View Full Version : The man utd take over..
danny1541
13-05-2005, 03:04 PM
Hey guys i wanted to know is the takeover good or bad?
Personally i beleave bad as he has lent 26 million jus to buy the club ..
Danny..
iRoss
13-05-2005, 03:05 PM
Lol, He's given fergie 20 million to spend on 2 players... He'd be lucky if he got 1 player for that!1!!1
danny1541
13-05-2005, 03:09 PM
YEH! I mean a good player costs that lol i feel sorry for man utd! as i can see em
going in debt very fast
paradox
13-05-2005, 06:19 PM
Me too, hes so close to that 75% mark, in which he can plunge his debt in the Club. He also plans to make them private, and alter the TV thing.. :S
I think it will turn it out like Leeds did, and that was a bad situation..
Also theres a roumer Glazer's son for Chairman?? Pfft.. Me thinks he should stick to Tampa Bay.
Davisman
13-05-2005, 08:04 PM
I dont like the American..............
I think its terrible. This guys doesn't know anything about footy and I have no idea why he's interested in Man U. Isn't he an NFL team owner or something? Ha he's some sort of billionare and he only gave Ferguson 20 mil pounds!
danny1541
14-05-2005, 12:21 PM
yeh but he has lent 500 mil to buy the club..
danny1541
18-05-2005, 01:25 PM
Glazer now has 75 % of shares mor eot come prolly this week..
Danny.
Colourful™
18-05-2005, 01:43 PM
Now he has 75%+ he can take it private
danny1541
18-05-2005, 02:43 PM
Yeah the stock market looks decent for once ;)
Danny.
paradox
18-05-2005, 03:30 PM
Bye Bye Man Utd. Bye Bye.. Why loan money to buy the club, only to put the debt in the club.. Rather ludachris.. and Glazer should stick to the superbowl teams.
Kroziun
19-05-2005, 05:30 PM
I think its terrible. This guys doesn't know anything about footy and I have no idea why he's interested in Man U. Isn't he an NFL team owner or something? Ha he's some sort of billionare and he only gave Ferguson 20 mil pounds!He's interested in Man Utd because he's a rich businessman. It makes thorough sense. When football teams want to start becoming businesses they have to take the rough with the smooth. Money talks. If Man Utd go under because of this, it will do football the world of good - someone might actually sit up and think it was a bad idea in the first place to have teams become businesses!
On the positive side, Yes, he does own Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and with him owning them, they won the Super Bowl.
Having said that, the revenue that is generated by TV is shared equally by ALL the teams, even the little ones (like Green Bay) so it helps all teams compete without an unfair advantage. This is something that should have been implemented by the FA/FIFA/whoever when Sky first started pumping their money into the game in this country. All the while the top teams get a bigger slice of the cake, there will always be just the same 1 or 2 teams at the top of the table.
So, Americans have got something right!
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.