A suggestion

[Boonzeet]

A lot of people are asking about rating alterations properly, so I was wondering if anyone would use this as a scale:

0/10 - No effort whatsoever, probably little squiggles and saved as JPEG.
1/10 - Similar to 0/10 - Hardly any effort, maybe just a recolored all one colour habbo...
2/10 - possible a poorly shaded maybe isometric box. Maybe many pixel errors, maybe poor quality (JPEG)
3/10 - A bit better, the object is taking shape and maybe minor attempts at shading, but still hundreds of errors and mistakes - or all C+P.
4/10 - Shading makes a breakthrough here - but a lot of errors/poor detail and/or lack of imagination/effort.
5/10 - Your alt is Satisfactory. It isn't brilliant, but it's isometric (if needed) it's the right shape too. Harsh colours/pixel errors/stolen or C+P is common here too.
6/10 - The alteration now counts as good. It has nice colours to it, less C+P (although if pulled off C+P can look superb) and good shading.
7/10 - A nice alteration - Good detail, nice colours, brilliant idea/well pulled off. C+P can be used still to pull of good alterations
8/10 - Very Good Alteration - Nice detail, superb choice of colours, shaded well, more then a box, maybe complex shapes too.
9/10 - Amazing alteration - Brilliant detail, looks nice on the eye, perfect shading (but maybe a pixel error ;o)
10/10 - worthy of the status "elite". This alteration is flawless!

I don't care if you do or don't tho.

[Yux]

0/10 - No effort whatsoever, probably little squiggles and saved as JPEG.
1/10 - Similar to 0/10 - Hardly any effort, maybe just a recolored all one colour habbo...
2/10 - possible a poorly shaded maybe isometric box. Maybe many pixel errors, maybe poor quality (JPEG)
3/10 - A bit better, the object is taking shape and maybe minor attempts at shading, but still hundreds of errors and mistakes - or all C+P.
4/10 - Shading makes a breakthrough here - but a lot of errors/poor detail and/or lack of imagination/effort.
5/10 - Your alt is Satisfactory. It isn't brilliant, but it's isometric (if needed) it's the right shape too. Harsh colours/pixel errors/stolen or C+P is common here too.
6/10 - The alteration now counts as good. It has nice colours to it, less C+P (although if pulled off C+P can look superb) and good shading.
7/10 - A nice alteration - Good detail, nice colours, brilliant idea/well pulled off. C+P can be used still to pull of good alterations
8/10 - Very Good Alteration - Nice detail, superb choice of colours, shaded well, more then a box, maybe complex shapes too.
9/10 - Amazing alteration - Brilliant detail, looks nice on the eye, perfect shading (but maybe a pixel error ;o)
10/10 - worthy of the status "elite". This alteration is flawless!

I don't care if you do or don't tho.


That's a useless guide you've wasted your time in my opinion, and you've used the word 'maybe' lots so this guide isn't very clear at all.

So supposing someone posts an alt, absolutely but they accidently left a black line going through it so I rate it 3/10 - in your little guide "the object is taking shape and maybe minor attempts at shading, but still hundreds of errors and mistakes" - just let people vote what they think

Poor.

[Boonzeet]

That's a useless guide you've wasted your time in my opinion, and you've used the word 'maybe' lots so this guide isn't very clear at all.

So supposing someone posts an alt, absolutely but they accidently left a black line going through it so I rate it 3/10 - in your little guide "the object is taking shape and maybe minor attempts at shading, but still hundreds of errors and mistakes" - just let people vote what they think

Poor.


For the idiots. You said let people vote what they think. That's why I put maybe to put in a lot of flexibility. I didn't waste my time, this has been on my PC since 2005 and a lot of people have said it's actually useful.

Like I said, I didn't care about your opinion. Its a Suggestion. NOT a forced event. So don't rate me bad because you suck at alterations. In my overveiw this rates all your alts perfectly.

0/10.

Isn't that nice.

[PaulMacC]

Very good guide +rep

[Test:Tube:Baby]

Aaaaaaaaaw dont be mean to him Yux
At least he trying to be helpful <3

[Kallot]

Nice guide. :P

[Yux]

Aaaaaaaaaw dont be mean to him Yux
At least he trying to be helpful <3

Don't worry, he's always had something against me, any posts on a thread I've made are negative.

But never mind, it's a small online forum he's getting wound up on here.

[Boonzeet]

Actually no, it was you who was mean to me after I rated one of your alts 4/10.
So it's you getting wound up not me =]

Thanks for comments =]

[Bujin]

That's a useless guide you've wasted your time in my opinion, and you've used the word 'maybe' lots so this guide isn't very clear at all.

So supposing someone posts an alt, absolutely but they accidently left a black line going through it so I rate it 3/10 - in your little guide "the object is taking shape and maybe minor attempts at shading, but still hundreds of errors and mistakes" - just let people vote what they think

Poor.


I agree, Very useless, People will always vote their own way if they have the option too.

[Boonzeet]

I agree, Very useless, People will always vote their own way if they have the option too.

Like I said IF YOU ARENT GONNA GIVE FEEDBACK DON'T WASTE YOUR LIFE POSTING =]

Yeah It's to stop hate rates.

[PaulMacC]

I think it's a great guide and if you have nothing nice to say dont say it at all.

[O]

This will be usefull when i start to rate other peoples alts soon when i have the time :) thanks!

[Bibliophobia]

u did just waste ur time

but i understand

on hxf peeps giv like anythin 10/10

[Boonzeet]

even hamheyelliot got like 2 10/10 i was like :S

Thanks for positive feedback, I know i wasted my time but i did it ages ago in the hols when I had Nothing to do lol

[-Eyeless-]

I think its really well thought out and Its a good Idea, I think some people on this forum just dont have a life and feel the need to spend all day posting Mean, Spitefull and over-opinionated views because they have nothing nice to say... :rolleyes:

[Hiro]

I wouldn't say that they saved as a JPEG being a fault.
I can post jpegs with the max quality, which is better than anything else.
It just depends what program people use to save.

If you said "saved in bad quality". Then I'd agree..


Also, I think more people should say what to improve if they think it's rubbish. Rather than just putting "2/10".
=/

[3.141]

I wouldn't say that they saved as a JPEG being a fault.
I can post jpegs with the max quality, which is better than anything else.
It just depends what program people use to save.

If you said "saved in bad quality". Then I'd agree..


Also, I think more people should say what to improve if they think it's rubbish. Rather than just putting "2/10".
=/

JPEG is generally the worst quality there is. It's fine sortof when you save images in JPEG on vista paint, but when veiwed on an XP device it looks terrible.

[Hiro]

Mhmm.
I guess.
usually works for me. :o

[Catzsy]

It is a good guide but everybody's standards are different. Good graphics artists would be more critical than me who just knows whether I like the concept or not. I would not like to be restrained in what marks I give. :)