A new rule is needed

[brapbrap]

When a signature picture is above blah blah limits etc, can SMODS/MODS/ADMIN, warn a person to remove it, so they can save it, if you have hotlinked or got it from other means and do not have the picture it is very annoying....

ONE pm is all it takes, Catszy pm'd me once about a signature being too big, i removed it, because she asked.

[Nixt]

That rule is already in place? The Super Moderator should PM the user regarding their signature/avatar before removing it depending on the content. For example if it was an adult image in their signature it would be removed without PMing the user.

[Dan]

Read this post below, it should clear things up :]

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?p=2837947#post2837947

[brapbrap]

Yeah....

"dan"

You removed mine and didnt tell me, just the "I removed your sig etc".

[Dan]

The post i linked you to explains that we dont have the time to pm first asking for removal of the signature, so its easier to remove it and send a pm explaining why its been removed

[brapbrap]

well you have just contradicted sierk, garion and the rules.

Preety good smod.

[Seatherny]

The post i linked you to explains that we dont have the time to pm first asking for removal of the signature, so its easier to remove it and send a pm explaining why its been removed

Well, it doesnt take that long?
When I smodded, I used to pm the user, and make a note of it in my usernotes, and i used to re-check them all at the end of the week. You guys should do your job properly instead of being lazy. If you dont have enough time to send someone a PM then please resign and let someone else who has time takeover.
You guys ban members straight away ... which takes more time.
Soon smods will be saying "We dont have time to edit posts".

[nvrspk4]

Well, it doesnt take that long?
When I smodded, I used to pm the user, and make a note of it in my usernotes, and i used to re-check them all at the end of the week. You guys should do your job properly instead of being lazy. If you dont have enough time to send someone a PM then please resign and let someone else who has time takeover.
You guys ban members straight away ... which takes more time.
Soon smods will be saying "We dont have time to edit posts".

Before accusing him of being lazy, why not take a look at the fact that they are much much much much MUCH busier than you were as a Super Moderator. Want proof?

His moderator logs (Dan) over the past 2 months, are equal to 3/4 of your TOTAL mod log. That's including ALL your time as a Super Mod and ALL your time as a Normal Moderator. So yeah, they are very busy, and have a lot to do, checking a lot of post reports and browsing the many forums. If your signature is over the limit, why not check it and not break the rules? At the end of the day, what you're trying to get us to do is go way out of our way and create more work for ourselves to make breaking the rules more convenient for you? Why not just check it, if its something within the rules fine, but it takes 2 minutes max to check the pixel height of your sig.

[Seatherny]

Well when I was smod, maybe not many people broke the rules? I was only smod for 2-3 months :rolleyes:
Hire more super mods if they are so busy then.

[---MAD---]

Well when I was smod, maybe not many people broke the rules? I was only smod for 2-3 months :rolleyes:
Hire more super mods if they are so busy then.
It is not an easy thing to hire smods. You need to be able to trust the mods and also know they will work hard and have a lot of time to dedicate.

[Seatherny]

It is not an easy thing to hire smods. You need to be able to trust the mods and also know they will work hard and have a lot of time to dedicate.

Find some :p lol
Hmmm, maybe spread out the jobs between each smod/admin?

[brapbrap]

STOP TURNING THREADS INTO A JIB AT THE STAFF ***.

I Dont suppose Dan will be called up on about this, because he is rule breaking :S

Edited by Italic (Forum Super Moderator): Please don't avoid the filter, this includes abbreviations.

[micky.blue.eyes]

Dan didn't break the rules. He removed it and I think he send you a message explaining why he removed it, not sure if he did that.
Anyway, you shouldn't be breaking the rules in the first place, you don't expect us to pm users asking to edit their posts either do you?

But even if Dan didn't PM you, we all make mistakes, we're not super humans.

[brapbrap]

Its the rules though, he should have PM'd me and told me to remove it, So i if i swear you dont have to edit it as it can be seen as a mistake, as im not super human?

RIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.

[Boxiel]

I better save mine just incase then.

[Seatherny]

I think when they remove it, they should send the user a PM with a copy of the image :)

[Pitch]

Before accusing him of being lazy, why not take a look at the fact that they are much much much much MUCH busier than you were as a Super Moderator. Want proof?

His moderator logs (Dan) over the past 2 months, are equal to 3/4 of your TOTAL mod log. That's including ALL your time as a Super Mod and ALL your time as a Normal Moderator. So yeah, they are very busy, and have a lot to do, checking a lot of post reports and browsing the many forums. If your signature is over the limit, why not check it and not break the rules? At the end of the day, what you're trying to get us to do is go way out of our way and create more work for ourselves to make breaking the rules more convenient for you? Why not just check it, if its something within the rules fine, but it takes 2 minutes max to check the pixel height of your sig.
Soz, dont understand american talk!!! in english plz!!!!!!!!!!!

[Y!]

Don't break the rules in the first place they should have just removed it and told you if you do it again you get banned...

[nvrspk4]

Find some :p lol
Hmmm, maybe spread out the jobs between each smod/admin?

All of us are very busy already, and have the jobs spread out.


Its the rules though, he should have PM'd me and told me to remove it, So i if i swear you dont have to edit it as it can be seen as a mistake, as im not super human?

RIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.

No, its not in the rules. He reserves the right to remove it at his leisure. If I were to call you a rude name that avoided the filter and didn't realize it was filtered and say made an "s" a $ to make it look uber leet, I didn't know, therefore human error since I'm not super human. Riiiiiiight? No, not quite. You sign up to HxF and agree to abide by the rules. It literally takes seconds to find the dimensions of a picture. I could list the dimensions of the signature pics of every user who had one in this thread in about a minute or two.


I think when they remove it, they should send the user a PM with a copy of the image :)

And why, I ask again, should we go out of our way to make rulebreaking more convenient to users? If anything this is good because it makes users think twice about it. Additionally, as far as the loss of the image, if you upload it to imageshack, its saved on your computer. If it came from a URL you can find it again pretty easily. Therefore what's the problem? And as I said before, its very very easy not to break the rule, therefore there's no reason why we should go through great pains to make it less inconvenient for you guys when you create more work for us by breaking the rules.

[Seatherny]

All of us are very busy already, and have the jobs spread out.



No, its not in the rules. He reserves the right to remove it at his leisure. If I were to call you a rude name that avoided the filter and didn't realize it was filtered and say made an "s" a $ to make it look uber leet, I didn't know, therefore human error since I'm not super human. Riiiiiiight? No, not quite. You sign up to HxF and agree to abide by the rules. It literally takes seconds to find the dimensions of a picture. I could list the dimensions of the signature pics of every user who had one in this thread in about a minute or two.



And why, I ask again, should we go out of our way to make rulebreaking more convenient to users? If anything this is good because it makes users think twice about it. Additionally, as far as the loss of the image, if you upload it to imageshack, its saved on your computer. If it came from a URL you can find it again pretty easily. Therefore what's the problem? And as I said before, its very very easy not to break the rule, therefore there's no reason why we should go through great pains to make it less inconvenient for you guys when you create more work for us by breaking the rules.

I thought smods PM the user once they remove their sig?

[nvrspk4]

I thought smods PM the user once they remove their sig?

That's the infraction message ;)

[benjamin]

Its the rules though, he should have PM'd me and told me to remove it, So i if i swear you dont have to edit it as it can be seen as a mistake, as im not super human?

RIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.
'its the rules though' exactly. same applys for you. you should follow them too.

if you bothered to FOLLOW the rules in the first place this wouldn't have happened?

[brapbrap]

If you scroll up Nvrspk4, most smods who have commented have said that it is procuedure to PM a member first.

And lube, dont talk to me gayboy.

Edited by micky.blue.eyes (Super Moderator): Please don't be rude towards other members.

[nvrspk4]

If you scroll up Nvrspk4, most smods who have commented have said that it is procuedure to PM a member first.

And lube, dont talk to me gayboy.

Edited by micky.blue.eyes (Super Moderator): Please don't be rude towards other members.

They are not required to, and its only if they have the time, often normal mods may do that.

[ReviewDude]

Thing is, if it was such a huge issue - it costs nothing just to send a quick PM to a member of the Moderation team, including the picture, and asking if it's appropriate or not. If it is, then worst case scenario you have to wait a few hours for their response before adding it.

If you had inappropriate material there - then it's the Super Moderators' right to remove it without warning. It's only things like asking for Reputation that get PMs first.

[brapbrap]

It was a picture saying "6 Minuites for the 96" and if it costs nothing to pm and is "Quick" why cant YOU Pm us.

[benjamin]

If you scroll up Nvrspk4, most smods who have commented have said that it is procuedure to PM a member first.

And lube, dont talk to me gayboy.

Edited by micky.blue.eyes (Super Moderator): Please don't be rude towards other members.
sorry but you're seriously pathetic. using my sexuality against me simply because i proved you wrong. you have some sort of personal vendetta against me and it's funny. because i've never ACTUALLY said anything to you before, let alone said anything nasty or hurtful in any way..

[DJ-Ali]

I wasn't warned when I had a large signiture picture a month ago.

[nvrspk4]

It was a picture saying "6 Minuites for the 96" and if it costs nothing to pm and is "Quick" why cant YOU Pm us.

Why do they have to PM you? And what's the reason? For them its 20 PMs to 20 people whereas for you its 1 PM to 1 person ;)


I wasn't warned when I had a large signiture picture a month ago.

As I said, it takes all of 5 seconds. Right click, properties, size, not that hard...

[Rubyetta]

Mine just got removed then I was PMed

[Pitch]

your arguement i think is ridiculous. Do you expect police officers to ask questions first before they punish criminals? Thats basically what you want, you, the offender, to be given priority over someone who could have better things to do. You cant expect them to take time out to inform you that your sig is too big, because its common sense, and clearly shown what the limits are.

[nvrspk4]

your arguement i think is ridiculous. Do you expect police officers to ask questions first before they punish criminals? Thats basically what you want, you, the offender, to be given priority over someone who could have better things to do. You cant expect them to take time out to inform you that your sig is too big, because its common sense, and clearly shown what the limits are.

That's a good example. Another few real life examples that are even more like this:

1.) A bad website - Do the police / authorities / hosting allow you to make a backup of your website and email you before they take it down? You may be sent a cease and desist letter from a company, but the authorities don't wait and shut you down.

That applies to a bad signature, but really an innapropriate signature you can't say we should PM you it. Here's an example of something being too big.

2.) Exceeding your bandwith - If you exceed your bandwith for the month does your server warn you before they suspend your account? No they just do it and your site is unaccesible and you have to pay more if you want to keep it up.

[The Professor]

your arguement i think is ridiculous. Do you expect police officers to ask questions first before they punish criminals? Thats basically what you want, you, the offender, to be given priority over someone who could have better things to do. You cant expect them to take time out to inform you that your sig is too big, because its common sense, and clearly shown what the limits are.

I dont understand that example. They do ask questions before they punish, thats what the criminal justice system is for...

[e5]

your arguement i think is ridiculous. Do you expect police officers to ask questions first before they punish criminals? Thats basically what you want, you, the offender, to be given priority over someone who could have better things to do. You cant expect them to take time out to inform you that your sig is too big, because its common sense, and clearly shown what the limits are.
pmsl did you actually know police offers do ask questions before they punish the 'criminals' looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

[benjamin]

i think he ment ask them to stop.

say they saw someone grafitti'ing they wouldn't go "hi excuse me could you stop please?" they're arrest him/her/them.