The Human Centipede 2!

[iBlueBox]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpmPJzLmGdI

Not any disturbing in images in the trailer just the director teasing.


Guess this is going ahead, does anyone know the story behind the second one?

[Misawa]

It's out this summer, was shot in the summer of last year. I met him at a party in August and he's a really nice guy. Showed some behind the scenes photos. The story is being kept under wraps but the centipede will be made up of 12 people.

[Oleh]

Can't wait for the proper trailer. all i know is its 12 people, i reckon that guy and the doctor are affiliated

[iBlueBox]

It's out this summer, was shot in the summer of last year. I met him at a party in August and he's a really nice guy. Showed some behind the scenes photos. The story is being kept under wraps but the centipede will be made up of 12 people.

Will it be a gimmick as I wouldn't think of a sequel would of worked, and what where the photos like?

[Misawa]

I always knew he'd make a sequel with a bigger centipede. I can't remember what the photos showed, they were just behind the scenes pics with him standing around directing covered in blood.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Will be interesting, I love horror films - this one though took it to another (sick) level.

[Misawa]

The first was tame if you know your horror.

[Conservative,]

They're both ****** up. No thanks lol.

[Chris]

I haven't even seen the first one yet, but from what ive heard it sounds quite gruesome. :P

[peteyt]

haven't got round to seeing the first yet, I'll need to soon. But it doesn't sound like my horror really

[Nikki]

Don't even want to watch the trailer. I watched the first one, so messed up and disturbing. I won't be watching this one!

[Stephen]

When the first one was shown on syfy were bits cut out of it? Because I really didn't think it was that disgusting. Only saw him cut someones skin abit and a little bit of puss from an infected wound? the rest wasn'tt even badddd

If it wasn't cut then I hope the next one has more disgustingty to it

[Dysentery]

Thats very *Removed* up......


Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator):
Please do not avoid the filter

[Misawa]

When the first one was shown on syfy were bits cut out of it? Because I really didn't think it was that disgusting. Only saw him cut someones skin abit and a little bit of puss from an infected wound? the rest wasn'tt even badddd

If it wasn't cut then I hope the next one has more disgustingty to it

It's more disturbing in principle than anything you actually see.

[Eoin247]

The first one isn't really gruesome, it's more what it suggests really.

I got warned for talking about the first movie in spam a while back, actualy alls i did was mention the name i believe.

[Gibs960]

I don't really see the point in this film. And also why did it say inaccurate at the end....?

[Misawa]

Because it's... 100% medically inaccurate unlike the first, which was billed as 100% medically accurate.

[Judas]

it just sounds like more being twisted for the sake of it. yawwwwn