why doesnt school do Gay sex education?

[CrazyColaist]

i think every guy/woman has the right to know what gay people do (as in sex) as much as a gay guy knows what straight people do...


but why don't they do Gay sex education?

[:Liam]

because anthropologically Gay sex is extremely complicated.

Edit: You don't understand sex is more than its taught. Anthropologically straight sex is built up on a basic structure in which a man and a women interact. however structurally its entirely different for gay couples. Also it isn't on the curriculum therefore it isn't taught. Its very confusing and its easy just to teach safe sex, because the same principles apply (i.e safety) its just different lol.

[CrazyColaist]

ino but same is straight sex education. for a gay guy or woman

[jesus]

i fink its pretty obvious so they dont need 2

[&]

I wish they would.
but immature children who havent grown up will look for the guys who are taking an interest and bully them tbh

[Nemo]

because most ppl are straight and wouldnt it be the same? Kind of

[:Liam]

because most ppl are straight and wouldnt it be the same? Kind of
I think your sig teaches us enough.

[Nemo]

I think your sig teaches us enough.i lol'd irl. Its true, just stick em in a room for an hour and play my sig over n over.

[CrazyColaist]

lmao


but tbh i find it unfair. you do need to just because like 70% of the world is straight doesnt mean that you cant learn about gay sex.

[:Liam]

lmao


but tbh i find it unfair. you do need to just because like 70% of the world is straight doesnt mean that you cant learn about gay sex.

Look its an extremely complicated subject its not as simple as people think sex is. Its hard to explain.


because anthropologically Gay sex is extremely complicated.

Edit: You don't understand sex is more than its taught. Anthropologically straight sex is built up on a basic structure in which a man and a women interact. however structurally its entirely different for gay couples. Also it isn't on the curriculum therefore it isn't taught. Its very confusing and its easy just to teach safe sex, because the same principles apply (i.e safety) its just different lol.

[ItsDave]

Theres nothing to learn from Gay Sex. But apart from Straight sex its part of natural life and theres science in it, where gay sex, yeah theres nothi8ng to be learnt.

[Wootzeh]

Because homosexuals are a minority, it would be pointless teaching the whole school about gay sex when only about 5% will turn out homosexual.

[Callum.]

i dont actually think you're gay from what i see. you're for ever moaning about things straight people get, but gay people don't. only gay because you want to be different? niceeeeee.

[Neversoft]

I think parents wouldn't want their child going to school and being taught about gay sex. Many people don't actually know their sexuality 'til an older age so learning about gay things in school may provoke a persons gay side, which parents don't want. ;)

[&]

there should be an extra service i suppose.
My school has it but thats mine.

5% of the worlds population is gay

[:Liam]

Yes, it would unwise (perhaps in older children 15 +) but for the younger ones, because of hormones sexuality isnt definable until the age of 15-20.

[Extor]

dunno bout england but most schools in scotland are like catholic and they dont approve of people being gay etc so maybe thats why...

[&]

Yes, it would unwise (perhaps in older children 15 +) but for the younger ones, because of hormones sexuality isnt definable until the age of 15-20.

I dont think Sex Ed. should be taught to children under 13/14 tbh.
i dont get people who say it should be taught at primary school - no ty?

[:Liam]

I dont think Sex Ed. should be taught to children under 13/14 tbh.
i dont get people who say it should be taught at primary school - no ty?
well thats to do to the social pressures, in which boundaries (taboos) have been created towards sex basically a HUSH WORD for small children, but the government want to rid of this taboo and create an excepting environment. there even taking about creating books for preschool children including gay marriage and talking about attraction bettween the sexes.

[Neversoft]

Yes, it would unwise (perhaps in older children 15 +) but for the younger ones, because of hormones sexuality isnt definable until the age of 15-20.

But if it was taught to younger ones they wouldn't understand it anyway. So either way teaching it isnt a very good idea.

[drama]

On the subject of sex ed.

What kind of sick aduly specialises and enjoys talking to kids about sex.

[&]

well thats to do to the social pressures, in which boundaries (taboos) have been created towards sex basically a HUSH WORD for small children, but the government want to rid of this taboo and create an excepting environment. there even taking about creating books for preschool children including gay marriage and talking about attraction bettween the sexes.

id promote the bold - but surely teaching them about it younger would promote sex at younger age?

[:Liam]

id promote the bold - but surely teaching them about it younger would promote sex at younger age?
Thats already happening though it always has so would you rather 14 year olds that had sex did it safely?

[&]

Thats already happening though it always has so would you rather 14 year olds that had sex did it safely?
by young sex i mean 13/14 yo. they should be taught safe sex, but what I mean is, we shouldnt be putting sexual info/thoughts into, say, a 7yo head really

[:Liam]

by young sex i mean 13/14 yo. they should be taught safe sex, but what I mean is, we shouldnt be putting sexual info/thoughts into, say, a 7yo head really
The earlier you enforce the thought of safe sex the better really. because the stuff you get taught when your younger you remember better.

[&]

The earlier you enforce the thought of safe sex the better really. because the stuff you get taught when your younger you remember better.

I see your point.
Ive always been 'sitting on the fence' with this taboo subject

[Technologic]

Look its an extremely complicated subject its not as simple as people think sex is. Its hard to explain.
How is it complicated...

Penis -> bumhole
<-
->
<-
*splurge*

End of

[&]

How is it complicated...

Penis -> bumhole
<-
->
<-
*splurge*

End of

LOLLLL.
+Rep to that.

[brapp]

How is it complicated...

Penis -> bumhole
<-
->
<-
*splurge*

End of
lol m8.

[:Liam]

How is it complicated...

Penis -> bumhole
<-
->
<-
*splurge*

End of
No the anthropology behind it is complicated you dont understand, basically the simplest thing to teach is heterosexual sex. I spent a month at durham university studying anthropology as part of NAGTY and we touched upon this subject, we spent a whole week explaining homosexual sex, becuase sex (even straight sex) is more than two people interacting.

[Nemo]

No the anthropology behind it is complicated you dont understand, basically the simplest thing to teach is heterosexual sex. I spent a month at durham university studying anthropology as part of NAGTY and we touched upon this subject, we spent a whole week explaining homosexual sex, becuase sex (even straight sex) is more than two people interacting.
im in NAGTY :-)

Reasons sed above tbh

[Technologic]

No the anthropology behind it is complicated you dont understand, basically the simplest thing to teach is heterosexual sex. I spent a month at durham university studying anthropology as part of NAGTY and we touched upon this subject, we spent a whole week explaining homosexual sex, becuase sex (even straight sex) is more than two people interacting.
Look, the only bit of sex ed i can rember was my teacher waving a condom infront of us for ten minutes...

Anyways, i don't need to be in NAGTY, too clever for them :]

But serious, my school has a 98% pass rate at gcse or summin..

[&]

No the anthropology behind it is complicated you dont understand, basically the simplest thing to teach is heterosexual sex. I spent a month at durham university studying anthropology as part of NAGTY and we touched upon this subject, we spent a whole week explaining homosexual sex, becuase sex (even straight sex) is more than two people interacting.
They dont just teach things because theyre easy :rolleyes:

[:Liam]

im in NAGTY :-)

Reasons sed above tbh
Oh wow thats wicked :P I hope I dont bump into you on an event, joke of course ;)

[Sammeth.]

I personally would have thought gay sex education wasnt needed. I think its understood that a lot of people wouldnt be mature enough to handle the situation at the age that Sex Education is taught. Plus one of the main reasons of sex education is to teach the importance of reproducing. The only way I can see gay sex being included is the part where they teach why safe sex is also important.

[Nemo]

Oh wow thats wicked :P I hope I dont bump into you on an event, joke of course ;)
i dont actually go to any of the events, dont even no wen they r haha. I just joined coz it looked gd on my record and if there ever was a decent event, that i found out about.

[:Liam]

They dont just teach things because theyre easy :rolleyes:
Yes but they dont teach biological anthropology in schools nor do they rocket science. They avoid subjects that are extremely complicated.

[Alkaz]

ooer ive never thought about that

[Jamie!]

i dont actually think you're gay from what i see. you're for ever moaning about things straight people get, but gay people don't. only gay because you want to be different? niceeeeee.

Couldn't agree more.. I hate gay people that are like that, why can't they just get on with things instead of complaining about why they can't do this or w/e?!

[GommeInc]

I think by the time you learn sex education later on (because earlier on is the basic stuff, because school education people don't believe Year 6s and 7s would know if they are gay yet), you would not need to know, it's pretty much to show where a baby comes from, because of the subject is about pregnancy and only a minor part is about diseases. Gay sex is irrelevant, because you don't get pregnant unless you're weird.

Anyway, by the time you are taught it again, Year 10 or 11, it is pretty damn obvious how a man has sex with another man or a woman with a woman, but learning about sex in Year 10 or Year 11 revolves around diseases and pregnancy, and ways to prevent it, because you are at the age where you are legally allowed to have sex, or thinking about it.

[:Liam]

LOL! quote of the century

I think by the time you learn sex education later on (because earlier on is the basic stuff, because school education people don't believe Year 6s and 7s would know if they are gay yet), you would not need to know, it's pretty much to show where a baby comes from, because of the subject is about pregnancy and only a minor part is about diseases. Gay sex is irrelevant, because you don't get pregnant unless you're weird.

Anyway, by the time you are taught it again, Year 10 or 11, it is pretty damn obvious how a man has sex with another man or a woman with a woman, but learning about sex in Year 10 or Year 11 revolves around diseases and pregnancy, and ways to prevent it, because you are at the age where you are legally allowed to have sex, or thinking about it.

[GommeInc]

It's either that or someone was lying about their sex ;)

[cocaine]

why doesnt school do Gay sex education?

why do you think?
:rolleyes:

[5,5]

Becuase the majority of people are straight.

[Moh]

hardly any 1 actualy know your born gay lol

[Sammeth.]

hardly any 1 actualy know your born gay lol
I think saying you were born gay is a matter of opinion. I dont beleive I was born gay at all!

[Sabbath]

Maybe because it has nothing to do with reproduction. Maybe you are just wanting to "stand up" for gay rights.

[Virgin Mary]

Because bum sex is technically illegal unless it's completely private.

[Antony]

because most ppl are straight and wouldnt it be the same? Kind of

You can't necessarily say that if you don't know the statistics. Most gay people in their teens probably aren't open etc so it would be hard to get an exact statistic on the amount of gay teens in the UK.

I also think when I was in school my teachers avoided sex ed as much as they could.. so having to teach two sections of it would probably give them a nervous breakdown... :O

[d17c]

im in NAGTY :-)

Reasons sed above tbh


I'm in NAGTY too
Woo for us :)

[Frodo13.]

At my school they do teach both, however gay sex is only breifly coverd. This is taught in PSE btw.

[timROGERS]

The main problem is that parents would complain and there would be a giant uproar.

[Throne Sofa]

They hardly teach straight sex education.
I wouldn't like to learn about bent sex education, nor would anyone in my school LOL!

[Lycan]

Most people tend to tune out of Lessons anyway....

Wiki is your friend, let it teach you

[CJW93]

Becuase at the age that it is taught at, it isn't important

[drama]

Becuase at the age that it is taught at, it isn't important
are you saying gay people don't have under-age sex lololol

[reindeer.]

i think every guy/woman has the right to know what gay people do (as in sex) as much as a gay guy knows what straight people do...


but why don't they do Gay sex education?

it's not about having the right. it's about wanting to know.
and i'm sure 99% of the kids in my school wouldn't want to know. plus, it's not like there's a scientific part to it. if you're so interested ask your teacher.

[d17c]

At my school we get taught both straight and gay
But that could be because my pshe teacher is gay

[CrazyColaist]

our school has about 8 gay teachers


we dont get taught gay sex ;[

[&]

o-m-g.
this use to be this proper fit dt teacher at school, he got promoted to some crappy school :(

[Sammeth.]

our school has about 8 gay teachers


we dont get taught gay sex ;[

Stick willy up bumhole. Have fun. Gay Sex Education over.

[drama]

The ad above this thread for me is about a Gay Gym O_o

[Nixt]

I haven't read the thread, but isn't it obvious!? In sex education, you aren't taught how to have sex, you are taught the risks of sex and what protection should be used etc. A lot of it (apart from the stuff about pregnancy) is relevant to both heterosexual and homosexual sex; such as the risk of STIs, how to use a condom etc etc.
The only thing they don't tell you is that you are at risk of tearing the skin in the anus, but you would soon learn that.

[Zuar]

you shouldn't teach it because it has nothing to do with making kids, and keeping the human race going.

[Elliott$]

I'd say because more people are straight and too many childish people would laugh, and imo I wouldn't want to know about gay sex...

[dannyisnotamazing]

liam why do you feel to promote your gay in every thread you make, no one cares that your gay **** off.

Edited by BobX (Forum Moderator): Please do not be rude or offensive to others.

[GommeInc]

Because bum sex is technically illegal unless it's completely private.
Isn't that in both sexualities, gay and straight? Sex in general is illegal unless done in private. Public sex is illegal, no matter what sexuality.


are you saying gay people don't have under-age sex lololol
It's not hard to have sex "/ One lick there, another tug there and then you find out about sticking something in somewhere that can take it. Do you remember when you were little, or if you don't, seen in loads of shops and cartoons, games for babies which include sticking shapes into holes that can take them? That's pretty much sex covered at the age of 4 "/

[Susie Dent]

Um what's there to learn? Some gays get horny and give each other bum love

[le harry]

liam why do you feel to promote your gay in every thread you make, no one cares that your gay **** off.

Edited by BobX (Forum Moderator): Please do not be rude or offensive to others.

it seems that way lol.

[Earthquake]

Because Gay sex is chosen and isn't natural, Its like a manual not automatic.

[Lubricant]

Theres nothing to learn from Gay Sex. But apart from Straight sex its part of natural life and theres science in it, where gay sex, yeah theres nothi8ng to be learnt.

I completely agree with this post.

Gay sex is just for pleasure. Hetrosexual sex is to but it involves the "science" of reproduction.

If they had a sex ed for gay sex, the lesson would last a few minutes or even less than a minute because there isn't much to say because I doubt they would go into sex positions.

[Sammeth.]

I completely agree with this post.

Gay sex is just for pleasure. Hetrosexual sex is to but it involves the "science" of reproduction.

If they had a sex ed for gay sex, the lesson would last a few minutes or even less than a minute because there isn't much to say because I doubt they would go into sex positions.

I think thats cleared it up in the simplest terms ever. Good show.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Jesus.

'WHY ISN'T THERE A GAY CLUB'
'WHY ISN'T THERE A GAY SHOP'
'WHY AREN'T WE TAUGHT ABOUT GAY SEX'

Political Correctness this is, we don't learn about gay sex because most already know about it, it would be laughed at, you would be educating people who might not be gay thus wasting valuable time.

[Browney]

I can't see alot of education to be made. An hour would suffice. "Penis in pooper." Other than HIV hazards theres not much else to it right?

[::::::::::]

mi scool onli duz gay sex education

[brapp]

cuz it's gay

[::::::::::]

ye i no & we practiss rape & incest in science

[brapp]

sounds fun

[::::::::::]

it iz !!1