Log in

View Full Version : A word un-filtered?


Tristan
02-09-2006, 07:12 PM
FFS is now a word that is not filtered?
Why?
If *** is shouldn't ffs be too?
brandon
02-09-2006, 07:13 PM
Might have been a mistake :s
ilovejordan
02-09-2006, 07:22 PM
dont tell them! :(
Hecktix
02-09-2006, 07:23 PM
Who really cares? I mean "text talk" as it is, is a thing from the past.

TALK IN GOD DAMN ENGLISH!
Tristan
02-09-2006, 07:45 PM
dont tell them! :(

Eeek! *SQUEALS*

k Sierk has made a thread about it so ffs isn't allowed so THREAD CLOSED.
NOBODY SPEAK OF THE NAUGHTY WORDS!

UMG I CAN'T LOCK MY THREAD???
O FORUM MODRATOR! LOCK IT! LOCK IT NOW DANG IT!
:]
FNX.
---MAD---
02-09-2006, 08:15 PM
I suggest pming Baving :).
sierk1
03-09-2006, 03:47 PM
Usually we only filter the full word when it is spelled properly. When people avoid the filter by using abbreviations it is a job for moderators to deal with the posts.
---MAD---
03-09-2006, 03:52 PM
Why is *** filtered then? :p

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!