-Evilpenguin-
07-07-2008, 12:00 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7490346.stm
It has been ruled that the popular Pringles crisp is in fact not a Potato Crisp a high court judge has ruled.
So lets look at the arguments why the Pringle is not a crisp...
+ The pringles packaging is so odd, being in a tube that the product can not be a crisp.
+ A pringle contains less than 50% potato therefore it is not a crisp
+ The pringle shape is uniformed/strict unlike normal crisps
So whats the impact of this decision?
+ Pringles are no longer a crisp therefore they are no longer subject to 17.5% VAT charge. This will make more money for the manufacturers which will ultimately leed to lower prices for consumers.
It has been ruled that the popular Pringles crisp is in fact not a Potato Crisp a high court judge has ruled.
So lets look at the arguments why the Pringle is not a crisp...
+ The pringles packaging is so odd, being in a tube that the product can not be a crisp.
+ A pringle contains less than 50% potato therefore it is not a crisp
+ The pringle shape is uniformed/strict unlike normal crisps
So whats the impact of this decision?
+ Pringles are no longer a crisp therefore they are no longer subject to 17.5% VAT charge. This will make more money for the manufacturers which will ultimately leed to lower prices for consumers.