View Full Version : Man charged with murder of Jo Yeates
Jordy
22-01-2011, 11:27 PM
A man has been charged with murdering landscape architect Jo Yeates.
Avon and Somerset Police said 32-year-old Dutch national Vincent Tabak, who was arrested on Thursday, will appear at Bristol Magistrates Court on Monday.
Miss Yeates, 25, was found dead on Christmas Day, eight days after going missing from her home in the Clifton area of Bristol.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-12257299
Great news really, one of the more obvious people involved it turns out in the end. Glad to see this murder hunt brought to an end at last. The motives etc are still very questionable though, I look forward to the trial which will no doubt be in a very long time :(
GommeInc
23-01-2011, 12:08 AM
That was rather quick :S They must of found a lot of evidence or he admitted to doing it, considering he was only pulled in on Thursday :/
Mrs.McCall
23-01-2011, 12:10 AM
Must've worn him down. Be interesting to hear more about the reasoning etc. Liz Jones will be toasting with her expensive wine tonight *eyeroll*
-:Undertaker:-
23-01-2011, 12:27 AM
I wonder how long he'll get if convicted, probably a 'harsh' sentence as its such a high profile case to show how 'tough' on crime we are.
.x.miss.angel.x
23-01-2011, 09:44 AM
Thank god for that! Now Jo can RIP and her family can grieve. I remember reading somthing about finding saliva on Jo's body and the attack was thought to be unplanned (explaining why they nabbed him so quickly)
Ajthedragon
23-01-2011, 12:58 PM
Seems a bit odd, I hope the family are ok.
Mrs.McCall
23-01-2011, 02:03 PM
I wonder how long he'll get if convicted, probably a 'harsh' sentence as its such a high profile case to show how 'tough' on crime we are.
That's always the issue with high profile cases and no doubt the question of how fair his trial is going to be will be raised.
Makes you feel sorry for her landlord though. His picture was on the News and everyone pretty much concluded it was him. He could sue if he wanted. Heck, he only needs to Twitter search his name and he'll have thousands of people he could sue!
Arron
23-01-2011, 02:22 PM
I wonder how long he'll get if convicted, probably a 'harsh' sentence as its such a high profile case to show how 'tough' on crime we are.
He'll get sent to life imprisonment maybe but I'll give it ten years before he's released.
GommeInc
23-01-2011, 04:20 PM
That's always the issue with high profile cases and no doubt the question of how fair his trial is going to be will be raised.
Makes you feel sorry for her landlord though. His picture was on the News and everyone pretty much concluded it was him. He could sue if he wanted. Heck, he only needs to Twitter search his name and he'll have thousands of people he could sue!
Wasn't he branded as being "mental" and a "nut job"? I remember seeing that splashed on the front pages of The Gazette and The Sun... That's not going to make them look very good, seeing as he's innocent:/
Slowpoke
23-01-2011, 04:31 PM
I wonder if they'll still show the reconstruction on Crimewatch this week which apparently cost £10,000 to film
Jordy
23-01-2011, 04:43 PM
I wonder if they'll still show the reconstruction on Crimewatch this week which apparently cost £10,000 to filmDoubt it, I can't really see much point in it especially when the airtime could be better spent helping someone else.
£10,000 is a small sum compared to the overall cost of this case which I've little doubt is well into the millions (I'm not disputing this, just pointing it out).
Mrs.McCall
23-01-2011, 04:55 PM
Wasn't he branded as being "mental" and a "nut job"? I remember seeing that splashed on the front pages of The Gazette and The Sun... That's not going to make them look very good, seeing as he's innocent:/
I know, I sort of hope he sues now. They need to be more careful, it was irresponsible journalism.
Doubt it, I can't really see much point in it especially when the airtime could be better spent helping someone else.
£10,000 is a small sum compared to the overall cost of this case which I've little doubt is well into the millions (I'm not disputing this, just pointing it out).
They might show one of those 'solved' things. I dunno.
Slowpoke
23-01-2011, 05:01 PM
Doubt it, I can't really see much point in it especially when the airtime could be better spent helping someone else.
Has he just been charged or has he admitted it? I still think its important they show it - he may not be the killer. Discount this post if he has admitted it, of course
MattHoskins
23-01-2011, 05:34 PM
I am one of those people who know alot about murders and murderers, and for some reason I don't think it was him, I don't know why, but it seems a little too correct, his front window was overlooking the front garden and the path round to her door, so if he was looking out his window he would know every move she would make, when she would get home, when she would leave. He has a easy way of knowing if she was in the house or not, because the walls are really quite thin so he would know.
But it does look bad for him, she looks like his current girlfriend, the blonde hair, glasses she looks similar, and after she was murdered he went away on holiday with his girlfriend. I am glad they have caught someone though, I think he would have only murdered her, I don't feel he would have murdered anyone else, because if he would, he would have done it already. But like they have said; once you kill one person, who's to say you won't someone else.
Slowpoke
23-01-2011, 11:57 PM
There's a thing I really don't get about this case and before I say it, I'd like to be clear that I'm seriously not trying to be funny.
What the hell happened to the pizza? The receipt for it was found at the house and her keys, mobile phone etc were all there. She obviously took it into the flat because the receipt was there so what the hell happened to it? It's so weird!
MattHoskins
24-01-2011, 12:22 AM
There's a thing I really don't get about this case and before I say it, I'd like to be clear that I'm seriously not trying to be funny.
What the hell happened to the pizza? The receipt for it was found at the house and her keys, mobile phone etc were all there. She obviously took it into the flat because the receipt was there so what the hell happened to it? It's so weird!
I know what you mean like, the cider was drunk a little bit, but there was no pizza left. It is friggin' weird. How has a glass of cider then eat a whole pizza and just hops out?
GommeInc
24-01-2011, 01:39 AM
I know what you mean like, the cider was drunk a little bit, but there was no pizza left. It is friggin' weird. How has a glass of cider then eat a whole pizza and just hops out?
^ Is it bad I find it amusing that these tiny details seem like something written in one of the "read-along-adventure" books? :P
£10,000 for a reconstruction seems about right. An actor in a small TV ad can fetch about £1,000 for about an hours work (obviously work is far and few between).
Jordy
24-01-2011, 05:19 PM
Has he just been charged or has he admitted it? I still think its important they show it - he may not be the killer. Discount this post if he has admitted it, of courseI think it's unknown, because you get charged either way and the Police aren't really saying much. Admitting the crime doesn't make you a killer anyway till you're convicted by a court, it has been known for people to admit crimes they didn't commit to cover for someone else (Yes I watch a lot of Silent Witness). Very little is known in terms of motive etc, it's quite mysterious.
ifuseekamy
24-01-2011, 06:55 PM
He probably killed her and stole her pizza
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.