My Latest Design.

[Josh-H]

Well as blobbed said I cannot design I decided to make a layout to pretty much prove I can.

Well I'll expect those of you who dislike me to criticise it totally unfairly. Oh well, ill live.

Depending on the response it gets, I may release the PSD to a select few :)

Anyway enjoy!

http://www.****************/uploads/9431762c44.gif

http://www.****************/uploads/9431762c44.gif

Thread closed by: J1MI (Forum Moderator) - To prevent further argument, thanks :)

[Liberation]

Awsome design, looks nice ^^

[[Chris]]

wow i like it

10/10+rep

[Josh-H]

Thanks Guys :D

[tekni]

These are rubbish tbh, anyone with PS and 2 brain cells could do it.


Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator) - Can I please remind you of this forum rule?
3. If someone wants to show their layout and ask for your opinion, do not just say its rubbish but say how to improve it! Do not post your layout if you don't want negative feedback or cant handle criticism.

[Josh-H]

These are rubbish tbh, anyone with PS and 2 brain cells could do it.

Grow up :)

[Net-Margin]

These are rubbish tbh, anyone with PS and 2 brain cells could do it.

And that is the reason that you cannot do it... Grow up you inconstructive ***.

[hybride]

Well, it's not THAT good - the design is pretty basic, but that's good sometimes. Good work.

[JoeComins]

These are rubbish tbh, anyone with PS and 2 brain cells could do it.

A few gradients, a few blending options, and the same ideas. What is it that people can't do in this layout? Im just following your theory.

[Josh-H]

These are rubbish tbh, anyone with PS and 2 brain cells could do it.

A few gradients, a few blending options, and the same ideas. What is it that people can't do in this layout? Im just following your theory.

I never said it was difficult, Thats where your going wrong ;)

And I realise I was wrong when I said your layout was simple and rubbish. As I was comparign it to your others, and tbh even you must admit, the 8 Series is poor compared to your others. I meant it was rubbish, for you.

[JoeComins]

Thats why they are free.
On the 801, I was trying some a colour palette, and a few effects.

Its more of a testing series, but I put some old templates taht I dont use in there. Ill make a free-layout site sometime when I get some free time next year

[SAMURAl555]

i quite like it :) would look good ona tutorial site.

[SimplyTech]

Thats why they are free.
On the 801, I was trying some a colour palette, and a few effects.

Its more of a testing series, but I put some old templates taht I dont use in there. Ill make a free-layout site sometime when I get some free time next year
LIES! All lies! i never said that atall you haxorer

Hmm so so it is only a few gradients it works quite well but its not really clean or complex

[Samster]

That's quality,well done good job:)

[[Oli]]

- dots as box borders look wierd in my eyes, I wouldn't use boxes and a simple vertical dots line to seperate the content.

- The shadow on the top white box were logo is, is nicly done, but a verry common effect (not that thats bad, couse potential buyers like it)

Thats all I see for the moment.
Quite clean and nice looking.
I'd rate this a 8,5/10


Greets,
Olivier P.

[Josh-H]

;2641308']- dots as box borders look wierd in my eyes, I wouldn't use boxes and a simple vertical dots line to seperate the content.

- The shadow on the top white box were logo is, is nicly done, but a verry common effect (not that thats bad, couse potential buyers like it)

Thats all I see for the moment.
Quite clean and nice looking.
I'd rate this a 8,5/10


Greets,
Olivier P.

Thanks Oli :)

[ebay]

very nice, sweet..!!

[Luckyrare]

The layout is good but the design isnt anything special.

How to improve this work

- Carm down on shadows, glows, grades ect. To many and it starts to look crap
- Yoursite is a bit to light towards the top
- The grades for the tabs need a border or a rounded corner, looks empty

Keep working at it
Danny :D

[Vulnerable]

That's quite nice, I like it.

Also, do you still own/run Rockers Only?

[tekni]

That's quite nice, I like it.

Also, do you still own/run Rockers Only?
lmao no - he sold it.

You're telling me to grow up?

pfft.

[Vulnerable]

lmao no - he sold it.

So many people said that'd happen..

[Agnostic Bear]

lmao no - he sold it.

You're telling me to grow up?

pfft.

Hey, the underlined bold and italics are MINE

Also, not a bad template don't like the header much though.

[tekni]

So many people said that'd happen..
I said it would happen from the start and you guys never believed me.

[Vulnerable]

I said it would happen from the start and you guys never believed me.

Yeh, I thought it'd go pretty far.

Also, I love your signature.

[:Blobbed]

Nice design, you have prooven you point. It would look great coded, its just, I dunno, I like starting arguements.

[[N]]

nice layout but seen that somewhere else.

[Recursion]

PM Me the .PSD Please xD

[omgDAN!]

OK Design, borders are a bit weird, and shadow is over-used.

Maybe if your head wasn't up your own "bottom" you wouldn't have had to do this.

[Josh-H]

Nice design, you have prooven you point. It would look great coded, its just, I dunno, I like starting arguements.
Thanks for that Blob.


nice layout but seen that somewhere else.
I have got inspiration from various sites, as does every web designer


OK Design, borders are a bit weird, and shadow is over-used.

Maybe if your head wasn't up your own "bottom" you wouldn't have had to do this.
Maybe if you would get over RO and realise that if you were offered £370 you wouldn't turn it down.

[-1.]

Thats very good, well done.

[[N]]

oh right. but still looks good tho

[Sygon.]

lmao no - he sold it.

You're telling me to grow up?

pfft.

Work on your own work then critisce.

Its an ok Layout not perfect. but its 100x better than what you can do?

Doesnt anyone have any sense of web 2.0 here, get a load of yourselfs,

grow up everyone he asked for CC not C i havent seen one good piece of work on this forum for a VERY long time so go back to the drawing board why cant everyone just get on?

Talk about egos..

[tekni]

Work on your own work then critisce.

Its an ok Layout not perfect. but its 100x better than what you can do?

Doesnt anyone have any sense of web 2.0 here, get a load of yourselfs,

grow up everyone he asked for CC not C i havent seen one good piece of work on this forum for a VERY long time so go back to the drawing board why cant everyone just get on?

Talk about egos..

Oh shut up - you're talking about criticising?

What do you think CC actually means?

If I don't like it, then I don't - that's MY opinion, not fact, not statement, an opinion.

Just because I suck as web design - it doesn't go to say that I can't give CC does it?

[omgDAN!]

Work on your own work then critisce.

Its an ok Layout not perfect. but its 100x better than what you can do?

Doesnt anyone have any sense of web 2.0 here, get a load of yourselfs,

grow up everyone he asked for CC not C i havent seen one good piece of work on this forum for a VERY long time so go back to the drawing board why cant everyone just get on?

Talk about egos..

very big-headed of yourself.

[Sygon.]

Oh shut up - you're talking about criticising?

What do you think CC actually means?

If I don't like it, then I don't - that's MY opinion, not fact, not statement, an opinion.

Just because I suck as web design - it doesn't go to say that I can't give CC does it?

If you dont like it, Say how it can improve instead of saying oh its a load of crap few gradients etc. Now lets see you do better.

YOUR opinion? ITS CC not **** me, learn how to do CONSTRUCTIVE critiscm.

Also - to emergency

Big headed? Ha. your pathetic just because im saying i havent seen anything good how does that make me big headed? Know what your saying before you say it, you ******ed idiot.

Edited by: J1MI (Forum Moderator) - Please don't be rude to other forum members, thanks :)

[omgDAN!]

Well, you're moaning at another member for not giving constructive criticism, and then all you say is

i havent seen one good piece of work on this forum for a VERY long time

OMGZ DATZ WELL CONSTRUCTIVE!!!!! EVERY1 IZ PROPA GOOD AT LAYOUTZ NOW!!!!!!!!!11one11!

[Josh-H]

Only a very small amount of replys have been constructive criticism. Just criticism because of past events. Which is pathetic to put it in a mod friendly way.

[Sygon.]

Well, you're moaning at another member for not giving constructive criticism, and then all you say is

i havent seen one good piece of work on this forum for a VERY long time

OMGZ DATZ WELL CONSTRUCTIVE!!!!! EVERY1 IZ PROPA GOOD AT LAYOUTZ NOW!!!!!!!!!11one11!

Wow rape the cap lock why dont you.

Was that directed at this thread? No at the forum. Do i have to be constructive about the WHOLE forum where it does not have a big stickied thread about constructive critisce. No, but places where it does ask i will. Now get a life and get your **** out of his ***.

Edited by [J1MI] (Forum Moderator): Please don't be rude, thanks :).

[omgDAN!]

Thanks for that Syg.

Only a very small amount of replys have been constructive criticism. Just criticism because of past events. Which is pathetic to put it in a mod friendly way.

So your allowed to do what we have done in everyone else's threads, but then when we all come and do it in yours as a joke it is different?

[Sygon.]

So your allowed to do what we have done in everyone else's threads, but then when we all come and do it in yours as a joke it is different?

Wheres my critiscm bum boy?

Edited by [J1MI] (Forum Moderator): Please don't be rude, thanks :).

[omgDAN!]

Wheres my critiscm bum boy?

That was directed at Josh.
Shows how big headed you actually are.

[tekni]

So now by using the Caps Lock button you're raping it?

Wow - I call that pathetic.

[Sygon.]

That was directed at Josh.
Shows how big headed you actually are.

Big head and caps locks wow. That all you can say ?

Also netik get something better the say i wasnt going omg !! i pwn blabla in, just get over yourself.

[omgDAN!]

Big head and caps locks wow. That all you can say ?

Also netik get something better the say i wasnt going omg !! i pwn blabla in, just get over yourself.

The words "blown" and "out" come to mind.

[tekni]

Big head and caps locks wow. That all you can say ?

Also netik get something better the say i wasnt going omg !! i pwn blabla in, just get over yourself.
Sygon, you're just as good as all the rest of us, we're all equal so shut up.

[Josh-H]

From Sygon.


Sygon, you're just as good as all the rest of us, we're all equal so shut up.

I wont "Shut up", We are not equal you see, call me big headed i dont care. just because you can use the stroke tool and make a crappy signature it doesnt mean your equal, look other people will be better than others it doesnt matter we can all learn from eachother but not if we critisce.

[YouFail]

Im going to agree on one thing here from Sygon.

Everyone says the shadows and effects are over used, the effect Josh has created here with the shadows and effects is a very web 2.0 style. For that it does look quite good. Many people do not know/understand what web 2.0 is around here. I like the blue colours used as I believe they portray a kind of more professional layout (dont know why, too me they just do). I dislike the borders on it, they don't look right for this type of design. Overall its an ok design, not rubbish, not specticula.

I'd give it around 8.5/10

Im not going to get involved in your wee comment slurring match here.

Josh have some rep

Edit: Gotta spread rep.

[tekni]

With my understanding - this layout would be web2.0?

[omgDAN!]

Who unlocked thread?

[Josh-H]

Well I made it with Web 2.0 in mind, trying to keep it clean.
I must say If I was doing it again now or If i was going to make some changes to it now I would remove the content boxes and just separate content with lines or somehting... as the content box's ruin the 2.0 theme.

[Mentor]

personaly i dont see what people mean by it look 2.0, firstly becuse web 2.0 isnt really a look, but more a way of useing, much of this comes with the codeing not the visual style which can be very varied, web 2.0 things do often go for a clean type layout, but that is not what makes them web 2.0, it is the two way interactivly. For exsample this forum is "web 2.0" as opposed to the static "web 1.0"
Personly the layout looks very web 1.0 to me, a static design, theres not much room for massive ineractivty shown in it innately, the simple constrution may have conotaions of web 2.0 but theres nothing there indicateing any form of web 2.0 functonalty "/

[:alexxTURNER]

TBH, I like this layout.
I would rate it about 8.5/10
It's clean and nice.
It's better than what I could do.

Also, we're not all equal. People are better
than others. It's just the way it goes.
See, I suck at layouts and I know for a fact
that there are LOADS of people better than me.
There is probably people better than Joe and Sygon etc.

[Yggdrasill]

I like web layouts like this one, nice work..

[Josh-H]

TBH, I like this layout.
I would rate it about 8.5/10
It's clean and nice.
It's better than what I could do.

Also, we're not all equal. People are better
than others. It's just the way it goes.
See, I suck at layouts and I know for a fact
that there are LOADS of people better than me.
There is probably people better than Joe and Sygon etc.

Probably? There ARE people who are better. People who earn their living from website design. They do it every hour of the day.

www.microvisuals.com

Some of those layouts are fabulous!

And yes you are right, it isn't very 2.0 :(

[MrChaz]

Holy **** www.microvisuals.com costs alot of damn money.

Anyways i like the layout... why is everyone so ******?

My god... Everything comes together nicely. One thing you could fix however, the Content box and the box on the left are not even, if you know what i mean.

9/10

-Chaz

[tekni]

Holy **** www.microvisuals.com (http://www.microvisuals.com) costs alot of damn money.

That's because you're used to paying £2.00 for a layout...

Welcome to the real world :)