-:Undertaker:-
24-06-2012, 08:16 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2163969/UN-migration-chief-calls-EU-force-member-states-multicultural-says-Britains-quota-legal.html
UN migration chief calls on EU to force member states to be multicultural as he says Britain's quota 'not legal'
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/06/24/article-2163969-003D268400000258-585_468x286.jpg
The EU should make sure that its member states are multicultural to ensure the prosperity of the union, the UN's special representative for migration has said. Peter Sutherland also suggested the UK government's immigration policy had no basis in international law. He was being questioned by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.
Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas. He told the House of Lords committee migration was a 'crucial dynamic for economic growth' in some EU nations 'however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states'. He said that an ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the 'key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states'.
Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group, a top level international networking organisation often criticised for its alleged secrecy, called on EU states to stop targeting 'highly skilled' migrants, arguing that 'at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice' about whether to come and study or work in another country.
Wow, well three points..
a) Who wants to wager a bet that Mr Sutherland doesn't live in a 'multicultural' area and instead lives in a wealthy area which is immune from the mass immigration that he like so many others advocate?
b) The European Union already has subjected this country to uncontrolled immigration, a policy (along with mass immigration from the third world) which has destroyed many inner-city areas in this country.
c) A Bilderberger, ahem.
..and before any confuses them both, multiculturalism is not multiracialism. I simply think that the argument for withdrawal from the UN (or an abstaining role in that increasingly meddlesome organisation) after our withdrawal from the meddling EU grows stronger and stronger by the day.
Thoughts? is Mr Sutherland right to call for uncontrolled, mass immigration?
UN migration chief calls on EU to force member states to be multicultural as he says Britain's quota 'not legal'
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/06/24/article-2163969-003D268400000258-585_468x286.jpg
The EU should make sure that its member states are multicultural to ensure the prosperity of the union, the UN's special representative for migration has said. Peter Sutherland also suggested the UK government's immigration policy had no basis in international law. He was being questioned by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.
Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas. He told the House of Lords committee migration was a 'crucial dynamic for economic growth' in some EU nations 'however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states'. He said that an ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the 'key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states'.
Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group, a top level international networking organisation often criticised for its alleged secrecy, called on EU states to stop targeting 'highly skilled' migrants, arguing that 'at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice' about whether to come and study or work in another country.
Wow, well three points..
a) Who wants to wager a bet that Mr Sutherland doesn't live in a 'multicultural' area and instead lives in a wealthy area which is immune from the mass immigration that he like so many others advocate?
b) The European Union already has subjected this country to uncontrolled immigration, a policy (along with mass immigration from the third world) which has destroyed many inner-city areas in this country.
c) A Bilderberger, ahem.
..and before any confuses them both, multiculturalism is not multiracialism. I simply think that the argument for withdrawal from the UN (or an abstaining role in that increasingly meddlesome organisation) after our withdrawal from the meddling EU grows stronger and stronger by the day.
Thoughts? is Mr Sutherland right to call for uncontrolled, mass immigration?