Scott Parker ready to pen City deal

[bigdavecox90]

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_4745527,00.html

[BlueMoon]

Like I've said in the other thread, it's a ******* disgrace. :'(

[bigdavecox90]

Like I've said in the other thread, it's a ******* disgrace. :'(

What's disgraceful about it?

[BlueMoon]

He's earning over 70,000.
He failed at West Ham, Newcastle and Chelsea.
If we really wanted a player like Parker we may aswell go for Barry.
He's ****, dirty and hardly scores unlike Barry.

[Antallica]

What's disgraceful about it?

hes slow.
hes dirty
hes not been succesful at any club hes been at.

[bigdavecox90]

He's earning over 70,000.
He failed at West Ham, Newcastle and Chelsea.
If we really wanted a player like Parker we may aswell go for Barry.
He's ****, dirty and hardly scores unlike Barry.

But we wouldn't get Barry as he is staying at Aston Villa.

End of.

[BlueMoon]

But we wouldn't get Barry as he is staying at Aston Villa.

End of.
He showed the desire to move to Liverpool for the £££.

[Antallica]

thats not the point.
i think parker is a really lazy signing.

[bigdavecox90]

It's not a great signing but will be good backup.

[BlueMoon]

It's not a great signing but will be good backup.
Bridge is a decent signing.

At the moment we don't want squad players, we want starting eleven players.

[Antallica]

weve got enough backup :S

kompany
fernandes
hamman
ireland
M.Johnson

:S and now parker.

[Flamedragon3]

I'm guessing Hughes is buying Parker as a substitute, but if he wants to play him in the starting eleven, i'm guessing he will play him instead of Elano/Vassel? Which is quite annoying as Elano tries to play and has done excellent for us... At least were buying players for our club, for all we know he may turn out to be a success... :rolleyes_