Man was ************ and killed 2 people

[Access]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7771299.stm

Drink driving at 120mph while giving himself one smashed into the back of a Fiat Punto carrying a man and his son killing them both only got 8 years for it aswell which is a ******* disgrace.

[Hiro]

LOL, what a time to be doing that?!
And you always get 8 years for drink driving..

[Access]

should have classed it as dangerous driving instead and gave him 14 years

[Minstrels]

Wonder how he got his Audi Q7. :rolleyes:

Shocking.

[Titch]

She be classed a murder and be given life.

[Stefy]

"The court heard that Hussain's erect penis was exposed when motorists came to his aid after the crash."

[Monopoly]

his punishment should be being shoved in a chastity belt for life. that'll learn 'em

[Virgin Mary]

maybe they mistook his nose for his penis

[Access]

Wonder how he got his Audi Q7. :rolleyes:

Shocking.

*REMOVED*


maybe they mistook his nose for his penis

hahaha

Edited by Yoshimitsui (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not post racist remarks.

[Stefy]

maybe they mistook his nose for his penis

Lol I laughed :lol:

[e5]

LOL, what a time to be doing that?!
And you always get 8 years for drink driving..
Er why are you laughing? He killed a 16 year old and a 47 year old :/

[Minstrels]

no doubt he owns a corner shop aswell
Corner shop selling illegal goodies which numb your sensors and slow down your reactions maybe. He was on the North West news around last year I think.

[Loser]

should have classed it as dangerous driving instead and gave him 14 years

No, he was drink driving, so it should be classed as drink driving.


She be classed a murder and be given life.

No, because for it to be murder, he has to have had intention.

[Access]

No, he was drink driving, so it should be classed as drink driving.

Still dangerous driving regardless of whether he had been drinking or not.

[Loser]

Still dangerous driving regardless of whether he had been drinking or not.

Yes, but it was dangerous because he had been drinking. Which is the difference between the two.

[Nemo]

Yes, but it was dangerous because he had been drinking. Which is the difference between the two.
Also because he was pleasuring himself

[Jordy]

Also because he was pleasuring himselfThere's actually no evidence of this, his Penis was merely poking out, so yes you would assume that but this cannot be proved so we shouldn't really accuse him of it. It could of slipped out when he crashed cause his trousers were low or maybe it was itching or something so he went to look at it, which then distracted him, thus crashing.

[Access]

No point arguing whether he was having a **** or not, in the end he still killed 2 people because of his driving and he should of got more than 8 years.. just proves the sentences are pathetic in this country.

[Fart]

I recon the good old rule should be re-inforced,
A eye for a eye.
Death penality pls

[velocity]

Actually, its manslaughter. As he did not initially have the incentive to go out and kill somebody.

[Wayne]

I recon the good old rule should be re-inforced,
A eye for a eye.
Death penality pls

Yeah, he was being idiotic but an eye for an eye and the World will be blind.

[Jordy]

Yeah, he was being idiotic but an eye for an eye and the World will be blind.Well actually if we all had the same 'driving' style as him all men would go blind, if you get my drift.

[wolfsburg]

There's actually no evidence of this, his Penis was merely poking out, so yes you would assume that but this cannot be proved so we shouldn't really accuse him of it. It could of slipped out when he crashed cause his trousers were low or maybe it was itching or something so he went to look at it, which then distracted him, thus crashing.
"itching or something so he went to look at it"

[Axel]

And they say men can't multi task, this guy can **** and drive.... just not very well.