View Full Version : A way to have images in your Signatures.
Cloudclone
12-04-2005, 06:53 PM
I see so many people going "Nooooo! Signatures cause lag and long page loadings!"
Okay... Are you stupid?
You have 20 replies per page, (If I remember correctly) and that is the default from VB setup.
1) 20 Signatures do NOT freeze up page space, yes, it takes up a bit more space but, common, Signatures own.
Solution: Vbulleton offer a program that allows members to turn off images shown in the signatures, this should of come with VB 3.0.0 (Hell, it comes with 2.6).
Just implent this into Habbox forums then everyone can be happy.
Solution 2: Create another skin which is only text based (Only allows posts, NO graphics at ALL) based, or keep this one and make a new skin which allows IMG tags to be placed inside signatures.
If people argue with this, theres something wrong with them. : /
Cypher-
13-04-2005, 06:34 PM
LOL Im trying to sound as un-biased as I can here but you are right and notice how noone has replied back :p
Drewar
13-04-2005, 06:38 PM
Wow, reading posts like these make me realize how stupid I *really* am. *Doesn't understand one word of this post*
Cloudclone
13-04-2005, 06:40 PM
Yeah, mainly, when people are right when everyone has been argued down to the ground with problems that could occure when having signatures they don't tend to reply when people are correct when they think they're right.
Edit: Don't worry about it man, the Moderators/Admins should know (As well as most members) ((I know all this because I own 2 VB forums. :p).
Mentor
13-04-2005, 06:51 PM
the 2 skin ideas is a good one. plus the abilty to turn sigs off has been known a while, its juts many refuse to aknolage it. i have a fast connection, and i would like a image in my sig :D. if people dont then can easy turn em off.
athogh there have been many topics asking for sigs, many wehre this logic is said, yet the request is still refused.
Cloudclone
13-04-2005, 07:06 PM
Mmmm, well, it's stupid when there is ways of doing it and making tons of people happy, but they won't do it.
BlueTails
13-04-2005, 07:37 PM
not bad, the dialup can turn off, and the broadband [yey!!!!!!!] can keep on if wanted
Vause
14-04-2005, 01:38 PM
:| this was random lol
Kroziun
14-04-2005, 01:48 PM
I am pro-signature, but I hate large ones - I think it shows a lack of imagination. I believe jrh2002 may be looking at limiting sig size and size/amount of text even, and implementing something in the future...
As I like to have a proper sig, I use the IMG in the body of the message so I use a signature 'the long way round.' (as below)
http://www.kroziun.com/offsite/kroziun-sig.gif (http://www.kroziun.com)
Mentor
14-04-2005, 01:56 PM
I am pro-signature, but I hate large ones - I think it shows a lack of imagination. I believe jrh2002 may be looking at limiting sig size and size/amount of text even, and implementing something in the future...
As I like to have a proper sig, I use the IMG in the body of the message so I use a signature 'the long way round.' (as below)
http://www.kroziun.com/offsite/kroziun-sig.gif (http://www.kroziun.com)
by defult u can limit the amount of charicters in a sig. on any good buliten board.
Athogh it would be hard resiving exstranl images. only way u could do it is by useing css atribute for max image size, and inseting it in to sig bbc output. athogh IE doesnt support it :/
Cloudclone
14-04-2005, 05:03 PM
Default, 100 x 60 max.
Anyone who breaks it or puts more than suposed gets a 7 day ban. [Shrugs].
They have no reason NOT to do it, so do it for gods sake. >_>
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.