PDA

View Full Version : UploadPicz V2 Beta


Hecktix
19-06-2009, 01:24 AM
Looking a lot better than the old one.
Lot more profesional, more user friendly.

Well done Jin :)
AgnesIO
19-06-2009, 06:57 AM
The new site looks really professional - I have even made an account (I didn't with the old site, as it looked crap :P - the uploader probably wasn't but the skin ruined it!)
PaulMacC
19-06-2009, 07:22 AM
I agree, well done Jin (:
Xarea
19-06-2009, 08:10 AM
Not so great support for a Mac. Works, but barely.
scott
19-06-2009, 08:14 AM
presume we lost all the images we had uploaded :(
Flisker
19-06-2009, 09:43 AM
presume we lost all the images we had uploaded :(


Unfortunatly due to the massive changes to the system we haven't been able to import your old files into the new system. Rest assure that all old files previously uploaded on uploadpicz will still continue to function.

They will still work.
scott
19-06-2009, 09:52 AM
I see i didn't read that before :D
Wootzeh
19-06-2009, 10:48 AM
The images on the homepage need to be redone.
Samishlol
19-06-2009, 10:53 AM
Someone link me ?
scott
19-06-2009, 10:56 AM
Someone link me ?
www.uploadpicz.com lol
Immenseman
19-06-2009, 11:03 AM
looks good :3 well done jinny
Hazza
19-06-2009, 11:10 AM
Well done to the graphics staff also for the banner ;)
aha.

And yes, it looks MILES better :)
Favourtism
19-06-2009, 11:54 AM
Well done to the graphics staff also for the banner ;)
aha.

And yes, it looks MILES better :)
No offence but the banner is the worst part; it's extremely blurry and needs a logo etc
N!ck
19-06-2009, 12:07 PM
It's great, well done.

One suggestion though. On the "home" bit where you upload the images could you make it so that there were multiple upload boxes by default (say 3) instead of having to click add, and then you can of course add more. As a registered users feature.
lick
19-06-2009, 12:53 PM
Well done to the graphics staff also for the banner ;)
aha.

And yes, it looks MILES better :)


No offence but the banner is the worst part; it's extremely blurry and needs a logo etc

Yeah i know all the graphics are crap, sorry lol
Plank
19-06-2009, 01:49 PM
Loads better than the old one. Although, I don't really like the banner and the big chunks of text at the top (the site news and intro paragraph) because it means I have to scroll down.
Hazza
19-06-2009, 03:14 PM
I personally, thought it looked blurry and I don't know why - I think its the odd shadowing...
I like the background, writing and the concept but it has been blurred somehow.
buttons
19-06-2009, 03:24 PM
o.o i don't like it. it looks like one of those sites you stumble on by accident, when you click an add by mistake or something. it's better than before yeah but not much, i only really like the part where the text is smaller and green.
Immenseman
19-06-2009, 03:25 PM
when i went to upload an image and i c+p to show a screenie on here. it didn't work? error? or am i doing it wrong lol
Jin
19-06-2009, 03:25 PM
Loads better than the old one. Although, I don't really like the banner and the big chunks of text at the top (the site news and intro paragraph) because it means I have to scroll down.

This will be removed after a few days after all there isn't really much news for a static content site.

http://www.uploadpicz.com/images/8888.jpg (http://www.uploadpicz.com/view-8888.jpg)

Your not doing it right Mr Immenseman.
AgnesIO
19-06-2009, 03:28 PM
No offence but the banner is the worst part; it's extremely blurry and needs a logo etc

Without the banner the site would look crap still..

And mwah if you can do better, I am sure Jin and the Graphics team would love to hear from you.. ;)
Frank459
19-06-2009, 03:32 PM
The blurryness is something to do with the font used. Should the font be changed the edges will be all straight and jagged.

Overall im liking the new look of it and how swiftly Jin was able to recreate the system. Go you!
lick
19-06-2009, 03:33 PM
Without the banner the site would look crap still..

And mwah if you can do better, I am sure Jin and the Graphics team would love to hear from you.. ;)

Im not the only one who said it looks crap so read first babe, and i never said i could do better did i? no so shut it cause you trying to start a argument with me and you will obviously loose


The blurryness is something to do with the font used. Should the font be changed the edges will be all straight and jagged.

Overall im liking the new look of it and how swiftly Jin was able to recreate the system. Go you!

Its a free image hosting script lol
AgnesIO
19-06-2009, 03:37 PM
Yeah i know all the graphics are crap, sorry lol


Yeh. Course you didnt :l
lick
19-06-2009, 03:39 PM
Yeh. Course you didnt :l

I know i said it looks crap, I SAID I WAS NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO SAID IT LOOKED CRAP SO WHY ONLY MENTION MY NAME?

MAYBE READ NEXT TIME OK!!
Hazza
19-06-2009, 06:09 PM
The blurryness isn't the font, its the icon/image (photo+folder) - It makes your eyes go funny! Will be sorted when Jin let's us know (A)
Jin
19-06-2009, 07:22 PM
The blurryness isn't the font, its the icon/image (photo+folder) - It makes your eyes go funny! Will be sorted when Jin let's us know (A)


You know what, this is actually a relief to hear. I thought it was my vision as its been a bit blurry and have even (no lie) booked an eye test with the optician to get new glasses. Glad that its not the case.
Hazza
19-06-2009, 08:13 PM
Haha, no it was - and at first I thought it may of been my eyes; but obviously not!
This needs to be sorted me thinks ;)
Wootzeh
20-06-2009, 03:51 PM
Just make the banner something simple like

http://www.uploadpicz.com/images/90uploadpicz.png

but obviously with a logo of some sort.
Mrs.McCall
20-06-2009, 04:32 PM
Just make the banner something simple like

http://www.uploadpicz.com/images/90uploadpicz.png

but obviously with a logo of some sort.

That's quite nice that one.

Something like that yeah.
Jin
20-06-2009, 04:35 PM
Is there a reason for a logo? None of our sites have a logo or a real requirement for one? It just seems that people suggest it as it seems standard convention that everything should have a logo.
Wootzeh
20-06-2009, 04:50 PM
Is there a reason for a logo? None of our sites have a logo or a real requirement for one? It just seems that people suggest it as it seems standard convention that everything should have a logo.
Can't think of anything else to go there that looks right :8
Mrs.McCall
20-06-2009, 04:54 PM
Can't think of anything else to go there that looks right :8

Just a simple logo to fill the space.

Why not just have the letters UP with the site name underneath. Simple but stylish logo.
Wootzeh
20-06-2009, 05:06 PM
ha http://www.uploadpicz.com/images/37upload.png
Jin
20-06-2009, 05:19 PM
This was sammeth's suggestion for the favicon.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v219/Sammeth/logoexample.png

Just something effective and basic that I really liked.
Plank
20-06-2009, 05:26 PM
This was sammeth's suggestion for the favicon.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v219/Sammeth/logoexample.png

Just something effective and basic that I really liked.
I think the UP on its own would look good for a favicon/logo.

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!