View Full Version : Queen assassination attempt in 1970 in Australia
ToxicPaddy
28-01-2009, 05:01 PM
Some aussie republicans tried to kill her and Prince Phillip.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/theroyalfamily/4359649/Queen-and-Prince-Philip-were-victims-of-Australian-assassination-attempt.html
Hazza
28-01-2009, 05:07 PM
why does it matter it was like 40 yrs ago... :|
scott
28-01-2009, 05:11 PM
I'm sure its happened more than that lol.
ToxicPaddy
28-01-2009, 05:11 PM
Because it's only just been found out it was an assassination attempt, and she is the Queen.
yeah well nothing happened and it was 40 years ago. old :D
N-Dubz
28-01-2009, 06:21 PM
well they failed.
LoveToStack
28-01-2009, 07:34 PM
well they failed.
i was gutted to hear tht too.
Twist
28-01-2009, 07:38 PM
Nobody will care if it happened like 40 years ago.
MrGazet
28-01-2009, 08:26 PM
1970??? jeez mate that's ages ago duhh
PaintYourTarget
28-01-2009, 09:11 PM
What a lame attempt; Putting a log on a railway line. They didn't deserve to succeed with an idea like that.
Jordy
28-01-2009, 09:15 PM
What a lame attempt; Putting a log on a railway line. They didn't deserve to succeed with an idea like that.How? Logs have caused many major train accidents over the years, as the article reads, if it was going a bit faster it would of derailed the train into a ditch, likely to cause many injuries and deaths.
PaintYourTarget
28-01-2009, 09:18 PM
How? Logs have caused many major train accidents over the years, as the article reads, if it was going a bit faster it would of derailed the train into a ditch, likely to cause many injuries and deaths.
Yeah, but that'd make it look like an accident - no good for any kind of political aims or objectives...
and just imagine the meeting... "right chaps, we're gonna put a log infront of the queen's train! now, where's the Fosters?"
assassinations will always happen in monarchys, especially by people in the royal family, everyone wants the power.
mike475
28-01-2009, 10:07 PM
i think this is the most truest time ever this statement can ever be used on hxf.
old news.
Describe
28-01-2009, 10:54 PM
What a lame attempt; Putting a log on a railway line. They didn't deserve to succeed with an idea like that.
Then again everybody deserves a shot at the Queen. ;)
i think this is the most truest time ever this statement can ever be used on hxf.
old news.
It's very hardly old news as no one knew about it until now, it's new news, it just happened so long ago so that isn't the "truest time" that statement can be used.
Blinger1
28-01-2009, 10:55 PM
What a lame attempt; Putting a log on a railway line. They didn't deserve to succeed with an idea like that.
Quite frankly, it probably would have worked if the train wasn't going so slow.
It's very hardly old news as no one knew about it until now
People did know about it, that towns police department people :)
why does it matter it was like 40 yrs ago... :|
39 years.
Loser
29-01-2009, 02:03 PM
What a lame attempt; Putting a log on a railway line. They didn't deserve to succeed with an idea like that.
Indeed. If you're going to kill someone, at least be creative about it.
Jordy
29-01-2009, 03:42 PM
39 years.If you're going to start correcting people do it properly, it's actually 38 years. Two can play at that game.
Presumably something would of leaked out or some terrorist organisation would of claimed to of done it if there was a cover-up.
People did know about it, that towns police department people :)
Outside of that small selection of people no one else knew, it's not old news, don't even try start an arguement about this.
Loser
31-01-2009, 12:06 AM
If you're going to start correcting people do it properly, it's actually 38 years. Two can play at that game.
Presumably, something would of *have leaked out or some terrorist organisation would of *have claimed to of *have done it if there was a cover-up.
If you're going to start correcting people who are correcting people, at least have the decency not to make a catalogue of gramatical errors in the next sentence.
(This could be fun)
Edited by Wayne (Forum Super Moderator) Please stay on topic.
Jordy
31-01-2009, 01:08 AM
If you're going to start correcting people who are correcting people, at least have the decency not to make a catalogue of gramatical errors in the next sentence.
(This could be fun)Yes that goes for you too, you couldn't spell the most important word in your post grammatical. I don't correct people's spelling/grammar unless they correct mine, there was no need for you to step in when spelling/grammar errors were totally irrelevant and also it wasn't a catalogue of errors, it was the same error repeated three times.
Edited by Wayne (Forum Super Moderator) Please stay on topic.
Loser
31-01-2009, 10:58 PM
Yes that goes for you too, you couldn't spell the most important word in your post grammatical. I don't correct people's spelling/grammar unless they correct mine, there was no need for you to step in when spelling/grammar errors were totally irrelevant and also it wasn't a catalogue of errors, it was the same error repeated three times.
There should really be a comma after "Yes".
Edited by Wayne (Forum Super Moderator) Please stay on topic.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.