Un-ban -:Undertaker:-!!

[Decode]

http://www.habboxforum.com/member.php?u=24233
He made loads of good posts, 99% of his posts were good, then he makes a few bad posts and he is banned for Negativity? He should be unbanned...

Edited By nvrspk4 (Assistant General Manager): Sorry guys, hate to break it to you but we don't ban by consensus, nor do we unban by popular vote. We also don't discuss specific bans on the forum. If you wish to discuss the rule itself in general, then feel free to start up another thread, I have no problem with that.

[Niko Bellic]

If he has a problem with his ban he should use the Contact Us button at the bottom of the board. ;)

[jackass]

Agreed.

[Decode]

Agreed.
With me or rambo?

[-Xiangu-]

Should be unbanned

[Dentafrice]

Should be unbanned :) He is a great guy

[Minstrels]

Unban the scouse!

[today]

He got banned for a fair reason, constant negative posts which Sierk posted anannouncmenet around xmas? (or little later i think..) so in all fairness it is fair.

I've seen loads of "bad" posts by him, not at users but Habbox.

[The Professor]

It isn't really a matter for users to decide, is it? The poll could show 300 yes's, but it'd make no difference.

[danandthe3gifts]

Unban the scouse!

Lmaoo, i'll rob ya tyres xx

Thanks guys, anyway, it just proves that this forum does stick up against things which can go the wrong way a lot of the time. x :)

[Callum.]

I agree with his views, but he is negative, which is what he got banned for. Not banned for having views, but negative attitudes.

[Decode]

He got banned for a fair reason, constant negative posts which Sierk posted anannouncmenet around xmas? (or little later i think..) so in all fairness it is fair.

I've seen loads of "bad" posts by him, not at users but Habbox.
You should be able to say what you want on the forum, its not some sort of dictatorship :L

[today]

You should be able to say what you want on the forum, its not some sort of dictatorship :L
You can within reason.

You can discuss Habbox how its bad and say how to improve it, take Jrh for a perfect example he'll mock Habbox but also say how to improve which is allowed but saying things like Habbox Rares are crap, bad and unreal is not acceptable.

[Slowpoke]

Lmaoo, i'll rob ya tyres xx

Thanks guys, anyway, it just proves that this forum does stick up against things which can go the wrong way a lot of the time. x :)

As much as I'd like to see you unbanned, it's not going to happen. Sierk posted an announcement a few months back stating members who post negatively excessively will be banned, it's fair.

[today]

*Removed*
Who is this guy?

As much as I'd like to see you unbanned, it's not going to happen. Sierk posted an announcement a few months back stating members who post negatively excessively will be banned, it's fair.

Thats the only reason why i see him getting banned tbh.

[Dentafrice]

As much as I'd like to see you unbanned, it's not going to happen. Sierk posted an announcement a few months back stating members who post negatively excessively will be banned, it's fair.
What about me? :P

[danandthe3gifts]

You can within reason.

You can discuss Habbox how its bad and say how to improve it, take Jrh for a perfect example he'll mock Habbox but also say how to improve which is allowed but saying things like Habbox Rares are crap, bad and unreal is not acceptable.

Actually I have said many times this forum can improve very easily, I hardly ever have a go at Habboxs' values since Jake does them and I don't really like having a go at him. I defend HHGS Values when needed, if someone says HHGS Green Smoke Machine is wrong and Habbox's is right then I will give examples of why it's going for less/more.

[-Xiangu-]

I agree with his views, but he is negative, which is what he got banned for. Not banned for having views, but negative attitudes.


A negative view is still a view and an opinion. So what if his posts are negative sometimes? It is basically saying "Always walk around with a grin on your face or be shot"

[today]

What about me? :P


Actually I have said many times this forum can improve very easily, I hardly ever have a go at Habboxs' values since Jake does them and I don't really like having a go at him. I defend HHGS Values when needed, if someone says HHGS Green Smoke Machine is wrong and Habbox's is right then I will give examples of why it's going for less/more.
I think its the fact you defend HHGS too far, and i guess you'll slate Habbox rare values but not your own as yours are "right".

Anyhow its not me to try and discuss why you got banned :P

[Decode]

As much as I'd like to see you unbanned, it's not going to happen. Sierk posted an announcement a few months back stating members who post negatively excessively will be banned, it's fair.
Its unfair, not everyone reads every word of the anoucments on this forum. I only read about 1/4 of them. This "negative post" rule should be added to http://www.habboxforum.com/faq.php?faq=rules_main

[danandthe3gifts]

A negative view is still a view and an opinion. So what if his posts are negative sometimes? It is basically saying "Always walk around with a grin on your face or be shot"

I agree, it's basically - agree with us or you will be banned.


I think its the fact you defend HHGS too far, and i guess you'll slate Habbox rare values but not your own as yours are "right".

Anyhow its not me to try and discuss why you got banned :P

I hardly slate Habbox's values, infact I often help Jake do some of them. As I have said preivously, I believe Habbox could easily become the best forum on all of Habbo and probably of all the online game forums. :)

[-Xiangu-]

@ hollywood

Honestly how can he defend HHGS to far? He has been there from the beginning of it so I think he has all the right to defend the site and it's values!

[today]

@ hollywood

Honestly how can he defend HHGS to far? He has been there from the beginning of it so I think he has all the right to defend the site and it's values!

I didnt say he cant, but i havent relly viewed him defended im just saying maybe he went too far and slated Habbox without meaning too a few times making it "anti habbox posts" thus leading to banning.

Or what other reason is there to ban him..

[jackass]

Defiantly should be unbanned.

Having views, no matter how negative they are (its his own opinion), isn't against the rules.

[dirrty]

just accept hes banned. whether anyone thinks its fair or not is totally irrelevant as what management says, goes. not the users.

[today]

Defiantly should be unbanned.

Having views, no matter how negative they are (its his own opinion), isn't against the rules.
But if they are leading to negtive views all the time about Habbox/Forum then it is.

Someone posted a link about sierk's announcment.

[danandthe3gifts]

I didnt say he cant, but i havent relly viewed him defended im just saying maybe he went too far and slated Habbox without meaning too a few times making it "anti habbox posts" thus leading to banning.

Or what other reason is there to ban him..

I was banned becaue I posted about the issue of ione Gifts, infact in that thread I actually said 'this isn't about Habbox VS HHGS, it's about the gifts'. :)

[today]

I was banned becaue I posted about the issue of ione Gifts, infact in that thread I actually said 'this isn't about Habbox VS HHGS, it's about the gifts'. :)
I havent viewed the thread but surly you was banned for other events as well, just that thread 'topped' it off and meant you got banned.

[GhostFace-]

unban him.

[jrh2002]

Ban the person who banned him :P

[today]

Ban the person who banned him :P
Now, that would be intresting depending on who banned him ;]

[-Xiangu-]

Tbh it would probably make habbox alot better!

[Decode]

Ban the person who banned him :P
I think it was mad

[Blue]

is it this announcement people are on about? - http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=441417

If it is it cleary says:


However we will be stricter with members that are ONLY causing trouble all the time, for example by repeatedly complaining about specific members, repeatedly making complaints without good argumentation, being rude all the time, repeatedly advertising other websites and repeatedly saying they are better than this forum,

[today]

is it this announcement people are on about? - http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=441417

If it is it cleary says:
Yes thats the one im on about :P

Ty for that quote.

[Blinger1]

weird, i pick fights heaps :D

[-Xiangu-]

Dan always had good reason to debate his view. He never posted just to cause trouble.

[danandthe3gifts]

I always backup my arguements whether it's against New Labour or Management. If I think Management are behaving in the wrong sort of way I will say and I will back it up with previous examples of their failure to listen to people. I only advertise in my signature - which is allowed. I also am not here to cause trouble because if I was I would be spamming the forum now with nude pictures and having a go at sierk. Some things management do are good, the recent updating of the site was long needed and I welcome it and hope it keeps going.

[Decode]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sierk
However we will be stricter with members that are ONLY causing trouble all the time, for example by repeatedly complaining about specific members, repeatedly making complaints without good argumentation, being rude all the time, repeatedly advertising other websites and repeatedly saying they are better than this forum,


It clearly says in there that people who ONLY cause trouble. Undertaker made a few posts that caused trouble, the rest were good posts.

[-Xiangu-]

Exactly so he should be unbanned. He always posted with good reason and never posted to cause trouble (purposly) SO UNBAN HIM

[jrh2002]

So he was forced to defend himself after immenseman was questioning him for no reason hes being negative towards habbox?

[Blue]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sierk
However we will be stricter with members that are ONLY causing trouble all the time, for example by repeatedly complaining about specific members, repeatedly making complaints without good argumentation, being rude all the time, repeatedly advertising other websites and repeatedly saying they are better than this forum,


It clearly says in there that people who ONLY cause trouble. Undertaker made a few posts that caused trouble, the rest were good posts.

Exactly what I was thinking.

[-Xiangu-]

So basically the rule does not apply to undertaker as he didn't break it. You could also argue that it is not written in the official rules and therefore doesn't stand.

[Decode]

just accept hes banned. whether anyone thinks its fair or not is totally irrelevant as what management says, goes. not the users.
Dont be negative or i will have to perm you :rolleyes:

[le harry]

i doubt this thread will do anything but it's slightly unfair i guess.


Defiantly should be unbanned.


what lol

[-Xiangu-]

Of course it's unfair he hasn't technically broken any rules

[Sixteen]

I think he should be IPBanned, let alone banned.

[Blue]

To be fair, the management can do what they like. But, it looks unprofessional if they ban someone for no apparent reason

[-Xiangu-]

they say they have a reason but with management these days "Reason" is a term used lightly

[Thetan]

*Removed*


Wow, and why would that be? Are you hitlers son or something?

[MissAlice]

However we will be stricter with members that are ONLY causing trouble all the time, for example by repeatedly complaining about specific members, repeatedly making complaints without good argumentation, being rude all the time, repeatedly advertising other websites and repeatedly saying they are better than this forum,

Undertaker makes posts that backs up his opinions with good arguement, he's certainly not here to ONLY cause trouble all the time. His posts tend to be interesting and contributes to the forum rather well, even if I don't always agree with him :)

[-Xiangu-]

Yeah. it is simply his opinion with good arguments to back them up.

[Sixteen]

Yeah. it is simply his opinion with good arguments to back them up.
But totally pointless, no one really wants to listen so why does he have to continue causing more mayhem? His practically bumping an issue whats already resolved.

[Nereo]

A negative view is still a view and an opinion. So what if his posts are negative sometimes? It is basically saying "Always walk around with a grin on your face or be shot"

yeah I agree with Jeeves, is it wrong to post negatively even if thats your beliefs and views. You cant say what you like if its going to offend someone but I dont think he ever offended anyone, seems unfair when you've got people on here who post occasional things that upset people but still carry on (not me of course :P) so I think its wrong

[Thetan]

But totally pointless, no one really wants to listen so why does he have to continue causing more mayhem? His practically bumping an issue whats already resolved.

No its not pointless, everyones opinion is welcome. He was not causing mayhem, and the issue is not resolved as a user has just been banned for stating his opinion and yet I see him still fighting to get unbanned.

[-Xiangu-]

yeah I agree with Jeeves, is it wrong to post negatively even if thats your beliefs and views. You cant say what you like if its going to offend someone but I dont think he ever offended anyone, seems unfair when you've got people on here who post occasional things that upset people but still carry on (not me of course :P) so I think its wrong


How dare you call me Jeeves. That is MY saying which I introduced to you!

I am google :)

I agree with above. It is not a pointless discussion at all.

[Thetan]

I think everything habbox knows about freespeech has been thrown out the window.

[-Xiangu-]

I think everything habbox knows about freespeech has been thrown out the window.

Habbox used to have plenty of free speech back in the good old days. Now it seems to be gone as you say.

[Thetan]

*Removed*


No, he did not do anything to GET banned in the first place.

[Decode]

*Removed*
On the basis that you have 31 posts and 0 rep power, and have been posting negativly in all of your posts, YOU should be banned.

[-Xiangu-]

ROFL. Tbh that goes with the apparent new rule.

[mlp16]

Un Ban..

If habbox ban users for not agreeing with habbox what ever happend to the say Habbox is a Guide not the Bible.

[-Xiangu-]

Contradictions are everywhere in the world of habbox :).

[jrh2002]

On the basis that you have 31 posts and 0 rep power, and have been posting negativly in all of your posts, YOU should be banned.

From seeing the posts I would say Sixteen is very similar to roboevil in their views :o could it be the same person?

[-Xiangu-]

No idea. Come again? what happened to Robo?

[today]

he resigned.

so why would he want a new account to post. Srsly Jrh you make me laugh

[-Xiangu-]

now now ladies, play nice!

[jrh2002]

he resigned.

so why would he want a new account to post. Srsly Jrh you make me laugh

Why would a new member on a new account suddenly start posting so strongly against undertaker? seriouly hollywood you make me laugh more.

[Thetan]

Why would a new member on a new account suddenly start posting so strongly against undertaker? seriouly hollywood you make me laugh more.


Why are you not doing anything about this whole incident? Im confused :S.

[MissAlice]

On the basis that you have 31 posts and 0 rep power, and have been posting negativly in all of your posts, YOU should be banned.

Interesting as they only joined the forum today, you are right, a high proportion of their posts are very negative. So why did they join today? Perhaps they have issues with a specific person here?

[-Xiangu-]

He did. He posted towards undertaker being unbanned earlier :).

[Thetan]

*Removed*


No your not.

[jrh2002]

Why are you not doing anything about this whole incident? Im confused :S.

What can I do? I am nothing to do with habbox
I see Sixteen is infact Earthquake and I only guessed Roboevil as hes not been sighted. I have read posts between roboevil and undertaker and they seemed very similar. Sorry :8

[le harry]

*Removed*
yeah okay.

[-Xiangu-]

At least you apologised :P

[Thetan]

Oh I see, your the forum founder, but you dont have power. No I am not being sarcastic, but I am surprised you dont have SOME power.

[-Xiangu-]

He doesn't his viewpoint may be taken more seriously than others but he is a mere vip.

[Nain]

He was banned for a fair reason? and no voting will change that, unless of course the mods are on the users side, then MAYBE.

but i doubt making this thread will un-ban him.

[-Xiangu-]

He wasn't exactly banned for a "Fair" reason at all.

[danandthe3gifts]

*Removed*

The temp ban was over turned and I have never been cautioned, you have no idea what your talking about.


No, he did not do anything to GET banned in the first place.

Thanks. :)


On the basis that you have 31 posts and 0 rep power, and have been posting negativly in all of your posts, YOU should be banned.

I agree, but then again I can't disagree? :P


Oh I see, your the forum founder, but you dont have power. No I am not being sarcastic, but I am surprised you dont have SOME power.

His power has been taken away from him because he defies what they thought. I have a lot of respect for Jrh. :)

[Qampo]

habbox managment dont make sense

[-Xiangu-]

Neither do alot of things in life but that is a prime example.

Here, have some rep.

[Meti]

Unban -:UnderTaker:- now!! :D

[-Xiangu-]

If only life were that simple!

[Meti]

Yh. Lol.
But he's a very good person. He just advertised a bit about HHGS.

[-Xiangu-]

He wasn't even banned with good reason.

[Plank]

It's like Hitler and the Nazis. Say something negative about Hitler or the Nazi Party and die.

[-Xiangu-]

Rofl. Kind of an exageration though.

[Niall!]

I voted yes.

[-Xiangu-]

So did I

[today]

i didnt though lol.

[-Xiangu-]

We have to keep this thread alive so Dan can be unabnned!

[today]

No we dont, he'll not get unbanned lets face it ;]

[The Professor]

No we dont, he'll not get unbanned lets face it ;]

He probably will tbh, people who are banned and kick up a fuss usually are. Sad reality :(

[-Xiangu-]

BUT HE WAS BANNED UNJUSTLY

Don't make me argue with you alex... "LOTR epic music"

[today]

But then i'll kick a fuss up...
He probably will tbh, people who are banned and kick up a fuss usually are. Sad reality :(

[The Professor]

BUT HE WAS BANNED UNJUSTLY

Don't make me argue with you alex... "LOTR epic music"

What's the name of that music? I downloaded it on my old PC but then I wiped it so my sister could play with it and i forgot the name of it :P

[-Xiangu-]

I shall send it to you sometime when you accept my call on x fire

[shizzle]

I put un-ban him.