View Full Version : Starting School
Samishlol
22-11-2007, 07:06 AM
Do you think children should start school until the age of 7?
It was said that if they get forced into reading and writing at a young age it may put them of.
womanizer
22-11-2007, 11:00 AM
they start at 6 here?
Sammeth.
22-11-2007, 11:37 AM
Absolutley not. Starting at the age of 4 is a good thing, and the government are finally cottoning onto the fact that Early Years education is the most important of all.
Agesilaus
22-11-2007, 11:41 AM
Well, although I'm not in the UK. In Australia, they also have the same type of system, a lot start at the age of 4, 5 or 6.
I agree with it because they are learning the basics at an earlie age so it's might not be so difficult for them to catch on later.
Muniflex
22-11-2007, 12:10 PM
Out here in Spain they can start as young as 2. 3 is the usual age though.
Agesilaus
22-11-2007, 12:31 PM
Out here in Spain they can start as young as 2. 3 is the usual age though.
Interesting, 2 is very young.
FlyingJesus
22-11-2007, 12:43 PM
That's a load of balls. I started education at 2 (at a nursery school) and I'm a keen reader and a good writer, so obviously not an ounce of truth in this idea. Starting later just means that parents have to try teaching their children for longer, which they usually aren't qualified to do, and so kids will just be underachievers for longer.
The earlier you start to learn something, the better you can learn it. Proven.
In englan we start at 4 :)
GommeInc
22-11-2007, 02:05 PM
That's a load of balls. I started education at 2 (at a nursery school) and I'm a keen reader and a good writer, so obviously not an ounce of truth in this idea. Starting later just means that parents have to try teaching their children for longer, which they usually aren't qualified to do, and so kids will just be underachievers for longer.
The earlier you start to learn something, the better you can learn it. Proven.
I started Nursery at 2 too. I didn't like reading books, but assuming ALL children who read books at a young age will therefore hate it when they're older is stupid...
RedStratocas
22-11-2007, 02:23 PM
for us UnitedStatesians, it depends on what you mean by "school". "school" can start as early as birth or as late as 6.
reindeer.
22-11-2007, 04:01 PM
I read somewhere that if you don't learn a language properly by 5 then you will never be able to learn it.
So early years are vital.
Agesilaus
22-11-2007, 08:36 PM
That's a load of balls. I started education at 2 (at a nursery school) and I'm a keen reader and a good writer, so obviously not an ounce of truth in this idea. Starting later just means that parents have to try teaching their children for longer, which they usually aren't qualified to do, and so kids will just be underachievers for longer.
The earlier you start to learn something, the better you can learn it. Proven.
I agree, entirely.
If there is any justification as to 'putting them off'. I know some people just have these crazy ideas. It's like political correctness if you've heard of it over there.
I read somewhere that if you don't learn a language properly by 5 then you will never be able to learn it.
So early years are vital.
What you read is not true, not true at all. Anyone can learn a language whether they are 7 or 20. How do you think translators get their skills? They learn it. Just because they might not learn something at an early age, doesn't mean they can't learn it at all.
brapp
22-11-2007, 08:36 PM
no .
lAdmire
22-11-2007, 09:09 PM
You start school at the age of 4 here. But it's fun. Like I remember kindergarten as fun, exciting. You have pure toys, games, etc. & everything is fun but you learn something.
MrGazet
23-11-2007, 12:41 AM
start primary skool 7 ere.but kids start early for their nursery.i fink dey shud start early thou :)
Muniflex
23-11-2007, 12:58 AM
I read somewhere that if you don't learn a language properly by 5 then you will never be able to learn it.
So early years are vital.
It's wrong. Istarted learning Spanish when i was 13 and was flunet in 2 years.
The youbger you are the easier and quicker it is to learn but doesn't matter if your 5 or 70 you can always learn a new language.
Muniflex
23-11-2007, 01:01 AM
Interesting, 2 is very young.
I know! And it isn't like Nursery it is like Reception, so it toys but learning still...
Edited by opensourcehost (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not multiple post.
Herman
23-11-2007, 07:46 AM
in singapore, you start school at 4.
nursery and kindergarten - 3 years
primary school - 6 years
secondary school - 4/5 years
polytechnic/junior college - 2/3 years
university - no idea how many years
i think 7 is a little too late. a child must have an interest and love for learning at an early age. starting at 7 also means that you will be behind your peers who have started learning at an earlier age.
bigdavecox90
23-11-2007, 09:45 AM
No, cos if they wait until 7, they pick up too many bad habits. That's just my opinion.
le harry
23-11-2007, 09:49 AM
I started proper schooling at 5. Went to pre-school and all that at 3-4. I started reading young, that's why I'm a good reader and a very fast one too. My brother hasn't started reading yet and he's 13, he'll have problems BECAUSE he started late. Why start them off later when they can be learning new things instead of things they could of learnt years ago.
I got into reading by reading Harry Potter 2 when I was like 8 heh, after that I never really stopped. Half my vocabulary would of come from reading. (Bryce Courtney is the one to thank there)
bigdavecox90
23-11-2007, 09:55 AM
I started proper schooling at 5. Went to pre-school and all that at 3-4. I started reading young, that's why I'm a good reader and a very fast one too. My brother hasn't started reading yet and he's 13, he'll have problems BECAUSE he started late. Why start them off later when they can be learning new things instead of things they could of learnt years ago.
I got into reading by reading Harry Potter 2 when I was like 8 heh, after that I never really stopped. Half my vocabulary would of come from reading. (Bryce Courtney is the one to thank there)
:O:O:O
velvet
23-11-2007, 10:33 AM
Interesting, 2 is very young.
I started school at two (private prep school) :/ And I resent school so much now that i've had to leave. Though that was more to do with the people than the work.
I think seven is a bit late to start school personally, we're fine with 4/5.
Ugawa
23-11-2007, 10:55 AM
The younger you are the quicker you learn things, for example a baby could learn how to talk in just over a year, where as it would take years for a teenager to learn a different language.
Also it's not like the children starting school at 4 are being forced to do like GCSE level stuff. They are usually made to draw pictures and learn alphabet, It's not really rocket science stuff is it.
XX
Nia
Metric.
23-11-2007, 04:35 PM
I started at 5..
KnuxIBF
24-11-2007, 05:25 PM
tbh, If parents support their kids starting school later, and refuse to teach them to read or write, they're only hindering their kids.
cocaine
24-11-2007, 05:34 PM
for example a baby could learn how to talk in just over a year, where as it would take years for a teenager to learn a different language.
no thats because a baby is being spoken english to ALL the time.
in french/german lessons you only speak it once/twice maybe three times a week.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.