Al-Qaeda operative is a security risk but can't be deported because of 'human rights'

[Hitman]

Two Pakistani men branded a threat to national security by a judge, today won the right to stay in the country.
Al-Qaeda operative Abid Naseer, 24, and Ahmad Faraz Khan, 26, should not be deported back to their homeland because of the risk to their safety, the same immigration judge ruled.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1279350/Al-Qaeda-operative-security-risk-deported-judge-rules.html#ixzz0oJb1ISQ4

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8688501.stm

:S:S:S

[cocaine]

they must be laughing themselves stupid

[Jordy]

More to the point, if they're Al Qaeda operatives or even a threat to National Security, why haven't they been charged and thrown in jail?

[Smits]

This is why the justice system in this country is plain stupid.

[Hitman]

For those who say "Dailymail, Dailymail" - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8688501.stm

[lorren]

what a ******* joke.

[Adamm]

I love this country. I want to move.

[Callum.]

"Faraz Khan: Bailed to a secret location, movements restricted"

I bet he's loving the free house.

[Caution]

I really want to move, it's unreal..

[Hitman]

Maybe it'll take another terror attack for the Government to do something or for the courts to realise terrorists aren't friendly people.

[alexxxxx]

if anything its better to have them under our surveillance. send them back to pakistan and god knows what they'll plot against us.

[Hitman]

if anything its better to have them under our surveillance. send them back to pakistan and god knows what they'll plot against us.
Yeah and waste taxpayers money. In Pakistan they can only do what all the other terrorists are doing... which is not a huge amount.

[alexxxxx]

Yeah and waste taxpayers money. In Pakistan they can only do what all the other terrorists are doing... which is not a huge amount.

ever thought they might come back?

[Hitman]

ever thought they might come back?
If the border patrol works then they won't be allowed back in.

[alexxxxx]

If the border patrol works then they won't be allowed back in.

fake ID? if someone wants to get back they will.

[-:Undertaker:-]

fake ID? if someone wants to get back they will.

They will with the EUs open door policy, so you are completely correct.

[alexxxxx]

They will with the EUs open door policy, so you are completely correct.

it's bugger all to do with the EU. we don't share borders with the EU at all - we are a member of the EU but we still have an effective border between them. Every EU national who wants to come to the UK for whatever reason has to show a passport or ID card and the same goes the other way. a pakistani national has to do the same. This is unless they come through via Ireland where we have a 'Common Travel' area, which is nothing to do with the EU but an agreement between Ireland and the UK. I've heard stories of people who've smuggled themselves/drugs into the UK via remote areas of scotland for heavens sake.

[Hitman]

fake ID? if someone wants to get back they will.
Well they'd look the same and I'm pretty sure they'd keep a photo of deported terrorists on file... if it was as easy as fake ID then I'm sure hell of a load more terrorists/criminals would be flying in and out more freely. It's not a nightclub.

Deporting them will make it harder, seeing as they have to fly back over and attempt to pass security checks. If the system is any good they wont. Keeping them here is just wrong, they're bloody terrorists for crying out loud. Keeping them here is worse than deporting them and hoping they don't come back. I think you just like to disagree.

[Jordy]

I'm still very disillusioned as to why he hasn't been charged and thrown in jail? If he's a threat then they must have evidence against him?

[alexxxxx]

I'm still very disillusioned as to why he hasn't been charged and thrown in jail? If he's a threat then they must have evidence against him?

yeah but the problem is that if you charge him and he's found not guilty you have to let him go freely. they said they do have evidence but not enough (or perhaps they don't want to disclose the evidence - ongoing inquiries, bigger fish to fry?)

[Jordy]

yeah but the problem is that if you charge him and he's found not guilty you have to let him go freely. they said they do have evidence but not enough (or perhaps they don't want to disclose the evidence - ongoing inquiries, bigger fish to fry?)Ahh okay, doesn't really sound like a very fair justice system though.