Log in

View Full Version : Drag me to hell



Andeeh
18-05-2009, 07:06 PM
Has anyone seen this advert for it? and is anyone going to see it?

i think it looks pretty alright and might watch it :)

Marucho
18-05-2009, 10:22 PM
Me nd my mum wanna see this lol. Look's good actually. From makers of Spidey 3 so it should be fine :D

Stephen!
18-05-2009, 10:30 PM
Saw the trailer in the cinema today. Looked so cheesy everybody was laughing.

Marucho
18-05-2009, 10:38 PM
Saw the trailer in the cinema today. Looked so cheesy everybody was laughing.

LOL that would be so funny. Usually if theres jumpy bits they get away with it

Misawa
19-05-2009, 06:10 PM
Read the script, it's good. Just a return to form for Sam Raimi with a low budget, treading the water ready for his next installment in the Evil Dead series, the trilogy far better than his Spider-man venture.

GrandTheftAudio
28-05-2009, 01:12 PM
went to see this today. it was well good. proper jumpy and creepy :( the ending.. OMG D:

Misawa
28-05-2009, 03:39 PM
Saw it yesterday. A good return to horror form for Sam Raimi. Now I look forward to his next Evil Dead film.

eight
28-05-2009, 03:50 PM
Seen the trailer it looks pretty decent, might go watch it :)

Skajo
07-06-2009, 07:44 PM
Read the script, it's good. Just a return to form for Sam Raimi with a low budget, treading the water ready for his next installment in the Evil Dead series, the trilogy far better than his Spider-man venture.
Drag me to hell is ****. Absolute ****. Is it meant to be a comedy? At least that way it'd have some sort of value. It was very, very, very poor and I felt robbed of my money to be honest. The story doesn't make much sense and the acting is stupid (i.e - when she gets thrown around the bedroom and crashes into the wardrobe she - when you get a close up of her face, she starts smiling - wth?).

Poor film.

Misawa
07-06-2009, 07:58 PM
Drag me to hell is ****. Absolute ****. Is it meant to be a comedy? At least that way it'd have some sort of value. It was very, very, very poor and I felt robbed of my money to be honest. The story doesn't make much sense and the acting is stupid (i.e - when she gets thrown around the bedroom and crashes into the wardrobe she - when you get a close up of her face, she starts smiling - wth?).

Poor film.

It's a Sam Raimi film. You should never take his pictures seriously. Look at his first trilogy - the legendary Evil Dead. Comedy horror, like Drag Me To Hell was supposed to be. You are supposed to laugh and you're supposed to jump. I guess no one will understand the director if they have had the misfortune not to have seen the Evil Dead trilogy.

Skajo
07-06-2009, 08:06 PM
It really doesn't say comedy in the genre column of the film, but if you say it's meant to be funny then it must be true - that gives the film little, if any credibility. It's poor. If you haven't got the budget to make a good film - don't pissing make one because you're just ripping people off. I couldn't care if he was Steven Spielberg - the film was terrible.

Misawa
07-06-2009, 08:18 PM
He made all three Evil Dead films with a very low budget, yet they're brilliant. After being at the directorial helm of a trilogy that cost over 400 million (Spider-man), and another on the way, I think it's fair to say a film-maker who came from very modest roots wanted to make a small film like Drag Me To Hell. More often than not, lower budget films are actually superior to films that are all gloss and no substance. Nevertheless, that's your opinion.

Skajo
07-06-2009, 08:23 PM
I don't care how good the Evil Dead films were, Drag me to hell is not Evil Dead.

Misawa
07-06-2009, 08:27 PM
No, it isn't, but it's a comedy-horror that is in the same vein as the Evil Dead trilogy. As I said earlier, a return to horror form for Raimi. Obviously, you didn't like the film, but it's had a lot of very positive reviews, and I enjoyed it.

mangle
07-06-2009, 08:32 PM
I liked it, it was a bit weird at the first but once you realise not to take it as a proper scary film, I'd say it's good. The girl in it was cute as well :)

Swinkid
07-06-2009, 09:28 PM
wut certificate is it - looks interesting..

Misawa
07-06-2009, 09:37 PM
It's a 15. I was disappointed when I heard it wasn't an 18, but you'd be surprised at how much the film-makers get away with given the certificate.

Skajo
07-06-2009, 10:01 PM
It's a 15. I was disappointed when I heard it wasn't an 18, but you'd be surprised at how much the film-makers get away with given the certificate.
I think that's the only thing we agree on with this film.

Misawa
08-06-2009, 12:00 AM
Someone gave me -rep for this thread? :rolleyes:

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!