Log in

View Full Version : NRG 1 - Who tried it?



Excellent2
20-09-2010, 12:01 PM
So Naphyrone, the big killer, who tried it then?

,elaboratedolls
20-09-2010, 05:31 PM
Never heard of it xD
So no.

FlyingJesus
20-09-2010, 05:38 PM
Hey let's talk about how great mephedrone is until it gets banned and the pharmacists have to invent something more expensive with more dangerous side effects and less good initial effects.

Hey let's talk about how great naphyrone is until it gets banned and the pharmacists have to invent something more expensive with more dangerous side effects and less good initial effects.

I wonder what the cool youth will be taking next

Mathew
20-09-2010, 05:50 PM
No, I want to get somewhere with my life...

Jordy
20-09-2010, 06:51 PM
No, I want to get somewhere with my life...Taking a drug doesn't throw your life off the rails. Just a bit of fun at parties if done carefully and infrequently.

Excellent2
20-09-2010, 10:47 PM
Hey let's talk about how great mephedrone is until it gets banned and the pharmacists have to invent something more expensive with more dangerous side effects and less good initial effects.

Hey let's talk about how great naphyrone is until it gets banned and the pharmacists have to invent something more expensive with more dangerous side effects and less good initial effects.

I wonder what the cool youth will be taking next
Negative and insensitive comment. I was purely asking who has tried it to see opinions on it. Naphyrone was a terrible research chemical, it was a killer. Talking about the drug has now got it to a class B, which means you can face up to 14 years in jail if convicted of possession with intent to supply. There is also a temporary ban on all research chemicals being sold in the UK whilst they are being researched.

I told you once before FlyingJesus, think.

FlyingJesus
20-09-2010, 10:55 PM
It was a negative comment yes, but I don't see how it was insensitive. What you said backs up my point - these substances get criminalised and the folks wanting to make money out of our willingness to experiment then have to make something else, mixing more untested chemicals and tweaking compounds that as we've seen become more dangerous each time. Unless you (mistakenly) thought I was talking about you personally with my "the cool youth" comment I don't see what you're attacking here as we seem to be of one mind in that we agree naphyrone to be more dangerous than it was worth risking

Excellent2
21-09-2010, 10:16 AM
It was a negative comment yes, but I don't see how it was insensitive. What you said backs up my point - these substances get criminalised and the folks wanting to make money out of our willingness to experiment then have to make something else, mixing more untested chemicals and tweaking compounds that as we've seen become more dangerous each time. Unless you (mistakenly) thought I was talking about you personally with my "the cool youth" comment I don't see what you're attacking here as we seem to be of one mind in that we agree naphyrone to be more dangerous than it was worth riskingAfter another read through, I was wrong to call you insensitive, apologies. I think what needs to be done about all these new research chemicals is PROPER testing. Not some foreigner setting up a holding company with eight sub companies so that customs bat an eye lid.

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!