CLEAR-UP ON WINNING RUGBY TEAM.

[.v.i.c.a.r.!]

As i earlier posted, some of you may have seen the ORIGINAL print screen i sent to habbo. The print screen that habbo have, was obviously taken by someone else because it was taken near enough at the same time. This proves i didn't submit this entry because how can you take 2 print screens that are seconds apart? Impossible.
ALSO, the suspect that i expect did this is Scottii. This is because when he submitted the entry that won, he obviously had to put mine, shortcheese and ross.gardners names down (because we are speaking) and has included himself. He is the ONLY person besides us three who was in the original screeny making it OBVIOUS he took it. I have emailed habbo witht he original screeny and a complaint, telling them the REAL habbo's who were in the room.
Here is what I sent via the Habbo Help tool;
"Hello, i am writing about the rugby screenshot competition. Me and other habbo's would of won the 1st prize but somebody print screened and put different names. I have the origional copy of the screenshot and its taken a second before the winning one. I can Prove this is the original copy as it has :chooser and shortcheese AND ross.gardner (who are speaking in it) will confirm this for you. Can you please sort this out. I have the people who were actually in the screen shot, and the original screenshot. I will not let this go.in the screenshot I have clearly used :chooser to show who was in the room whereas in the screen shot you have, there is no :chooser proving this is the original. I have attached the original print screen and will hope you understand my fury towards this subject.

Many thanks,

.v.i.c.ar."

[jesus]

norty .

[.v.i.c.a.r.!]

i forgot 2 attach prt scrn

il attach it nw

[JackBuddy]

tom u spelt your name wrong in the email

[.v.i.c.a.r.!]

ERM OK I CANT ATTACH IT BUT U CAN SEE IT IN THIS THREAD:
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=401879&page=2

[Photonical]

conkers. is on it aswell so it was one of those 2.

its well out of order n pathetic tbh.
some lazy idiot writing well known names knowing they'd win, why don't you get off you butt and do one yourself.

[.v.i.c.a.r.!]

tom u spelt your name wrong in the email
o jebus *resends*

[Lozzoling]

norty norty

[Robby]

technically you never won then, Scottii won. As it was his screenie that won.

But he had no right to do that and this should be taken further

[@xP]

Good luck with the email

Tom, it's just jelousy as you have alot of badges..

[.v.i.c.a.r.!]

technically you never won then, Scottii won. As it was his screenie that won.

But he had no right to do that and this should be taken further

perhaps. but i dont chose who wins and i was blatently set up here.

[JammieDodgers]

THT BLUDI SCOTTII

hiya ppl

[PTER]

it seems as if scottii or w/e is in both 1st and 2nd. err..

[JammieDodgers]

it seems as if scottii or w/e is in both 1st and 2nd. err..


omg rly
he makes me sik

[Ashley]

Scottii is so pathetic.
He should be banned or atleast have his badge removed.

[Robby]

Lol its not toms fault

Proof:

If you look at both screenies, they are taken at the same time. One with :chooser and one without. (Which is probs impossible)

And if you look at them the are both saved in different formats.

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/4678/rugbyyyzt7.png

[.v.i.c.a.r.!]

OH BTW IF I HAD SUBMITTED OTHER PEOPLE, I WUD HAVE SUBMITTED CLONES, DONT YOU THINK?

[Ashley]

Even though this may be tiny, it's still big proof.

If you look at the TVs in the screenshots they are showing different things, but if you look at the ones on Habbo you can see which screen comes first and prove that Toms was taken first.

[PTER]

alterations are very easy to do these days, you think?

[JammieDodgers]

Scottii is so pathetic.
He should be banned or atleast have his badge removed.


no he shud get banned and his badge removed 2 oh wait if he was banned he would have his badge THIKO ERE

[msb.]

Scottii is so pathetic.
He should be banned or atleast have his badge removed.


no he shud get banned and his badge removed 2 oh wait if he was banned he would have his badge THIKO ERE
LOL

ermm anyways, so I am right in saying wth is my name on the homepage for gold LOL, i was like okkk then, tbh I got a gold already and quit habbo
SO THERE :DDDDDDDDDD
wooooooooooooooooooot
anyways I see ur point. LOL scotiiiiiii

.V.i.c.a.r. u make my life difficult, lol
If habbo believe this email there gonna probs remove my gold then I have to ask them for it back as I won it in the World Cup Rugby 1 :S

[JammieDodgers]

if they do msb just email explaining and they will most defo give back

[msb.]

if they do msb just email explaining and they will most defo give back
ok will do :D

[Qamp]

Someone got owned :o lol joke ^^

[byrnesiscool]

msb u silly sosij

[le harry]

o bad luk tom u shud of let me in urs :@

[Ecoutez]

Peeps, it WASNT SCOTTII
I got a msg last night from the person who e-mailed in with the wrong names. Here's the console message..
http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a232/NymrodUK/notscottii.png

I promise you it was not Scottii. This person who sent me the console message told me not to tell anyone, so I decided to post the console message but cover his name..

[Lozzoling]

well duh it wasnt scottii

scottii wouldn't scam a fly

[Earthquake]

49, is safe, Thanks for doing that 49, :)

[Ashley]

Peeps, it WASNT SCOTTII
I got a msg last night from the person who e-mailed in with the wrong names. Here's the console message..
http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a232/NymrodUK/notscottii.png

I promise you it was not Scottii. This person who sent me the console message told me not to tell anyone, so I decided to post the console message but cover his name..

Well a possible name to fit into that gap is 49,, he's the only one who has stayed quiet and not got involed with this cheating.

[Ecoutez]

Just because 49, fits into the gap, doesn't mean it was him. This person could have easily shortened their name. i.e .v.i.c.a.r could have been shortened to vic.

[Earthquake]

Just because 49, fits into the gap, doesn't mean it was him. This person could have easily shortened their name. i.e .v.i.c.a.r could have been shortened to vic.
If it was he just 0wnt .v.i.c.a.r. respect to him!

[Ashley]

Just because 49, fits into the gap, doesn't mean it was him. This person could have easily shortened their name. i.e .v.i.c.a.r could have been shortened to vic.

Tbh you aren't really helping much and it's obvious that you want to keep the badge that isn't rightfully yours. But we, who didn't get the badge want it so we are going to sort this out.

Anyway how could .v.i.c.a.r have taken a screenshot with :chooser open, put it on paint, opened up another paint screen, closed :chooser, taken another screenshot, put that on paint all in less than 1 second?

[Ecoutez]

Tbh you aren't really helping much and it's obvious that you want to keep the badge that isn't rightfully yours. But we, who didn't get the badge want it so we are going to sort this out.

Anyway how could .v.i.c.a.r have taken a screenshot with :chooser open, put it on paint, opened up another paint screen, closed :chooser, taken another screenshot, put that on paint all in less than 1 second?
If I wanted to keep the badge then why would I email telling them that they made a mistake and to remove it? :S
I wasn't saying it was .v.i.c.a.r. because it wasn't - I was just saying the person could have shortened their name in the console message.

[Earthquake]

Tbh you aren't really helping much and it's obvious that you want to keep the badge that isn't rightfully yours. But we, who didn't get the badge want it so we are going to sort this out.

Anyway how could .v.i.c.a.r have taken a screenshot with :chooser open, put it on paint, opened up another paint screen, closed :chooser, taken another screenshot, put that on paint all in less than 1 second?
Well the fact he was their he done his own screenshot.

[Ashley]

Well the fact he was their he done his own screenshot.

Toms one had :chooser open.

[Earthquake]

Toms one had :chooser open.
well the fact he was their and if owner or some1 says :chooser only he can see it :l just stop it

[Ashley]

well the fact he was their and if owner or some1 says :chooser only he can see it :l just stop it

What are you on about and how is this relevant to who took the other screenshot? :s

[Earthquake]

What are you on about and how is this relevant to who took the other screenshot? :s
49, took screenshot same time as vicar..

[Ashley]

49, took screenshot same time as vicar..

We know that... :S

[Ashley]

I was speaking to 49, about it in .v.i.c.a.r.s room and he suddenly started talking about ClubHabbo and Huntrex and how I got fired and how him and Huntrex are very close friends.

Could this just be a coincidence that Huntrex's name was added to the winning teams list?
I doubt it.

And when I mentioned this to him, he said "Oh you're annoying me" then left the room.

[Photonical]

why would he assume that tom's screenshot couldn't win, they said it won because of the scottish national anthem not because of the people, its stupid and unfair tbh.
I doubt he would've put me, tom and ross if we hadn't spoke either.