View Full Version : Strongest Country!
Karma
08-07-2008, 09:49 PM
Hey Guys,
Which Country do you think is the Strongest! By this I mean if this Country came under-attack they could fight there own battles without calling for back-up from allies!
I think India or China tbh!
What about you guys?
Thanks
Karma
Kardan
08-07-2008, 09:50 PM
America/Russia/China
All could probably wipe each other out... But I'm not an expert on the subject...
N-Dubz
08-07-2008, 11:03 PM
The biggest countries and the richest ones.
China possiably?
le harry
08-07-2008, 11:17 PM
norway
Loser
08-07-2008, 11:20 PM
Liechtenstein is probably the most powerful country in the world.
dirrty
08-07-2008, 11:24 PM
iraq are the strongest.
helenhiya
08-07-2008, 11:26 PM
scotland cos we'd just smack you with our whiskey bottles.
Janczyk
08-07-2008, 11:29 PM
It's China and you can't disagree with facts.
heartbeat
08-07-2008, 11:33 PM
wales probably.
Immenseman
08-07-2008, 11:47 PM
It's China and you can't disagree with facts.
facts please adam
Mr.Sam
08-07-2008, 11:57 PM
This alone should be enough..
(china)
fit for service:
281,240,272 males, age 18–49 (2005 est.),
269,025,517 females, age 18–49 (2005 est.)
if needed they could call upon their reserves by law which would total
342,956,265 males, age 18–49 (2005 est.),
324,701,244 females, age 18–49 (2005 est.)
Budget:
only $59 billion (2008 est.)
They have the higest active troops number:
2,255,000
However Iran have the higest number of troops:
12,585,000
But only have 545,000 currenctly active.
ToxicPaddy
08-07-2008, 11:58 PM
I think China is the strongest.
Agnostic Bear
09-07-2008, 01:52 AM
Right now? Russia.
,Rachyy,
09-07-2008, 03:34 AM
China.
Agnostic Bear
09-07-2008, 06:14 AM
Ok basically it's like this:
Whoever has the most nukes is the strongest.
That would be Russia.
Janczyk
09-07-2008, 06:28 AM
Ok basically it's like this:
Whoever has the most nukes is the strongest.
That would be Russia.
China are developing a sort of 'a bomb'-esque weapon which infiltrates people and sees if their DNA is that of chinese orientation and if not, they are eliminated.
True fact.
Oh and Jake, Wikipedia is your friend because you have no others :8
Inseriousity.
09-07-2008, 08:17 AM
As far as I'm aware (I no expert), China has biggest army. Geography teacher was like 'wouldn't want a war with them.'
Misawa
09-07-2008, 11:18 AM
China. China will, one day, take over the entire world.
JackBuddy
09-07-2008, 11:38 AM
Has everyone forgotten North Korea?
Joshuae
09-07-2008, 11:41 AM
America/Russia/China
All could probably wipe each other out... But I'm not an expert on the subject...
Bingo.
If it came to it these countries would stand their own:
China
Russia
America
Korea (North & South)
Japan
Although Japan seems a very quiet country when it comes to war.
They have a decent military.
Wootzeh
09-07-2008, 11:53 AM
france and canada
Misawa
09-07-2008, 12:16 PM
^ You joking...
Joshuae
09-07-2008, 01:09 PM
france and canada
France would be utterly destroyed by the worlds super powers like China, USA, Russia or Korea.
Same with Canada.
Immenseman
09-07-2008, 01:21 PM
China are developing a sort of 'a bomb'-esque weapon which infiltrates people and sees if their DNA is that of chinese orientation and if not, they are eliminated.
True fact.
Oh and Jake, Wikipedia is your friend because you have no others :8
norway
Okay I've done my research and came to the same conclusion as Harry. Norway are by far the strongest nation, they will control the world one day. :)
JackBuddy
09-07-2008, 01:26 PM
In terms of nuclear weapons, Russia has the most, followed by America. So they are probably the most 'powerful' seeing as 1 bomb can wipe out hundreds of thousands of men.
Janczyk
09-07-2008, 01:32 PM
Okay I've done my research and came to the same conclusion as Harry. Norway are by far the strongest nation, they will control the world one day. :)
Show me this so called Re-Search.
jackass
09-07-2008, 02:59 PM
USA, Russia & China.
:)
Yum999
09-07-2008, 03:17 PM
Estimates say the countries with the most nuclear warheads, in order, is as follows.
1) United States
2) Russia
3) United Kingdom
4) France
5) China
However, if push came to shove, I'd have to say China are most likely to come off best.
Immenseman
09-07-2008, 03:20 PM
Here we go Adam.. this alone should be enough..
(norway)
fit for service:
281,240,272 males, age 18–49 (2005 est.),
269,025,517 females, age 18–49 (2005 est.)
if needed they could call upon their reserves by law which would total
342,956,265 males, age 18–49 (2005 est.),
324,701,244 females, age 18–49 (2005 est.)
Budget:
only $59 billion (2008 est.)
They have the higest active troops number:
2,255,000
Janczyk
09-07-2008, 03:30 PM
So Norway have a population of over 200,000,000?
Jake, your research has just been abolished.
Virgin Mary
09-07-2008, 04:51 PM
A big army is pointless unless they're well-trained, like our army.
Immenseman
09-07-2008, 05:55 PM
So Norway have a population of over 200,000,000?
Jake, your research has just been abolished.
Prove that they don't! :$
JackBuddy
09-07-2008, 08:12 PM
Here we go Adam.. this alone should be enough..
(norway)
fit for service:
281,240,272 males, age 18–49 (2005 est.),
269,025,517 females, age 18–49 (2005 est.)
if needed they could call upon their reserves by law which would total
342,956,265 males, age 18–49 (2005 est.),
324,701,244 females, age 18–49 (2005 est.)
Budget:
only $59 billion (2008 est.)
They have the higest active troops number:
2,255,000
and they won't get wiped out by one bomb will they?
Immenseman
09-07-2008, 08:19 PM
and they won't get wiped out by one bomb will they?
nope :):)
Joshuae
09-07-2008, 08:23 PM
A big army is pointless unless they're well-trained, like our army.
The only decent-trained part of our army is the 22nd Reg. (SAS)
lPinoy
09-07-2008, 08:32 PM
I'd go for Russia.
Geraint
09-07-2008, 08:33 PM
I think that the USA are probably the strongest.
I wouldn't discount Britain from that one though because I think Britain have a bit more firepower than you think they have.
Just because China has a massive population doesn't mean they're the strongest. You're trying to tell me that a couple of nukes wouldn't destroy China?
Janczyk
09-07-2008, 08:48 PM
I'd go for Russia.
This ain't sweepstakes, duckie.
Jaykey baby, Norway have a population of around 4 million.
Joshuae
09-07-2008, 08:48 PM
I think that the USA are probably the strongest.
I wouldn't discount Britain from that one though because I think Britain have a bit more firepower than you think they have.
Just because China has a massive population doesn't mean they're the strongest. You're trying to tell me that a couple of nukes wouldn't destroy China?
Before the Nukes hit, China would've already deployed more.
Immenseman
09-07-2008, 08:54 PM
This ain't sweepstakes, duckie.
Jaykey baby, Norway have a population of around 4 million.
Have you ever been :S
It's a well known fact they have a population of up to 200 million Adam...
Geraint
09-07-2008, 09:00 PM
Have you ever been :S
It's a well known fact they have a population of up to 200 million Adam...
You mean 1.2 billion.
Karma
09-07-2008, 10:31 PM
C'mon guys its India! Don't under estimate India! 3rd largest Army, with more and more people going into service with a huge pool off doctors,scientists,computer porgrammers. Along with them creating new technology for there defences and for attacking enemies like Pakistan LOL!
ToxicPaddy
09-07-2008, 10:44 PM
C'mon guys its India! Don't under estimate India! 3rd largest Army, with more and more people going into service with a huge pool off doctors,scientists,computer porgrammers. Along with them creating new technology for there defences and for attacking enemies like Pakistan LOL!
But you are Indian, so your view could be biased.
Joshuae
09-07-2008, 11:12 PM
C'mon guys its India! Don't under estimate India! 3rd largest Army, with more and more people going into service with a huge pool off doctors,scientists,computer porgrammers. Along with them creating new technology for there defences and for attacking enemies like Pakistan LOL!
India has a terrible army. They are very badly trained. Very much towards the worst armies ever. So no, don't act biased.
But you are Indian, so your view could be biased.
Don't act as if you're pro with this please.
You really annoy me.
visa.
09-07-2008, 11:44 PM
everyone loves the numbers. they provide "an easy answer" that is not always necessarily correct.
first off, to confront the attitude that france is a weak country which it seems most british people have to some degree - incidentally, france is the strongest european nation when it comes to military strength. they have the largest, most intensely trained and best equipped army in all of europe.
second, it seems to be some sort of a fad that you guys are just picking up on that we need to all be scared of china and that they're going to take over the world. please, that was new about ten years ago when their economy first started picking up. china is powerful, and that is a given. in fact, individually they are arguably the most powerful nation in the world (but this is only arguable, and not fact). even if the thread is asking for a single country, china is a bit of a worldwide pariah and would be up against a force of nations that outpower them with ease. in addition, bigger is not always better. take belgium in world war two - such a powerless, defenseless nation was able to hold against the (huge, powerful) nazi army for days before they fell to hitler. china is not the be all and end all.
india is not powerful. they have an army that is about as effective as schoolboys through a two week training program equipped with some faulty rifles. they would have trouble going against a nation like pakistan - a country that is smaller but easily more powerful.
canada. granted, the canadians are known to have a small army and are generally the target of ridicule when it comes to military strength, the canadian army is one of the best trained armies in the world. canada has proven itself militarily time and time again throughout history. in either of the world wars, it was the canadian army that was able to win battles that neither the americans nor the british could win. take a look at the battles of ypres, the somme, vimy ridge, juno beach and the other highlights of canadian military achievement. not only that, but as far as a strategic nation physically, canada is probably the most important nation in the world. not only does canada hold control of one of the worlds largest supplies of oil, canada also has the largest supply of fresh (drinkable) water in the world (which is quickly becoming important). canada also holds control of the northwest passage, which is probably the most important shipping and military passage in history since the panama canal.
america seems to have suffered a lot of stigma since the begin of george w bush's presidency. without going in to any detail because you have all heard it before, america is still one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful nation in the world. poised to enter union with mexico and canada within the next fifty years, north america should not be discounted at any level. russia, on the other hand, is just beginning to flex their muscles since the fall of the soviets in the late eighties and early nineties. no one can be sure what to expect from them but it is certainly not a huge threat. their army has dwindled and they are dealing with one of the fastest shrinking populations in the world. their dated technology does not help them any either.
the bottom line here if a lot of people love to look at numbers and only numbers. sure, china has lots of fit to serve citizens. china also has lots of fit to serve underground resistance forces. just because germany was under the rule of the nazis during world war two does not account for the fact that thousands if not hundreds of thousands of germans opposed hitler and secretly sabotaged many nazi efforts across europe which was a great factor in the fall of nazi germany. there are many factors that play in to national power and just because china or russia have numbers on their side certainly does not guarantee either of them power of victory.
ToxicPaddy
09-07-2008, 11:48 PM
India has a terrible army. They are very badly trained. Very much towards the worst armies ever. So no, don't act biased.
Don't act as if you're pro with this please.
You really annoy me.
The only reason I annoy you is because I left you -rep for a comment you said about me treating my hamster badly, which I didn't do. I think the majority of people on this forum don't have a problem with me :)
On topic however, Russia has spent most of its money on defense so they would do good aswell.
Don't act as if you're pro with this please.
You really annoy me.
What's pro about saying the comment was biased?
ToxicPaddy
10-07-2008, 12:07 AM
What's pro about saying the comment was biased?
Meh, I would ignore it if I was you. He has had something against me but I don't know why..
Joshuae
10-07-2008, 10:14 AM
What's pro about saying the comment was biased?
No, he always acts as if he knows everything about certain subjects.
I was telling him not to.
Karma
10-07-2008, 11:23 AM
I think we would need a WWIII then to see which is the strongest country! I am not biased ok, I was only saying India because it is a very large nation with a huge population!
Also they are developing very fast! from 3rd world to 2nd world! maybe in a few years Developed country!
camera
10-07-2008, 11:25 AM
china or russia
PaintYourTarget
10-07-2008, 12:12 PM
Russia, purely because the manpower and resources needed to invade the enite nation and eliminate any resistance and set it up as a secure nation would be immense.
You have to take into account that people will fight more fiercely defending their homeland and families. That not all nations are flat plateau's with paved roads and moderate weather for you to march your army across. The Americans in WW2 would have spent years and thousands more lives Island Hopping to get to the heart of Japan like they were doing.
I think I'm going to go with Israel on this one - if under attack very few nations would be able to cope with the heat, the terrain varies greatly and their intelligence services are one of the best in the world. Add all that to well trained troops with good modern equipment and a great patriotism, and you've got yourself a fairly solid enemy.
Blinger1
10-07-2008, 12:33 PM
Russia, purely because the manpower and resources needed to invade the enite nation and eliminate any resistance and set it up as a secure nation would be immense.
You have to take into account that people will fight more fiercely defending their homeland and families. That not all nations are flat plateau's with paved roads and moderate weather for you to march your army across. The Americans in WW2 would have spent years and thousands more lives Island Hopping to get to the heart of Japan like they were doing.
I think I'm going to go with Israel on this one - if under attack very few nations would be able to cope with the heat, the terrain varies greatly and their intelligence services are one of the best in the world. Add all that to well trained troops with good modern equipment and a great patriotism, and you've got yourself a fairly solid enemy.
What about Russia? It is bloody cold during winter...
Germany will not be a strong country again I don't think!
Pyroka
10-07-2008, 12:59 PM
Ukraine.
They're strong, because they're neutral. xD
JackBuddy
10-07-2008, 01:24 PM
everyone loves the numbers. they provide "an easy answer" that is not always necessarily correct.
first off, to confront the attitude that france is a weak country which it seems most british people have to some degree - incidentally, france is the strongest european nation when it comes to military strength. they have the largest, most intensely trained and best equipped army in all of europe.
second, it seems to be some sort of a fad that you guys are just picking up on that we need to all be scared of china and that they're going to take over the world. please, that was new about ten years ago when their economy first started picking up. china is powerful, and that is a given. in fact, individually they are arguably the most powerful nation in the world (but this is only arguable, and not fact). even if the thread is asking for a single country, china is a bit of a worldwide pariah and would be up against a force of nations that outpower them with ease. in addition, bigger is not always better. take belgium in world war two - such a powerless, defenseless nation was able to hold against the (huge, powerful) nazi army for days before they fell to hitler. china is not the be all and end all.
india is not powerful. they have an army that is about as effective as schoolboys through a two week training program equipped with some faulty rifles. they would have trouble going against a nation like pakistan - a country that is smaller but easily more powerful.
canada. granted, the canadians are known to have a small army and are generally the target of ridicule when it comes to military strength, the canadian army is one of the best trained armies in the world. canada has proven itself militarily time and time again throughout history. in either of the world wars, it was the canadian army that was able to win battles that neither the americans nor the british could win. take a look at the battles of ypres, the somme, vimy ridge, juno beach and the other highlights of canadian military achievement. not only that, but as far as a strategic nation physically, canada is probably the most important nation in the world. not only does canada hold control of one of the worlds largest supplies of oil, canada also has the largest supply of fresh (drinkable) water in the world (which is quickly becoming important). canada also holds control of the northwest passage, which is probably the most important shipping and military passage in history since the panama canal.
america seems to have suffered a lot of stigma since the begin of george w bush's presidency. without going in to any detail because you have all heard it before, america is still one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful nation in the world. poised to enter union with mexico and canada within the next fifty years, north america should not be discounted at any level. russia, on the other hand, is just beginning to flex their muscles since the fall of the soviets in the late eighties and early nineties. no one can be sure what to expect from them but it is certainly not a huge threat. their army has dwindled and they are dealing with one of the fastest shrinking populations in the world. their dated technology does not help them any either.
the bottom line here if a lot of people love to look at numbers and only numbers. sure, china has lots of fit to serve citizens. china also has lots of fit to serve underground resistance forces. just because germany was under the rule of the nazis during world war two does not account for the fact that thousands if not hundreds of thousands of germans opposed hitler and secretly sabotaged many nazi efforts across europe which was a great factor in the fall of nazi germany. there are many factors that play in to national power and just because china or russia have numbers on their side certainly does not guarantee either of them power of victory.
since when did Canada fight in ypres, the sommes or other WWI battles?
RedStratocas
10-07-2008, 02:33 PM
depends on who attacks first. plenty of countries have nukes, so they can wipe out a country without anyone having any time to respond.
If it wasn't for the SAS, US military would be ****** right now, that was to Joshuae, in reply anyways.
I reckon China or Russia. But idk.
JackBuddy
10-07-2008, 03:22 PM
depends on who attacks first. plenty of countries have nukes, so they can wipe out a country without anyone having any time to respond.
I think it takes 6 minutes for a nuclear weapon to go from Russia- USA or something ridulous like that. George Bush has someone following him wherever he goes, with 'that red button'.
Joshuae
10-07-2008, 03:26 PM
since when did Canada fight in ypres, the sommes or other WWI battles?
US/Canadian battalion, fought in Ypres 1917/1918...
If it wasn't for the SAS, US military would be ****** right now, that was to Joshuae, in reply anyways.
I reckon China or Russia. But idk.
Yup. SAS are the most trained army in the world.
I'm not sure what post this was at though. xD
I think it takes 6 minutes for a nuclear weapon to go from Russia- USA or something ridulous like that. George Bush has someone following him wherever he goes, with 'that red button'.
Depends where in Russia.
32 Minutes East, 21 West.
The only decent-trained part of our army is the 22nd Reg. (SAS)
It was this one Josh ;)
But that and the Royal Navy is what makes Britain, Britain.
Joshuae
10-07-2008, 05:16 PM
It was this one Josh ;)
But that and the Royal Navy is what makes Britain, Britain.
Ah thanks.
Yeah, the TA are terrible, RAF aren't bad.
But our SAS, and Navy as you said, are the things that make Britain, Britain.
CJW93
10-07-2008, 05:42 PM
Germany
Freaks!
visa.
11-07-2008, 01:24 AM
lmao at whatever idiot thought that canada didn't participate in the somme or ypres or other world war two battles. first off, it was canadian soldiers that forced the german retreat at ypres (the first time for a colonial country to do so). at the somme the canadians got the reputation as the army with the strongest individual units ... says the prime minister: "The Canadians played a part of such distinction that thenceforward they were marked out as storm troops; for the remainder of the war they were brought along to head the assault in one great battle after another. Whenever the Germans found the Canadian Corps coming into the line they prepared for the worst.".
and i hate to bring it up again, but to the guy who said germany, the strongest military power in europe is france. no contest.
Monopoly
11-07-2008, 01:42 AM
I like to think that Britain isn't that bad actually. :)
I'm sure we could fend for ourselves if need be.
I was still under the impression however that America had the most advanced and powerful army in the world.
I knew China was strong, just didn't know it was a threat.
AMERlCA...
11-07-2008, 03:08 AM
America
everyone loves the numbers. they provide "an easy answer" that is not always necessarily correct.
first off, to confront the attitude that france is a weak country which it seems most british people have to some degree - incidentally, france is the strongest european nation when it comes to military strength. they have the largest, most intensely trained and best equipped army in all of europe.
second, it seems to be some sort of a fad that you guys are just picking up on that we need to all be scared of china and that they're going to take over the world. please, that was new about ten years ago when their economy first started picking up. china is powerful, and that is a given. in fact, individually they are arguably the most powerful nation in the world (but this is only arguable, and not fact). even if the thread is asking for a single country, china is a bit of a worldwide pariah and would be up against a force of nations that outpower them with ease. in addition, bigger is not always better. take belgium in world war two - such a powerless, defenseless nation was able to hold against the (huge, powerful) nazi army for days before they fell to hitler. china is not the be all and end all.
india is not powerful. they have an army that is about as effective as schoolboys through a two week training program equipped with some faulty rifles. they would have trouble going against a nation like pakistan - a country that is smaller but easily more powerful.
canada. granted, the canadians are known to have a small army and are generally the target of ridicule when it comes to military strength, the canadian army is one of the best trained armies in the world. canada has proven itself militarily time and time again throughout history. in either of the world wars, it was the canadian army that was able to win battles that neither the americans nor the british could win. take a look at the battles of ypres, the somme, vimy ridge, juno beach and the other highlights of canadian military achievement. not only that, but as far as a strategic nation physically, canada is probably the most important nation in the world. not only does canada hold control of one of the worlds largest supplies of oil, canada also has the largest supply of fresh (drinkable) water in the world (which is quickly becoming important). canada also holds control of the northwest passage, which is probably the most important shipping and military passage in history since the panama canal.
america seems to have suffered a lot of stigma since the begin of george w bush's presidency. without going in to any detail because you have all heard it before, america is still one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful nation in the world. poised to enter union with mexico and canada within the next fifty years, north america should not be discounted at any level. russia, on the other hand, is just beginning to flex their muscles since the fall of the soviets in the late eighties and early nineties. no one can be sure what to expect from them but it is certainly not a huge threat. their army has dwindled and they are dealing with one of the fastest shrinking populations in the world. their dated technology does not help them any either.
the bottom line here if a lot of people love to look at numbers and only numbers. sure, china has lots of fit to serve citizens. china also has lots of fit to serve underground resistance forces. just because germany was under the rule of the nazis during world war two does not account for the fact that thousands if not hundreds of thousands of germans opposed hitler and secretly sabotaged many nazi efforts across europe which was a great factor in the fall of nazi germany. there are many factors that play in to national power and just because china or russia have numbers on their side certainly does not guarantee either of them power of victory.
Prior to reading this I thought you were the biggest douchebag I've ever seen.. but now that I see you have some smarts, I take it back :)
Who are you saying though, the US?
since when did Canada fight in ypres, the sommes or other WWI battles?
http://canadaonline.about.com/od/ww1battles/p/ypres.htm for ypres
I'd probably say the us or something.
longlyfe
11-07-2008, 03:33 PM
china no doubt.. own any country
visa.
11-07-2008, 06:08 PM
thanks.
and yeah, i would say america.
Jordy
11-07-2008, 06:57 PM
Why Russia? The question is about defending their homeland not about the strongest army, nuke's are surely irrelevant if your defending your own country, that would be classed as attacking in the opponents country. Russia is the largest country on Earth easily by landmass. As your all saying, China's army is hugeeeee, surely if they took Russia from all angles that'd be rather easy, the bigger the country, the easier to invade?
America, Israel and UK would be my top three in defending.
le harry
12-07-2008, 12:26 PM
Jaykey baby, Norway have a population of around 4 million.
quality over quantity m8
Ashley 12344
12-07-2008, 07:09 PM
USA lol.
Although as said they'd wipe each other out.
USA is, IMO the strongest. Others are catching up, but their Economic strength alone is enough.
[Chris]
13-07-2008, 12:54 AM
Chrisonapolis would win
They have 9999999999999999999 nukes/troops/vehicles/weapons
WE WIN, even though our country is 1cm3 so nurrrrrrr
Anyway, i recon japan would be pretty dangerous in war, i mean they are like uber-smart and they have the knowldge
Also - UK is VERY prepared.. its an even split
Davii
13-07-2008, 12:56 AM
..Iraq..
visa.
13-07-2008, 03:52 AM
lmao do none of you know your history? japan hasn't had an army since the end of world war two ... they're not allowed to have one as set out in the postwar treaties and agreements.
and for the third time, get over all the british nationalism. if the strongest country is european, it's france. france has the strongest, largest, best equipped and most refined army in all of europe.
Daphne,
13-07-2008, 04:26 AM
Previously mentioned, but I think that
Russia, America, China - the whole of china are pretty threatening, but mainly because they're... huge and they're like little soldier fish; territorial as shiz.
I'd love to say Australia, but i'd be fooling no one.
Poor Australia- we got nothing...
Isaac
13-07-2008, 07:11 AM
America/UK/Russia/India/China would probably be the most strongest/prepared.
JackBuddy
13-07-2008, 10:26 AM
You could say that the UK is the best position wise, being an Island 'n all.
China
They like have so many people so they will be like
"WARRRRRRRRRRRR" lol
Swearwolf
13-07-2008, 01:05 PM
it aint rly about how big the country is, its how well disciplined and trained the army is... therefore i would say UK/USA
Davii
13-07-2008, 01:14 PM
Africaaa
Describe
13-07-2008, 01:31 PM
it's korea
BlueTango
13-07-2008, 01:32 PM
Russia
America
Sammeth.
13-07-2008, 01:58 PM
Switzerland!
Every country will just nuke each other until the only country that is left is Switzerland. Then they will take over the world, and one day we'll all be eating Toblerones for lunch.
Fact.
visa.
13-07-2008, 06:35 PM
THE UK ISN'T IN ANY POSITION TO BE THE STRONGEST. STOP BEING NATIONALISTIC AND LOOK UP THE FACTS; FRANCE HAS THE STRONGEST, MOST PREPARED, BEST EQUIPPED, LARGEST AND MOST POWERFUL MILITARY IN EUROPE.
for the fourth time ~~
Sammeth.
13-07-2008, 10:57 PM
I think the UK is the strongest.
Immenseman
13-07-2008, 11:04 PM
I think the UK is the strongest.
After studying I'd say that UK has the strongest, most prepared, best equipped, largest and most powerful military in Europe. Good call.
Sammeth.
13-07-2008, 11:07 PM
After studying I'd say that UK has the strongest, most prepared, best equipped, largest and most powerful military in Europe. Good call.
Where is France btw?
Immenseman
13-07-2008, 11:11 PM
Where is France btw?
Eastern Asia I think, certainly not in Europe anyway.
Sammeth.
13-07-2008, 11:18 PM
Eastern Asia I think, certainly not in Europe anyway.
Well I've seen facts before and that looks like one.
PaintYourTarget
14-07-2008, 03:09 PM
Sparta, clearly.
redtom
14-07-2008, 03:18 PM
THE UK ISN'T IN ANY POSITION TO BE THE STRONGEST. STOP BEING NATIONALISTIC AND LOOK UP THE FACTS; FRANCE HAS THE STRONGEST, MOST PREPARED, BEST EQUIPPED, LARGEST AND MOST POWERFUL MILITARY IN EUROPE.
for the fourth time ~~
Yes sure the french are going to rule the world, if it wasn't for the UK it would be germany now not france.
JackBuddy
14-07-2008, 04:25 PM
THE UK ISN'T IN ANY POSITION TO BE THE STRONGEST. STOP BEING NATIONALISTIC AND LOOK UP THE FACTS; FRANCE HAS THE STRONGEST, MOST PREPARED, BEST EQUIPPED, LARGEST AND MOST POWERFUL MILITARY IN EUROPE.
for the fourth time ~~
what is your source... wikipedia????
Browney
14-07-2008, 04:56 PM
THE UK ISN'T IN ANY POSITION TO BE THE STRONGEST. STOP BEING NATIONALISTIC AND LOOK UP THE FACTS; FRANCE HAS THE STRONGEST, MOST PREPARED, BEST EQUIPPED, LARGEST AND MOST POWERFUL MILITARY IN EUROPE.
for the fourth time ~~
i just cant believe those liberal wishy-washy French have the best military. and strongest isn't all about military strength. For examplre russia could cut off gas supplies and put a stranglehold on the rest of the world.
Virgin Mary
14-07-2008, 05:03 PM
We have all the commonwealth armies to rely on as well, seeing as the queen is technically head of their armies.
visa.
14-07-2008, 11:56 PM
first off the commonwealth is on the brink of collapse. second, countries like canada would have no problem whatsoever withdrawing from the commonwealth. in fact, canada stopped listening to british military orders back around the boer war when we denied to help you guys with our actual army when you requested us to.
meaning, the commonwealth is useless, dated and the uk can in fact not rely on any of the commonwealth armies because no country would put the commonwealth before their own national interest.
oh, and by the way, germany isn't allowed to have a strong army and france could easily overpower the united kingdom. they have a much, much stronger army.
Sammeth.
15-07-2008, 12:20 AM
first off the commonwealth is on the brink of collapse. second, countries like canada would have no problem whatsoever withdrawing from the commonwealth. in fact, canada stopped listening to british military orders back around the boer war when we denied to help you guys with our actual army when you requested us to.
meaning, the commonwealth is useless, dated and the uk can in fact not rely on any of the commonwealth armies because no country would put the commonwealth before their own national interest.
oh, and by the way, germany isn't allowed to have a strong army and france could easily overpower the united kingdom. they have a much, much stronger army.
Gosh, you are so nationalistic.
visa.
15-07-2008, 04:16 AM
uhh, i'm south african? i have barely mentioned south africa if at all. the fact is canada is about the most influential country left in the commonwealth aside from the uk which is why i used it. i am only in canada for high school on an exchange program.
-Wolverine
15-07-2008, 11:52 AM
US/Russia/China
pick any one of the above
Blinger1
15-07-2008, 12:01 PM
AUSTRALIA!
Sammeth.
15-07-2008, 01:47 PM
uhh, i'm south african? i have barely mentioned south africa if at all. the fact is canada is about the most influential country left in the commonwealth aside from the uk which is why i used it. i am only in canada for high school on an exchange program.
I was being facetious :(!
helenhiya
15-07-2008, 01:55 PM
Eastern Asia I think, certainly not in Europe anyway.
:S
france is in europe
Sammeth.
15-07-2008, 05:06 PM
:S
france is in europe
Are you trying to claim Jake doesn't know facts? Thats rediculous.
Ashley 12344
15-07-2008, 08:13 PM
lmao do none of you know your history? japan hasn't had an army since the end of world war two ... they're not allowed to have one as set out in the postwar treaties and agreements.
and for the third time, get over all the british nationalism. if the strongest country is european, it's france. france has the strongest, largest, best equipped and most refined army in all of europe.
Just a shame they get battered everytime ;)
China
They like have so many people so they will be like
"WARRRRRRRRRRRR" lol
Like Russia in both world wars, oh wait a minute...
:S
france is in europe
Since when?
oh, and by the way, germany isn't allowed to have a strong army and france could easily overpower the united kingdom. they have a much, much stronger army.
Like from the Treaty of Versailles? That lasted a whole of 10 years, before coming back even worse.
CrazyColaist
15-07-2008, 08:38 PM
russia or america.
DaveTaylor
15-07-2008, 10:35 PM
this thread is about the strongest without allies, america are out as they call the uk, and vice versa, russia call siberia so they are out the two countries that dont are north korea and china
Neversoft
15-07-2008, 11:43 PM
China. Jackie Chan would take on everyone. However, America have Chuck Norris, this is a close one.
Sammeth.
15-07-2008, 11:46 PM
China. Jackie Chan would take on everyone. However, America have Chuck Norris, this is a close one.
The UK has Alan Carr, so yaknow. Goodbye world!
visa.
16-07-2008, 02:06 AM
um babe siberia isn't a country .. LOL.
and if all allies were excluded the strongest country is america. china relies on importing technology and raw materials from other countrys to hold its power.
america has oil. america has water. america has technology. china has no oil. china has no water. china takes technology from other countries. i'm not american, don't live in america, but when you isolate countries the strongest is america.
le harry
16-07-2008, 06:21 AM
wow thanks for ur analysis colonel visa
visa.
16-07-2008, 11:47 AM
wow thanks for ur analysis colonel visa
if it isn't my cynical little post-stalker himself
hi bebe~~~~~~~~
Blinger1
16-07-2008, 11:49 AM
um babe siberia isn't a country .. LOL.
and if all allies were excluded the strongest country is america. china relies on importing technology and raw materials from other countrys to hold its power.
america has oil. america has water. america has technology. china has no oil. china has no water. china takes technology from other countries. i'm not american, don't live in america, but when you isolate countries the strongest is america.
What about Iran, or some middle east country?
le harry
16-07-2008, 12:02 PM
if it isn't my cynical little post-stalker himself
i'd probably lol more if i knew what you're talking about ;sssss
Tintinnabulate
16-07-2008, 12:41 PM
india is not powerful. they have an army that is about as effective as schoolboys through a two week training program equipped with some faulty rifles. they would have trouble going against a nation like pakistan - a country that is smaller but easily more powerful.
You don't seem to know anything do you?
India has never lost a war against Pakistan. They have tried to attack us many times and we have beaten them every time. We even had the chance to take over Pakistan twice but India isnt like USA and we just told Pakistan to back off.
Please get your facts right next time.
If you don't believe me still, go and read some facts first.
India has a terrible army. They are very badly trained. Very much towards the worst armies ever. So no, don't act biased.
Again, its not terrible rofl.
Sammeth.
16-07-2008, 01:21 PM
I think Birmingham would win.
JackBuddy
16-07-2008, 04:06 PM
um babe siberia isn't a country .. LOL.
and if all allies were excluded the strongest country is america. china relies on importing technology and raw materials from other countrys to hold its power.
america has oil. america has water. america has technology. china has no oil. china has no water. china takes technology from other countries. i'm not american, don't live in america, but when you isolate countries the strongest is america.
but america has no marmite...
GoldSolid
17-07-2008, 11:25 AM
North Korea...
helenhiya
17-07-2008, 11:33 AM
I think Birmingham would win.
but america has no marmite...
Are you trying to claim Jake doesn't know facts? Thats rediculous.
:L at all above
Since when?
im so sure france is in europe :S
am i being completely stupid here? or are other people? cos i've always been 100% that it is but people are saying it isnt :S
i got the bloody geography prize in my school, i cant have the wrong continent for france!!! :(
PaintYourTarget
17-07-2008, 12:19 PM
:L at all above
im so sure france is in europe :S
am i being completely stupid here? or are other people? cos i've always been 100% that it is but people are saying it isnt :S
i got the bloody geography prize in my school, i cant have the wrong continent for france!!! :(
Looks like you should give that prize to someone else Helen :)
le harry
17-07-2008, 12:38 PM
im so sure france is in europe :S
am i being completely stupid here? or are other people? cos i've always been 100% that it is but people are saying it isnt :S
i got the bloody geography prize in my school, i cant have the wrong continent for france!!! :(
evidently so.
helenhiya
17-07-2008, 12:46 PM
Looks like you should give that prize to someone else Helen :)
no way!!!!!
what continent is it in?
PaintYourTarget
17-07-2008, 01:06 PM
no way!!!!!
what continent is it in?
Eastern Asia - it was posted a few pages back.
http://jewbear.net/img/1216300457603.png
no waiii
17-07-2008, 01:23 PM
ireland ::P
Sammeth.
17-07-2008, 02:49 PM
Eastern Asia - it was posted a few pages back.
http://jewbear.net/img/1216300457603.png
Well done, thats a very accurate map. Can't believe people would actually think it's in Europe :S
helenhiya
21-07-2008, 08:38 AM
Eastern Asia - it was posted a few pages back.
http://jewbear.net/img/1216300457603.png
that's not where france is :S:S:S
im sooo confused!
this annoyed me so much i asked my friends and they were like "of course it's in europe" :S:S
Niall!
21-07-2008, 10:02 AM
I think that the USA are probably the strongest.
I wouldn't discount Britain from that one though because I think Britain have a bit more firepower than you think they have.
Just because China has a massive population doesn't mean they're the strongest. You're trying to tell me that a couple of nukes wouldn't destroy China?
When push comes to shove, Britain would hardly have enough power to overthrow Marks and Spencers, let alone another nation.
Kardan
21-07-2008, 10:11 AM
that's not where france is :S:S:S
im sooo confused!
this annoyed me so much i asked my friends and they were like "of course it's in europe" :S:S
Don't be so gullible :( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France
And since when did Mongolia get renamed? :p
Andys
21-07-2008, 10:17 AM
USA/Russia/China.
India? What the hell are they gonna do? Pray to there elephant God tellng him to kill us all?I'm not being rude or anything, just my opinion :). I would say America.
Hey Guys,
Which Country do you think is the Strongest! By this I mean if this Country came under-attack they could fight there own battles without calling for back-up from allies!
I think India or China tbh!
What about you guys?
Thanks
Karma
helenhiya
22-07-2008, 12:55 PM
England =]
i think you mean the UK...:/
Sammeth.
22-07-2008, 02:10 PM
i think you mean the UK...:/
I think he means England.
ideabox
22-07-2008, 02:12 PM
Cambodia by far! Woops, I've said too much...
helenhiya
22-07-2008, 02:17 PM
I think he means England.
cos england alone can totally stand up to countries like china. scotland is of some importance yano.
Sammeth.
22-07-2008, 02:44 PM
cos england alone can totally stand up to countries like china. scotland is of some importance yano.
Its called an opinion, he is allowed to have one. England could easily stand up to China, its the least populated country in the world.
ideabox
22-07-2008, 02:48 PM
Its called an opinion, he is allowed to have one. England could easily stand up to China, its the least populated country in the world.
Finally! Someone who knows the facts for once! <=D
helenhiya
22-07-2008, 02:54 PM
Its called an opinion, he is allowed to have one. England could easily stand up to China, its the least populated country in the world.
i didnt say he couldnt have one
im allowed one too yano, and my opinion is that his is stupid.
Sammeth.
22-07-2008, 03:03 PM
Finally! Someone who knows the facts for once! <=D
Im like a walking Encyclopedia :8
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.