PDA

View Full Version : Cable hits out at Obama administration over BP oil spill disaster



-:Undertaker:-
05-06-2010, 12:57 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1284125/Stop-blaming-UK-BP-oil-spill-disaster-Cable-hits-America.html


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/06/04/article-0-0686F397000005DC-591_233x423.jpg



Vince Cable has hit out at the 'extreme and unhelpful' anti-British rhetoric from the U.S. over BP's handling of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The Business Secretary stopped short of criticising President Barack Obama personally, and declared that Britain should not use ' gunboat diplomacy'. Some MPs, however, have said Mr Obama was wrong to blame Britain for the problem. The comments, which came yesterday as BP announced that a plan to funnel the oil away had partially worked, risked provoking a trans-Atlantic rift. American politicians and broadcasters have laid the blame for the accident on the Deepwater Horizon rig at the feet of the UK - despite BP being a multinational company. Mr Obama has continually referred to the company as 'British Petroleum' although it changed its name to BP more than a decade ago.

Mr Cable said yesterday: 'It's clear that some of the rhetoric in the U.S. is extreme and unhelpful.' He added that the fury being levelled at the company was 'a reaction to big oil'. Mr Cable cautioned against the Government resorting to 'gunboat diplomacy' by aggressively lobbying the White House on the oil company's behalf. He said Mr Obama was treating BP no more harshly than he would a U.S. company such as Exxon - the previous holder of the dubious record for the biggest oil leak in American history. But other MPs voiced their concern about the hostile tone of the U.S. Tory MP Andrew Rosindell said: 'It is not the British government or the British people who are to blame. It's a multinational company and it is up to them to fix this.'


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/06/04/article-0-09E4CE98000005DC-797_468x467.jpg



BP's gaffe-prone chief executive, Tony Hayward, risked exacerbating the divide by saying that he was not damaged by the crisis because of his British 'stiff upper lip'. 'No one has actually physically harmed me,' he said. 'They've thrown some words at me. 'But I'm a Brit, so sticks and stones can hurt your bones but words never break them, or whatever the expression is.' Mr Hayward also indicated the company would not be pressured into scrapping its dividend, which represents £1 in every £7 paid out in dividends in the UK.

The oil giant has faced calls from U.S. politicians to cancel an estimated £6.8billion in payouts due to shareholders. Last night Mr Obama criticised BP for failing to halt divided payments. He accused the company of 'nickel and diming' Gulf coast residents while preparing to spend billions on dividends - the American phrase is used to describe someone who pays the minimum to someone. He said the company's priority should be those residents worst affected by the spill. Mr Obama castigated BP as he made his third trip to Louisiana to check on progress being made to contain the massive oil spill.

It also emerged that oil had finally reached the coast of Florida, at Pensacola beach. Pressure groups have urged the Obama administration to seize BP's assets and divide them among those affected by the disaster. The company has lost £42billion in value since the start of the crisis. BP's containment cap over the stricken Gulf of Mexico well is collecting about 1,000 barrels per day. This is just a fraction of the 19,000 barrels a day the U.S. government has estimated is still gushing from the well, but a BP executive said that as the collection rate increases, it could clean up '90-plus per cent' of the oil.
Its about time somebody stood upto Obama who has no anglo-american concept and has shown it numerous times in the way hes snubbed the United Kingdom despite the fact that this is a private company (who didnt even cause the oil leak) and the other factor being we are the only country who has stood with the United States and continues to do so in Afghanistan in larger numbers than any other country (whether we agree with the conflicts or not). I'm glad Cable has stood upto Obama and the US administration though.

Thoughts?

Jordy
05-06-2010, 01:02 PM
Yeah I'm glad to see a cabinet member has spoke out about this, been reading the blogs this morning and many UK politicians are upset by Obamas claims and rightly so.

Obama is useless, he's using the British as a scapegoat and just trying to say the right things to please his people although from I hear people in the US are getting quite annoyed by his poor handling of the crisis. The federal government has not helped BP what-so-ever and it's totally within their interests to protect the company and most importantly their coasts and people. BP are struggling it is clear to see and are doing all they can yet the Obama administration isn't helping, it's just complaining. Let's hope it becomes Obama's "Katrina".

MrPinkPanther
05-06-2010, 01:05 PM
I agree, I feel that the US believe they can do what they want and the United Kingdom will blindly agree like we always have. I also think that politicians are scared to criticise Obama because he has such a golden image, he's a good leader sure but he isn't perfect. I'm just glad it was a Liberal Democrat that finally manned up enough to criticise him.

HotelUser
06-06-2010, 12:50 AM
They're a company responsible for a massive spill which is hurting the American economy. He is within his every right to insult the company.

FlyingJesus
06-06-2010, 12:53 AM
They're a company responsible for a massive spill which is hurting the American economy. He is within his every right to insult the company.

Point is he isn't just insulting the company, he's wording it to make it appear a British problem and not a private industrial one

HotelUser
06-06-2010, 12:59 AM
Point is he isn't just insulting the company, he's wording it to make it appear a British problem and not a private industrial one

He's talking about seizing the companies assets and such. He's hardly causing any political damage to England?

Also America gets more stick from you guys for multinational corporations that originated from there, like Apple and Microsoft!

-:Undertaker:-
06-06-2010, 01:18 AM
He's talking about seizing the companies assets and such. He's hardly causing any political damage to England?

Also America gets more stick from you guys for multinational corporations that originated from there, like Apple and Microsoft!

BP did not cause the spill, it was an American company that did the drilling as far as I am aware.

HotelUser
06-06-2010, 04:19 AM
BP did not cause the spill, it was an American company that did the drilling as far as I am aware.

Then he just picked a random oil company with no relation to the spill and decided to bully it?

xxMATTGxx
06-06-2010, 08:07 AM
BP did not cause the spill, it was an American company that did the drilling as far as I am aware.

I thought that company was linked with BP anyway? I believe BP maintain the rig or something. I forgot what was said.

FlyingJesus
06-06-2010, 11:31 AM
Again, the point is not what company is involved, but the fact that Obama and his office keep referring to it as British Petroleum despite that not even being the (multinational) company name, which indirectly shifts the blame from the US to the UK.

Swastika
06-06-2010, 12:40 PM
Disgusting that he's referring to BP as 'British Petroleum', he's trying to act the "goody" in the situation to the American people and blame the oil spill onto the UK.
It's about time the UK stood upto the US, im sick of us following or listening to whatever they do.
Didn't America say if conflict brakes out in the Falklands, they wouldn't help? Good to see them helping us.

ifuseekamy
06-06-2010, 01:45 PM
They're a company responsible for a massive spill which is hurting the American economy. He is within his every right to insult the company.
Pretty hypocritical from a country that consumes 25% of the world's oil and will declare wars and ravage countries in the Middle East and Africa in order to get it. But then that's just living up to the stereotype.

-:Undertaker:-
06-06-2010, 05:11 PM
Then he just picked a random oil company with no relation to the spill and decided to bully it?

The oil company BP was obviously incharge of the rig/the well but from what I have heard, the very thing that caused the spill was down to a slip up/a mistake by a contractor company and not BP itself. This is nothing more than a cheap ploy by Obama to shift the blame and its at the expense of the anglo-american bond.

MrPinkPanther
06-06-2010, 05:14 PM
For once I agree with Dan. Obama is just trying to pass the blame.

HotelUser
07-06-2010, 03:01 AM
Pretty hypocritical from a country that consumes 25% of the world's oil and will declare wars and ravage countries in the Middle East and Africa in order to get it. But then that's just living up to the stereotype.

Tell that to the innocent fishermen living off the coast in the USA who have been officially screwed over and are without someone to blame.

GommeInc
07-06-2010, 09:20 AM
So what we have here is a fine example of "stupid American" politics? If they do not want their shores ruined they should attempt to assist the British with clean up operations and prevention, rather than assume we/they should do it all. It's common sense. If a next door neighbour had a bonfire next to a boundary hedge and it caught alight, you would want to put out the fire and prevent it from spreading just as much as they do. Of course, some blame would go either way, but chucking complete blame is stupid, pointless and a waste of time seeing as it is closer to America than Britain/the UK :/

Technologic
07-06-2010, 01:29 PM
Tell that to the innocent fishermen living off the coast in the USA who have been officially screwed over and are without someone to blame.

The innocent fishermen who are getting paid twice as much cleaning up oil than they did from their already failing industry?

RedStratocas
08-06-2010, 08:21 PM
bp is in charge of maintaining the rig, which includes safety. they've had nearly 800 safety violations in the past few years, all other companies drilling in offshore u.s. have had less than 10. but, it is pretty pointless to argue over whose fault it is cause it just depends on how far you can trace it back to an event; all that matters is that legally, bp is responsible for stopping it/cleaning it up. i havent heard any anti-british sentiment at all to be honest, i think more people are just astounded at the fact that we literally don't have the technology/resources to stop the oil leak. i thought they were prepared for this stuff, i mean its happened before?

my slight defense of obama: he has had a pretty terrible/slow reaction to all of this, and frankly hes not really angry enough, but really even if he seized operation of bp, what could he do? its not like the government has a plan that it's hiding from bp, theres literally just no one who knows how to stop the leak. the people who should know how to stop it best are the people who dug it in the first place.

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!