get rid of the RD value in rare values!

[Buggy]

This drives me mad. I hate people offering me 60 rubber ducks for a HC, who wants 60 rubber ducks! Its really annoying, and the fact that nearly every habbo that knows how to trade follows these values its 10 times as annoying. I really think you should get rid of it.

[Drewar]

Believe it or not, a lot of people DO buy 60 ducks with their hcs.. I know I would..

[Mentor]

I dont see any problem with it. Athogh cw (credits worth) would be a more ovios choice, alot opf people wount be used to it, and it would just casue confusion

[GommeInc]

RD is better and takes less space than creds or credits.

[BlueTails]

its a great idea, not bad

[Buggy]

What mentor said would be better than rubber ducks, i wouldnt mind being offered 60 creds worth of furni opposed to 60 rubber ducks.

[Drewar]

Dude, thats only your opinion and your entitled to it, but what does it matter if you put the word "Rubber Ducks" worth or "credits worth". There is nothing wrong with saying RD's worth so I *HIGHLY* doubt they will change it just to suit one person's thoughts.
Sorry if that seemed harsh but I tell it as it is.

[doraemonkiller]

60 duck ... must be used alot time collect

do u think CF (credit furni) is better?

[Mit]

if u say 60credits people would get confused because you can be a hc for 25credits. it would confuse habbos leave it as it! dont change it!!!!

[micky.blue.eyes]

=.=
Do you people read the page?

Anyway, rd doesn't mean you have to offer rubber ducks, it's just 60 credits worth of norms, but we can't place mb as mode bar can we?
The duck is the one of the only 1 credit items that stay for ever. (so not dog food or something)
It can also be stools but that is to long.

[doraemonkiller]

RD = rubber duck
S = stool

stool shorter

[Drewar]

Gah, I really think this makes no difference AT ALL! Meh..

[Buggy]

RD might not mean you have to offer rubber ducks, but people still do offer rubber ducks because it says rubber ducks. CV credit value would be better, then people wouldnt think they have to offer rubber ducks.

[micky.blue.eyes]

RD = rubber duck
S = stool

stool shorter
Yeah that's true.
But it can also be s of sink. :p
Besided, people will complain like they are doing now, but say they offer 60 stools. =.=

[Crying-Angel]

RD might not mean you have to offer rubber ducks, but people still do offer rubber ducks because it says rubber ducks. CV credit value would be better, then people wouldnt think they have to offer rubber ducks.

it cant be credit value because credit value and furni value are actully different...

1 RD doesnt equal 1 C after it is brought, it is worth less. If you didnt want a duck, would you trade a mode sofa for 3 ducks? . The point is you can get 60ish ducks for a HC.

[sierk1]

But Credit Value can be confused for the value in real credits. For example I would say the credit value of a hc is 15 creds, because that is what you can trade it for when you sell rares for credits. I want a notation that can not be confused with the value in real credits in any way.


RD might not mean you have to offer rubber ducks, but people still do offer rubber ducks because it says rubber ducks. CV credit value would be better, then people wouldnt think they have to offer rubber ducks.

[hedgeog325]

It doesnt drive me mad..
Lol
:D

[8Freak8]

This drives me mad. I hate people offering me 60 rubber ducks for a HC, who wants 60 rubber ducks! Its really annoying, and the fact that nearly every habbo that knows how to trade follows these values its 10 times as annoying. I really think you should get rid of it.
Heh, thats kinda funny actually.

I think some people would trade thir HCs for 60 ducks, but I think its mainly there for comparison. How would you know how much a HC plasto set was worth in CS if the CS didnt have an RD value too? :rolleyes:

I didnt use to realise that RD is completely different to credits, I thought it was the same thing - but its not. I think people would like to know a credit value for a HC especially, because people are often trading credits for HCs. Im not completely sure about why there isnt, thats sierks "thang". ;)


it cant be credit value because credit value and furni value are actully different...

1 RD doesnt equal 1 C after it is brought, it is worth less. If you didnt want a duck, would you trade a mode sofa for 3 ducks? . The point is you can get 60ish ducks for a HC.
Omg, didnt I say exactly that somewhere else recently? I swear I did...

[Crying-Angel]

yup ='] soz but it had to be said and i couldnt word it :(

[Phlyer]

Rubber duck is easier because then people would start trying to con you with all different furni and trying to add it up. Were as if you just say 60 creds. And also every1 now knows that rubber duck is 1 cred so its easy changing would confuse ppl and may rip some ppl off

[micky.blue.eyes]

Heh, thats kinda funny actually.

I think some people would trade thir HCs for 60 ducks, but I think its mainly there for comparison. How would you know how much a HC plasto set was worth in CS if the CS didnt have an RD value too? :rolleyes:

I didnt use to realise that RD is completely different to credits, I thought it was the same thing - but its not. I think people would like to know a credit value for a HC especially, because people are often trading credits for HCs. Im not completely sure about why there isnt, thats sierks "thang". ;)


Omg, didnt I say exactly that somewhere else recently? I swear I did...
It isn't really possible to set a value like that, some people can't buy 15 credits for an hc sofa etc etc.

Just stick with the rubber ducks and don't make a fuz about it. Is it really that stupid? I think ducks are cool. :)

[iqon222]

No offense but the rubber duck's help pepole that re new so, personal don't get rid off them. :eusa_danc