[Youtube] Nude Baby - Child Pictures ?!

[Laggings]

This thread deals with mature subject matter, and may not be suitable for younger people. Only open the spoiler if you can handle such subject matter.

Laggings and Habbox is not responsible for images/movie you may see on other websites.

The only links in this thread go to channels, not select movies.

Ok, sorry about the red text. Just had to put that so I don't get a bunch of msgs like OMG HE LUKX AT NUDE PEEPS. Anyways, on to the thread! If you open a spoiler inside this spoiler, you have to reopen this spoiler to see the spoiler you opened. Just thought I'd make it a little bit harder, just incase you didn't mean to click the spoiler...

Recently I recieved an email from a member of another forum, about certain child endangerment videos posted on youtube. I have to totally agree with what the email was about, and that's why I'm posting it here for others to debate about.

If you go on youtube, you're not likely to find a 'First Bath' video in your recommended videos. Hell, you're not likely to find them at all, unless you want to. I've picked 3 users that should be put to shame because of the movies that are posted on their channel. Now, don't get me wrong, I totally agree with taking videos of your child. I just think that these videos should not be posted on a public site. Some people post them on there for their family to see, I understand that. I just find it hard that they have over 20,000 family members at times.

So, what do you think? You think familys should have the right to post nude videos of their children on youtube? I mean, let's face it, I'm sure all 20,000+ people that just happened to search 'First Bath' just wanted a good laugh, right? Lol at anyone that thinks that.

Links are posted to the channel. If you're sick enough to want to see these videos, you're going to have to look for them.

Top 3 offenders:
Stux2c

Not much about Stux2c compared to others. Theres a few videos of their child 'CC' in the bathtub, with 'red water'. Whatever that means. Anyways, these videos show A LOT that shouldn't be posted on a public website.

shiplist

This one was different. Not really compared to the other 2, when their kids are above 6 months old, this one has a totally nude baby, which they in depth show wiping his/her entire body. And wth is 'wangling', because they have that too...

zflowerz

This one doesn't show any of the... 'lower' parts, but is equally sick. The two videos I saw were of the dad going into the bathroom while their girl was trying to use it, and videoing her. She continually cries and asks for the door to be closed. I find it repulsive that this would be posted on a public website. I mean, there is a little bit of privacy for everyone, right?

I feel that these videos shouldn't be posted on a public site at all, without the childs permission. And since they can't talk yet, it should stay no. I mean, what if you decided to go on youtube one day and found 100 videos of you taking your first bath, first potty. I do understand that most of the users of Youtube that happen to see these videos arn't looking at them and getting hot. But I have a hard time believing that 20,000+ people that view these have the same motive.


Now, I know a lot of you are going to disagree with me, and that's fine. You're not going to see -reps in your cp with '*** ED' on it, don't worry. I just want your honest thoughts on this.

As stated before, I didn't go searching youtube for these videos, I received it in an email. Photos, images, and videos are not the property of Habbox or Laggings, and cannot be held accountable for what you see on other websites.

Mods, if this breaks a rule I'm sorry. Feel free to close it if you must.

Edited by Garion (Forum Super Moderator): With permission of the thread starter, I have chose to remove the links to the videos as they could be considered inappropriate - the descriptions are more than adequate rather than the the videos as well.

[Four]

The only 1 i think is actually bad is the one with the baby in the bath when you see her fanny

After all there could be paedophiles watching it.

i was hoping to see a bit of the mums instead :(

[Laggings]

Well the fanny one was bad, but the one where the dad barges into the bathroom and videos his daughter when she asks not is equally disturbing.

And the one with the little little baby getting wiped all over has no purpose on youtube either.


After all there could be paedophiles watching it.


That's what I'm talking about.

[Four]

Well the fanny one was bad, but the one where the dad barges into the bathroom and videos his daughter when she asks not is equally disturbing.

And the one with the little little baby getting wiped all over has no purpose on youtube either.


didnt see dem 1's lol

[Laggings]

Well, that's why I said you have to look around their channel to see them. I think it's like, 4 - 10 pages back, but that's for you to find if you really want to. Most of the movies are of their children playing, vacation and stuff, but others are just disturbing. Get a private website...

[Hecktix]

I think mainly they are innocent, probably shouldnt be on youtube no.. privately on facebook or something would be better?

The one where the child is older and is requesting her dad to shut the door, then someone starts talking to her about merrygorounds -- blatent paedophiles.

[Laggings]

Yeah, that one 'shut the door' was the most disturbing thing I've seen in a while.
Privately on facebook would be better if they were just posting it for family who doesn't see their child a lot. I agree with everything you said xD.

Don't view this thread just for the movies please, post what you have to say about it aswell.

[buttons]

it's perfectly normal for parents to want to take pictures/videos of their children no matter what, especially if it's their first child. Big bloody deal, it's a human body, it's a baby, it's not wrong. I'm sure i've seen pictures of friends as naked babies :P when their mum tries to embarass them:D

The only 1 i think is actually bad is the one with the baby in the bath when you see her fanny

After all there could be paedophiles watching it.

i was hoping to see a bit of the mums instead :(
Do you think they would put their children up on these sites if they wanted them harmed? C'mon there's babies everywhere and if some peado wanted one i'm sure they'd find anywhere, not as though they're gonna track this one down, i doubt the mothers think it's harmful, they're just proud to show their baby off and why shouldn't they?

Well the fanny one was bad, but the one where the dad barges into the bathroom and videos his daughter when she asks not is equally disturbing
if the father was actually perving on his little child (i didn't watch the link) do you really think he would post it over YOUTUBE,where he'd be claimed as a peado like you're trying to say, if he thought it was wrong?

i see where you're coming from though, i would hate to see mine on the internet!

[Axel]

the only weird thing is people searching 'first bath' on youtube as if they were lookin for porn?

[Jahova]

They shouldn't be permitted on Youtube. It could be a Paedo's dream.

[Laggings]

First off, Thank you to Garion who took the links out. I was getting wayyy to many people viewing this thread just for the links.

Next, on button's response..

I totally agree, 100% that it's just fine for parents to video their children all they want. That's a parents right. I wish my childhood was video'd aswell.

I really don't think they're going to be harmed by putting the videos on the site. I just think that if they're putting their children on the site for family, they could do it in a more private way. If they have any other reason besides that, I'd like to hear it. It's not everyday someone feels like taping their child in the bathtub, naked, for the world to see.

If you did watch the link, you'd see how disturbing it was. I would exactly say peadofile, but the father was in the bathroom while his daughter was trying to use it, which caused the daughter to cry and ask/scream at him to leave, and he started talking about a bunch of mindless stuff so she'd be quiet and he could continue filming. It wasn't 'peado', but it was just as disturbing.

I doubt anyone puts videos of their children naked on youtube for everyone to see and comment on. I'm guessing it's for other family who want to see their child grow up, but can't be there. I just feel that there's a better way of going about that. I'd really be upset if I had nude movies of me in the bathtub on youtube :O


the only weird thing is people searching 'first bath' on youtube as if they were lookin for porn? Not all peadofiles want older things. I think 8/10 of the top FBI list is people that raped little kids.

[Jordy]

it's perfectly normal for parents to want to take pictures/videos of their children no matter what, especially if it's their first child. Big bloody deal, it's a human body, it's a baby, it's not wrong. I'm sure i've seen pictures of friends as naked babies :P when their mum tries to embarass them:D

Do you think they would put their children up on these sites if they wanted them harmed? C'mon there's babies everywhere and if some peado wanted one i'm sure they'd find anywhere, not as though they're gonna track this one down, i doubt the mothers think it's harmful, they're just proud to show their baby off and why shouldn't they?

if the father was actually perving on his little child (i didn't watch the link) do you really think he would post it over YOUTUBE,where he'd be claimed as a peado like you're trying to say, if he thought it was wrong?

i see where you're coming from though, i would hate to see mine on the internet!I agree, baby nudity really isn't frowned upon and is allowed on TV before the Watershed so there isn't anything wrong with them showing their babies on YouTube. It could be embarrassing for the child but that's slightly different :P

Paedofiles? They're not gonna track them down and they're not causing anyone harm by watching videos allowed on YouTube, if I was you I wouldn't use the word as you don't know what it means.

The girl being walked in on is just cruel and probably illegal therefore shouldn't be allowed.

[Hitman]

I searched the flowerz and the shiplist one to see how bad they were... the flowerz isn't too bad but it's not really suitable for YouTube... poor kid... and the shiplist one... unsuitable. I only watched the first 2 seconds and the poor kid was totally nude lol.

They should keep them as home videos, like my parents did.

[Laggings]

I'm glad basically everyone agrees about that little girl one. That was really bad.

Uhm, yeah, they won't probably track you down. I wouldn't exactly say 'peado'. People that get 'hot' over little children have a nice heaven in youtube though with this. (I'm not one of them, don't look at me like that!)

But you got to think, why would parents want nude movies of their children online in a public place at all? It makes you think about their motives..



They should keep them as home videos, like my parents did.

Agreed ^^

The user with the dad walking in also has a movie called 'Lisa's boobs'. WOW... :l

[Jord]

the only weird thing is people searching 'first bath' on youtube as if they were lookin for porn?


They prob do ;l

[buttons]

god damn i keep pressing add instead of watching it i hope i don't get any related videos :X
nah they're not that bad, look at the rest of the videos, looks like they're really proud of their little girl. Loads of perfectly acceptable videos there. On the one when she's on the toilet there's a reply there explaining what it was about when asked


do I do what often? the door wasn't really shut, daddy was telling her that if she didn't hurry up and got potty that he would shut the door. she was then 'telling on daddy' to me saying, "daddy shut the door" meaning he was going to. make sense? :)i think what she's saying is that she doesn't want her dad to shut the door and she's crying to her mum saying "daddy shut the door :(" that could be a cover up but honestly they were just winding her up and if i saw that happen i wouldn't think anything bad of it.

i agree with the privacy though but if people want to share their family life i don't mind.

oh and yeh i saw that one, "coping a feel" they just look like a family having fun, why not!

[Twist]

What the **** man?

[Laggings]

god damn i keep pressing add instead of watching it i hope i don't get any related videos :X
nah they're not that bad, look at the rest of the videos, looks like they're really proud of their little girl. Loads of perfectly acceptable videos there. On the one when she's on the toilet there's a reply there explaining what it was about when asked

i think what she's saying is that she doesn't want her dad to shut the door and she's crying to her mum saying "daddy shut the door :(" that could be a cover up but honestly they were just winding her up and if i saw that happen i wouldn't think anything bad of it.

i agree with the privacy though but if people want to share their family life i don't mind.

oh and yeh i saw that one, "coping a feel" they just look like a family having fun, why not!

They also egg her on in 2+ other videos, 'Flowers Best Fit' and another one, which makes me think that what he said was just a cover up. And Yes, I agree. Loads of amazing 'acceptable' videos have been posted by all 3 of the users I pointed out. But what I'm concerned with, are the ones that arn't acceptable, or shouldn't be. I don't it's it's right to post a full body nude shot of your 6 month girl in the tub, taking a crap, or wiping her off. Atleast not on a public website where any lowlife, scumbag, sick person that gets hot on little kids, can just search for a couple of terms and find loads of this stuff. If they wan't to post those videos, post them on a private website, where only the people they want to view them can. But yeah, the coping a feel was ok, yeah :)

EDIT: 'Throwing of Children' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6JWPylXbcQ&feature=related
If they missed, that would be bad.

[Kardan]

I don't think it should be allowed, no - but I don't think parents are doing it just so they can let disgusting people watch them for sick reasons - for all we know it could be a mother with a new born baby uploading a video for their dad to see who works abroad or something - I don't think that they fully understand the severity of it maybe? I mean, my parents have tons of videos with me naked and photos - but they're sensible enough not to post it on the internet... Maybe it's that some parents jsut don't see... that side to things.

[Laggings]

Exactly what I've been saying Kardan. They post it for family who can't see, but they don't post it in a private website, like facebook. I think it could be handled differently.

[buttons]

They also egg her on in 2+ other videos, 'Flowers Best Fit' and another one, which makes me think that what he said was just a cover up. And Yes, I agree. Loads of amazing 'acceptable' videos have been posted by all 3 of the users I pointed out. But what I'm concerned with, are the ones that arn't acceptable, or shouldn't be. I don't it's it's right to post a full body nude shot of your 6 month girl in the tub, taking a crap, or wiping her off. Atleast not on a public website where any lowlife, scumbag, sick person that gets hot on little kids, can just search for a couple of terms and find loads of this stuff. If they wan't to post those videos, post them on a private website, where only the people they want to view them can. But yeah, the coping a feel was ok, yeah :)

EDIT: 'Throwing of Children' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6JWPylXbcQ&feature=related
If they missed, that would be bad.
that video actually brought a smile to my face lol :D:D:D
you can see how careful they're being and the kids enjoy it! my dad used to do that to me, obviously it's stupid but jeeeeeeez i wouldn't mind. They're all laughing, it's cute!!
maybe i just see different sides of things but it could be worse, & yehhh i do agree it shouldn't be public but if they wanna show their kids off no-one should stop them.

[Laggings]

Yes, it could be a lot worse. And I agree, they were being careful ;D

[Twist]

They also egg her on in 2+ other videos, 'Flowers Best Fit' and another one, which makes me think that what he said was just a cover up. And Yes, I agree. Loads of amazing 'acceptable' videos have been posted by all 3 of the users I pointed out. But what I'm concerned with, are the ones that arn't acceptable, or shouldn't be. I don't it's it's right to post a full body nude shot of your 6 month girl in the tub, taking a crap, or wiping her off. Atleast not on a public website where any lowlife, scumbag, sick person that gets hot on little kids, can just search for a couple of terms and find loads of this stuff. If they wan't to post those videos, post them on a private website, where only the people they want to view them can. But yeah, the coping a feel was ok, yeah :)

EDIT: 'Throwing of Children' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6JWPylXbcQ&feature=related
If they missed, that would be bad.
Idiots.

[Laggings]

It did look scary, but they were being carful at least.

Edit: Not going to post the link(s), but why in the world do parents post videos of the crap in their babies diapers? It's repulsive!

[Twist]

It did look scary, but they were being carful at least.
Doesn't matter - only takes one slip. Did you see how tall that girl was? Looked like a bloody Oompa Loompa and they were still chucking her.

[Laggings]

Yes I did. And that's why I posted it. 1 slip and 'crack'.

[brandon]

Oh well, it's the parents choice and if I was on YouTube when I was that age, naked. I think I'd find it hilarious.

[Laggings]

I'd be embarassed :(
Wd on Features Manager btw brandon!

[Virgin Mary]

You're overreacting. It's not like a pedo can do anything by watching a video. If they didn't do that they'd probably just go out and rape a child.

[Laggings]

I wasn't the one that brought up peado. I was just pointing out the fact that they could post these more privatley.

[Nli.]

I don't like this what so ever, I could only manage to watch the first few seconds of one. But I think these should be removed? or the users warned? because YouTube are removing silly videos that break copyright laws, but they allow this. It's sick tbh, I know famlies might want to share this with other relatives. But not like this, there is a private option on videos... why not use that. Are the parents brain dead or something?

[buttons]

yes, the human body, disgusting!!!!!!!

[Laggings]

Human body = Not disgusting.

If your body is posted without you saying so = Wrong

If you know it's going to be posted, and allow it = Fine.