PDA

View Full Version : New Search Site Attempts To Rival Google



Tom-743
29-07-2008, 02:51 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7528503.stm


Search site aims to rival Google


http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44868000/jpg/_44868826_cuil-cuil226.jpg The Cuil homepage is even more sparse than Google's

Former workers at the web giant Google have launched a rival search engine.
Called Cuil, from the Gaelic for knowledge and hazel, its founders claim it does a better and more comprehensive job of indexing information online.
The technology it uses to index the web can understand the context surrounding each page and the concepts driving search requests, say the founders.
But analysts believe the new search engine, like many others, will struggle to match and defeat Google.
Hard fight
Cuil, pronounced "cool", says it uses more than 120 billion webpages to build up its index of the information it finds on the web.
It claims this is more than Google uses though the search giant has stopped reporting how much it indexes. Without revealing numbers Google claimed its index was still bigger.

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gif
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif The founders of Cuill are former Google engineers and they obviously have a fiercely competitive attitude to their former mother-ship http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif


Rory Cellan-Jones
BBC technology correspondent

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/inline_dashed_line.gif

Read Dot.life blog (http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/)

Cuil claims that its technology moves away from the methods that have driven Google's success. Instead of just looking at the number and quality of links to and from a webpage as Google's technology does, Cuil attempts to understand more about the information on a page and the terms people use to search. Results are displayed in a magazine format rather than a list.
The company is also trying to set itself apart from Google by not retaining any information about what people search for.
Cuil founders, Anna Patterson, Russell Power and Louis Monier are former Google staffers. The other founder Tom Patterson worked for IBM and others on search and storage technologies.
By declaring its aim of taking on Google, Cuil joins a long list of others that have tried and largely failed to dent the search giant's market share. Other contenders include Teoma, Vivisimo, Snap, Mahalo and Powerset.
"The time may be right for a challenger," said Danny Sullivan, editor in chief of Search Engine Land. "Competing with Google is still a very daunting task, as Microsoft will tell you."


And another article about it http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/29/4-ways-to-beat-google-at-search/

--ss--
29-07-2008, 02:53 PM
Not going to happen lol.

Niall!
29-07-2008, 03:01 PM
Not going to happen lol.

Actually that search engine is really good, I'm using it over google.

Jassim
29-07-2008, 03:04 PM
I actually like the search engine, google still my main search though.

Kevin
29-07-2008, 03:05 PM
I've just tried it. works amazingly well. hope it overtakes google. which it wont but theres allways a hope :P time to buy shares boys

-Kevin

PaintYourTarget
29-07-2008, 03:10 PM
The "searching in context" thing intrigues me, but does it actually work?

Mr.Sam
29-07-2008, 03:19 PM
it was started by the woman who coded googles search, google bought her system in 2004 to upgrade.

Recursion
29-07-2008, 03:35 PM
I found it yesterday on BBC News, I still will use Google though haha

VPSwow
29-07-2008, 03:39 PM
Im still using google but it does have the potential to over-rule google.

360
29-07-2008, 03:43 PM
It doesn't even have an image search, does it? And on it's launch day the server crashed

HotelUser
29-07-2008, 03:55 PM
If it had a better name:rolleyes:.

Johno
29-07-2008, 06:53 PM
I really like this, quite an alright name too I guess.

I love the way it displays your results and I like the overall design of it compared to Google's monotonous layout (I know it does what it needs to, but I'm all in favour for a change!

Its really nice and all, but somehow I don't think it will overturn Google's popularity and success. Maybe if it had started earlier, but not now.

Tom-743
29-07-2008, 08:29 PM
If it had a better name:rolleyes:.
When Google was made it wasn't realy a good name?

Pazza
29-07-2008, 10:58 PM
I do prefer this, but i'm sticking to google, as it's alot easier to type than cuil, if you get what I mean

HotelUser
30-07-2008, 09:38 AM
When Google was made it wasn't realy a good name?

At least with Google I don't have to read an article to find out how to pronounce the name :P. Though good point..Google is a weird name too.

RyanDOT
30-07-2008, 09:54 AM
No-one can compete with Google.

Google is more famous than the Queen.
Cuil is like 0.00000.0% famous?

Stephen!
30-07-2008, 10:36 AM
Horrible way to produce the search results.

Jahova
30-07-2008, 10:52 AM
Cuil won't match google.
It is practically IMPOSSIBLE.

It hasn't even matched Yahoo or LiveSearch yet..

Tom-743
30-07-2008, 12:03 PM
Cuil won't match google.
It is practically IMPOSSIBLE.

It hasn't even matched Yahoo or LiveSearch yet..
Its only been out a few days :P Give it chance.

NN-Dom
30-07-2008, 12:11 PM
Actully, Google is a number - it just isnt spelt like that.

alexxxxx
30-07-2008, 03:17 PM
it looks good buit it's crap at searching.

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!