GTA V Discussion

[ItsDave]

Yes, its very, very early to be talking to it - but I do love the franchise and I thought I'd just post some articles I found on the web.

Dan Houser talking about the fifth: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=227291

Some guy who... amazingly found the link on the Stories of Liberty City manual: http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6239776.html

[Fez]

Make it fun again.

[syko2006]

It would be nice to see another GTA!
Can't wait for it's release if there is going to be one! :D

[dbgtz]

Funny how people think this will be PS3 exclusive. I just want a large map, I wouldn't mind if they downscaled the graphics slightly or used multiple discs for xbox maybe. Oh and planes of course.

[AlexOC]

ITS GOING TO BE IN TOKYO CALLED TOKYO STREETS OK


Warning - Link contains swearing that is filtered on the forum.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnfKIuCHAlU

[-Xiangu-]

I really hope it's computer compatible like IV ;D

[CJW93]

Back to Vice City pleaseeeee!

[Fez]

Funny how people think this will be PS3 exclusive.

Where are people thinking this?

You should learn too that the game industry isn't built on providing the best entertainment or innovative experience but making the most money in the end. That is why they sometimes they cut titles content to make it appeal to 360 owners. Not saying the average 360 owner is stupid and the concept that more than two discs would put off any game owner, but we have to put into consideration that the biggest owner age for 360s is 12-15 years old.

If this means also cutting the PS3 version, maybe even getting a little money from the console manufacturer (games industry is unfair, live with it), then there's nothing we can do.

[dbgtz]

Because Rockstar said like there's gonna be 3 PS3 exclusive things or something like that or "The PS3 is getting 3 good things next year" - if that was the quote then one is the DLC and another is Agent.

[Adamm]

Because Rockstar said like there's gonna be 3 PS3 exclusive things or something like that or "The PS3 is getting 3 good things next year" - if that was the quote then one is the DLC and another is Agent.
GTA will never be exclusive.

[Fez]

GTA will never be exclusive.

Already been a timed exclusive nest egg for Microsoft


Because Rockstar said like there's gonna be 3 PS3 exclusive things or something like that or "The PS3 is getting 3 good things next year" - if that was the quote then one is the DLC and another is Agent.

One of those is Liberty City stories, another is Agent and the last one is Red Dead Redemption. Yes it's multiplatform but it's what Rockstar said.

[Adamm]

That was just add ons though.

[Fez]

That was just add ons though.
They're both 10 hour games, not traditional DLC in the sense. More like full on episodic games like Half Life 2's Episode 1 and 2.

[Simmzay]

A new location would be nice.

[GommeInc]

As long as it is better than GTA IV, which was unbelievably crap :/

[dbgtz]

It wasn't bad, it was just bad in comparison (to san andreas).

[GommeInc]

It wasn't bad, it was just bad in comparison (to san andreas).
I found the story line to be incredibly dry, and it never used the whole map. It was just like playing a gangster film, when a little bit of unrealistic gameplay would of been nice to see too. Rockstar were probably worried about the fact they were using New York though :P

[Fez]

I thought GTA IV was one of the most well written and emotionally involving tales ever to come out of videogames. But then I reminded myself this is GRAND THEFT AUTO.

You're supposed to parody srsbznis, not become it.

LIKE BATMAN.

[Black_Apalachi]

I only liked GTA IV so much because it was the first 360 game I ever played so the graphics and feel was all new to me. I was actually mesmerised by the driving experience of the vehicles. I play it now wishing I could relive that moment. I like to hope the next one will offer something else completely mind-blowing but I doubt it will be much different to GTA IV apart from missions (which are getting really repetitive now by the way) and the odd vehicle or two.

Wouldn't be surprised if that "teaser" poster was a complete red herring either (not that it actually suggests anything anyway).

[Adamm]

GTA: SA + GTA 4 Graphics + Ragdoll = :8:8

[Fez]

GTA: SA + GTA 4 Graphics + Ragdoll = :8:8
I agree.

With more nudity too.

[dbgtz]

I also want the ability to move cars by running into it :D Also wasn't there a GTA exclusive on PS2 at one point?

[ItsDave]

I also want the ability to move cars by running into it :D Also wasn't there a GTA exclusive on PS2 at one point?

That might have been GTA III because the Xbox was released later than the PS2, however I think it was like, released later for the Xbox


GTA: SA + GTA 4 Graphics + Ragdoll = :8:8

Too true.

If ya go on that picture though, its either Vice City, or wherever that poster means, or hopefully San Andreas, where thousands of people was hoping it was Mt Chiliard.

Any famous places with volcanoes?

[Fez]

Any famous places with volcanoes?

Hawaii... that would be interesting.

[dbgtz]

Hawaii? Even though it is just one big volcano.

[[Chris]]

I agree.

With more nudity too.

You only want another Thomas stubbs scene..

I must say, I liked GTA IV's Gameplay - I liked the handling of cars - How bikes handled different in TLAD.

The main story of IV was Too serious i think. Hi, Im niko bellic. The end.

I think that going back to vice city will be good, Because its lively, The map was big, but small enough to remember, But who knows where Rockstar will take us.

[ItsDave]

If it does go back to Vice City I would still like an 80's radio station.

[Ashley 12344]

If it does go back to Vice City I would still like an 80's radio station.

Nice big map. I liked the Desert areas, countryside areas, and casino areas. A couple more 'bank job' type missions wouldn't go amiss either. Apart from that, I have no doubt Rockstar will keep me entertained.

I seriously, seriously doubt this game will not be a PS3 exclusive.

If it won't fit on a disc, they'll put it on two. I don't understand how thats even considerable as a reason.

[Oleh]

The only feature worthy of my 5 star approval would be the ability to ghost ride

[dbgtz]

I'd like a more entertaining online too.

[ItsDave]

Most GTA's come out years at a time. They have got to be thinking up some upgraded Multiplayer, game engine, nice big map. However, they may wait until a new console comes out, perhaps make it compatible with Natal, which I personally wouldn't like, however just saying.

[Frodo13.]

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a207121/analyst-gta-v-announcement-imminent.html

[GommeInc]

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a207121/analyst-gta-v-announcement-imminent.html

As the article says, this is planned to over-sell it's predecessor - not like that would be hard. Provided it has a decent storyline, and the story in the game goes on for ages, it will be fine. Multiplayer would need to be better too, and alot of people seem to have their little dislikes for the current multiplayer. It would be interesting to see what this one involves :D

[Eight.]

This isn't GTA V. It's a new GTA with a improved engine of IV. Like How Vice City and San Andreas was to GTA III. GTA V won't come out for a long time. Its just anotehr Vice City or San Andreas.

[ItsDave]

This isn't GTA V. It's a new GTA with a improved engine of IV. Like How Vice City and San Andreas was to GTA III. GTA V won't come out for a long time. Its just anotehr Vice City or San Andreas.

Rockstar moved straight onto Vice City after GTA III. They didn't improve it alot, they said that when San Andreas was coming out because they took alot more time on it. The only time they improved the engine was when they made a new one for GTA IV.

[Black_Apalachi]

Rockstar moved straight onto Vice City after GTA III. They didn't improve it alot, they said that when San Andreas was coming out because they took alot more time on it. The only time they improved the engine was when they made a new one for GTA IV.

GTA, GTA II, GTA III and GTA IV are the main games. All the other titles are just side-projects.

[HotelUser]

And I still played San Andreas?

I have no idea how readily available IV is for the PC. I'd hope that its like SA where you can just go on freeplay and mess around: that's fun!

[Richie]

And I still played San Andreas?

Your right to still play san andreas it was by far the best gta game out. What I don't understand about rockstar is why after every game they take stuff out that were in the older games, like for san andreas betting in big casinos was great and buying propertys. They just scraped all that which is so ******* annoying. Although I must say the details in gta have improved greatly, its becoming allot more realistic, although if I jumped off a building I think I'd break my legs :P

[Black_Apalachi]

Your right to still play san andreas it was by far the best gta game out. What I don't understand about rockstar is why after every game they take stuff out that were in the older games, like for san andreas betting in big casinos was great and buying propertys. They just scraped all that which is so ******* annoying. Although I must say the details in gta have improved greatly, its becoming allot more realistic, although if I jumped off a building I think I'd break my legs :P

It's probably to do with what I said about them being side-projects. I'm glad they keep the main games more simpler while the others have all the extra stuff. If anything, it at least gives us the option to stick with a core type of GTA game which consists of driving around and shooting people, rather than being forced to become a property developer with a gambling habit while juggling multiple girlfriends - all at the same time as protecting da hood. :P

[Richie]

It's probably to do with what I said about them being side-projects. I'm glad they keep the main games more simpler while the others have all the extra stuff. If anything, it at least gives us the option to stick with a core type of GTA game which consists of driving around and shooting people, rather than being forced to become a property developer with a gambling habit while juggling multiple girlfriends - all at the same time as protecting da hood. :P

I know but it'd be class if they incorporated them all into one and its a shame they got rid of two player offline that was hilarious

[GommeInc]

It would be great if they looked at GTA III again. Some of the locations in that game were great. The sheer-cliff in the third island, and the one story mansion in the first island built into the side of cliff which you can go inside and hide. If they made locations like that, with buildings you can go in with backgrounds and scenery as described surround them, then I'll be happy.

I also liked how in GTA III you purposely attacked the police in one mission when there was a police mens ball. Oh and bringing back the car crusher would be fun, it could be useful to make some income - you take a car, and crush them, incorporated into some side missions that aren't too relevant to the game. There were quite alot of fun missions and locations in that game :P I found GTA IV to be too dull and boring, but then again it was based on New York, so it wasn't really going to be original anyway :/

Making the radios funny again would be a good idea too. The radio stations in San Andreas are legendary, specifically the adverts :P

[ItsDave]

I also liked how in GTA III you purposely attacked the police in one mission when there was a police mens ball. Oh and bringing back the car crusher would be fun, it could be useful to make some income - you take a car, and crush them, incorporated into some side missions that aren't too relevant to the game. There were quite alot of fun missions and locations in that game :P I found GTA IV to be too dull and boring, but then again it was based on New York, so it wasn't really going to be original anyway :/

Making the radios funny again would be a good idea too. The radio stations in San Andreas are legendary, specifically the adverts :P

I would prefer to them to redo Vice City, map was brilliant, time setting was brilliant, radio was brilliant. However I do agree San Andraes was amazing. Downloaded it for my 360 like a week ago, do love those old tunes but for funny adverts? GTA IV set the limit, with the razor blade advert "How about frolicle close? Thats not close enough". Just brilliant. GTA IV was depressing but driving to a funeral with hilarious adverts like that. Fantastic.

[Black_Apalachi]

It would be great if they looked at GTA III again. Some of the locations in that game were great. The sheer-cliff in the third island, and the one story mansion in the first island built into the side of cliff which you can go inside and hide. If they made locations like that, with buildings you can go in with backgrounds and scenery as described surround them, then I'll be happy.

I also liked how in GTA III you purposely attacked the police in one mission when there was a police mens ball. Oh and bringing back the car crusher would be fun, it could be useful to make some income - you take a car, and crush them, incorporated into some side missions that aren't too relevant to the game. There were quite alot of fun missions and locations in that game :P I found GTA IV to be too dull and boring, but then again it was based on New York, so it wasn't really going to be original anyway :/

Making the radios funny again would be a good idea too. The radio stations in San Andreas are legendary, specifically the adverts :P

GTA III was also based on NYC, GTA IV just made it more realistic. I do agree with you on pretty much everything though [also bring back ambulance/fire/taxi missions], as long as they made the maps slightly bigger.

[CrazyColaist]

i would like planes and all that stuff.. and maybe like propper jobs? but not like the sims 3

[Richie]

Making the radios funny again would be a good idea too. The radio stations in San Andreas are legendary, specifically the adverts :P

Ha yeah and loads of the songs are great too.

[Black_Apalachi]

i would like planes and all that stuff.. and maybe like propper jobs? but not like the sims 3

That's exactly my point - those of us who have been playing GTA since it began on PS1 don't want to play the Sims, we just want to drive around and shoot people.

[GommeInc]

GTA III was also based on NYC, GTA IV just made it more realistic. I do agree with you on pretty much everything though [also bring back ambulance/fire/taxi missions], as long as they made the maps slightly bigger.
Not completely based off it though, most of it looks as though it was made up. The only NYC based areas seem to of been done on a zone-by-zone basis, for example the north of third and final island was residential much like in GTA IV (and maybe NYC), but the landscape included cliffs and steep hills. The mansions were really the only key feature that resembled GTA IV.

Although I do agree with what someone else said, about Vice City. The map and the missions were good :) I liked flying around the city in helicopters doing missions, like the one where you infiltrate a mafia hangout or that one where you have to follow that guy in the pink limo. Owning and buying hangouts was kinda fun too, if they did that again it would make it interesting, provided they don't make it a necessity. It also depends on the story too, a Polish immigrant can't really turn into a property developer/owner immediately :P

[ItsDave]

Although I do agree with what someone else said, about Vice City. It also depends on the story too, a Polish immigrant can't really turn into a property developer/owner immediately :P

Was me :/

Anyway, I think the character should be an ex-cop, haven't had it yet surprisingly enough.

[GommeInc]

Was me :/

Anyway, I think the character should be an ex-cop, haven't had it yet surprisingly enough.
I'm too lazy to scroll up :P But a good suggestion :) I also agree with the ex-cop idea! It's funny they've not done that yet... Maybe the creators of GTA do not want to stray away from immigrants/migrants/secretive people? It would be interesting though, although I can't think of any films or books with ex-cops gone bad :/ Does anyone have an example?

[Black_Apalachi]

Not completely based off it though, most of it looks as though it was made up. The only NYC based areas seem to of been done on a zone-by-zone basis, for example the north of third and final island was residential much like in GTA IV (and maybe NYC), but the landscape included cliffs and steep hills. The mansions were really the only key feature that resembled GTA IV. ...

That's pretty much the whole concept of the word 'based'. Anyway there were loads of aspects which vaguely resembled NYC, for example; Central Park, Ground Zero, JFKA.


Was me :/

Anyway, I think the character should be an ex-cop, haven't had it yet surprisingly enough.

That's such an unoriginal yet amazing idea. :P Would just feel like I was playing Driver though.

[GommeInc]

That's pretty much the whole concept of the word 'based'. Anyway there were loads of aspects which vaguely resembled NYC, for example; Central Park, Ground Zero, JFKA.
GTA III had all these? I don't remember the central-city island having any of them. It was a long time ago though, I remember there being a building site and a car park you can get a stunt bonus :P

[Black_Apalachi]

GTA III had all these? I don't remember the central-city island having any of them. It was a long time ago though, I remember there being a building site and a car park you can get a stunt bonus :P

The building site would have been relevant to Ground Zero and there was a park on the same island. The airport was on the third island.

[ItsDave]

Playing through San Andreas has made me realise how obvious it was they were going back to Liberty City to it, even flying back to Liberty City, so anywhere in particular in GTA IV that got mentioned? I can only think of San Andreas because of all the "Fly To Los Santos // Las Venturas". Who thinks the same?

[Adamm]

Playing through San Andreas has made me realise how obvious it was they were going back to Liberty City to it, even flying back to Liberty City, so anywhere in particular in GTA IV that got mentioned? I can only think of San Andreas because of all the "Fly To Los Santos // Las Venturas". Who thinks the same?
I wouldn't be disappointed.

However it's looking increasingly likely that it will be Vice City. Which again, will not be disappointing.

[ItsDave]

I wouldn't be disappointed.

However it's looking increasingly likely that it will be Vice City. Which again, will not be disappointing.

That would be amazing. Just like Liberty City, it'd be redone.

Perhaps it could be taking on just like the first 3D GTA? Like GTA III then Vice City? And now its doing it again like GTA IV then Vice City?

What information is there to it being Vice City again too out of interest?

[Adamm]

Well I mean there's loads of conspiracies from this picture:

http://gamerant.com/wp-content/uploads/Grand-Theft-Auto-51.jpg

It gives us nothing, really. But I've read many stories mostly linking to Vice City.

[Oleh]

That is quite obviously Yorkshire ;)

[GommeInc]

Would be interesting to see what they do with Vice City. Is it based on anything, or was Liberty City the only map based on a real life location?

[Zak]

To be honest I liked San Andreas the best, gang culture was always entertaining. Planes also ftw.

[Black_Apalachi]

Can't remember if it's been said or what but when I first saw that image I always imagined the tear in the paper to be the shape of a country... would be a fantastic clue if it was.

[engaged]

Australia?! GTA SA was the best, quad bikes and jetpacks ftw.

[Black_Apalachi]

Yeah Australia jumped out at me too but when you compare it to an actual map, it's nothing like it lol

[dbgtz]

I'd love to see another GTA: London :(

[AlexOC]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnfKIuCHAlU

GTA V is to be set in Tokyo


you heard it here first.

[Pazza]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnfKIuCHAlU

GTA V is to be set in Tokyo


you heard it here first.

or not..?

All them pictures are from flight simulator i'm guessing, aswell as the fact that anyone can download a GTA font, and write places on it.
also, funny how there are no pictures without planes in it?

and i'm guessing they'll go back to vice city, and has anyone noticed how in the corner of this picture http://gamerant.com/wp-content/uploads/Grand-Theft-Auto-51.jpg it just says seagulls, pretty randomly. In vice city, one of the songs on the radio's was a flock of seagulls, i ran :O

or maybe i'm looking too far into it :P

And i'd quite like to see the flying car cheat back :P and maybe an ingame video editor, like the PC has ?

[ItsDave]

or not..?

All them pictures are from flight simulator i'm guessing, aswell as the fact that anyone can download a GTA font, and write places on it.
also, funny how there are no pictures without planes in it?

and i'm guessing they'll go back to vice city, and has anyone noticed how in the corner of this picture http://gamerant.com/wp-content/uploads/Grand-Theft-Auto-51.jpg it just says seagulls, pretty randomly. In vice city, one of the songs on the radio's was a flock of seagulls, i ran :O

or maybe i'm looking too far into it :P

And i'd quite like to see the flying car cheat back :P and maybe an ingame video editor, like the PC has ?

Exactly. I can't wait. Loved Vice City and everything in it. VCPR for the win!

[Black_Apalachi]

I can't remember if that was the reason or not, but I had it in my head that the next game will have seagulls instead of pigeons to shoot and collect.

Vice City was pretty good, but did nobody else hate the way the sun was always low and shining in your face while you were trying to drive?

[ItsDave]

I can't remember if that was the reason or not, but I had it in my head that the next game will have seagulls instead of pigeons to shoot and collect.

Vice City was pretty good, but did nobody else hate the way the sun was always low and shining in your face while you were trying to drive?

Yes to the sun one and on The Lost and Damned its Seagulls instead of pigeons if thats how you got confused.

[GommeInc]

And i'd quite like to see the flying car cheat back :P and maybe an ingame video editor, like the PC has ?
The car-to-boat cheat was pretty fun too :P The wheels would turn on their sides and make the cars act like hovercraft :D

[Technologic]

I notcied some odd convo in BOGT between luis and tony... they keep talking about business in London.... Anybody think its a hint?

[ItsDave]

I notcied some odd convo in BOGT between luis and tony... they keep talking about business in London.... Anybody think its a hint?

Really? I didn't catch up on it that much. I would love it. But they also talked about other places in GTA and compared to that "the next stop" thing It couldn't be London. I wish I knew what R* were planning.

[Meanies]

it'd be awesome if it was london, but most likely wont be.

[Black_Apalachi]

I've been waiting for them to recreate London since GTA III!


Yes to the sun one and on The Lost and Damned its Seagulls instead of pigeons if thats how you got confused.

Oh aye, that might have been it :P

[ItsDave]

A new piece of news.

http://www.oxm.co.uk/article.php?id=19532

[W00TZEH]

It's not really 'news' just someone predicting something.

[ItsDave]

Yeah... i know. :/ lol me > fail > myself

[Adamm]

anti climax

[Fez]

I'm saying way too much when I say there will be something from Rockstar at E3.

I hope my editor doesn't follow my I.P, he does already check my Twitter. :P

[ItsDave]

I just hope it isn't a side one like a new Vice City 2. I would like, GTA V. The new new GTA.

[Adamm]

I just hope it isn't a side one like a new Vice City 2. I would like, GTA V. The new new GTA.
u wot.

vice city wasn't a 'side one'.

they're all different.

gta3 was claude
gta vc was tommy
gta sa was carl
gta 4 was niko

chances are, it'll be a new character.

[Black_Apalachi]

I'm saying way too much when I say there will be something from Rockstar at E3.

I hope my editor doesn't follow my I.P, he does already check my Twitter. :P

Well it's not like even the expert or whatever he is in the article was necessary for us to work out that there is a slim possibility :P


u wot.

vice city wasn't a 'side one'.

they're all different.

gta3 was claude
gta vc was tommy
gta sa was carl
gta 4 was niko

chances are, it'll be a new character.

Everything other than GTA, GTA II, GTA III and GTA IV was a side-project.

[Adamm]

yeah you can think like that if you want but they were all completely new games with no carry ons, much, from either game.

they're all separate games.

[Neil]

yeah you can think like that if you want but they were all completely new games with no carry ons, much, from either game.

they're all separate games.

SA and Vice City are "spin-offs" so to speak, like some of the CoD games, they are the only two that are not set in Liberty City, other than London of course, hence when it's not "GTA 3 Vice City" etc.

[Black_Apalachi]

yeah you can think like that if you want but they were all completely new games with no carry ons, much, from either game.

they're all separate games.

I didn't say anything was a carry on of anything. :S

[Fez]

I hope they trump Red Dead.

[GommeInc]

I didn't say anything was a carry on of anything. :S
I'm guessing they find the term "side-project" a bit confusing. In a way they are side projects, but the term is usually used for games that weren't intended or had similar characters and maps, while Vice City and so forth were quite diverse compared to GTA III, which was quite basic compared to them :P That's how I'm guessing the confusion came about :)

[Black_Apalachi]

I'm guessing they find the term "side-project" a bit confusing. In a way they are side projects, but the term is usually used for games that weren't intended or had similar characters and maps, while Vice City and so forth were quite diverse compared to GTA III, which was quite basic compared to them :P That's how I'm guessing the confusion came about :)

Ah, I see. I guess the way to look at it is that all the main numbered titles (I, II, III, IV) are evolutions of each other - all set in the same city but just made more advanced each time. :)

[GommeInc]

Yep, pretty much :) If you look at the map of Liberty City in the original GTA, you can see alot of similarities in the current one:

http://www.rockstargames.com/gta/

It's interesting seeing how it's evolved, especially now the islands are vertical, rather than horizontal (to make it easier to read I imagine).

Anyway, what has this got to do with GTA V? Are we still speculation V is Vice City? Kinda destroys the evolution theory, but expansions like Liberty City Stories are the future :P

[Pazza]

Apparently it'll be called Grand theft auto: Vice or something, and apparently this is a snap of it http://www.gamereactor.eu/media/30/grandtheftauto_213021.jpg

[Adamm]

Ah, I see. I guess the way to look at it is that all the main numbered titles (I, II, III, IV) are evolutions of each other - all set in the same city but just made more advanced each time. :)
In which case the next GTA should be called GTA 4: Something. If you think about it:

GTA 1 & spinoffs - 1st game topdown
GTA 2 better graphics, on consoles
GTA 3 3d
GTA 4 next gen
GTA 5 ????????

they evolve so why is it gta 5? it should be gta 4: ???????

[Black_Apalachi]

In which case the next GTA should be called GTA 4: Something. If you think about it:

GTA 1 & spinoffs - 1st game topdown
GTA 2 better graphics, on consoles
GTA 3 3d
GTA 4 next gen
GTA 5 ????????

they evolve so why is it gta 5? it should be gta 4: ???????

Why? :S There has never been any thus far with a number and then a subtitle. It's just been GTA, GTA 2, GTA III, GTA IV. All the others with random names were just that - random names and no numbers. (Click (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_(series)#Games))

We've already had spin-offs of IV with Episodes From Liberty City so I don't see why V shouldn't be next in line.

[W00TZEH]

In which case the next GTA should be called GTA 4: Something. If you think about it:

GTA 1 & spinoffs - 1st game topdown
GTA 2 better graphics, on consoles
GTA 3 3d
GTA 4 next gen
GTA 5 ????????

they evolve so why is it gta 5? it should be gta 4: ???????
I don't remember a game being called GTA 3 vice city or GTA 3 san andreas

[Adamm]

I don't remember a game being called GTA 3 vice city or GTA 3 san andreas
they werent gta 4 and 5 either

SO I'M SORRY GTA: SOMETHING PICKY ****

[Black_Apalachi]

they werent gta 4 and 5 either

SO I'M SORRY GTA: SOMETHING PICKY ****

GTA V doesn't exist yet. I don't understand what you're getting at :P

[Moh]

I lost all respect when rockstar had the cheek to sell you the game for ps3 and then turn around and say you can't have any updates.

[Firehorse]

Fan Art:

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=652408&p=6565781