PDA

View Full Version : How come


Aflux
08-09-2007, 05:57 PM
Men showing their nipples is not classed as naked-images but women showing theirs are.

I mean, if we can see boob without nipple and not classing it as "naked-images" then clearly we can see the nipple because it's only the same as a man's, a bit bigger but they're both there.

Sorry, random thread.
Smits
08-09-2007, 05:58 PM
I mean, if we can see boob without nipple and not classing it as "naked-images" then clearly we can see the nipple because it's only the same as a man's, a bit bigger but they're both there.

I don't get that bit.

But yeh, if women went around showing their nipples, some men would take advantage.
Mr.Sam
08-09-2007, 06:00 PM
what he means is - if you post a picture of a topless woman with her nipples blanked out it shouldn't be classed as a nude image.
Aflux
08-09-2007, 06:00 PM
what he means is - if you post a picture of a topless woman with her nipples blanked out it shouldn't be classed as a nude image.
Aye, it wasn't very well explained.

If men can expose their nipples, why can't women?
Mr.Sam
08-09-2007, 06:01 PM
I'm guessing it's because they can be and are use in a sexual way where as a mans are not.

Aye, it wasn't very well explained.

If men can expose their nipples, why can't women?
Aflux
08-09-2007, 06:02 PM
I'm guessing it's because they can be and are use in a sexual way where as a mans are not.
In reality, they're the same thing though...
LeftForDead
08-09-2007, 06:02 PM
It isnt anyway i dont think:s
Because you get loads of mags where they have stars and stuff on:)
Smits
08-09-2007, 06:03 PM
^ in most cases they are not anyway.

But yeh, i agree
Mr.Sam
08-09-2007, 06:04 PM
They are but womans are published more in papers and magazines and there is actually something there rather than a flat chest, and as i said the fact they are liked with sexual ways.

Before someone says you have some woman with flat chests they are not really flat there is still something there..


In reality, they're the same thing though...
Alkaz
08-09-2007, 06:14 PM
ino wot u mean lol, and its almost ok for a woman to flash her private area, but for a man to do it its the most disgusting thing u could EVER do lol.
Charlie
08-09-2007, 06:18 PM
Because, mens nipples aren't seen as anything sexual, whereas womans are because of the breasts as well. So, showing it would be classed in some way as a sexual image
lScottl
08-09-2007, 06:19 PM
ino wot u mean lol, and its almost ok for a woman to flash her private area, but for a man to do it its the most disgusting thing u could EVER do lol.

Is it?
Nemo
08-09-2007, 06:20 PM
Is it?no he lies...

Yeah its seen as somethin 'dirty' lol...
Charlie
08-09-2007, 06:22 PM
ino wot u mean lol, and its almost ok for a woman to flash her private area, but for a man to do it its the most disgusting thing u could EVER do lol.

No, it's not. If they saw another man flashing their parts, they'd think it was disgusting but to a woman it won't. The same goes to woman, if they saw another woman flashing their parts they'd be disgusted, apart from the men.
Aflux
08-09-2007, 06:24 PM
Because, mens nipples aren't seen as anything sexual, whereas womans are because of the breasts as well. So, showing it would be classed in some way as a sexual image
But women are allowed to pose their breasts in a non-sexual way, just not the nipple.

It makes no sense.
Charlie
08-09-2007, 06:34 PM
But women are allowed to pose their breasts in a non-sexual way, just not the nipple.

It makes no sense.

I guess, because the nipple is the most played with part of the breast, they have to cover that because of that reason?
Aflux
08-09-2007, 06:37 PM
I guess, because the nipple is the most played with part of the breast, they have to cover that because of that reason?
But then, why don't they cover the man's nipples?

It's sexist in a weird way.

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!