Log in

View Full Version : Bulldogs Are Minor Premiers!



VirtualG
03-09-2009, 09:57 PM
Tonight Bulldogs are Verusing Tigers in the hope to win the Minor Premiership, but as long as Dragons LOSE to Eels we will win the MP. If Dragons win and we lose they become MP's if both teams win or lose then we are still MP's. It's a bit of a shame that Bulldogs didn't beat that round against Dragons because even the Ref's Boss cam out and admitted we should have won the game after a perfectly good try was denied to the Bulldogs in the last seconds of the game.


Edited by Hecktix (Forum Moderator): Thread closed due to arguements

CJW93
03-09-2009, 10:02 PM
Please explain

StefanWolves
03-09-2009, 10:03 PM
is he on about dog racin

-Heart
03-09-2009, 11:20 PM
Tonight Bulldogs are Verusing Tigers in the hope to win the Minor Premiership, but as long as Dragons LOSE to Eels we will win the MP. If Dragons win and we lose they become MP's if both teams win or lose then we are still MP's. It's a bit of a shame that Bulldogs didn't beat that round against Dragons because even the Ref's Boss cam out and admitted we should have won the game after a perfectly good try was denied to the Bulldogs in the last seconds of the game.
1) Hardly a fair contest.
2) Doubt that will happen, Dragons have fire.

Also, we have no time for your Australian sports.

VirtualG
04-09-2009, 06:14 AM
I thought this was a predominatly british forum, then probably the second biggest nation on here would be Aussie. So saying it's a british sport when rugby league is actually british is kinda stupid. The following sports in my opinion suck:
Union
Tennis
Golf
NFL
etc..
Watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxHKr9HJACc the middle sport is rugby league, like union just faster a less *****...
Rugby League is Massively played in Australia, New Zealand, France, Japan, England, Scottland, Fiji, Ireland, New Guinea,

lBlue
04-09-2009, 07:49 AM
I thought this was a predominatly british forum, then probably the second biggest nation on here would be Aussie. So saying it's a british sport when rugby league is actually british is kinda stupid. The following sports in my opinion suck:
Union
Tennis
Golf
NFL
etc..
Watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxHKr9HJACc the middle sport is rugby league, like union just faster a less *****...
Rugby League is Massively played in Australia, New Zealand, France, Japan, England, Scottland, Fiji, Ireland, New Guinea,
Union is the British game.

Browney
04-09-2009, 08:48 AM
Union is the British game.

Union is for southeners, League is for northeners.

-Heart
04-09-2009, 09:37 AM
I thought this was a predominatly british forum, then probably the second biggest nation on here would be Aussie. So saying it's a british sport when rugby league is actually british is kinda stupid. The following sports in my opinion suck:
Union
Tennis
Golf
NFL
etc..
Watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxHKr9HJACc the middle sport is rugby league, like union just faster a less *****...
Rugby League is Massively played in Australia, New Zealand, France, Japan, England, Scottland, Fiji, Ireland, New Guinea,

*Removed*

Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not make pointless posts. Thanks.

lBlue
04-09-2009, 02:07 PM
Union is for southeners, League is for northeners.
Urr... not heard of Sale Sharks or Newcastle? Not seen Scotland? Not seen Wales? Union is the British game, league is for ***** holes.

Bun
04-09-2009, 02:48 PM
Urr... not heard of Sale Sharks or Newcastle? Not seen Scotland? Not seen Wales? Union is the British game, league is for ***** holes.
i prefer union myself but browney is right in what he says.

StefanWolves
04-09-2009, 02:55 PM
Union is for proper men, league is for pretty boys.

I prefer Union anyway, but I don't mind watching RL if it's an important match or something, but besides that, Union all the way!

CJW93
04-09-2009, 05:49 PM
I have no interest what so ever for Australian Rugby. Screw You Australia. We won the ashes

Browney
04-09-2009, 06:34 PM
Urr... not heard of Sale Sharks or Newcastle? Not seen Scotland? Not seen Wales? Union is the British game, league is for ***** holes.

Not heard of *deep breath* Leeds, St Helens, Hull KR, Huddersfield, Wigan, Wakefield, Castleford, Warrington, Bradford, Hull or Salford? All northern rugby league teams in the top division. Ever heard of *deep breath* Bath, Bristol, Gloucester, Northampton, London Irish, London Wasps orr Worcester? All Union teams from the south. Union is the world's rugby game and League is for northerners and Australians. :P


Union is for proper men, league is for pretty boys.

I prefer Union anyway, but I don't mind watching RL if it's an important match or something, but besides that, Union all the way!

Union is for proper men? Having played both, I'm shattered by the end of a league match, in Union I spend most my time doing nothing. Both have their strengths, League being more athletic, exciting and quick, Union being more physical, tension building and powerful.

lBlue
04-09-2009, 06:56 PM
Not heard of *deep breath* Leeds, St Helens, Hull KR, Huddersfield, Wigan, Wakefield, Castleford, Warrington, Bradford, Hull or Salford? All northern rugby league teams in the top division. Ever heard of *deep breath* Bath, Bristol, Gloucester, Northampton, London Irish, London Wasps orr Worcester? All Union teams from the south. Union is the world's rugby game and League is for northerners and Australians. :P



Union is for proper men? Having played both, I'm shattered by the end of a league match, in Union I spend most my time doing nothing. Both have their strengths, League being more athletic, exciting and quick, Union being more physical, tension building and powerful.
Bu.. bu... but! Sale Sharks! We're the City of rugby! :(

Simmzay
05-09-2009, 07:58 AM
I assumed you were talking about AFL but I don't think the Western Bulldogs came first.

Browney
05-09-2009, 08:01 AM
Bu.. bu... but! Sale Sharks! We're the City of rugby! :(

There there. You're better than Newcastle.

VirtualG
08-09-2009, 07:15 AM
Urr... not heard of Sale Sharks or Newcastle? Not seen Scotland? Not seen Wales? Union is the British game, league is for ***** holes.
Sorry, maybe your a *Removed* Check the vids below

Union is for proper men, league is for pretty boys.

I prefer Union anyway, but I don't mind watching RL if it's an important match or something, but besides that, Union all the way!
League is for pretty boys? Rugby League is the worlds taughest ball game (true fact). Rugby Union has too many breaks and has nothing on League.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hetZB9n7neA How *****?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4T5Iq62LPA&feature=fvw Look at those pretty boys!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyGAVKacvCA Worlds pussiest player... Did you know, he was a Bulldogs (rugby league) player but went to Union because he wanted to play a softer game (heres the exact qoute) "It's just that I've been playing for a couple of years now, and I need a change to a... softer game, that why I chose to play with toulon" (toulon is a french union team btw)


I have no interest what so ever for Australian Rugby. Screw You Australia. We won the ashes
Sorry, why would we want some burnt pommy stumps anyway? And thats cricket... You can smash you're balls around all day if you like but you still *******. The only time cricket was ever rough was when you pommy ***** could beat bradmon and the Aussies so you started using body line heats to get us out of the game you no good cheats!

I assumed you were talking about AFL but I don't think the Western Bulldogs came first.
Sorry, I dont follow AFL. Rugby League and AFL hate each other (Rugby League is a NSW and QLD sport while Aussie Rules is a VIC sport) but your closing in on League territory and we're getting peved.

*Removed*

Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not avoid the filter or be rude to others. Thanks.

StefanWolves
08-09-2009, 09:55 AM
Sorry, sir, but I am going to have to rip your post apart.

*Removed*


League is for pretty boys? Rugby League is the worlds taughest ball game (true fact). Rugby Union has too many br
eaks and has nothing on League.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hetZB9n7neA How *****?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4T5Iq62LPA&feature=fvw Look at those pretty boys!


Wow, can't you take just a little bit of sarcasm? I was joking, but I do doubt that League is the toughest ball game in the world, you can provide all the bias facts and opinions you want, but I aint buying that one bit, uncontested scrums? that's what rugby is all about, yes I know it's faster, but Union in my opinion is the 'tougher' of the two games, you just have to look at the size of the players to realise that. So get off your high horse.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyGAVKacvCA Worlds pussiest player... Did you know, he was a Bulldogs (rugby league) player but went to Union because he wanted to play a softer game (heres the exact qoute) "It's just that I've been playing for a couple of years now, and I need a change to a... softer game, that why I chose to play with toulon" (toulon is a french union team btw

I don't care about the, as you put it 'pussiest player in the world' ~ who says that? you? and you bias Australian views? And I would love for you to provide me a link where he says, and I quote;
t's just that I've been playing for a couple of years now, and I need a change to a... softer game, that why I chose to play with toulon ~ cause I'm not buying that either, you also go on to talk about Toulon, I know what Toulin is and where they're based, so don't talk to me like i'm an idiot, Johnny Wilkinson plays for them, I do know quite a bit about Rugby in europe.



Sorry, why would we want some burnt pommy stumps anyway? And thats cricket... You can smash you're balls around all day if you like but you still *******. The only time cricket was ever rough was when you pommy ***** could beat bradmon and the Aussies so you started using body line heats to get us out of the game you no good cheats!

Wow, you go on to say "why would we want some burnt pommy stumps anyway?" but you then go on to defend it by saying 'The only time cricket was ever rough was when you pommy ***** could beat bradmon and the Aussies so you started using body line heats to get us out of the game you no good cheats!' ~ firstly, that made no sense, secondly, are you talking about the same 'body line' methods people use today? i.e. short balls? the same balls that Brett Lee & Co in the Australian cricket team use? bit contradictive 'mate'. And I'd be careful when you call us 'pommys', after all you are on a forum where 95% of the population is from the Country that founded Australia, and populated, remember the whole 'we went our prisoners to Australia' thing? yeh, I won't go down that road.
Sorry, I dont follow AFL. Rugby League and AFL hate each other (Rugby League is a NSW and QLD sport while Aussie Rules is a VIC sport) but your closing in on League territory and we're getting peved.

*Removed*
Maybe you deserve it because you're swearing at everyone and being cocky? telling people to shut the **** off ect is not very nice, also, I think Grayz was actually having a little bit of 'banter' with you, but then again, you Australians can't take loosing, can you?

That's what I think, and probably what the others think that you have started attacking, chill out, calm down, and remember, you're on a forum where 95% of the users are English/British, so I'd think twice before calling us pommys, ect.

Browney
08-09-2009, 06:15 PM
Wow, can't you take just a little bit of sarcasm? I was joking, but I do doubt that League is the toughest ball game in the world, you can provide all the bias facts and opinions you want, but I aint buying that one bit, uncontested scrums? that's what rugby is all about, yes I know it's faster, but Union in my opinion is the 'tougher' of the two games, you just have to look at the size of the players to realise that. So get off your high horse.

You just have to look at the sheer athleticism of League players to realise what they do is just as hard as Union.

StefanWolves
08-09-2009, 06:26 PM
You just have to look at the sheer athleticism of League players to realise what they do is just as hard as Union.

I guess there is arguments for both forms, but my opinion is the bigger the players the more physical it'll be, but that's just based on opinion. :8

lBlue
08-09-2009, 06:57 PM
Sorry, maybe your a *Removed* Check the vids below

League is for pretty boys? Rugby League is the worlds taughest ball game (true fact). Rugby Union has too many breaks and has nothing on League.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hetZB9n7neA How *****?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4T5Iq62LPA&feature=fvw Look at those pretty boys!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyGAVKacvCA Worlds pussiest player... Did you know, he was a Bulldogs (rugby league) player but went to Union because he wanted to play a softer game (heres the exact qoute) "It's just that I've been playing for a couple of years now, and I need a change to a... softer game, that why I chose to play with toulon" (toulon is a french union team btw)


Sorry, why would we want some burnt pommy stumps anyway? And thats cricket... You can smash you're balls around all day if you like but you still *******. The only time cricket was ever rough was when you pommy ***** could beat bradmon and the Aussies so you started using body line heats to get us out of the game you no good cheats!

Sorry, I dont follow AFL. Rugby League and AFL hate each other (Rugby League is a NSW and QLD sport while Aussie Rules is a VIC sport) but your closing in on League territory and we're getting peved.

*Removed*

Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not avoid the filter or be rude to others. Thanks.
I wont reply to you considering this isn't football and I don't feel as passonate about rugby as I do football however I will say that I've played both league and union. Guess which one I ****** my knee up in? ;)

Sorry, sir, but I am going to have to rip your post apart.

*Removed*


Wow, can't you take just a little bit of sarcasm? I was joking, but I do doubt that League is the toughest ball game in the world, you can provide all the bias facts and opinions you want, but I aint buying that one bit, uncontested scrums? that's what rugby is all about, yes I know it's faster, but Union in my opinion is the 'tougher' of the two games, you just have to look at the size of the players to realise that. So get off your high horse.



I don't care about the, as you put it 'pussiest player in the world' ~ who says that? you? and you bias Australian views? And I would love for you to provide me a link where he says, and I quote; ~ cause I'm not buying that either, you also go on to talk about Toulon, I know what Toulin is and where they're based, so don't talk to me like i'm an idiot, Johnny Wilkinson plays for them, I do know quite a bit about Rugby in europe.




Wow, you go on to say "why would we want some burnt pommy stumps anyway?" but you then go on to defend it by saying 'The only time cricket was ever rough was when you pommy ***** could beat bradmon and the Aussies so you started using body line heats to get us out of the game you no good cheats!' ~ firstly, that made no sense, secondly, are you talking about the same 'body line' methods people use today? i.e. short balls? the same balls that Brett Lee & Co in the Australian cricket team use? bit contradictive 'mate'. And I'd be careful when you call us 'pommys', after all you are on a forum where 95% of the population is from the Country that founded Australia, and populated, remember the whole 'we went our prisoners to Australia' thing? yeh, I won't go down that road.
Sorry, I dont follow AFL. Rugby League and AFL hate each other (Rugby League is a NSW and QLD sport while Aussie Rules is a VIC sport) but your closing in on League territory and we're getting peved.

*Removed*
Maybe you deserve it because you're swearing at everyone and being cocky? telling people to shut the **** off ect is not very nice, also, I think Grayz was actually having a little bit of 'banter' with you, but then again, you Australians can't take loosing, can you?

That's what I think, and probably what the others think that you have started attacking, chill out, calm down, and remember, you're on a forum where 95% of the users are English/British, so I'd think twice before calling us pommys, ect.
http://baysideproducts.com/store/images/victoria_cheval_mirror.jpg

VirtualG
09-09-2009, 06:17 AM
Sorry, sir, but I am going to have to rip your post apart.

*Removed*


Wow, can't you take just a little bit of sarcasm? I was joking, but I do doubt that League is the toughest ball game in the world, you can provide all the bias facts and opinions you want, but I aint buying that one bit, uncontested scrums? that's what rugby is all about, yes I know it's faster, but Union in my opinion is the 'tougher' of the two games, you just have to look at the size of the players to realise that. So get off your high horse.



I don't care about the, as you put it 'pussiest player in the world' ~ who says that? you? and you bias Australian views? And I would love for you to provide me a link where he says, and I quote; ~ cause I'm not buying that either, you also go on to talk about Toulon, I know what Toulin is and where they're based, so don't talk to me like i'm an idiot, Johnny Wilkinson plays for them, I do know quite a bit about Rugby in europe.




Wow, you go on to say "why would we want some burnt pommy stumps anyway?" but you then go on to defend it by saying 'The only time cricket was ever rough was when you pommy ***** could beat bradmon and the Aussies so you started using body line heats to get us out of the game you no good cheats!' ~ firstly, that made no sense, secondly, are you talking about the same 'body line' methods people use today? i.e. short balls? the same balls that Brett Lee & Co in the Australian cricket team use? bit contradictive 'mate'. And I'd be careful when you call us 'pommys', after all you are on a forum where 95% of the population is from the Country that founded Australia, and populated, remember the whole 'we went our prisoners to Australia' thing? yeh, I won't go down that road.
Sorry, I dont follow AFL. Rugby League and AFL hate each other (Rugby League is a NSW and QLD sport while Aussie Rules is a VIC sport) but your closing in on League territory and we're getting peved.

*Removed*
Maybe you deserve it because you're swearing at everyone and being cocky? telling people to shut the **** off ect is not very nice, also, I think Grayz was actually having a little bit of 'banter' with you, but then again, you Australians can't take loosing, can you?

That's what I think, and probably what the others think that you have started attacking, chill out, calm down, and remember, you're on a forum where 95% of the users are English/British, so I'd think twice before calling us pommys, ect.
Lol, *Removed* above, like calling someone pommy on this forum is gonna make me think twice, some dummy called me a cobber (what ever that is) and calling me Aussie is the same thing as Pom. I cant call you an Engy, that sounds weird... First of all I'd just like to state. Australia and New Zealand saved Britains ass in WW1. Second of all, look in wiki under Sonny bill williams and see what he states. I never told anyone to shut the "astrix's" up, maybe you'r refering to the comment that I displayed that someone posted in my -rep. I was, btw, bagging the ashes, although I didn't defend like you think I just said that you English players couldn't beat the Aussies without playing dirty. I havent seen the body line method purposely used in a long time. Ohh and I cant take losing like you can, probably coz Im not used to it (dont worry if you dont get it right away, ill let you think... Ok, thats long enough)

You just have to look at the sheer athleticism of League players to realise what they do is just as hard as Union.
I think you need to be a lot tougher (mentally and physically) to play rugby league.

I guess there is arguments for both forms, but my opinion is the bigger the players the more physical it'll be, but that's just based on opinion. :8
Ok, in Rugby League they dont not wear padding at all besides (rarrely) head gear and and mouth guards.

I wont reply to you considering this isn't football and I don't feel as passonate about rugby as I do football however I will say that I've played both league and union. Guess which one I ****** my knee up in? ;)
League? Or did you chuck a sickie. And what do you mean this aint football? League is Football. Union is football. Football is football. Aussie Rules is football. Gridiron is football. They are just different codes.


PTBA

Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not rude to others. Thanks.

lBlue
09-09-2009, 07:36 AM
*Removed*



Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not make inappropriate comments. Thanks.

Browney
09-09-2009, 09:01 AM
I think you need to be a lot tougher (mentally and physically) to play rugby league.

I know, I was agreeing with you. :blue_doub


Ok, in Rugby League they dont not wear padding at all besides (rarrely) head gear and and mouth guards.

I'm on your side, but I've got to say I've never worn pads playing Union, I got encouraged to do so when I started playing league.


League? Or did you chuck a sickie. And what do you mean this aint football? League is Football. Union is football. Football is football. Aussie Rules is football. Gridiron is football. They are just different codes.

No, league is rugby football league and Union is rugby football Union. Football is the most popular sport in the world and the best. How about you look that up.

VirtualG
09-09-2009, 09:41 AM
I know, I was agreeing with you. :blue_doub.Same thing as below




I'm on your side, but I've got to say I've never worn pads playing Union, I got encouraged to do so when I started playing league.They encourage you when youre younger so you dont get too hurt because you're still growing. And I know you're on my side, I was agreeing with you, it just came out in an angry way :)




No, league is rugby football league and Union is rugby football Union. Football is the most popular sport in the world and the best. How about you look that up.
Cant say I understand what your talking about in the first sentence. football is the worlds most popular sport but thats due to many reasons, eg. all you need is a round ball that, in poorer countries, can be made out of rags. The rules are very simple. Football is a lot older as union evolved from football and league and gridiron both evolved from union (I seriously think that rugby league, and I know almost all rugby league fans will agree, that rugby league would be contending for that spot as the worlds most popular sport if it wasn't for the super league wars, but you probably dont fully understand that). Football tickets around the world are a lot cheaper than rugby league tickets as league (and union, and afl, and grid iron all) needs much better facilities (for example, look at old trafford and compare it to anz stadium, which can hold more fans?) Football doesn't have such a low salery cap (if any) but rugby league does. Football can be played by anyone of any race and size that have average physical qualities, they just need to learn skill where as sports such as league and union (afl is the same as football in this case) you need to be born with seperate qualities to be born into seperate positions on the field and either you have potential or you dont. Rugby league, union, ect costs a lot more to play in minor leagues (for children) as gear gets destroyed a lot more! And the last one I can think of (because it's quite late in Australia) is that we dont get enough people playing when they are younger because of over protective perants... Ever heard of the term, soccer mum?

StefanWolves
09-09-2009, 11:35 AM
Lol, *Removed* above, like calling someone pommy on this forum is gonna make me think twice, some dummy called me a cobber (what ever that is) and calling me Aussie is the same thing as Pom. I cant call you an Engy, that sounds weird... First of all I'd just like to state. Australia and New Zealand saved Britains ass in WW1. Second of all, look in wiki under Sonny bill williams and see what he states. I never told anyone to shut the "astrix's" up, maybe you'r refering to the comment that I displayed that someone posted in my -rep. I was, btw, bagging the ashes, although I didn't defend like you think I just said that you English players couldn't beat the Aussies without playing dirty. I havent seen the body line method purposely used in a long time. Ohh and I cant take losing like you can, probably coz Im not used to it (dont worry if you dont get it right away, ill let you think... Ok, thats long enough)

I think you need to be a lot tougher (mentally and physically) to play rugby league.

Ok, in Rugby League they dont not wear padding at all besides (rarrely) head gear and and mouth guards.
League? Or did you chuck a sickie. And what do you mean this aint football? League is Football. Union is football. Football is football. Aussie Rules is football. Gridiron is football. They are just different codes.


PTBA

Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not rude to others. Thanks.

yet again causing arguments, that shows who is rite and who is wrong.

an sorry, but i laughed hard when you said AU and NZ saved the UK in WW1, just lol, lol lol lol, seeing as though you were our country then, so you were expected to help us, cause we ruled you (and are still part of OUR commonwealth, as is most of the WORLD), but in NO way did you save us at all, if anything you were in the way, we kicked ass on our own in WW1, it was just WW2 where America had to help.

Pfft, what are those Aussie teachers teaching you?

-Heart
09-09-2009, 02:41 PM
I thought this was a predominatly british forum, then probably the second biggest nation on here would be Aussie. So saying it's a british sport when rugby league is actually british is kinda stupid. The following sports in my opinion suck:
Union
Tennis
Golf
NFL
etc..
Watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxHKr9HJACc the middle sport is rugby league, like union just faster a less *****...
Rugby League is Massively played in Australia, New Zealand, France, Japan, England, Scottland, Fiji, Ireland, New Guinea,
Your -rep to me was pathetic. Get out. Before I start getting angry and swearing at you.

lBlue
09-09-2009, 02:59 PM
Your -rep to me was pathetic. Get out. Before I start getting angry and swearing at you.
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR, :eusa_danc

StefanWolves
09-09-2009, 03:14 PM
Your -rep to me was pathetic. Get out. Before I start getting angry and swearing at you.

this 14 year old is gonna rampageeeee :P

-Heart
10-09-2009, 07:04 PM
this 14 year old is gonna rampageeeee :P
Not funny. Not even slightly, to be honest.

VirtualG
10-09-2009, 09:11 PM
yet again causing arguments, that shows who is rite and who is wrong.

an sorry, but i laughed hard when you said AU and NZ saved the UK in WW1, just lol, lol lol lol, seeing as though you were our country then, so you were expected to help us, cause we ruled you (and are still part of OUR commonwealth, as is most of the WORLD), but in NO way did you save us at all, if anything you were in the way, we kicked ass on our own in WW1, it was just WW2 where America had to help.

Pfft, what are those Aussie teachers teaching you?
You didn't rule us in world war one, nor did you rule New Zealand, Austalia federated in 1901, the war started in 1914. And yes, we did help you. You called on Aussies in france, Dradanelles, Africa, and many other places to save you (new zealand was at all of those) and New Zealand was also at Hill 60 to save your ass.
Pfft, what are you even talking about?

StefanWolves
10-09-2009, 09:12 PM
Not funny. Not even slightly, to be honest.

i wasn't trying to be, i was being serious, then again, you're the one temp banned.


You didn't rule us in world war one, nor did you rule New Zealand, Austalia federated in 1901, the war started in 1914. And yes, we did help you. You called on Aussies in france, Dradanelles, Africa, and many other places to save you (new zealand was at all of those) and New Zealand was also at Hill 60 to save your ass.
Pfft, what are you even talking about?

Wow, you were and still part of our commonwealth, you abide by our monarch, if the queen asks you to come to war with us, you do it (well, it was back then) ~ in NO way did you 'SAVE' us, what are those teachers teaching you, save our ass? pfft, you're getting worse than some Americans.

VirtualG
11-09-2009, 05:54 AM
i wasn't trying to be, i was being serious, then again, you're the one temp banned.



Wow, you were and still part of our commonwealth, you abide by our monarch, if the queen asks you to come to war with us, you do it (well, it was back then) ~ in NO way did you 'SAVE' us, what are those teachers teaching you, save our ass? pfft, you're getting worse than some Americans.
You obviously dont know that just because we are apart of the commonwealth doesn't mean you rule us. As I recall, you requested us to free the water ways through the dardanelles to allow Russia to be resupplied.Thats when Australian soldiers landed on Gallipoli. And, also, (true fact btw) while we were fighting for you two of your commanders landed us on the wrong beach allowing us to be slaughtered. We saved your ass because without us you would have in no way enough soldiers to continue with the war effort. I've got a text book here saying that Australia suffered the third most casualties in world war one after New Zealand and France (in ratio to our population) and we had the most soldiers in ratio fighting in the war. I also dont thinky ou would have requested our help unless needed, correct? And let me tell you one more time, you did not control us, as we can become a republic if we wanted to, we just didn't cause there was no point but you still do not control us and havent since 1901.

StefanWolves
11-09-2009, 12:44 PM
You obviously dont know that just because we are apart of the commonwealth doesn't mean you rule us. As I recall, you requested us to free the water ways through the dardanelles to allow Russia to be resupplied.Thats when Australian soldiers landed on Gallipoli. And, also, (true fact btw) while we were fighting for you two of your commanders landed us on the wrong beach allowing us to be slaughtered. We saved your ass because without us you would have in no way enough soldiers to continue with the war effort. I've got a text book here saying that Australia suffered the third most casualties in world war one after New Zealand and France (in ratio to our population) and we had the most soldiers in ratio fighting in the war. I also dont thinky ou would have requested our help unless needed, correct? And let me tell you one more time, you did not control us, as we can become a republic if we wanted to, we just didn't cause there was no point but you still do not control us and havent since 1901.

WOW, YOU'RE STILL PART OF THE COMMONWEALTH, YOU STILL ABIDE BY OUR QUEEN, IF SHE ASKS YOU TO COME TO WAR, YOU WILL COME, YOU'RE STILL PART OF OUR MONARCH (EVEN THOUGH YOU'RE TRYING TO SEPARATE FROM IT) - AND NO, YOU DID NOT SAVE US IN WW1, UGH....

What are those teachers teaching you? some bias crap that isn't fact, at all, if you think helping us in one little but of the whole of a WW (because we ordered your country to), was 'saving our ass' then god help you, really, I would like to see how your countty would have coped against the nazi's in WW1, and especially in WW2 after our cities got bombed by the German Air Force 24/7, but we never gave up, and won with the help of the US and Russia (IN WW'2' not WW'1') ~ Australia played really no part in ANY of the WWs.

lBlue
11-09-2009, 02:08 PM
You didn't rule us in world war one, nor did you rule New Zealand, Austalia federated in 1901, the war started in 1914. And yes, we did help you. You called on Aussies in france, Dradanelles, Africa, and many other places to save you (new zealand was at all of those) and New Zealand was also at Hill 60 to save your ass.
Pfft, what are you even talking about?
I wasn't going to participate in this thread again however I feel I might as well do considering the bile you're writing.

I'll point out what I said in a PM to someone, Australia didn't "Save our ass". We simply called in a favor which we duly deserved from you and you gave us that favor. Andrew Fisher thought that helping us out would be a good way to show how loyal they were to it's "mother country" which you liked to hold close ties to. Along with looking loyal you would gain respect from other countries like France, India, America etc making it easy to trade and build connections.

We didn't call in France. We were co-operating with France...

VirtualG
14-09-2009, 10:44 AM
Your -rep to me was pathetic. Get out. Before I start getting angry and swearing at you.
Wow everyones sooo scared...

this 14 year old is gonna rampageeeee :P
rofl

Not funny. Not even slightly, to be honest.
It's not that its funny, its that your comment was stupid, oh and suck for being banned, you too wolf...

I wasn't going to participate in this thread again however I feel I might as well do considering the bile you're writing.

I'll point out what I said in a PM to someone, Australia didn't "Save our ass". We simply called in a favor which we duly deserved from you and you gave us that favor. Andrew Fisher thought that helping us out would be a good way to show how loyal they were to it's "mother country" which you liked to hold close ties to. Along with looking loyal you would gain respect from other countries like France, India, America etc making it easy to trade and build connections.

We didn't call in France. We were co-operating with France...
First of all, America fought against you in the American revolution and won. India fought against you in the indian revolution and won, tahnks to Gahndi. France was fighting against you through-out history. You were hated back then like the americans are today.

WOW, YOU'RE STILL PART OF THE COMMONWEALTH, YOU STILL ABIDE BY OUR QUEEN, IF SHE ASKS YOU TO COME TO WAR, YOU WILL COME, YOU'RE STILL PART OF OUR MONARCH (EVEN THOUGH YOU'RE TRYING TO SEPARATE FROM IT) - AND NO, YOU DID NOT SAVE US IN WW1, UGH....

What are those teachers teaching you? some bias crap that isn't fact, at all, if you think helping us in one little but of the whole of a WW (because we ordered your country to), was 'saving our ass' then god help you, really, I would like to see how your countty would have coped against the nazi's in WW1, and especially in WW2 after our cities got bombed by the German Air Force 24/7, but we never gave up, and won with the help of the US and Russia (IN WW'2' not WW'1') ~ Australia played really no part in ANY of the WWs.
Ok, for your first paragraph let me correct you... WE ARE NOT UNDER YOUR CONTROL! If Australia was under the Uk control then you would stop us from becoming a republic if we wanted to but you wouldn't would you? No. You didn't try and prevent last time a referendum was passed on the subject therefore you do not control us. And seriously, if it was n't for Australia and New Zealand in the war you would have had a 50/50 chance of losing it from that point. If it was just a favour then why did we get slaughtered on the beaches of Gallipoli 20 000 miles away from home for you. One big effing favour.And if it was just a favour I dont think we would have to have forced people to join the army to fight and die for a country 22000miles away as a favour. We were struggling to suppourt you, do you think we would have been suppourting if you didn't need it, and even if we were then wh would we have to go to such lenghts as to force men to die for another country as a "favour" ohh and Nazi's in world war one? That shows how much you know. The National Socialist Party (aka Nazi's) weren't until the 1930's, way after the first war. Dont forget, Australia was bombed in World war two repeatedly, especially in Darwin by Nazi's and the Japanese.You also only mentioned the Russians and Yanks for helping you. How bout New Zealand, French Resistance, Australia, German Resistance, Italian Resistence, Malta, etc... Once again, shows how much you know. Did you know after world war two the Uk actaully offered malta to become apart of the uk because they were so impressed with how they fought. And saying that we took no part in the war is just dumb! As I remember (all I've said is fact btw...) that Japan controlled a lot of asia and almost the whole pacific up until Papau New Guinea (the closest country to Australia After New Zealand) before Anzacs fought all the way back to Japan (with Phillipino resistance help). Ever heard of Kokoda. I majored in War's through-out History so Im sure Im right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZXTpjLPQUg

lBlue
14-09-2009, 02:27 PM
Wow everyones sooo scared...

rofl

It's not that its funny, its that your comment was stupid, oh and suck for being banned, you too wolf...

First of all, America fought against you in the American revolution and won. India fought against you in the indian revolution and won, tahnks to Gahndi. France was fighting against you through-out history. You were hated back then like the americans are today.

Ok, for your first paragraph let me correct you... WE ARE NOT UNDER YOUR CONTROL! If Australia was under the Uk control then you would stop us from becoming a republic if we wanted to but you wouldn't would you? No. You didn't try and prevent last time a referendum was passed on the subject therefore you do not control us. And seriously, if it was n't for Australia and New Zealand in the war you would have had a 50/50 chance of losing it from that point. If it was just a favour then why did we get slaughtered on the beaches of Gallipoli 20 000 miles away from home for you. One big effing favour.And if it was just a favour I dont think we would have to have forced people to join the army to fight and die for a country 22000miles away as a favour. We were struggling to suppourt you, do you think we would have been suppourting if you didn't need it, and even if we were then wh would we have to go to such lenghts as to force men to die for another country as a "favour" ohh and Nazi's in world war one? That shows how much you know. The National Socialist Party (aka Nazi's) weren't until the 1930's, way after the first war. Dont forget, Australia was bombed in World war two repeatedly, especially in Darwin by Nazi's and the Japanese.You also only mentioned the Russians and Yanks for helping you. How bout New Zealand, French Resistance, Australia, German Resistance, Italian Resistence, Malta, etc... Once again, shows how much you know. Did you know after world war two the Uk actaully offered malta to become apart of the uk because they were so impressed with how they fought. And saying that we took no part in the war is just dumb! As I remember (all I've said is fact btw...) that Japan controlled a lot of asia and almost the whole pacific up until Papau New Guinea (the closest country to Australia After New Zealand) before Anzacs fought all the way back to Japan (with Phillipino resistance help). Ever heard of Kokoda. I majored in War's through-out History so Im sure Im right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZXTpjLPQUg
We were fighting alongside France in WW1 and WW2...

StefanWolves
14-09-2009, 10:30 PM
Lol I can't be bothered even contemplating a reply to that above post... :/

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!