of what it tasted like- I could care less.

Argument over, ok. If you want to counter this, you would have to admit my first assumtion was right which simply proves you have no grasp on simple logic and are as you seem to be showing a compleat and utter idiot. I’ve already shown you where you were wrong. Whether you’ll accept that fact or not is up to you. Lol. I don’t believe Wikipedia has an article concerning your idiocy with that comment.
You know, we would save so much time if every time you wanted to start another circular argument you’d say that I was right.
Sorry, but I have better things to do than to count your grammatical fallacies, however, Microsoft Word has done it for me as it is near impossible absorbing the content of your atrocious writing skills without proper corrections.

[Mentor]

Lol! There you go again with your equivocatory argument. My argument hadno logical fallacy because you interpreted it incorrectly.

· That’s what I’ve been trying to tell you, idiot! Because we have not tasted it, we have no way of telling what pond water tastes like. Are you following so far?
· I never denied that you had not tasted pond water. NOT being key word.



No, it was not implying anything, and you victimized yourself in vain. My only goal with my original comment was to get a point across to you that we have no knowledge whatsoever of what pond water tastes like, not that you were unaware of what it tasted like- I could care less.
I’ve already shown you where you were wrong. Whether you’ll accept that fact or not is up to you. Lol. I don’t believe Wikipedia has an article concerning your idiocy with that comment.
You know, we would save so much time if every time you wanted to start another circular argument you’d say that I was right.
Sorry, but I have better things to do than to count your grammatical fallacies, however, Microsoft Word has done it for me as it is near impossible absorbing the content of your atrocious writing skills without proper corrections.


Yea, i know im right, everyone who reads this knows im right. You im not so bothered about. feel free to delude yourself and insult me all you like :)

[HUGECOOL]

Yea, i know im right, everyone who reads this knows im right. You im not so bothered about. feel free to delude yourself and insult me all you like :)
They say denial is the way a human protects itself from knowledge that they don't wish to be aware of.

[Mentor]

They say denial is the way a human protects itself from knowledge that they don't wish to be aware of.

I suppose that accounts for your actions "/ but as i said delude away

[HUGECOOL]

I suppose that accounts for your actions "/ but as i said delude away
Was that a conclusion, or did just get tired of thinking?