Bush claims victory as fifth Iraq Invasion anniversary nears..

[-:Undertaker:-]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7305023.stm

What a great victory against innocent civillians who never harmed or threatend the western world.

http://www.thelastminuteblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/bush-faces-of-the-dead-large.jpg

[jrh2002]

I would hate to see a loss and anybody who says it was not him settling a score for his dad would be wrong but the added bonus of oil helped. at least george bush looks after his own much better than our great PM and mr Blair. We love getting involved with things that we have no need to and now we worry why terrorists want to blow us up.

[Pyroka]

=/ It's silly. I'm sure the Al-Qaeda (which apparently resided in Iraq) never even resided there you know. There's many signs that they were in fact, based in Afganistan. The US is at war with that many countries, it's silly. There's many types of terrorists nowadays: Followers, Co-ordinators, Preachers, Extremists (well then again, that describes them all), but some actually hold a valid point sometimes. What would you do if you lived in a country, opressed by the likes of the US & (the assitance of) UK? I know what I'd do, I'd fight for freedom no matter what.

George Bush is just a idiot in my opinion. He's far from a presidential leader, and I'd much rather have had Al Gore as a president. He would've won too if it wasn't for Ralph Nader. The idiot. The war isn't a victory, it's still progressing and the battle isn't taking place in Iraq anymore. It's worldwide & George Bush wouldn't even admit to it, as to raise suspicions and terror amongst citizens would be a outrageous and stupid thing to do.

No-ones won, not yet. In all honesty, I support a minority of the preachings some of these groups hold. They hold a valid point in the world of today...

[Virgin Mary]

I thought that redneck was removed from power

[FlyingJesus]

I thought that redneck was removed from power

No he got smod and a name change

[GommeInc]

Gives terrorists a reason to bomb us. We bring it upon ourselves, really, to be hated in Iraq.

[RedStratocas]

'tis a shame really. the democrats in congress have done absolutely nothing about it too. we voted them in to end the war, and they've backed down on everything they tried to do it.

[lScottl]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7305023.stm

What a great victory against innocent civillians who never harmed or threatend the western world.

http://www.thelastminuteblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/bush-faces-of-the-dead-large.jpg

No of course not.. anyone of them could of turned into a terrorist.

[Nereo]

The whole thing with Iraq was just stupid and a waste of time and resources. Big mistake

[Wig44.]

I'm surprised that bush wasn't impeached for this greedy decision. I believe that oil was a large factor in this intrusion. not the only factor, but none-the-less a big one.

[Dan2nd]

When I was led to beleive Iraq possessed Nuclear weapons I supported the war thinking removeing Saddam was the right thing to do but my opinion has changed. The US Goverment think they have the right to label countries Evil and control whos allowed to own what weapons. Apprently the US is allowed Nuclear weapons because they will use them in a responsible way.... but countries who have them who they don't want to they label as irrisponsible. My opinion is that the only responsible way of using Nuclear weapons is to not use them at all! So whats the point in even having them?

[RedStratocas]

No of course not.. anyone of them could of turned into a terrorist.

you know nothing about the situation. the extremely large majority of iraqis are decent and hard working people, as many soldiers who have been there will tell you.

[-:Undertaker:-]

When I was led to beleive Iraq possessed Nuclear weapons I supported the war thinking removeing Saddam was the right thing to do but my opinion has changed. The US Goverment think they have the right to label countries Evil and control whos allowed to own what weapons. Apprently the US is allowed Nuclear weapons because they will use them in a responsible way.... but countries who have them who they don't want to they label as irrisponsible. My opinion is that the only responsible way of using Nuclear weapons is to not use them at all! So whats the point in even having them?

The point of Nuclear Weapons is to use them as a deterrent. If the United States Of America never had Nuclear Weapons and the Soviet Union did tehn no doubt the Soviet Union would of fired at the United States. Saddam Hussein did in the 1980's/1990's try to aquire Nuclear Arms to defend his country from future threats but failed and eventually gave up. The danger of Middle Eastern countrys having Nuclear Weapons is that if a crackpot gets into power in one of them countrys they will not hesitate to fire at anyone. I do agree with you though that the Bush Administration have obliterated the United States' reputation, which is a sad thing because I would rather have the USA in charge rather than the People's republic of China or even the Russian Federation.


you know nothing about the situation. the extremely large majority of iraqis are decent and hard working people, as many soldiers who have been there will tell you.

Exactly, infact there were no terrorists in Iraq until we illegally invaded the country.