PDA

View Full Version : Miley Cyrus apologizes for topless photo...



Kardan
28-04-2008, 05:14 PM
Miley Cyrus has apologised to fans for posing topless in a forthcoming issue of Vanity Fair.

The 15-year-old said that the snap, by photographer Annie Leibovitz, had not turned out how she expected.

She told OK!: "I took part in a photoshoot that was supposed to be 'artistic' and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed. I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologise to my fans who I care so deeply about."

The Disney Channel criticised the magazine for taking the picture, in which Cyrus appears wrapped in only a blanket.

A spokesperson for the network, home of her show Hannah Montana, said: "Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines."

However, a Vanity Fair representative told US TV show Entertainment Tonight: "Miley’s parents and/or minders were on the set all day. Since the photo was taken digitally, they saw it on the shoot and everyone thought it was a beautiful and natural portrait of Miley.”


I would post the photo but I have a feeling management wouldn't like it :rolleyes:

Javascrypt
28-04-2008, 05:15 PM
Cool. XD Nice one!

Pyroka
28-04-2008, 05:16 PM
PM ME PLZ. LOL. Nice of her to apologise tho.

dirrty
28-04-2008, 05:17 PM
tbh i dont see why she is apologizing for as she and her parents must have known the response they would get from these risque pictures. i just generally she is just showing her true colours, and not being a devoted christian, but a ****.

Markness.
28-04-2008, 05:17 PM
Isn't that illegal cos shes a minor ?

Wootzeh
28-04-2008, 05:18 PM
pics or didnt happen.

Kardan
28-04-2008, 05:19 PM
Isn't that illegal cos shes a minor ?

Obviously not :rolleyes:

I'll PM someone to see if I can post it :)

dirrty
28-04-2008, 05:21 PM
http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii311/lucky_jinx/miley-cyrus-vanity-fair.jpg

Kardan
28-04-2008, 05:22 PM
There's a better high quality version to be honest... :rolleyes:

Vanity Fair website.

cocaine
28-04-2008, 05:26 PM
http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii311/lucky_jinx/miley-cyrus-vanity-fair.jpg

is that it? LOLL

Wootzeh
28-04-2008, 05:26 PM
http://www.vanityfair.com/images/culture/2008/06/cusl02w-miley.jpg
/bore

Breakfloor
28-04-2008, 05:27 PM
PM me a link pls

edit: shes ugly. dont want it now ;D

Pyroka
28-04-2008, 05:33 PM
i... would not tap that.

Xarea
28-04-2008, 05:34 PM
what the hell is up with her lips.

Mitch4?
28-04-2008, 05:37 PM
I so would.
xo.
i really don't think it's being that ****** tbf.
I would be seen as arty if it wasnt a hugely successful popstar.

Javascrypt
28-04-2008, 05:37 PM
what the hell is up with her lips.

It was done like that to make the picture look well... I cant say on the forum. But you get the idea.

Con
28-04-2008, 05:38 PM
http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii311/lucky_jinx/miley-cyrus-vanity-fair.jpg
Lol at that... Its not exactly showing anything.
Like it said, Its a "beautiful" + natural photo?
Not revealing...Much..

Mr.Sam
28-04-2008, 05:40 PM
it looks like they have photoshopped her head onto the body of a 18th century portrait.

dirrty
28-04-2008, 05:41 PM
I so would.
xo.
i really don't think it's being that ****** tbf.
I would be seen as arty if it wasnt a hugely successful popstar.
i can see where you are coming from, but she is 15 and an icon for little children, so i think her decision to do these pictures were over the line a bit. this isnt the first shes had pictures of her which are a little mature for her age. e.g http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f25/golvy2/cyrus.jpg which i think for her age and her exposure, is a bit mature as ive said before.

Pyroka
28-04-2008, 05:43 PM
its a bad pic, ive seen better. *googles jailbait sum moar*

LOL this is vanityfair trying to jailbait!!!

Dan2nd
28-04-2008, 05:45 PM
The picture isn't really that bad is it?

brandon
28-04-2008, 05:45 PM
What a disappointment that was!

Pyroka
28-04-2008, 05:46 PM
i just realised why they might not be showing her... cleavage. she wears padding, its so obvious.

Abbie.
28-04-2008, 05:49 PM
OMG

its only a photo, people are like

'WELL THAT A LET DOWN'

god, its hannah montana, what do u expect

its not like any of you would stand a chance with her anyway

Xarea
28-04-2008, 05:50 PM
i just realised why they might not be showing her... cleavage. she wears padding, its so obvious.

miley cyrus is like, 9 isn't she?

Pyroka
28-04-2008, 05:50 PM
*HARTBREAK* im going to jump off a cliff bcuz of u. & 15 oli. never stopped some peoples lol.

Supersam
28-04-2008, 05:50 PM
If she didnt apologise she'd probs be fired from DC or something.

dirrty
28-04-2008, 05:51 PM
miley cyrus is like, 9 isn't she?
15 lol

Niko Bellic
28-04-2008, 05:52 PM
Have you even seen her sleep over pics? They're better. ;)

Abbie.
28-04-2008, 05:53 PM
Have you even seen her sleep over pics? They're better. ;)

OMG PERVE LOL

Edited by Hayd93 (Forum Moderator): Please don't be rude

Xarea
28-04-2008, 05:53 PM
Have you even seen her sleep over pics? They're better. ;)

it would be very bad

to ask you for a link please!!! now wouldnt it.

;)

Niko Bellic
28-04-2008, 05:54 PM
Google is your friend.

Mitch4?
28-04-2008, 05:54 PM
miley cyrus is like, 9 isn't she?

november 23rd 1992.
im kinda sad like that.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Niko Bellic
28-04-2008, 05:57 PM
http://teenscoop.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/miley-cyrus-strips.jpg

Theres loads more. Just check.

Pyroka
28-04-2008, 05:57 PM
RAMBO, LINK ME. dont be a playa hate guiz.

ive just realised, i sound bloody awful.

Xarea
28-04-2008, 06:03 PM
RAMBO, LINK ME. dont be a playa hate guiz.

ive just realised, i sound bloody awful.

yeah but we was all thinking "link me!!!"

Pyroka
28-04-2008, 06:05 PM
*cry* the guy side of me has come out... god. i think im thankful im never one of the 'lads' lol.

Xarea
28-04-2008, 06:07 PM
*cry* the guy side of me has come out... god. i think im thankful im never one of the 'lads' lol.

i dont care what side comes out, i just wanna see these photos LOL

makes me sound like a perv.

Javascrypt
28-04-2008, 06:09 PM
i dont care what side comes out, i just wanna see these photos LOL

makes me sound like a perv.

:o Lmao.

Edited by Hayd93 (Forum Moderator): Please don't post pointlessly

Mitch4?
28-04-2008, 06:57 PM
even though i love her
i lol'd
http://perezhilton.com/2008-04-28-separated-at-birth-93#respond

dirrty
28-04-2008, 06:59 PM
even though i love her
i lol'd
http://perezhilton.com/2008-04-28-separated-at-birth-93#respond
LOLL
im always on perezhilton lol

prada
28-04-2008, 06:59 PM
even though i love her
i lol'd
http://perezhilton.com/2008-04-28-separated-at-birth-93#respond
omggg i LOVE perez! complete legenddd.
and lmao god i dont see whats so wrong with showing her back?!

Asher
28-04-2008, 07:07 PM
why does she try and purport herself as some squeaky clean girl next door. shes clearly just as sexually curious and lustful as all the others such as jamie lynn spears.

Virgin Mary
29-04-2008, 07:16 AM
She looks 13 she has no ****.

Barmi
29-04-2008, 03:39 PM
http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f25/golvy2/cyrus.jpg

The most polite and respectful thing I can say is she's a little too young.

jackass
29-04-2008, 03:44 PM
I would.

:eusa_whis

Asher
29-04-2008, 06:26 PM
arghh lusty boys on a forum fantasizing about getting it on with a much too young girl.

lovely

Barmi
29-04-2008, 06:36 PM
arghh lusty boys on a forum fantasizing about getting it on with a much too young girl.

lovely
Taking into account the fact that the majority of the userbase are 14-15 themselves, it's hardly surprising.

I pity the poor girl... but that's what you get from public exposure.


Just remembered a relevant article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7364475.stm

Mr.Sam
29-04-2008, 06:38 PM
I don't see what is wrong with the photo.

1. children aren't going to be reading the magazine
2. it has an arty feel to it, it doesn't have a porn look.
3. you would see more if she was on the beach wearing a bikini.

Ashley 12344
29-04-2008, 06:41 PM
it looks like they have photoshopped her head onto the body of a 18th century portrait.

Haha it does as well.


Softcore at its worst. That sleepover pic has she just done a jog or summit?

Asher
29-04-2008, 07:04 PM
I don't see what is wrong with the photo.

1. children aren't going to be reading the magazine
2. it has an arty feel to it, it doesn't have a porn look.
3. you would see more if she was on the beach wearing a bikini.

To me it looks like a very young girl who is being exploited and sexualized. It doesn't look arty at all to me. If anything it looks like she's a child prostitute that has been glammed up.

--ss--
29-04-2008, 07:11 PM
Eww she looks like a ghost?

There may be no cleavage in the actual photo but for the photo be taken she had to be completely nude infront of the photographer at one point. Tbh what sort of parents actually let their 15 year old girl actually walk around topless infront of 5/10 random old men. This is all the result of bad parenting.

Also has anyone seen the other pictures of hers? It's a surprise she hasn't got a certain type of home video out yet.

I swear Melissa joans heart got sacked for doing the exact same thing for a magazine photoshoot?

Mr.Sam
29-04-2008, 07:35 PM
since when is someone showing their back prostitution?


To me it looks like a very young girl who is being exploited and sexualized. It doesn't look arty at all to me. If anything it looks like she's a child prostitute that has been glammed up.

her family were with her at the photo shoot, because the photos are digital they appear right away so the parents could have got them deleted, she didn't have to be topless infront of the photographer as she has the blanket to cover up, also the photo was taken by a professional woman photographer.


Eww she looks like a ghost?

There may be no cleavage in the actual photo but for the photo be taken she had to be completely nude infront of the photographer at one point. Tbh what sort of parents actually let their 15 year old girl actually walk around topless infront of 5/10 random old men. This is all the result of bad parenting.

Also has anyone seen the other pictures of hers? It's a surprise she hasn't got a certain type of home video out yet.

I swear Melissa joans heart got sacked for doing the exact same thing for a magazine photoshoot?

--ss--
29-04-2008, 07:39 PM
Sam, you may want to see some of her leaked myspace pics which were leached last year when she was only 14, She also apparently has some sleep over pics aswell where she is misbehaving ;).

jackass
29-04-2008, 07:42 PM
Same you may want to see some of her leaked myspace pics which were leached last year when she was only 14, She also apparently has some sleep over pics aswell where she is misbehaving ;).

She looks innocent on her shows, but you know all she thinks about is sex. Bad, dirty girl. ;)

Roxy
29-04-2008, 07:42 PM
Tbh I think she just looks ugly like that..

Asher
29-04-2008, 08:02 PM
since when is someone showing their back prostitution?

It's the fact she looks so young and vulnerable so it's suggestive of that.

Scarcely
29-04-2008, 08:03 PM
Lmao!
Topless?
I was expecting to see the lot!
Not her back.
Why do we have to be so prudish?

"Oh my goodness, some flesh. Tut-tut."

The media are hyping it up.

I accept that she's 15, and tbh don't think it's morally right.
But what's done is done.

cocaine
29-04-2008, 08:05 PM
since when is someone showing their back prostitution?

you know how it is, yeah, prostitutes showing their backs.. yeah.. ;)

Meanies
29-04-2008, 08:06 PM
I'm thinking some of the pics here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLvmTtZlEts&feature=related)are worse than that.

GhostFace-
29-04-2008, 08:55 PM
omg theres a load of pics of her being a **** on youtube

Pazza
01-05-2008, 10:48 PM
Nobodies posted them, so i will :P

http://bp3.blogger.com/_Wdg4HXjbaYY/R3PrVifQ2II/AAAAAAAAJtw/pzRM5hNy1P4/s400/miley+cyrus+naked+pictures1.jpg
And
http://lh5.google.com/fisherwy/Rup2EUm1i9I/AAAAAAAAIdg/Gf2pF64DTmo/vanessa%20hudgens%20lesbian%20kissing%20pictures%2 05%5B2%5D.jpg

They're worse.

I reckon theres a new Vanessa Anne Hudgens coming along ;S

FlyingJesus
01-05-2008, 11:17 PM
Mmm kids

bo$$
02-05-2008, 02:03 AM
I don't see anything wrong with the pics..

Evescence
02-05-2008, 02:49 AM
***** shes ugerly

Samishlol
02-05-2008, 05:22 AM
Bit stupid wasn't it.

Alkaz
02-05-2008, 05:40 AM
A 15 year old girl shouldnt be posing half naked for a fasion or what ever it is magazine.

shizzle
02-05-2008, 07:36 PM
She is skinnny.

Dusty-09
03-05-2008, 09:37 AM
Well I dont know, she shouldnt be taking those pictures, even the sleepover ones.

But its just a bit of skin?

But I'd think her parents wouldnt accept that, but they did. Just shows that people just want more publicity.

shizzle
03-05-2008, 10:15 AM
Yeah, I might be the next Vanessa Hudgens.

today
03-05-2008, 08:46 PM
Wow she sure is ugly and well a **** tbh.

candee82
04-05-2008, 12:33 AM
*Removed*

Edited by --ss-- (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not spam

Jord
04-05-2008, 12:38 AM
llool I dont see why everyones going mad in the papers etc its just her back its, like me showing my leg :rolleyes: omg put him away get him to say sorry.

Asher
04-05-2008, 10:26 AM
That's not the issue. It's the fact she posed topless, and she's suppose to be a role model for little girls - she obviously realised that, given her public apology to her fans. It wouldn't be as bad if she was older, she is only 15.

Ashley 12344
04-05-2008, 12:23 PM
Topless only matters if it shows the front if you ask me.

Backs don't do it for me.

today
04-05-2008, 05:08 PM
Why is she even a role model, i've never heard of her before.

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!