Layout i made

[:Woof]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v260/iPodi/try5.png



What you think?
made for Habb-Extreme.co.uk :)

[Ziabotsu]

Nice! :D

[Scriptermone]

W00t! My site is gonna Pwn you al when everything is added to it!!

[iRoss]

I suppose it's better than HabWiz's ... :')

[:Woof]

OMG!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOO
IM SOOOO HAPPY!!!
ROSS SAID ITS BETTER !!!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
PARTY!!!!!!!!!!

[Scriptermone]

Damn right its better :)

[iRoss]

OMG!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOO
IM SOOOO HAPPY!!!
ROSS SAID ITS BETTER !!!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
PARTY!!!!!!!!!!

I never said it was good. I just said it was better... :$

[scottish]

Yeh Well Better!

[Mentor]

OMG!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOO
IM SOOOO HAPPY!!!
ROSS SAID ITS BETTER !!!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
PARTY!!!!!!!!!!
before you start celibrating, have u seen habwiz's template?

Anyway its an image, not a layout, its only a layout if its got all the codeing done, and if its just codeing in top of a flat image, that both ads to load time, and isnt realy particaly good codeing "/

[:Woof]

lmao yes, i made it :(
and i shall be coding it by a rubbish coding program >: ( Mx :l

[iRoss]

What's wrong with fireworks. It owns when coding... >:l

[:Woof]

lmao, ;) if you say so :)

[Scriptermone]

Hes saying that because he doesen't like it :\

[:Woof]

yeh true :) hate the way its set out ;)

[Mentor]

Sorry, i just get annoyed as everyone on this forum calls an image a layout, As to be alyout ity woudl have to be coded, and woulnt actaly nessary need any images at all, the codeing being the bigger bit.

coded properly, aka, resivable tables to fit browsers, text rather than image based writings, and usiang backgroun colring rather than useing a large image, etc. Then would be good.
So im no longer going to rate a layout unless it is a layout.

ps. i hate fireworks the code it genrates is waistful and near imposible to work with

[:Woof]

Gawd calm down dude :'(
it will be coded there for a layout :)

[Scriptermone]

Hes coding it in 20/30 mins its my site :|

[iRoss]

>=o i don't do that i hope... and who in their right mind would use images for text anyway? And also using a background picture for the background would just be insane, when it takes up more space or your hosting 2 have it there! LOL :')

[:Woof]

true :) i have to get out of the habbit of using iframes >: ( for navs, lol

[Mentor]

>=o i don't do that i hope... and who in their right mind would use images for text anyway? And also using a background picture for the background would just be insane, when it takes up more space or your hosting 2 have it there! LOL :')

fireworks codeing does use iamge for backgrounds, plus puting layers over a image based site does cause that problems.

By image based writing, doenst usealy apply to body, but say the sectoions, down the side, people may use 6 diffent images, with diffent writing on them, rather than just load one image, and use a few times and put text on top of them "/

[iRoss]

No... I code it then delete the middle bits so i can write content into it. Then add a background colour the same colour as i would do using the image. But i would never use the image to write over... Plus, it takes longer to do it that way.

[:Woof]

who would write on the image? :s
if they did kill um

[zak-x]

Nice layout

[iRoss]

who would write on the image? :s
if they did kill um

... what i was thinking :P :rolleyes:

[:Woof]

lmao! ross, Hmm.. i think i will try and find someone who is stupid and does that >: D
just to kill them woo

[gum]

i use frontpage which bites. i usually make the template then get dave to code it cawz i am real bad. :P

[scottish]

here As you Wish :D
http://img236.echo.cx/img236/482/copyoftry44fs.th.png (http://img236.echo.cx/my.php?image=copyoftry44fs.png)

[:Woof]

you always get one who trys to be funny, but there not :l