Manchester city

[Middlesbrough]

Sorry but how stupid is the club transfer wise, 10 strikers, what the ****, I mean they're going to be telling people like Tevez that they aren't even travelling on the trip, the worst of it is people thing they're an amazing club by doing this, eventually their is going to be problems, players will leave because they're not getting their game. Views?

[StefanWolves]

One word, Chelsea.

kthx.

[Middlesbrough]

One word, Chelsea.

kthx.

Yeah what also annoyed me was the nerve of chelsea fans saying it ruins football, 2 years ago they did the exact same things, *****.

[Immenseman]

chelsea built a team, all positions. not just offensive minded players. city have had a crap tour and will be mid table this season.

[Skajo]

chelsea built a team, all positions. not just offensive minded players. city have had a crap tour and will be mid table this season.
and by all means Manchester United have had a STEAMING tour.

[StefanWolves]

and by all means Manchester United have had a STEAMING tour.

What's your obsession with CAPITALISING certain WORDS? it doesn't make you sound any bigger.

City will finish 6th this season, behind Aston Villa.

[Immenseman]

it's a tour. football works like this. if you win games, it's good. if you don't against people who are plumbers, it's bad.

[Skajo]

What's your obsession with CAPITALISING certain WORDS? it doesn't make you sound any bigger.

City will finish 6th this season, behind Aston Villa.
It's to emphasise certain words, it's a quicker, easier way than using italics or bold type face to have the same effect. It's also used to indicate where sarcasm is used as it can be difficult to pick up in text.


it's a tour. football works like this. if you win games, it's good. if you don't against people who are plumbers, it's bad.
Newcastle lost 6-1 to Orient oh no they're going to finish 24th. No. It's pre-season. It matters none. It's all about the fitness in pre-season. And money in United's case. Greedy beggers.

[Immenseman]

they lost 6-1 to a team one league below them. city are losing to part time players who are a comparison of conference north teams, where doncaster should be :eusa_danc

[StefanWolves]

haha doncaster are crap imo.

[Skajo]

they lost 6-1 to a team one league below them. city are losing to part time players who are a comparison of conference north teams, where doncaster should be :eusa_danc
you mean the most successful team in english football over the past 10 years?

United lost to Southend omg they should be in divisioon 67!!!!

[Clowgon]

Sometimes, i really do wonder if the players just go to City just for the money. Who'd want to go there, players say the want to go to City for the challenge, i think that's complete ****. It's all about picking up the best wages for the week so they see some real money after the tax man deducts 40 percent.

Gareth Barry for an example.. oh and Ady he said he had offers from Milan and Barcelona, why didn't he go there? Because they (City) were offering him alot more money.. He said he wanted to make history with this club (City) that's a load
of poo, he put it down to that... Excuses.

[Immenseman]

you mean the most successful team in english football over the past 10 years?

United lost to Southend omg they should be in divisioon 67!!!!
:eusa_wall:eusa_wall:eusa_wall:eusa_wall:eusa_wall

city r silly nd rubbish. end of.

im WRIGHT and YOUR wrong

[Skajo]

What's your obsession with CAPITALISING certain WORDS? it doesn't make you sound any bigger.
:eusa_danc

[StefanWolves]

In the famous words of TheWolf, adam. ;)

[Immenseman]

:eusa_danc
lmao, dont worry me and you are in the same boat. we understand such complicated things :eusa_clap:eusa_whis

[Geraint]

ever heard of selling players??

[Rock]

Chelsea made a title-contending team and bought the right players for the right position when they came into the money. City seem focused on showing off almost.

[-Heart]

they lost 6-1 to a team one league below them. city are losing to part time players who are a comparison of conference north teams, where doncaster should be :eusa_danc
What a ridiculous post.

Pre-season doesn't matter, it just doesn't. Just because City are losing to these teams doesn't mean they are ****. How do you know that they were playing to their full potential in those games? And I've explained the Doncaster thing in the post below (even if you were being sarcastic).

haha doncaster are crap imo.
They play some of the best football in the Championship. Last season they were one of the best teams in the division based on how they played. Just the first half of the season let them down as they couldn't hit the back of the net.

[lBlue]

Sorry but how stupid is the club transfer wise, 10 strikers, what the ****, I mean they're going to be telling people like Tevez that they aren't even travelling on the trip, the worst of it is people thing they're an amazing club by doing this, eventually their is going to be problems, players will leave because they're not getting their game. Views?
Hello lad, you wont know me however I'm about to rip the crap out of your post.

Stupid transfer wise? How do you mean stupid? Do you mean the players we're going in for? The players we've signed? Or the publicity we're producing once we've signed a player?

OK we'll go over them all just to make sure we pinpoint the option you are dribbling on about.

When Hughes first came to Manchester City he publicly stated that the squad was unbalanced. We had too many strikers who didn't have the right caliber we need to smash the top four. We've got...


Adebayor
Bellamy
Benjani
Tevez
Evans
Caicedo
Jo
Robinho
Santa Cruz
Bojinov

Looking at that list we can say a number of things. We can instantly cross off Benjani & Evans. That leaves us on eight. We're then loaning out Caicedo and Jo. Leaving us with six. Then we've got The Boj, his future is complicated. We don't know whether he's staying or going, either way that leaves us with five strikers because Robinho plays in a attacking midfield role who is allowed to roam.

So in the end we've got five. Now let's look at Manchester United shall we? This is the fun bit!


Obertan
Owen
Berbatov
Welbeck
Macheda
Brandy

Six, more than City. I wont bother looking at Liverpool or Chelsea.

Now then, we're going to be playing both Ade and Tevez on a weekly basis. Tevez will come off for Bellamy later on in the game when he's tired. When we're at Stoke away or WBA Santa will partner Ade, we'll have a physical presence.

We're being far from stupid producing PR from the transfers. We've managed to win a mind game with Fergi, whose "cracking up".

I'm bored of the transfer front so I'll move onto the Tevez bit. Where did you get this idea from? We'll have five strikers... We'll be taking them all. Tevez and Bellamy. Ade and RSC and Boj. Easy is it not? If anyone gets told to stay it's Boj, who doesn't know whether he wants to stay or go anyway.

Surely if players go then that means they're not up to the demanded caliber of the starting line up or they don't fit in? Either way they're not needed by the club are they? Hows this bad? The player gets to leave and the club don't need to pay a wage to a bloke who'll come on every so often.

chelsea built a team, all positions. not just offensive minded players. city have had a crap tour and will be mid table this season.
Which is why we're signing Toure this week.
Crap tour? How've United played? We've played a line up containing youths and reserves for two games and a line up containing players who were playing the first game of there campaign, of course they wont be up to scratch.


Sometimes, i really do wonder if the players just go to City just for the money. Who'd want to go there, players say the want to go to City for the challenge, i think that's complete ****. It's all about picking up the best wages for the week so they see some real money after the tax man deducts 40 percent.

Gareth Barry for an example.. oh and Ady he said he had offers from Milan and Barcelona, why didn't he go there? Because they (City) were offering him alot more money.. He said he wanted to make history with this club (City) that's a load
of poo, he put it down to that... Excuses.
Hello lad, you will know me and I'm about to rip the crap out of your post.

Who would want to come to Manchester City? I know mate, I'm in the same boat as you - it's a (excuse me, my post appears to of turned to italics which I can't turn off) bleeding mystery, we best call in Scooby Doo. The only clues I've got so far is that they've got a trillionaire owner who is backing the club with "gifts". A young British manager. A decent ground and training facilities. A decent YOUNG squad to link up with and decent areas to live. We need more clues Clowny, call in Scooby Doo will you? I ain't got any signal.

Please be quick, I'm getting confused as to why they don't want to go to United (Tevez) because they've got an attractive aging squad, debt and a manager whose about retire. I DON'T UNDERSTAND! ;(

I know mate, City have a **** challenge. Who wants to crack the top four in the Premiership eh? Must be really dull, if I was them I'd rather go to Liverpool or someone with fear of seeing City gaining pace knowing I could of been apart of that. Must be a big turn off that.

Gareth Barry? Why? O'neil publicly stated that Liverpool didn't put a bid in for him this summer and City were the only club who did, hence him coming to us. Ade? Ever though he might of had a change of heart and noticed how many of his mates were at City and what they were doing? He might of fancied a bit of the future glory. He stated how happy he felt when the fans greeted him, he wanted to feel loved by the fans. Not have his family abused because of where they're from. That's a load of what? You would rather sign for Manchester United knowing about the aging squad, manager and debt than City who have a young team, manager, a class owner and lots of future success? I think you would be the real merc in this, quick success eh? Wouldn't want to make your own success eh?


Chelsea made a title-contending team and bought the right players for the right position when they came into the money. City seem focused on showing off almost.
Toure and Lescott next mate.

Oh look my writings back to normal now. Hmm. Enjoy the post lads.

[Immenseman]

grasp sarcasm and come back boy.

[CHA!NGANG]

Which Toure? Yaya or kolo? Kolo wont go to City, end of. Yaya is an amazing player and might not get first team football so maybe. Plus they need money for ibra.

[StefanWolves]

Hello lad, you wont know me however I'm about to rip the crap out of your post.

Stupid transfer wise? How do you mean stupid? Do you mean the players we're going in for? The players we've signed? Or the publicity we're producing once we've signed a player?

OK we'll go over them all just to make sure we pinpoint the option you are dribbling on about.

When Hughes first came to Manchester City he publicly stated that the squad was unbalanced. We had too many strikers who didn't have the right caliber we need to smash the top four. We've got...


Adebayor
Bellamy
Benjani
Tevez
Evans
Caicedo
Jo
Robinho
Santa Cruz
Bojinov

Looking at that list we can say a number of things. We can instantly cross off Benjani & Evans. That leaves us on eight. We're then loaning out Caicedo and Jo. Leaving us with six. Then we've got The Boj, his future is complicated. We don't know whether he's staying or going, either way that leaves us with five strikers because Robinho plays in a attacking midfield role who is allowed to roam.

So in the end we've got five. Now let's look at Manchester United shall we? This is the fun bit!


Obertan
Owen
Berbatov
Welbeck
Macheda
Brandy

Six, more than City. I wont bother looking at Liverpool or Chelsea.

Now then, we're going to be playing both Ade and Tevez on a weekly basis. Tevez will come off for Bellamy later on in the game when he's tired. When we're at Stoke away or WBA Santa will partner Ade, we'll have a physical presence.

We're being far from stupid producing PR from the transfers. We've managed to win a mind game with Fergi, whose "cracking up".

I'm bored of the transfer front so I'll move onto the Tevez bit. Where did you get this idea from? We'll have five strikers... We'll be taking them all. Tevez and Bellamy. Ade and RSC and Boj. Easy is it not? If anyone gets told to stay it's Boj, who doesn't know whether he wants to stay or go anyway.

Surely if players go then that means they're not up to the demanded caliber of the starting line up or they don't fit in? Either way they're not needed by the club are they? Hows this bad? The player gets to leave and the club don't need to pay a wage to a bloke who'll come on every so often.

Which is why we're signing Toure this week.
Crap tour? How've United played? We've played a line up containing youths and reserves for two games and a line up containing players who were playing the first game of there campaign, of course they wont be up to scratch.


Hello lad, you will know me and I'm about to rip the crap out of your post.

Who would want to come to Manchester City? I know mate, I'm in the same boat as you - it's a (excuse me, my post appears to of turned to italics which I can't turn off) bleeding mystery, we best call in Scooby Doo. The only clues I've got so far is that they've got a trillionaire owner who is backing the club with "gifts". A young British manager. A decent ground and training facilities. A decent YOUNG squad to link up with and decent areas to live. We need more clues Clowny, call in Scooby Doo will you? I ain't got any signal.

Please be quick, I'm getting confused as to why they don't want to go to United (Tevez) because they've got an attractive aging squad, debt and a manager whose about retire. I DON'T UNDERSTAND! ;(

I know mate, City have a **** challenge. Who wants to crack the top four in the Premiership eh? Must be really dull, if I was them I'd rather go to Liverpool or someone with fear of seeing City gaining pace knowing I could of been apart of that. Must be a big turn off that.

Gareth Barry? Why? O'neil publicly stated that Liverpool didn't put a bid in for him this summer and City were the only club who did, hence him coming to us. Ade? Ever though he might of had a change of heart and noticed how many of his mates were at City and what they were doing? He might of fancied a bit of the future glory. He stated how happy he felt when the fans greeted him, he wanted to feel loved by the fans. Not have his family abused because of where they're from. That's a load of what? You would rather sign for Manchester United knowing about the aging squad, manager and debt than City who have a young team, manager, a class owner and lots of future success? I think you would be the real merc in this, quick success eh? Wouldn't want to make your own success eh?


Toure and Lescott next mate.

Oh look my writings back to normal now. Hmm. Enjoy the post lads.

Hello Minstrels, still full of anger are we? :P fair play to that post though, you really did put it straight. Fair play. :)

[Shoovers]

Which Toure? Yaya or kolo? Kolo wont go to City, end of. Yaya is an amazing player and might not get first team football so maybe. Plus they need money for ibra.

Yaya Toure has just signed a contract extension with Barca so I doubt he'll be moving

[Jam]

What's your obsession with CAPITALISING certain WORDS? it doesn't make you sound any bigger.

City will finish 6th this season, behind Aston Villa.

Nah, Villa won't have as good a season as last, most likely Everton, or Arsenal depending if they have a poor season.

[Jack.Lfc]

City will be up there.

[Immenseman]

don't worry that user is prolific for making up rumours about players moving to city :lol:

"Kaka has singed" along with all the others... :lol:

[StefanWolves]

Ha yeah I remember that Jake.

[Immenseman]

there have been many many more he's completely made up, lol.

[StefanWolves]

i forget what the others were, i remember once he said that he never criticised mark hughes, so i posted a link where he made a thread about mark hughes and totally ripped him.

good times.

[Jack.Lfc]

lBlue said lad, i love you lad.

[StefanWolves]

you can only say lad if ur kl

i say lad so im kl

me jack and lblue are kl

get me :)

[-Heart]

grasp sarcasm and come back boy.
I've seen the posts you've made previously in this thread, and they do not indicate sarcasm. You were stating that because certain teams lost to certain teams in lower divisions, it meant they were ****.

[Disaronno]

I've seen the posts you've made previously in this thread, and they do not indicate sarcasm. You were stating that because certain teams lost to certain teams in lower divisions, it meant they were ****.

Christ you really can't do sarcasm at all can you.....


Anyway, City will do ok, nothing amazing. But in seasons to come, once they balance the squad why not? They are not trying to win the league this season, they are pre-paring by buying the players that can't decide if they want to leave or stay at teams. Every player they have bought has either been deciding or wanted to leave. I don't think you can deny this. However, they will not, well at least i think so, do very well this season, i think in 2/3 seasons once they have got a fully prepared squad, yea why not.

Fergie is not cracking up, he is playing mind games. He always does.

Pre-season, as already stated is about fitness and trials and chemistry, if you don't know that - don't post.

I think it will finish

Arsenal/Liverpool
Chelsea
United (4th)
Everton
Villa
Fulham
West Ham
City

[StefanWolves]

It must be a thing with Wolves fans not being able to detect sarcasm in plain writing, cause tbh unless you bold/underline or capitalize the sarcasm it is very hard to tell if your being sarcastic.

[Browney]

Christ you really can't do sarcasm at all can you.....


Anyway, City will do ok, nothing amazing. But in seasons to come, once they balance the squad why not? They are not trying to win the league this season, they are pre-paring by buying the players that can't decide if they want to leave or stay at teams. Every player they have bought has either been deciding or wanted to leave. I don't think you can deny this. However, they will not, well at least i think so, do very well this season, i think in 2/3 seasons once they have got a fully prepared squad, yea why not.

Fergie is not cracking up, he is playing mind games. He always does.

Pre-season, as already stated is about fitness and trials and chemistry, if you don't know that - don't post.

I think it will finish

Arsenal/Liverpool
Chelsea
United (4th)
Everton
Villa
Fulham
West Ham
City

Wow. Arsenal 1st, 2nd even? Last season proved how far you were off the top 3. Hey, best of luck to you. You play nice football.

Personally, I'm saying:
Chelsea
United
Liverpool
Arsenal
---
Everton
Aston Villa
City/Spurs (I cant call it)

[Immenseman]

:eusa_wall:eusa_wall:eusa_wall:eusa_wall:eusa_wall

city r silly nd rubbish. end of.

im WRIGHT and YOUR wrong


I've seen the posts you've made previously in this thread, and they do not indicate sarcasm. You were stating that because certain teams lost to certain teams in lower divisions, it meant they were ****.
you're right. no sarcasm there or the ones where i used :eusa_danc :rolleyes:

Christ you really can't do sarcasm at all can you.....


I think it will finish

Arsenal/Liverpool
Chelsea
United (4th)
Everton
Villa
Fulham
West Ham
City
it'll be
united
chelsea
liverpool
arsenal
everton
spurs
villa
city
west ham
fulham

[StefanWolves]

I think it'll be:

Liverpool
Man U
Chelsea
Arsenal
Villa
City

cant be bothered doing the rest. :P

[Mexel]

they lost 6-1 to a team one league below them. city are losing to part time players who are a comparison of conference north teams, where doncaster should be :eusa_danc

Orient done 1 better than us when we beat then 5-1 from the Championship! But ours was at St James Park, so ours was better :)

I would brag about somthing else but.. we dont get much to brag about.


And Villa are going to have a crap season, 8/9/10

[-Heart]

Christ you really can't do sarcasm at all can you.....


Anyway, City will do ok, nothing amazing. But in seasons to come, once they balance the squad why not? They are not trying to win the league this season, they are pre-paring by buying the players that can't decide if they want to leave or stay at teams. Every player they have bought has either been deciding or wanted to leave. I don't think you can deny this. However, they will not, well at least i think so, do very well this season, i think in 2/3 seasons once they have got a fully prepared squad, yea why not.

Fergie is not cracking up, he is playing mind games. He always does.

Pre-season, as already stated is about fitness and trials and chemistry, if you don't know that - don't post.

I think it will finish

Arsenal/Liverpool
Chelsea
United (4th)
Everton
Villa
Fulham
West Ham
City
Lol wow. Seriously wow at you :rolleyes:.

[Rock]

Christ you really can't do sarcasm at all can you.....


Anyway, City will do ok, nothing amazing. But in seasons to come, once they balance the squad why not? They are not trying to win the league this season, they are pre-paring by buying the players that can't decide if they want to leave or stay at teams. Every player they have bought has either been deciding or wanted to leave. I don't think you can deny this. However, they will not, well at least i think so, do very well this season, i think in 2/3 seasons once they have got a fully prepared squad, yea why not.

Fergie is not cracking up, he is playing mind games. He always does.

Pre-season, as already stated is about fitness and trials and chemistry, if you don't know that - don't post.

I think it will finish

Arsenal/Liverpool
Chelsea
United (4th)
Everton
Villa
Fulham
West Ham
City


Ermm, yeah right?


Wow. Arsenal 1st, 2nd even? Last season proved how far you were off the top 3. Hey, best of luck to you. You play nice football.

Personally, I'm saying:
Chelsea
United
Liverpool
Arsenal
---
Everton
Aston Villa
City/Spurs (I cant call it)

I couldn't agree more tbh.

[luce]

Jose said they can win the title but i highly doubt that as they have a team of good players but i don't know if they're going to be able to play together.. like someone else in this thread said Chelsea :)

[Rock]

City will fail, mark my words. These "good" players all have different styles and they haven't planned out a clever strategy

[Immenseman]

they're building a team. only time will tell. they will challenge in the years to come i imagine. maybe a bit too early this season.

[Rock]

agreed..

[lBlue]

Which Toure? Yaya or kolo? Kolo wont go to City, end of. Yaya is an amazing player and might not get first team football so maybe. Plus they need money for ibra.

Indeed CHA!NGANG, Kolo will never sign for City. End of.
















































http://content.mcfc.co.uk/%7E/media/Images/Home/News/Team%20News/2009/signings/IMG_0706.ashx?as=0&dmc=0&h=450&thn=0&w=800

[StefanWolves]

thats a k.o punch

*** is toures shirt underneath his suite all about? :/

[Scotteriath]

Ahahahahahaha, and the winner of the "OWNED 2009 AWARD" goes to...


CHA!NGANG!

Post edited by iAdam (Forum Moderator); please do not post pointlessly.

[lBlue]

CHA!NGANG, how do you feel for Toure now he's a Arsenal Manchester City player?

[CHA!NGANG]

Indeed CHA!NGANG, Kolo will never sign for City. End of.

http://content.mcfc.co.uk/%7E/media/Images/Home/News/Team%20News/2009/signings/IMG_0706.ashx?as=0&dmc=0&h=450&thn=0&w=800


thats a k.o punch

*** is toures shirt underneath his suite all about? :/


Ahahahahahaha, and the winner of the "OWNED 2009 AWARD" goes to...


CHA!NGANG!

Post edited by iAdam (Forum Moderator); please do not post pointlessly.

Are you 7 or something? What a stupid post :rolleyes:


CHA!NGANG, how do you feel for Toure now he's a Arsenal Manchester City player?

Read the Summer Transfers thread, I replied the signing there ;) Yeah I was annoyed and surprised a bit but then again he wanted a change and more money so yeah. £16 Mill not bad for Arsenal either.

[lBlue]

Are you 7 or something? What a stupid post :rolleyes:



Read the Summer Transfers thread, I replied the signing there ;) Yeah I was annoyed and surprised a bit but then again he wanted a change and more money so yeah. £16 Mill not bad for Arsenal either.
It must be a major loss losing Toure, Adebayor and forth spot?

[CHA!NGANG]

Lol not really, Toure has been replaced and we have enough strike power now. Plus, £40 Million for both is good bussiness. From your posts, I really think you have no clue about football. You say it is a big loss, but it is good bussiness. Wow.. Inter lost Ibra they can't finish first now.. never mind the £30 Mill and Eto'o they got for him, and wow Liverpool lost or are going to loose Alonso, they won't win will they, never mind the £30 Mill they got for him too... We got £41 Million for two players that we can replace and already have in some ways so no.. it's not a major loss.

[lBlue]

Lol not really, Toure has been replaced and we have enough strike power now. Plus, £40 Million for both is good bussiness. From your posts, I really think you have no clue about football. You say it is a big loss, but it is good bussiness. Wow.. Inter lost Ibra they can't finish first now.. never mind the £30 Mill and Eto'o they got for him, and wow Liverpool lost or are going to loose Alonso, they won't win will they, never mind the £30 Mill they got for him too... We got £41 Million for two players that we can replace and already have in some ways so no.. it's not a major loss.
Aha... I do laugh. OK then. You've lost a captain, a leader, a hardcore trainer, a man who would lead the dressing room and keep the youths heads up. This will be a major loss, you've got Gallas running a dressing room. What's all that about?

£40,000,000 is good for both, agreed. However you wont see much of that. You've got a stadium to pay for.

No clue? We'll counter this below.

Inter lost Ibra, a player who was crap against English clubs and they've gained a striker who scored against Manchester United in the Champions League Final. Go figure. That was major business on Inters side, a stupid move for Barca.

Liverpool lost Alonso, step up Mascherano. He can play in pretty much the same position as Alonso. Alonso wasn't a captain and it seems he wasn't a leader in the dressing room. Who have you got for Toure again? Sorry I forgot his name... :rolleyes:. And who steps up for Adebayor? Bendtner? :lol:
http://www.dirtytackle.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/bendtner-pink-boots.jpg

You need to make atleast £25,000,000 per season to pay for the Stadium. Liverpool will see most of that £30,000,000 unlike the Arse.

Not a major loss eh? :rolleyes:

[CHA!NGANG]

Aha... I do laugh. OK then. You've lost a captain, a leader, a hardcore trainer, a man who would lead the dressing room and keep the youths heads up. This will be a major loss, you've got Gallas running a dressing room. What's all that about?

£40,000,000 is good for both, agreed. However you wont see much of that. You've got a stadium to pay for.

No clue? We'll counter this below.

Inter lost Ibra, a player who was crap against English clubs and they've gained a striker who scored against Manchester United in the Champions League Final. Go figure. That was major business on Inters side, a stupid move for Barca.

Liverpool lost Alonso, step up Mascherano. He can play in pretty much the same position as Alonso. Alonso wasn't a captain and it seems he wasn't a leader in the dressing room. Who have you got for Toure again? Sorry I forgot his name... :rolleyes:. And who steps up for Adebayor? Bendtner? :lol:

You need to make atleast £25,000,000 per season to pay for the Stadium. Liverpool will see most of that £30,000,000 unlike the Arse.

Not a major loss eh? :rolleyes:

Fabregas is captain, not gallas, and he has been doing a good job so far. Toure was never officially captain and neither was Adebayor so I don't know what your talking about. He was a good player, no doubt but we can replace him and Vermelaen is a start. As i've stated in the Transfers thread, I know we have a stadium to pay back, but that £40 Mill will mainly be available as the original budget is already altered to include stadium costs. £15 Mill will go towards the stadium probably, that leaves us £25 Mill to spend.

As for your other two posts... dear god...I was being sarcastic :$. Of course I know Liverpool and Inter got good deals despite loosing key players, and that is what I was comparing Arsenal too.

As for who is going to fill Adebayor shoes well... Arshavin in amazing form, Eduardo in great form, Van Persie has a lot of talent, Walcott has a lot of potential and this season could be his to shine, Bendtner can step up, Carlos Vela can step up and we might also buy another striker so we have enough talent to fill his shoes, not to mention Rosicky who can get a few goals in too.

[Jack.Lfc]

http://www.dirtytackle.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/bendtner-pink-boots.jpg



They are a nice pair of legs.

Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not make pointless posts. Thanks.

[lBlue]

Fabregas is captain, not gallas, and he has been doing a good job so far. Toure was never officially captain and neither was Adebayor so I don't know what your talking about. He was a good player, no doubt but we can replace him and Vermelaen is a start. As i've stated in the Transfers thread, I know we have a stadium to pay back, but that £40 Mill will mainly be available as the original budget is already altered to include stadium costs. £15 Mill will go towards the stadium probably, that leaves us £25 Mill to spend.

As for your other two posts... dear god...I was being sarcastic :$. Of course I know Liverpool and Inter got good deals despite loosing key players, and that is what I was comparing Arsenal too.

As for who is going to fill Adebayor shoes well... Arshavin in amazing form, Eduardo in great form, Van Persie has a lot of talent, Walcott has a lot of potential and this season could be his to shine, Bendtner can step up, Carlos Vela can step up and we might also buy another striker so we have enough talent to fill his shoes, not to mention Rosicky who can get a few goals in too.
http://arsenalcolumn.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/gallas1.jpghttp://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Sport/Pix/pictures/2009/1/9/1231525432119/Kolo-Tour--001.jpg
Simply because they're not full time captains doesn't rule them out of being a leader of the dressing room, a vocal point from the side of the room. I never mentioned Adebayor was a captain? I stated that you've lost a captain in Toure, he's a captain figure. A man who will tell people where to go and what they need to do. What will happen when Fabregas is crocked again?

Wenger stated he needs to make £25,000,000 per season...http://smiliesftw.com/x/Smiley-Facepalm.gif

Whats the point in posting crap then? :rolleyes:http://smiliesftw.com/x/Smiley-Facepalm.gif



Let's do a run down...

Arshavin - Winger
Eduardo - Small
Van Persie - Attacking midfielder
Walcott - Winger, light weight
Bendtner - The man Wenger stated will take place for Adebayor :lol:
Vela - Light weight
Rosicky? :lol:

[Skajo]

They are a nice pair of legs.
I swear to God we need to get you laid.

[CHA!NGANG]

Simply because they're not full time captains doesn't rule them out of being a leader of the dressing room, a vocal point from the side of the room. I never mentioned Adebayor was a captain? I stated that you've lost a captain in Toure, he's a captain figure. A man who will tell people where to go and what they need to do. What will happen when Fabregas is crocked again?

Wenger stated he needs to make £25,000,000 per season...http://smiliesftw.com/x/Smiley-Facepalm.gif

Whats the point in posting crap then? :rolleyes:http://smiliesftw.com/x/Smiley-Facepalm.gif



Let's do a run down...

Arshavin - Winger
Eduardo - Small
Van Persie - Attacking midfielder
Walcott - Winger, light weight
Bendtner - The man Wenger stated will take place for Adebayor :lol:
Vela - Light weight
Rosicky? :lol:

I think I know more about Arsenal than you do seeing as I've supported them my whole life.

You said: You've lost a captain

We haven't lost a captain, neither toure or Adebayor were captains. And by you saying we lost a captain could have refurred to Toure or Ade. I just said that I know Toure was a strong figure and a leader and he will be missed, so how about you read first. Also, Gallas was captain for the first half of the season, and then was demoted and Cesc was handed it instead. We have a few leaders in the team: Almunia, Gallas, Rosicky, Fabregas, V. Persie have all worn the arm band and all can be captain if needed. As for the £25 Mill, that is already taken from the budget as I have said. Arsene didn't know that he was going to Sell Toure and Ade so I don't know how you can say that he needs £25 Mill a year as he doesn't, as I've said that is taken from the transfer budget hence why we don't spend big. If you get me the quote where he said that then I'd be intrested in seeing that, so yeah, as far as I'm concered your posting crap at the moment :eusa_wall

Arshavin: Can play as a striker, has proven himself as a goal scorer and he isn't a winger either although he can play there.
Eduardo: Has a great finish and a great touch, and so what if he is small :S
Van Persie - You saying he is an attacking midfielder shows you know nothing about Arsenal. He is an out and out striker.
Walcott - He does play on the wing, but can play as striker, and yes he is lightweight, he is also faster than most the PL.
Bendtner - Good player, not as good as Ade but still good.
Vela - I agree with you that he is a bit too lightweight hence why Arsene isn't prepared to play him yet but he will shine in the future.
Rosicky - As I said above, he isn't a striker no but he can score goals.

READ BEFORE YOU POST. :eusa_wall

Anyway, not going to bump this thread anymore as it is pointless, as is talking to you but if you want to reply PM me or something..

-rep for being annoying and immature.

[Jack.Lfc]

I swear to God we need to get you laid.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

People who know me, know im just acting a clown.

Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not make pointless posts. Thanks.

[Skajo]

Wenger stated he needs to make £25,000,000 per season...http://smiliesftw.com/x/Smiley-Facepalm.gif

You're just posting for an argument but I'll stop you on this point - Arsenal makes £3m per home game - 19 home games a season (not counting cup games/friendles/internationals) 19x3=57m. That's £32m operating costs and £25m profit. That pays for the stadium.

[AlexOC]

RANGERS - 3
CITY - 2

DAMN. SORT THE DEFENCE!

[Flamedragon3]

Funny how I used to see City as a good defensive side with no attack. Now I see us as a side with a good attack and no defence lol. As long as we get Lescott and Richards picks up the form he had in 07/08, then we have a defence.

[AlexOC]

Funny how I used to see City as a good defensive side with no attack. Now I see us as a side with a good attack and no defence lol. As long as we get Lescott and Richards picks up the form he had in 07/08, then we have a defence.

Lescott was supposed to be at city today at 6pm.

That didn't happen, i waited there for him aswell :(

[StefanWolves]

Itll happen soon enough. :P

[Flamedragon3]

Itll happen soon enough. :P
Well if we don't get him today then we're going to try and get someone else as we only gave Everton this week to decide to sell or not. So far I can only see us getting Matthew Upson as West Ham apparently need the money.

[TonyPulis]

i dont like man city

[lBlue]

*Removed*


Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not be rude to other members.

[Skajo]

*Removed*

I see you haven't replied to my post.

[Byron]

:L pretty dumb imo but thats manchester for you

[Jack.Lfc]

i dont like man city




Why did this make me laugh.

[lBlue]

I see you haven't replied to my post.
Link me?

:L pretty dumb imo but thats manchester for you
*Pretty
*that's
*Manchester
*.
... :rolleyes:

[Skajo]

Link me?

http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost.php?p=5976720&postcount=60

[lBlue]

You're just posting for an argument but I'll stop you on this point - Arsenal makes £3m per home game - 19 home games a season (not counting cup games/friendles/internationals) 19x3=57m. That's £32m operating costs and £25m profit. That pays for the stadium.
http://www.espnstar.com/football/premier-league/news/detail/item84329/Wenger:-Arsenal-must-sell-stars/

Good night. x

[AlexOC]

RICHARD DUNNE IS FIT

[Skajo]

http://www.espnstar.com/football/premier-league/news/detail/item84329/Wenger:-Arsenal-must-sell-stars/

Good night. x
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/a/arsenal/7009944.stm

Good morning. x

[lBlue]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/a/arsenal/7009944.stm

Good morning. x
Stop it, just stop. You're making a idiot of yourself, I don't need to pass any comments to do it myself - you're doing it for me.

Well done on trying to be witty and sarcastic, it just blew right up in your face. Hopefully in doing so it'll blow a hole somewhere in your head so while you're getting stitched up at the hospital they can inject some footballing knowledge in there easily.

http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/1753/40921644.png

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/9158/96798817.png


Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please be careful not to potentially cause an argument. Thanks.

[Skajo]

In case you haven't noticed but Arsenal sell out every league home game. The prices have stayed the same, the income has stayed the same. The operating profits have stayed the same. Arsenal obviously don't have to sell their stars, I've explained before that Adebayor and Toure are no real loss and that Arsenal have money to spend - Arshavin, Vermealen, possibly Chamakh - PH-W said that there was money to spend but it's Wenger's decision whether to or not. If a player wants to go, then Wenger doesn't stand in their way (Flamini, Ade, Henry, Kolo, Hleb) as they went for money or trophies at big clubs.

You've been banned from this forum many times before so it just goes to show who has the respect and the football knowledge eh? I'll see you be banned again. You just can't keep away can you.

Oh yeah, where's Kaka btw?

[lBlue]

In case you haven't noticed but Arsenal sell out every league home game. The prices have stayed the same, the income has stayed the same. The operating profits have stayed the same. Arsenal obviously don't have to sell their stars, I've explained before that Adebayor and Toure are no real loss and that Arsenal have money to spend - Arshavin, Vermealen, possibly Chamakh - PH-W said that there was money to spend but it's Wenger's decision whether to or not. If a player wants to go, then Wenger doesn't stand in their way (Flamini, Ade, Henry, Kolo, Hleb) as they went for money or trophies at big clubs.

You've been banned from this forum many times before so it just goes to show who has the respect and the football knowledge eh? I'll see you be banned again. You just can't keep away can you.

Oh yeah, where's Kaka btw?
That's it Adam, ignore what the gaffer says... deary me.

Oh, and umm... about that ban? If you wish, ask Robbie or that Matt guy about why I was banned. They not tell you however if they don't I will. Infact, I asked to be banned because this forum was full of idiotic people ignoring what the manager of the club they follow stated. They choose to make excuses up in there mind about why they don't need to sell.

It was then brought to my attention that some people couldn't get around the idea why City needed Adebayor, I showed them why. Then it was why Kolo isn't a leader of the dressing room. Now it's you stating that Arsenal don't need to sell which is keeping me on here. Once I've got it into your head that WENGER has said he must sell then I can go.

[StefanWolves]

Minstrels is gettin kicked in the goolies

just leave dude, all you do is cause arguments. (lBlue)

[lBlue]

Minstrels is gettin kicked in the goolies

just leave dude, all you do is cause arguments. (lBlue)
Eh? It's Adam whose stated that Arsenal don't need to sell and is ignoring Wenger? lolol.

[Skajo]

Show me Wenger saying he must sell - not an article, an interview, within the past year and I will believe you. Until then, nada. You do need Adebayor, yes. You do need Toure, yes. Because you're a club second to Arsenal. Adebayor will be a good signing for you, as will Toure. Adebayor hasn't scored in pre-season as he? No, he misssed an open net at Forest or wherever you played. Toure is a good player, he will be missed - but we have purchased a considerably younger replacement and we have 2 more strikers than we had last year, Eduardo and Vela (who should shine this season given the chance). Eduardo is a better striker than Adebayor will ever be: Ade is a good target man, 'tis all.

Oh, and unless it's a security issue you can't be banned upon request to my knowledge.

[StefanWolves]

there wasn't an argument until you stuck your nose in. lolol

[lBlue]

Show me Wenger saying he must sell - not an article, an interview, within the past year and I will believe you. Until then, nada. You do need Adebayor, yes. You do need Toure, yes. Because you're a club second to Arsenal. Adebayor will be a good signing for you, as will Toure. Adebayor hasn't scored in pre-season as he? No, he misssed an open net at Forest or wherever you played. Toure is a good player, he will be missed - but we have purchased a considerably younger replacement and we have 2 more strikers than we had last year, Eduardo and Vela (who should shine this season given the chance). Eduardo is a better striker than Adebayor will ever be: Ade is a good target man, 'tis all.

Oh, and unless it's a security issue you can't be banned upon request to my knowledge.
How am I supposed to obtain a video of a interview he did for a paper or something? Show me a video of Wenger stating he does not need to sell from 8th July 2008 to this present date.

http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost.php?p=5791090&postcount=36

[Skajo]

The fact is though, Matthew, BBC is a PSB and therefore CANNOT lie. They cannot sensationalise stories because they are a PSB. ESPN isn't. They can 'lie'. They can sensationalise. Newspapers can sensationalise. To be honest with you, unless you show me an interview/press conference with Wenger saying he needs to sell - you're just going on sensationlist stories from newspapers - which is silly.

Oh and @your link - LOL. It's funny because what Robbie's saying is that you posted just to be banned, as in you posted negative comments in order to get banned on purpose. This is shown by the word INCLUDING (when talking after people getting banned for a reason) otherwise he would've used the word EXCLUDING.

[CHA!NGANG]

Then piss off out of this thread? :rolleyes:

Is it your forum? No. Is it your thread? No. Then why make such a stupid comment. Yes I agree his comment wasn't needed but you don't have to be so immature about it.


Link me?

*Pretty
*that's
*Manchester
*.
... :rolleyes:

Same as above... I don't type in caps or properly all the time, doesn't mean my post is stupid just means I don't have time or cba. Grow up.


Eh? It's Adam whose stated that Arsenal don't need to sell and is ignoring Wenger? lolol.

Arsenal don't need to sell, so either that BBC source is wrong or missquoted. If you use your commen sence you can tell Arsenal don't need to sell seeing as we have an extra £41 Mill now.

You're the one causing arguements not anyone else and I can see why you were banned now.

EDIT: And I can't belive that your using a post from over a year ago to proove your point. In a year alot has changed, we have an extra years worth of stadium funds, and the selling of players. It's like saying, from a post last year saying Man U need to sell, they do this year too, nevermind them gettting £80 Million for Ronaldo. All you've done is cause arguements and show you know nothing about football imo.

[--ss--]

I'm guessing the credit crunch hasn't hit the Arab nations yet?

[StefanWolves]

no and it never will.

[lBlue]

The fact is though, Matthew, BBC is a PSB and therefore CANNOT lie. They cannot sensationalise stories because they are a PSB. ESPN isn't. They can 'lie'. They can sensationalise. Newspapers can sensationalise. To be honest with you, unless you show me an interview/press conference with Wenger saying he needs to sell - you're just going on sensationlist stories from newspapers - which is silly.

Oh and @your link - LOL. It's funny because what Robbie's saying is that you posted just to be banned, as in you posted negative comments in order to get banned on purpose. This is shown by the word INCLUDING (when talking after people getting banned for a reason) otherwise he would've used the word EXCLUDING.


Is it your forum? No. Is it your thread? No. Then why make such a stupid comment. Yes I agree his comment wasn't needed but you don't have to be so immature about it.



Same as above... I don't type in caps or properly all the time, doesn't mean my post is stupid just means I don't have time or cba. Grow up.



Arsenal don't need to sell, so either that BBC source is wrong or missquoted. If you use your commen sence you can tell Arsenal don't need to sell seeing as we have an extra £41 Mill now.

You're the one causing arguements not anyone else and I can see why you were banned now.

EDIT: And I can't belive that your using a post from over a year ago to proove your point. In a year alot has changed, we have an extra years worth of stadium funds, and the selling of players. It's like saying, from a post last year saying Man U need to sell, they do this year too, nevermind them gettting £80 Million for Ronaldo. All you've done is cause arguements and show you know nothing about football imo.

http://www.goonersworld.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=12464

[StefanWolves]

I laugh at how wrong you are, tbh.

Just because your club is filthy rich, doesn't mean all other clubs are piss poor and need money, you know.

There are a lot of people with a lot of money, ever heard of Alisha Usmanov? yea.

[lBlue]

I laugh at how wrong you are, tbh.

Just because your club is filthy rich, doesn't mean all other clubs are piss poor and need money, you know.

There are a lot of people with a lot of money, ever heard of Alisha Usmanov? yea.
Dear god. This is NOTHING to do with how rich we are. This is to do with Arsenal fans who don't go to the game IGNORING there manager when true fans know that's what Wenger said.

[StefanWolves]

you were arguin that wenger needed to sell players when he doesn't???


Aha... I do laugh. OK then. You've lost a captain, a leader, a hardcore trainer, a man who would lead the dressing room and keep the youths heads up. This will be a major loss, you've got Gallas running a dressing room. What's all that about?

£40,000,000 is good for both, agreed. However you wont see much of that. You've got a stadium to pay for.

No clue? We'll counter this below.

Inter lost Ibra, a player who was crap against English clubs and they've gained a striker who scored against Manchester United in the Champions League Final. Go figure. That was major business on Inters side, a stupid move for Barca.

Liverpool lost Alonso, step up Mascherano. He can play in pretty much the same position as Alonso. Alonso wasn't a captain and it seems he wasn't a leader in the dressing room. Who have you got for Toure again? Sorry I forgot his name... :rolleyes:. And who steps up for Adebayor? Bendtner? :lol:
http://www.dirtytackle.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/bendtner-pink-boots.jpg

You need to make atleast £25,000,000 per season to pay for the Stadium. Liverpool will see most of that £30,000,000 unlike the Arse.

Not a major loss eh? :rolleyes:

yet you couldn't provide sufficiant proof, only crappy 'sports' websites, and news articles, forum threads, then when someone comes a long and provides actual proof that you were wrong, you cannot take it, and lash and and attack people, because someone proved that your 'footballing knowledge' does not exist.

The sooner you are banned, the better, this place was much more pleasant without you.

Edited by invincible (Forum Moderator): Please do not post to cause arguements or be rude to other members.

[lBlue]

you were arguin that wenger needed to sell players when he doesn't???



yet you couldn't provide sufficiant proof, only crappy 'sports' websites, and news articles, forum threads, then when someone comes a long and provides actual proof that you were wrong, you cannot take it, and lash and and attack people, because someone proved that your 'footballing knowledge' does not exist.

The sooner you are banned, the better, this place was much more pleasant without you.
Hey, it's not my fault I live in the real world.

The world where when interviews are done for papers no cameras are around. A world where we don't use sources from 2007 to combat ones from 2008.

[StefanWolves]

Did it ever occur to that brain of yours that news reporters ACTUALLY MAKE ******** UP SO THEY CAN SELL PAPERS?

You live in so much denial, you believe everything you read, now I realize where all of your 'footballing knowledge' has came from - The Sun.

Go on, carry on with your petty insults, you can't take being wrong, and being put in your place, just leave us all in peace and back to your other forums with your petty arguments.

Edited by invincible (Forum Moderator): Please don't make inappropriate comments.

[Flamedragon3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes'_list_of_the_most_valuable_football_clubs

[StefanWolves]

/gameover

Edited by invincible (Forum Moderator): Please don't post pointlessly.

[CHA!NGANG]

And just to add to you being prooven wrong: 'Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger has hinted he will start the new Premier League season with his current crops of stars.'

So clearly that means we are not selling anyone and if we do, then it's not because we need to.

Source: http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5483614,00.html

[lBlue]

Did it ever occur to that brain of yours that news reporters ACTUALLY MAKE ******** UP SO THEY CAN SELL PAPERS?

You live in so much denial, you believe everything you read, now I realize where all of your 'footballing knowledge' has came from - The Sun.

Go on, carry on with your petty insults, you can't take being wrong, and being put in your place, just leave us all in peace and back to your other forums with your petty arguments.

Edited by invincible (Forum Moderator): Please don't make inappropriate comments.
Umm... this is what Wenger said. Deary me. Petty insults? You're the one being warned here sonny.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes'_list_of_the_most_valuable_football_clubs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbes%27_list_of_the_most_valuable_football_clubs )
That's how much a club is worth. Manchester United are at the top however you seen there debt? :eusa_wall

And just to add to you being prooven wrong: 'Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger has hinted he will start the new Premier League season with his current crops of stars.'

So clearly that means we are not selling anyone and if we do, then it's not because we need to.

Source: http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5483614,00.html
Because you've just sold Adebayor and Toure... :eusa_wall:rolleyes::eusa_clap


Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not post to cause arguments. Thanks.

[CHA!NGANG]

Umm... this is what Wenger said. Deary me. Petty insults? You're the one being warned here sonny.


That's how much a club is worth. Manchester United are at the top however you seen there debt? :eusa_wall

Because you've just sold Adebayor and Toure... :eusa_wall:rolleyes::eusa_clap

How do you know that it's what Wenger said. You can't provide a good reliable source, so wherever you got that from is either outdated or not reliable and he was missquoted.

And your saying that we need to sell now and I'm saying we don't. We never planned to sell Ade or Toure and didn't need to. If we did need to sell, we wouldn't have spent 10 mill on Vermalean before we sold them both.

The bottom line is that we don't need to sell anymore players and if anything will be buying.

[Flamedragon3]

That's how much a club is worth. Manchester United are at the top however you seen there debt? :eusa_wall
But if you look, theres a column about the percentage debt on the clubs value. Arsenal's is 107% in debt with their club value. City is 0% in debt woop! lol.

[StefanWolves]

In theory Real Madrid are actually the richest/most expensive club in the world, but yeah, i agree with the rest, surprised Arsenal are third though. :O

Barcelona 7th, haha, Newcastle 19th - Championship side LOL.

[lBlue]

How do you know that it's what Wenger said. You can't provide a good reliable source, so wherever you got that from is either outdated or not reliable and he was missquoted.

And your saying that we need to sell now and I'm saying we don't. We never planned to sell Ade or Toure and didn't need to. If we did need to sell, we wouldn't have spent 10 mill on Vermalean before we sold them both.

The bottom line is that we don't need to sell anymore players and if anything will be buying.
But your source is from bleeding 2007, one year earlier than the paper interview for Christs sake.

[Skajo]

But your source is from bleeding 2007, one year earlier than the paper interview for Christs sake.
But the BBC can't lie.

[lBlue]

But the BBC can't lie.
But it can be canceled out by 2008 ***.

[Skajo]

But it can be canceled out by 2008 ***.
Oh of course, a truthful BBC article can be cancelled out by sensationalised American propaganda.

Bravo.

[lBlue]

Oh of course, a truthful BBC article can be cancelled out by sensationalised American propaganda.

Bravo.
Deary me, deluded or what eh?

[StefanWolves]

Adam is actually right.

[lBlue]

Adam is actually right.
Because a source from 2008 can't cancel out one from 2007 because it's on ESPN... :rolleyes:

[Skajo]

Because a source from 2008 can't cancel out one from 2007 because it's on ESPN... :rolleyes:
Oh dear, deluded, my friend.

[StefanWolves]

Would you rather believe an American broadcaster who is allowed to say ********, or a British broadcaster who is funded by the government and cannot say ********?

It's not hard.

[Browney]

Hey Matty, I just got told Arsene Wenger spends all his money from transfers on buying hair gel and wax for RVP.

There's a 2009 source. Must cancel out all other sources eh? I bet I'm more reliable than ESPN too.

[Skajo]

Would you rather believe an American broadcaster who is allowed to say ********, or a British broadcaster who is funded by the government and cannot say ********?

It's not hard.
That's not entirely true but it's close - same principal.

[Immenseman]

Who would you rather believe Skajo or Minstrels, mhm.