Sorry to those I posted about the 'Too Many Homosexuals'

[Buzle]

I just meant there was alot, and Im sorry for those I hurt. :(
Please forgive me.

[foxyfox00]

Well. As I Said In Future Think First And Ask The Appropriate Questions To The Right People. I Forgive You As You Are New To The Forum. Try Not To Do It Again!

[Buzle]

Well. As I Said In Future Think First And Ask The Appropriate Questions To The Right People. I Forgive You As You Are New To The Forum. Try Not To Do It Again!

Thank you! Im not like that though, I just don't know what came over me. :(

[foxyfox00]

We All Make Mistakes. Everyone deserves a second chance

[Nixt]

It takes a brave person to apologise for something, to accept they are wrong... Apology Accepted!
Remember, you can NEVER have too many Homosexuals :D

[brandon]

no need for a thread about it though, post in the one you said it in or PM them all? or post it in spam?

[Buzle]

Ok, but I think the thread that I made would affect the people over here more because this is the place that I posted my rude thread.
And thanks guys for the accepting my apologies :)

[edible]

'Poligy 'cepted..

[Zenzi]

I don't see why it was closed. It didn't cause any arguments.. :S:S:S

It was a perfectly valid point of view, therfore i don't blame you for speaking your mind. :S You weren't bad tempered or nasty?

Don't appologise! :P


Btw:



Remember, you can NEVER have too many Homosexuals

k. +rep

[Stab]

But arguably you can never have enough hetero
and bi?

[foxyfox00]

I agree it was a debateable point of view.
Maybe to many points were raised about the unessacary "straight" subforum?

[Rizla]

^ Like I said, I suggested the straight forum as a joke, it was taken seriously.

Anyway, to whoever said "never have too many gays", even though it was a joke, you can have too many homosexuals, if everybody was gay, then the human race would die out. Homosexuality is unnatural. Nothing wrong in it, but it isn't natural, it isn't supposed to happen.

Edit: Even though that was a joke, it promted me to make a sig :)

[Stab]

maybe the thread title should have been, do you think.....

[StripedTiger]

you didnt hurt my feelings as i suppose theres gunna be alot of people who say that i guess but its nice that you apologised :)

[Zenzi]

Edit: Even though that was a joke, it promted me to make a sig :)

I'm going to be argumentative here as i thought it was rather inappropriate to post that in your signature.

How do you KNOW it's not natural? You can not compare us to disabled people because we have no physical or chemical differences from straight people. All of our genetics are relatively the same, our cell tissue is the same, and we have no difference in physical ability/ appearence.

and hey, if rats can reproduce young without mother/ father cells, then who's to say that HUMANS can't? Obviously the male body structure isn't able to cope with a developing foetus, but it's possible in some animals to reproduce with a missing sex cell. (and Please, don't try tell me it's not, because scientists have done it several times with common rats, :P)

All i'm saying is, Humans/ Scientists don't know everything about the earth, why we're here, or what we're supposed to be doing. There's alot of things that we won't ever figure out or discover, but there's a hell of alot more to uncover, so please, don't call us unatural until that day comes.

[Buzle]

I honestly think Zenzi is right and he is being fair to all of us <33
+Rep Zenzi ;)

[Virgin Mary]

Okay, I shall ask God to forgive you.

[benjirofl]

You should think before you post.
It would obviously start arguments l;#

Ryanp's Signature is pathetics >;[/ + BADrepz.

[Rizla]

In reply to those posts, you didn't fully read the sig, or mis-understood it. By saying "everything is natural" is just nit-picking, being gay goes against the survival instincts. I never said it was wrong to be gay, since one of the reps seemed to think that. We could get into the debate that "we don't know what is supposed to be", but as I said in a PM to somebody already, I can't really be bothered. I'll remove the sig if it offends you that much :rolleyes:

Edit: And I wasn't comparing anybody with being disabled, well, not directly anyway. I was using it as a way to illustrate the "not wrong part" ;)

[Zenzi]

In reply to those posts, you didn't fully read the sig, or mis-understood it. By saying "everything is natural" is just nit-picking, being gay goes against the survival instincts. I never said it was wrong to be gay, since one of the reps seemed to think that. We could get into the debate that "we don't know what is supposed to be", but as I said in a PM to somebody already, I can't really be bothered. I'll remove the sig if it offends you that much :rolleyes:

Edit: And I wasn't comparing anybody with being disabled, well, not directly anyway. I was using it as a way to illustrate the "not wrong part" ;)

Thanks for removing the sig. Also, we're not touchy, we just don't like one- track minded people.

[Rizla]

I wouldn't say I was one-track minded, nor homophobic, but make your own mind up.

[Buzle]

I thought this was my apology thread.. ?
But I want EVERYONE who got offended that Im sorry.