Next-Gen iPhone (iPhone 5?)

[Shorty]

9to5mac released images of what is to most likely be the next-gen iPhone.

http://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/lg_iphone5_011.jpg?w=655
http://9to5mac.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/lg_iphone5_0211.jpg?w=655

Thoughts?

Thread moved by Jordan (Forum Super Moderator): From 'Technology Discussion' to here as more suited

Thread Closed by Lee (Forum Super Moderator): Due to it leading way off-topic, and turning into an argument.

[GoldenMerc]

Saw someone posting this on Twitter, i don't think iPhones are much anymore when they first got released they were something people desired, i now know people of different cultures who have these phones, they arn't what they were meant to be really :(

[dirrty]

whether it's real or not, it'd look better if the black strip continued around the side (opposed to just being on the back). either way, i think it looks horrid so i'm hoping it's fake.

[iBlueBox]

Theres been a few concept pictures with that design,with the section in the middle being slight different.

My predictions for the next iPhone are,

- will be called The new iPhone, not iPhone 5, just like the new iPad.
- Slight thinner,
- Bigger screen 4 inches,
- Support 4G.

[sex]

i'd like a bigger screen, looks nice tbh. ill probably get if when its out

[Metric1]

I wanna see the front

[Chris]

Looks nice but as said above I want to see the front. :P

[xxMATTGxx]

Front:

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/4837723/lg_iphone5_0711-1_gallery_post.jpg

http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/29/3200057/iphone-5-fully-assembled-rumor-pictures

[Lee]

Is it just me that think those pictures look ugly?!

[Kieran]

They look more like renders to me. Especially that front view. Still like the look of it though if that turns out to be the real design.

[Chris]

Thanks for posting the front Matt! I hope that is the real design, I like it!

[Dawson]

Different charger then?

[dirrty]

Different charger then?
i'll find that incredibly annoying. i like that fact that i can use the cable for the various iphones and ipads in the house. not that i can afford the new iphone anytime soon though haha

[HotelUser]

Theres been a few concept pictures with that design,with the section in the middle being slight different.

My predictions for the next iPhone are,

- will be called The new iPhone, not iPhone 5, just like the new iPad.
- Slight thinner,
- Bigger screen 4 inches,
- Support 4G.

I thought the current iPhone 4s already had support for LTE. As far as the screen goes that would be great if they made a larger varient.

[Sharon]

My mum is buying my uncle onee as soon as they're released and I'm buying an iPhone 4S soon after, looks like I'm excited. Was trending for hours how it's going to cost $800, hasn't it always cost something like that in the UK (maybe US too, I don't know?)

[Jordan]

Different charger then?


Maybe they will have that new way of charging wireless or is that too far away at the moment

[smithy1997]

Just got an iPhone 4 so waiting for the iPhone 6 to come out when my contract can be changed

[Sunny.]

As mentioned above I found it funny when it was trending on twitter at some of the remarks that $800 is such a ridiculous price when its always been around £500 in the UK. Also I have no idea where they got that figure from seeing as its not even been announced yet. Then again it may have just been a media stunt by rivalling companies.

Im not sure whether il buy it seeing as I bought my 4S on launch and recently invested in a new Macbook Pro. Feels a bit of a waste to buy the new one so may just went for next years model.


Maybe they will have that new way of charging wireless or is that too far away at the moment

I doubt wireless charging will be introduced as standard. Maybe as an optional upgrade later. I think the smaller charging port is to maybe accomodate new technology in faster charging. As well as that it may also get rid of the annoying problem in the middle of the night when its pitch black and you try to get your charging wire in the correct way. I think the new port will be able to fit in both ways as its only 8-pin.

[GommeInc]

Knowing Apple they will propably supply an adapter with the new iPhone. It would be a bit annoying if people have however many charging cables and can't use them anymore. I think Apple ship adapters with their Macs for HDMI connectivity (they used mini at one point) until it becomes a standard, so the same may happen here.

It did seem weird that iPhones have huge great holes in them for the power cable, it's one design issue that they seem to be focusing on now.

[Eric]

looks a like a nice design. the only thing i don't like is the little holes, err speakers?

probably have to wait for a while to get a new phone :(

[Dawson]

looks like they've also moved the headphone hole to the bottom which i quite liked being at the top :(

[Richie]

I haven't really looked at iphone plans in the past so does anyone know how much bill pay contracts will be increased to? I wouldn't buy the phone outside a contract as the internet, calls and texts would cost significantly more not to mention the iphone is usually expensive as it is and I'm not sure if company's allow people to buy insurance for a phone, 15 euro a month wouldn't be able to cover their arses.

[Tomm]

Or they could just use micro usb like everyone else. No idea why they stick with their proprietary connector when literally everyone else uses micro usb on mobile devices.


Knowing Apple they will propably supply an adapter with the new iPhone. It would be a bit annoying if people have however many charging cables and can't use them anymore. I think Apple ship adapters with their Macs for HDMI connectivity (they used mini at one point) until it becomes a standard, so the same may happen here.

It did seem weird that iPhones have huge great holes in them for the power cable, it's one design issue that they seem to be focusing on now.

[mrwoooooooo]

i get an iphone when i start my new job later this month, hopefully they wait till new one comes out

[GommeInc]

Or they could just use micro usb like everyone else. No idea why they stick with their proprietary connector when literally everyone else uses micro usb on mobile devices.
They could, but they like to inconvenience their users for the sake of individualism :P

[Kieran]

Or they could just use micro usb like everyone else. No idea why they stick with their proprietary connector when literally everyone else uses micro usb on mobile devices.

Because then they can make a lot more money from accessories rather than you just using standard USB cables that everyone has. It's all a business plan!

[Ashley]

It doesn't look like anything special, but I upgrade in November so I'll probably get one.

[samsaBEAR]

That aluminium (I assume) strip looks so tacky

[Red]

Eww why are the headphones at the bottom? :S

[Shockwave.2CC]

The back of it looks like an old phone (not iphone) but the front looks like any other iphone
It's good that they've done something different to the back

[Kieran]

There's a lot of rumour going round that Apple have released this on purpose so it'd get leaked and that there is in fact a completely different design around.

[e5]

I saw a picture on Facebook, where the screen fills the phone edge to edge which looks good if it's the real one. But they are going to have to put something amazing on it to beat the Samsung . I'll always stick with apple anyway, for now.

[Mark]

I saw a picture on Facebook, where the screen fills the phone edge to edge which looks good if it's the real one. But they are going to have to put something amazing on it to beat the Samsung . I'll always stick with apple anyway, for now.

Lol I swear I've seen that too however it was one of those annoying "Like if you want this to be the new iPhone".
I heard that the packs will come with an adapter or they will be readily available so you can still use your old chargers but with the new iPhone.

[Mr-Trainor]

I'm personally not a huge fan of this, and I liked having the headphones at the top. I'm planning to keep my 4S for at least another year anyway.

[HotelUser]

They could, but they like to inconvenience their users for the sake of individualism :P

I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money. I'm not surprised to see you spouting out some random anti-Apple garbage which doesn't make any monetary sense for Apple to do though. Just because you don't like Apple Gomme, doesn't mean they're a religious cult that preaches "individualism" over the corporate objectives of making a crapload of money :rolleyes:


I'm personally not a huge fan of this, and I liked having the headphones at the top. I'm planning to keep my 4S for at least another year anyway.

Same, I'm either buying a used Galaxy from my brother or my father's old 4s :P

[GommeInc]

I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money. I'm not surprised to see you spouting out some random anti-Apple garbage which doesn't make any monetary sense for Apple to do though. Just because you don't like Apple Gomme, doesn't mean they're a religious cult that preaches "individualism" over the corporate objectives of making a crapload of money :rolleyes:
I knew you would over-react again to what is a harmless comment :P Lighten up, although in theory it is to inconvenience their customers to have to buy specific adapters rather than universal ones you find with virtually every Android/WP7 phone, in order to make money.

Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected? Oh wait, you didn't - I did, hence why your post seems to be about inconveniencing customers to make a crap load of money. Not that they need to, when companies like Samsung can make a crap load of money without inconveniencing their customers with daft adapters.

Not that I need to reply to an over-reactive, protective post from you again.

[HotelUser]

I knew you would over-react again to what is a harmless comment :P Lighten up, although in theory it is to inconvenience their customers to have to buy specific adapters rather than universal ones you find with virtually every Android/WP7 phone, in order to make money.

Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected? Oh wait, you didn't - I did, hence why your post seems to be about inconveniencing customers to make a crap load of money. Not that they need to, when companies like Samsung can make a crap load of money without inconveniencing their customers with daft adapters.

Not that I need to reply to an over-reactive, protective post from you again.

Your statements towards Apple are the definition of over-reactive.

Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (not that they're even the only or first company to do this, anyway). I did not state I am happy about it at all, I merely pointed out to you that Apple does it because they want to make a crapload of money. It's funny, because my statements are typically not really promoting Apple. I point out that the patent system completely is flawed, you jump down my throat and continue smashing Apple and trying to make only Apple look bad. I point out that Apple does something to make a crapload of money, and you "overreact" and think I've handed Apple this big undeserved compliment when in reality I've stated a clear fact which doesn't make Apple look good or bad. *Sigh*, you call my posts protective, but you've hammed the last nail into the coffin for yourself by misconstruing a blatant objective of Apple wanting to making money into some weird sort of cultural/religious ideology that Apple is evil and wants to preach bigger ideas of things like "isolationism". What a load of crap.

[GommeInc]

Your statements towards Apple are the definition of over-reactive.

Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (not that they're even the only or first company to do this, anyway). I did not state I am happy about it at all, I merely pointed out to you that Apple does it because they want to make a crapload of money. It's funny, because my statements are typically not really promoting Apple. I point out that the patent system completely is flawed, you jump down my throat and continue smashing Apple and trying to make only Apple look bad. I point out that Apple does something to make a crapload of money, and you "overreact" and think I've handed Apple this big undeserved compliment when in reality I've stated a clear fact which doesn't make Apple look good or bad. *Sigh*, you call my posts protective, but you've hammed the last nail into the coffin for yourself by misconstruing a blatant objective of Apple wanting to making money into some weird sort of cultural/religious ideology that Apple is evil and wants to preach bigger ideas of things like "isolationism". What a load of crap.
As per usual, your failure to read is your one and only weakness, and causes yet another pointless discussion in a thread because "you're too serious" and defensive of Apple (this post is evident of it). Point out the part in my post where I said you were happy Apple did this. You would notice I didn't say this, mainly because you cast aspersions and merely make assumptions because you seem to really like pointless discussions and have the ineptitude to read. Well done David, this is thread two you've derailed.

You would notice a -rep which should act as a sign that your reputation as being reasonable and logical in your approach to discussions is in tatters. Also, well done ignoring most of my post yet again and only reading what you want to read (which isn't there). Jeez.

From now on I won't "Feed the Troll", as you clearly have no interest in reading any posts, and I honestly do not have the energy to further belittle you.

[HotelUser]

As per usual, your failure to read is your one and only weakness, and causes yet another pointless discussion in a thread because "you're too serious" and defensive of Apple (this post is evident of it). Point out the part in my post where I said you were happy Apple did this. You would notice I didn't say this, mainly because you cast aspersions and merely make assumptions because you seem to really like pointless discussions and have the ineptitude to read. Well done David, this is thread two you've derailed.

You would notice a -rep which should act as a sign that your reputation as being reasonable and logical in your approach to discussions is in tatters. Also, well done ignoring most of my post yet again and only reading what you want to read (which isn't there). Jeez.

From now on I won't "Feed the Troll", as you clearly have no interest in reading any posts, and I honestly do not have the energy to further belittle you.

This is why your arguments suck:

1. It's the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my entire life that you actually thought Apple used those adapters to preach a stupid view like isolationism. It's possible you don't know anything about economics so I'll spell it out again for you, companies like to make money. I'm also shocked because I had previously thought you had a decently sound political head on your shoulders, but now that I've seen you take personal vendettas against companies to this all new level, I'm not so sure.

2. A brainless monkey could repeat the sentence that someone doesn't know how to read when you just don't know what to say, and when infact it's YOU who has completely failed to read what I said properly. Then again, a brainless monkey could also repeat insults directed toward a single company, and then consistently never back up their claims as to why that company is in the wrong.

3. Here's the difference between you and I. Instead of just arbitrarily and baselessly telling you that you don't know how to read (like how you've done in atleast 3 different posts in 2 different topics now), I'm going to tell you that you've invalidly read my post, and now I'm going to explain how you have (unlike you, I don't throw around such accusations and then fail to explain them). In your initial response to me you said:


Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected? And then in my response to that I thought oh, Gomme posted something. I am going to assume that Gomme is capable of reading and processing text, and so I'm going to highlight what Gomme said in green and respond to it directly in green writing as well, and hope that Gomme knows his colours. Proceeding this I told you to point out where I said I'm happy that Apple has different adapters. If you thought for a moment before writing up a reply to me perhaps you would of put two and two together and figured out that maybe the green text I wrote was in direct reply to the green text I highlighted in your reply to me, and that I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer) (I'm using brackets and underlining text now to make sure you actually read what I say before making any further irrelevant and incorrect statements about my posts).

If you read my posts properly in the first place, then you would have learned two things about my opinion:
1. I think it's stupid that Apple uses specific adapters.
2. I think your suggestion that the reason they use specific adapters is completely stupid.

In regards to your reputation, the other day I considered gifting you negative reputation and explaining that I'm disappointed in that instead of arguing facts and backing them up, you've begin arguing rude accusations and not backing them up at all. But then I remembered that I actually don't care about reputation, and to further emphasize this point: when I was an administrator I never really bothered deleting my reputation even when others abused this power, so as a member I'm not even going to bother to post in the reputation removal thread. You can give me negative reputation until you're blue in the face, and I could care less. I'm more interested in arguing or discussing the facts of the topic at hand, not prancing about like a little girl and pettily wagging my finger lecturing about reputation, and talking of trolls and belittling :)

[SackRace]

I got the iPhone 4s last year so i shall not be buying a new phone for several years

[samsaBEAR]

I got the iPhone 4s last year so i shall not be buying a new phone for several years
Several years?! Phones will be able to cook breakfast by then!

[SackRace]

Several years?! Phones will be able to cook breakfast by then!

I take good care of it :D

[GommeInc]

snip
Answer my question please: Where did I say you were happy that Apple inconvenienced their customers to gain money? I read your wall of text again and your over-reactive response didn't seem to answer my questions (again).

[HotelUser]

Answer my question please: Where did I say you were happy that Apple inconvenienced their customers to gain money? I read your wall of text again and your over-reactive response didn't seem to answer my questions (again).

I'm seriously beginning to question on what merits you've questioned my ability to read and how you've called me a troll when I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money (okay, I covered that twice in this paragraph so maybe you've grasped it now). Since you quite clearly failed to read my previous post, though, and because you probably will fail to read the above, I shall try conveying to you what happened in this thread (which you didn't read) via a dialogue:

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

GOMME: I CANT READ HURR

ME: My current and latest reaction to your inability to read (http://davzy.com/screenshots/fail-20120809-185539.png) (the underline here means this is a link Gomme, you click it)

[GommeInc]

I'm seriously beginning to question on what merits you've questioned my ability to read and how you've called me a troll when I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money (okay, I covered that twice in this paragraph so maybe you've grasped it now). Since you quite clearly failed to read my previous post, though, and because you probably will fail to read the above, I shall try conveying to you what happened in this thread (which you didn't read) via a dialogue:

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

GOMME: I CANT READ HURR

ME: My current and latest reaction to your inability to read (http://davzy.com/screenshots/fail-20120809-185539.png) (the underline here means this is a link Gomme, you click it)
Again, point out where I said you were happy that Apple used different adapters. The post you've quoted doesn't mention anything to do with you being happy, it isn't even in response to the adapters - hence the new paragraph.

And where did I say that Apple only do it to inconvenience their users? I never said it was, you assumed I did - because you love assumptions to start a pointless discussion.

And you say I can't read :rolleyes: What's worse is you made an image which really is a present from yourself to yourself, I just did the delivering.

Gomme 1 - HotelUser 0

[HotelUser]

Again, point out where I said you were happy that Apple used different adapters. The post you've quoted doesn't mention anything to do with you being happy, it isn't even in response to the adapters - hence the new paragraph.

And where did I say that Apple only do it to inconvenience their users? I never said it was, you assumed I did - because you love assumptions to start a pointless discussion.

And you say I can't read :rolleyes: What's worse is you made an image which really is a present from yourself to yourself, I just did the delivering.

Gomme 1 - HotelUser 0

Gomme are you incapable of reading my god damn posts?


I'm seriously beginning to question on what merits you've questioned my ability to read and how you've called me a troll when I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money (okay, I covered that twice in this paragraph so maybe you've grasped it now). Since you quite clearly failed to read my previous post, though, and because you probably will fail to read the above, I shall try conveying to you what happened in this thread (which you didn't read) via a dialogue:

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with. The score isn't Gomme 1 HotelUser 0, it's more like HotelUser 3 Gomme 0 because your ability to read my posts is equivalent to the ability of an ant to fly to the moon and back.

Like, seriously, I'm even beginning to question as to whether or not you even know how to read at all. Read what I post before you reply please, it just might prevent you from looking like a moron. Stop making stupid assumptions and stop replying with stupid and completely wrong statements which can be invalidated at the snap of my fingers by merely redirecting you back to my previous posts.

TO SPELL IT OUT FOR ABOUT THE 100TH TIME:

1. IN MY PAST TWO POSTS AS WELL AS THIS ONE I EXPLAINED EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT BY MY STATEMENT INCLUDING THE WORD "HAPPY" IN IT

2. YOURE MAKING ASSUMPTIONS IN THINKING I SAID YOU SAID THAT I WAS HAPPY WITH APPLES CORDS BECAUSE I NEVER ONCE SAID THAT MYSELF, I ASKED YOU TO TELL ME WHERE I SAID I WAS HAPPY WITH THE CORDS, IN RESPONSE TO YOU TELLING ME THEY HURT THE CONSUMERS

3. MY TEN YEAR OLD COUSIN HAS BETTER READING AND UNDERSTANDING SKILLS THAN YOU DO.

[GommeInc]

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with. The score isn't Gomme 1 HotelUser 0, it's more like HotelUser 3 Gomme 0 because your ability to read my posts is equivalent to the ability of an ant to fly to the moon and back.
So this post doesn't exist?

Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (not that they're even the only or first company to do this, anyway).
You clearly suggest that I apparently said you were happy Apple inconvenience their users. So why say it? I never did.

Gomme 2 - HotelUser 0

And no response to my question: Where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users?

Gomme 3 - HotelUser 0

</doesn't feed the troll>

[HotelUser]

So this post doesn't exist?

You clearly suggest that I apparently said you were happy Apple inconvenience their users. So why say it? I never did.

Gomme 2 - HotelUser 0

And no response to my question: Where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users?

Gomme 3 - HotelUser 0

</doesn't feed the troll>

I did absolutely no such thing, you're putting words into my mouth.

I already explained my response to you, please refer to:


I'm seriously beginning to question on what merits you've questioned my ability to read and how you've called me a troll when I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money (okay, I covered that twice in this paragraph so maybe you've grasped it now). Since you quite clearly failed to read my previous post, though, and because you probably will fail to read the above, I shall try conveying to you what happened in this thread (which you didn't read) via a dialogue:

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

GOMME: I CANT READ HURR

ME: My current and latest reaction to your inability to read (http://davzy.com/screenshots/fail-20120809-185539.png) (the underline here means this is a link Gomme, you click it)

and


This is why your arguments suck:

1. It's the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my entire life that you actually thought Apple used those adapters to preach a stupid view like isolationism. It's possible you don't know anything about economics so I'll spell it out again for you, companies like to make money. I'm also shocked because I had previously thought you had a decently sound political head on your shoulders, but now that I've seen you take personal vendettas against companies to this all new level, I'm not so sure.

2. A brainless monkey could repeat the sentence that someone doesn't know how to read when you just don't know what to say, and when infact it's YOU who has completely failed to read what I said properly. Then again, a brainless monkey could also repeat insults directed toward a single company, and then consistently never back up their claims as to why that company is in the wrong.

3. Here's the difference between you and I. Instead of just arbitrarily and baselessly telling you that you don't know how to read (like how you've done in atleast 3 different posts in 2 different topics now), I'm going to tell you that you've invalidly read my post, and now I'm going to explain how you have (unlike you, I don't throw around such accusations and then fail to explain them). In your initial response to me you said:

And then in my response to that I thought oh, Gomme posted something. I am going to assume that Gomme is capable of reading and processing text, and so I'm going to highlight what Gomme said in green and respond to it directly in green writing as well, and hope that Gomme knows his colours. Proceeding this I told you to point out where I said I'm happy that Apple has different adapters. If you thought for a moment before writing up a reply to me perhaps you would of put two and two together and figured out that maybe the green text I wrote was in direct reply to the green text I highlighted in your reply to me, and that I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer) (I'm using brackets and underlining text now to make sure you actually read what I say before making any further irrelevant and incorrect statements about my posts).

If you read my posts properly in the first place, then you would have learned two things about my opinion:
1. I think it's stupid that Apple uses specific adapters.
2. I think your suggestion that the reason they use specific adapters is completely stupid.

In regards to your reputation, the other day I considered gifting you negative reputation and explaining that I'm disappointed in that instead of arguing facts and backing them up, you've begin arguing rude accusations and not backing them up at all. But then I remembered that I actually don't care about reputation, and to further emphasize this point: when I was an administrator I never really bothered deleting my reputation even when others abused this power, so as a member I'm not even going to bother to post in the reputation removal thread. You can give me negative reputation until you're blue in the face, and I could care less. I'm more interested in arguing or discussing the facts of the topic at hand, not prancing about like a little girl and pettily wagging my finger lecturing about reputation, and talking of trolls and belittling :)

and


TO SPELL IT OUT FOR ABOUT THE 100TH TIME:

1. IN MY PAST TWO POSTS AS WELL AS THIS ONE I EXPLAINED EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT BY MY STATEMENT INCLUDING THE WORD "HAPPY" IN IT

2. YOURE MAKING ASSUMPTIONS IN THINKING I SAID YOU SAID THAT I WAS HAPPY WITH APPLES CORDS BECAUSE I NEVER ONCE SAID THAT MYSELF, I ASKED YOU TO TELL ME WHERE I SAID I WAS HAPPY WITH THE CORDS, IN RESPONSE TO YOU TELLING ME THEY HURT THE CONSUMERS

3. MY TEN YEAR OLD COUSIN HAS BETTER READING AND UNDERSTANDING SKILLS THAN YOU DO.

How many times do I have to spell it out for you? How many times do I have to tell you that when I said "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" that I was challenging your statement: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" because I am infact not happy with their chargers.

The only troll you've fed with your replies is your own. Maybe take the next 20 minutes to read the thread for the first time and then reply to me. With every post you make I begin thinking you're even more and more helpless.


In the 8 years I've been at Habbox I have NEVER had to repeat myself so many times to get something through somebody's thick skull. I am begging you, for the love of jesus christ and everything good, read my post, and turn on your brain. I am not asking you to agree with me, I'm not even asking you to say something positive about Apple, I am asking you to use your god given brain to READ before you type.

[GommeInc]

I did absolutely no such thing, you're putting words into my mouth.
I'm not a moderator, super moderator or member of management, so I didn't edit your post to "put words in your mouth". You clearly said it in that post. Click the tiny pip, it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

Gomme 4 - HotelUser 0

And again no response to the claim that I said Apple only do it to inconvenience their users.

Gomme 5 - HotelUser 0

I think I've won this argument, mainly because I've read the thread.

[HotelUser]

it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)



Oh, you want to know what I meant by that? Why don't you freaking read these posts:

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648692#post7648692
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648585#post7648585
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648194#post7648194
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7647508#post7647508

In absolutely every single one of them I explain exactly what I meant by my sentence "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters". Since you don't understand how the internet works, let me show you:


I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else

I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords

How many times do I have to tell you that when I said "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" that I was challenging your statement: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" because I am infact not happy with their chargers.

I addressed this FIVE times previously, and here you are still not even sure I know what you're on about. If you told me you were high and drunk at the same time I would believe you, because it would take that level of stupidity to make such a huge oversight.

Would you like me to explain what I meant by that sentence again Gomme? Or is five times enough for you?


it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)


Okay Gomme, you ready? Put your reading glasses on. Are they on? Good. I underlined the word "accuse" here. I did so because you are, again, putting words into my mouth. I never accused you of anything. If you don't understand what I meant by the sentence "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" then you only need to read the five quotes of my self above, and you should understand what I was saying :)


unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?

I'd like to dive into your mind and see how it works, truly I would. Here are several quotes of me in this thread:


I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with.

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)

Does it look like I think it's convenient that Apple uses different chargers? Do you have alzheimer's?




Gomme 4 - HotelUser 0

And again no response to the claim that I said Apple only do it to inconvenience their users.



a) I've made like five posts about the same thing now and you just keep ignoring it (refer to all the above quotes which you've just not read or blatantly ignored)
b) I've already replied to your "claim" waaaay earlier in the thread. I told you that I think Apple does it because Apple likes to make money:


I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money.

Apple does it because they want to make a crapload of money.

It's possible you don't know anything about economics so I'll spell it out again for you, companies like to make money.

I think it's pretty damn obvious based off of those three statements by me in three different posts that I think Apple do it to make money, and NOT to promote isolationism and NOT to only inconvenience users. So I think you might need to rethink that score :)


I think I've won this argument, mainly because I've read the thread. Yeah *looks up at your statements and all my replies to them in PREVIOUS posts* it sure looks like you've read the thread :rolleyes:

[GommeInc]

SNIP
So... I won the argument? Don't go back on my question. You asked me to point out where you said you are happy that Apple sell a different adapter to the rest. I responded I didn't, which is correct. Therefore, your posts explaining what you meant are irrelevant, as you clearly are asking me to point out where I said what I (did not) say.

What you've done is link to posts explaining where you failed to read the entire thread, which was literally based on you misreading my post that apparently I think you are happy that Apple use a different adapter (which we've established is incorrect) AND that Apple only do it to be annoying to their customers.

And again, where do I state that they only do it for individualism? Just because I say they do it to inconvenience their customers for the sake of individualism to Tomm does not mean only. Do you know why I said for individualism? Because I was speaking from the point of view of the customer, which was what Tomm and I were discussing the view point of, rather than the view point of the company making money - it was you that pointed out this rather irrelevant point and destroyed this thread (as you enjoy doing). Therefore:

Why would customers care about the economics behind Apple making money? Hence I never stated that, as the customer doesn't benefit from Apple selling an adapter which is an inconvenience to them, they only benefit for the basic need to charge their phones. Apple could use the mini-USB many other phone companies use (since smartphones have become the "in" thing, loads of functions, features and aesthetics have become standards), but they don't because they want to seperate their product from the rest to make extra money - although arguably this conversation is pointless because chargers come as a standard with the phone, so they rarely have to buy adapters unless misplaced or broken. Apple make most of their money through the sale of the actual phone (incl. the power cable), not through selling the accessories. £500+ vs. £30.

Gomme 6 - HotelUser 0

If this was tennis, I would have won and received a rather lovely trophy with my name on by now.

[HotelUser]

So... I won the argument? Don't go back on my question. You asked me to point out where you said you are happy that Apple sell a different adapter to the rest. I responded I didn't, which is correct. Therefore, your posts explaining what you meant are irrelevant, as you clearly are asking me to point out where I said what I (did not) say.


Awh, wouldn't it be convenient for you if all you had to do was answer one magical question so you can win some arbitrary argument on an internet forum? (p.s. this argument isn't about one single sentence. This argument is about why Apple uses custom connectors. You just never understood my sentence initially, and you continued to be ignorant to it this entire time).

Unfortunately for you when someone says something and you interpret it a certain way, that doesn't mean that the way you interpreted it is correct. I have explained atleast five times what I meant by what I said and you can either accept my meaning or reject it, not make up some other meaning which I didn't infer to at all. All my explanations are perfectly valid, because it was a rhetorical question in response to something you said.



What you've done is link to posts explaining where you failed to read the entire thread,

Here is my previous post which I'm going to title in my mind "Gomme can't read":


it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)




Oh, you want to know what I meant by that? Why don't you freaking read these posts:


http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648692#post7648692
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648585#post7648585
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648194#post7648194
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7647508#post7647508


In absolutely every single one of them I explain exactly what I meant by my sentence "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters". Since you don't understand how the internet works, let me show you:



I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else

I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?


ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords

How many times do I have to tell you that when I said "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" that I was challenging your statement: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" because I am infact not happy with their chargers.


I addressed this FIVE times previously, and here you are still not even sure I know what you're on about. If you told me you were high and drunk at the same time I would believe you, because it would take that level of stupidity to make such a huge oversight.


Would you like me to explain what I meant by that sentence again Gomme? Or is five times enough for you?



it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)



Okay Gomme, you ready? Put your reading glasses on. Are they on? Good. I underlined the word "accuse" here. I did so because you are, again, putting words into my mouth. I never accused you of anything. If you don't understand what I meant by the sentence "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" then you only need to read the five quotes of my self above, and you should understand what I was saying



unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?


I'd like to dive into your mind and see how it works, truly I would. Here are several quotes of me in this thread:



I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with.

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)


Does it look like I think it's convenient that Apple uses different chargers? Do you have alzheimer's?






Gomme 4 - HotelUser 0


And again no response to the claim that I said Apple only do it to inconvenience their users.





a) I've made like five posts about the same thing now and you just keep ignoring it (refer to all the above quotes which you've just not read or blatantly ignored)
b) I've already replied to your "claim" waaaay earlier in the thread. I told you that I think Apple does it because Apple likes to make money:



I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money.

Apple does it because they want to make a crapload of money.

It's possible you don't know anything about economics so I'll spell it out again for you, companies like to make money.


I think it's pretty damn obvious based off of those three statements by me in three different posts that I think Apple do it to make money, and NOT to promote isolationism and NOT to only inconvenience users. So I think you might need to rethink that score



I think I've won this argument, mainly because I've read the thread. Yeah *looks up at your statements and all my replies to them in PREVIOUS posts* it sure looks like you've read the thread

Do you seriously think you can just snap your fingers, say I failed to read the thread and then make your statement true? I told you you failed to read the thread and then I proved that you failed to read the thread. Deal with it.


which was literally based on you misreading my post that apparently I think you are happy that Apple use a different adapter (which we've established is incorrect) AND that Apple only do it to be annoying to their customers.

Hey Gomme "tell me where I said that I think that you think that I am happy that apple uses a different adapter". Send me the exact post, quote the exact words. If you quote this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" I'm going to laugh in your face and redirect you to my previous post where I point out all your instances of epically failing to read anything properly.


And again, where do I state that they only do it for individualism? Just because I say they do it to inconvenience their customers for the sake of individualism to Tomm does not mean only.

Thanks for posting this, you've given me another opportunity to demonstrate that you don't read posts before you reply to them :) This is taken from my previous post:

"I think it's pretty damn obvious based off of those three statements by me in three different posts that I think Apple do it to make money, and NOT to promote isolationism and NOT to only inconvenience users."

notice how I say "NOT to only" only before inconveniencing users, and not before isolationism. I never said in my previous post that you said it was to *ONLY* promote isolationism. This is a classic case of Gomme putting words in HotelUser's mouth.


Do you know why I said for individualism? Because I was speaking from the point of view of the customer

I'm a consumer and I think Apple only does it to make money. If you think as a consumer that they do it promote individualism then that's the stupidest view I've ever heard. They do it to make money and they make money from doing it, simples.



Why would customers care about the economics behind Apple making money? Hence I never stated that, as the customer doesn't benefit from Apple using an adapter which is an inconvenience, they only benefit for the basic need to charge their phones. Apple could use the mini-USB many other phone companies use (since smartphones have become the "in" thing, loads of functions, features and aesthetics have become standards), but they don't because they want to seperate their product from the rest to make extra money - although arguably this conversation is pointless because chargers come as a standard with the phone, so they rarely have to buy adapters unless misplaced or broken. Apple make most of their money through the sale of the actual phone (incl. the power cable), not through selling the accessories. £500+ vs. £30. Unless you're suggesting consumers like to buy Apple accessories and not the product those accessories go with?

At every gas station I go into off the highway I see loads and loads of car adapters, and I see them at loads of other stores. They wouldn't be there if they didn't sell them.



Gomme 6 - HotelUser 0

If this was tennis, I would have won and received a rather lovely trophy with my name on by now.

HotelUser 7, Gomme -1, a net point loss for failure to read. If this was tennis I'd be running victory laps and you'd be standing in the middle of the court with a nose bleed, after having hitting yourself in the head with the ball numerous times.

In my last post:
1. you still didn't understand my "happy" sentence and I pointed out five times where I explained it.
2. You accused me of accusing you that you said you're happy they use a separate adapter and I challenged you on it. In your latest reply you never sent me the post where I make this accusation against you because I never did, it doesn't exist.
3. You thought I might have been saying it was an inconvenience that apple uses a different adapter than the standard one and I sent you 4 quotes of myself which state the exact opposite.
4. You thought I didn't reply to your claim that Apple only does it to inconvenience their users, and I produced three previous quotes of myself which had already responded to that claim.

Considering those 4 things, and the lackof you addressing any of them despite you quoting that post (:S:S:S) then I think you must be dreaming if you think you've "won" anything. They only thing you've "won" is managing to represent yourself as a fool to me.

[GommeInc]

Again you've not read the thread and make a colossal reply :rolleyes:

1. Where did I say you were happy Apple only use a unique adapter? The explanations you've given build off this, when I clearly never said this.

2. Where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users?

I don't care about the economics side as I was clearly talking from the viewpoint of the customer with the user Tomm. It was your protectionist mentality that started your pointless ranting again.

Seriously David, read. You can explain what you meant by "being happy about Apple only using one type of adapter", but I honestly don't care, because I never said you were to begin with. Stop wasting your time with that one point because it is literally making you look stupid, the same for going on about the economics. I obviously know it is to make money - show me where I disagree? You assumed I did, like you assume the whole time.

Speaking of which, why aren't you having a go at Tomm who doesn't understand why Apple use their charger and somewhat agree with my point that it is an inconvenience?

[HotelUser]

Again you've not read the thread and make a colossal reply :rolleyes:


The story of your life in this thread.



1. Where did I say you were happy Apple only use a unique adapter? The explanations you've given build off this, when I clearly never said this.

This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.




2. Where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users?



Did I say you said this as your opinion? No. You posted this:

unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?
And then I quoted four previous posts of my own which completely contradicted your idea of what I thought (I guess you just never read the thread, shocker). Don't you even remember you saying the above????? I guess not based on your confusion here.




I don't care about the economics side as I was clearly talking from the viewpoint of the customer with the user @Tomm (http://www.habboxforum.com/member.php?u=14161). It was your protectionist mentality that started your pointless ranting again.


Asked and answered:


I'm a consumer and I think Apple only does it to make money. If you think as a consumer that they do it promote individualism then that's the stupidest view I've ever heard. They do it to make money and they make money from doing it, simples.

If you're just going to bring up the same things over and over I'm just going to continue requoting myself. You're a broken record.



Seriously David, read. You can explain what you meant by "being happy about Apple only using one type of adapter", but I honestly don't care, because I never said you were to begin with. Stop wasting your time with that one point because it is literally making you look stupid, the same for going on about the economics. I obviously know it is to make money - show me where I disagree? You assumed I did, like you assume the whole time.


WASTING MY TIME WITH THAT POINT LOL? IT TOOK 6 POSTS OF MINE FOR YOU TO FIGURE OUT WHAT I SAID AND IM STILL NOT CONVINCED :P



Speaking of which, why aren't you having a go at @Tomm (http://www.habboxforum.com/member.php?u=14161) who doesn't understand why Apple use their charger and somewhat agree with my point that it is an inconvenience?

Tomm isn't part of the extreme anti-Applists movement of 2k12, and I'm assuming unlike you that Tomm can probably read to some capacity, so it probably wouldn't have required 6 posts of explaining one sentence for him to understand it.

---

What, you're not going to address my most post #52 of this thread where you made an argument completely based on the fact that I used the word "only" before two items and not one and then I showed you that you misquoted me? I'm not surprised, what can you say, you were mistaken. You shouldn't have started this whole "you can't read" crap because you're certainly not perfect at all, and I've demonstrated numerous instances where your failure to read has gotten the best of you.

[Chippiewill]

Guys, guys - no one gives a ****, stop arguing like children

OP: That looks hideous it's probably a fake unless Johnny Ives has been smoking meth, and even then. Especially when we're seeing iPad 7" backs which continue the old trend of design.

[GommeInc]

The story of your life in this thread.
Yet you make another colossal reply again :rolleyes:


This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.
So why say it? I'm not "thinking somebody said it", you "actually", said it, by saying "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy", I didn't. Move on. I even replied to the bit where I asked "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread that customers ought to be protected?" saying that wasn't even anything to do with the adapters. Again, you suck at reading, by making assumptions :rolleyes:


Did I say you said this as your opinion? No. You posted this:

And then I quoted four previous posts of my own which completely contradicted your idea of what I thought (I guess you just never read the thread, shocker). Don't you even remember you saying the above????? I guess not based on your confusion here.
Yes, you did say it was my opinion, because you you posted this:


I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money. I'm not surprised to see you spouting out some random anti-Apple garbage which doesn't make any monetary sense for Apple to do though. Just because you don't like Apple Gomme, doesn't mean they're a religious cult that preaches "individualism" over the corporate objectives of making a crapload of money :rolleyes:
So: Where did I say they only do it for individualism? Answer the question this time, I know you can do it.


If you're just going to bring up the same things over and over I'm just going to continue requoting myself. You're a broken record.
Says the person who has been proven wrong so many times in this thread accusing me of putting words in your mouth when you said them yourself (with quotes). I never said you were happy Apple use a different adapter, you did. You're the broken record hell bent on destroying threads, like this one for example.


WASTING MY TIME WITH THAT POINT LOL? IT TOOK 6 POSTS OF MINE FOR YOU TO FIGURE OUT WHAT I SAID AND IM STILL NOT CONVINCED :P
Oh dear, the capital letters are coming out. You're only getting angry at your inability to read and write properly, by making accusations based on nothing. So, where did I say Apple don't do it to make money and where did I also say you're happy Apple inconvenience their users? You've not answered the quesiton, you keep quoting your posts which makes me wonder if you're arguing with yourself rather than me.


What, you're not going to address my most post #52 of this thread where you made an argument completely based on the fact that I used the word "only" before two items and not one and then I showed you that you misquoted me? I'm not surprised, what can you say, you were mistaken. You shouldn't have started this whole "you can't read" crap because you're certainly not perfect at all, and I've demonstrated numerous instances where your failure to read has gotten the best of you.
I never misquoted you, you mucked up your argument from the beginning by misreading my posts again and making accusations. One last time, where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users and you're happy they do that? Heck, let's assume my post about consumer protectionism was about this - where in that post does it explicitly say "You're happy that customerss aren't protected by the use of standard power cables" ;) Come on, you can do it... or you can just admit you fail at arguments and resort to petty arguments where you try to redefine the definition of "happy" and rewrite your arguments, despite the fact you can look back at posts on here.

Just admit defeat HotelUser, you're seriously looking stupid -.- I probably should of kept with the idea of not feeding the troll, as your pure rage does seem to have effected your ability to read again :rolleyes:


Guys, guys - no one gives a ****, stop arguing like children

OP: That looks hideous it's probably a fake unless Johnny Ives has been smoking meth, and even then. Especially when we're seeing iPad 7" backs which continue the old trend of design.
Don't blame me if he gets over protective of Apple. It's hard explaining to a 10 year old where they went wrong in a thread.

Knowing these rumours that get released each year, it probably is fake. If it is real, Apple seem to of removed a few design features like making the buttons more appealing. Maybe they've discovered nearly everyone has their phones in a pouch or a case, so they dn't really care about making it pretty anymore, and hope someone else can make a case to do that for them.

[Recursion]

Guys, guys - no one gives a ****, stop arguing like children

OP: That looks hideous it's probably a fake unless Johnny Ives has been smoking meth, and even then. Especially when we're seeing iPad 7" backs which continue the old trend of design.

Quote for truth.

Not the iPhone 5, it'd be design suicide, IMO.

[HotelUser]

Quote for truth.

Not the iPhone 5, it'd be design suicide, IMO.

I'm used to dealing with people on the internet who have no idea what they're talking about. But honestly Tom, when I can pull this off:

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648753#post7648753

And literally just cut and paste previous posts of mine as replies to whatever he says, then it really just turns into madness because I don't think he's reading the thread before he speaks at all. It's not even as if to every item he brought up I was able to give him 1 quote of me already refuting it, but whenever he brought up anything I was able to give him several different posts of mine which already refuted whatever he says. In his latest reply below, he just does the same thing. He brings things up which never transpired, or which have already been discussed and then he tells me I can't read when 1. He doesn't give any facts to back up that claim, and 2. I've given him an entire post on a platter of me demonstrating he isn't reading the thread and you know what? He understood the post entirely wrong.

I love debating with you and Matt because when we debate you don't put words into my mouth, you don't quote me wrong, and you don't ignore my rebuttles and just repeat the "point". This guy on the other hand is a monster, and even for him he's hit a new all time low.

---


Yet you make another colossal reply again



Do you think before you speak? What do you think your reply is?






So why say it? I'm not "thinking somebody said it", you "actually", said it, by saying "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy", I didn't. Move on. I even replied to the bit where I asked "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread that customers ought to be protected?" saying that wasn't even anything to do with the adapters. Again, you suck at reading, by making assumptions



Another example of poor old Gomme not understanding how to read. Me saying that WAS IN RESPONSE TO YOU SAYING "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" do you not remember accusing me of being a hypocrite? Jeez Gomme. Read my now SEVEN other posts which explain what this was in response to.


I


NEVER


said


you


called


me


happy


I've posted


SEVEN


posts saying this


READ THEM.




Yes, you did say it was my opinion, because you you posted this:




So: Where did I say they only do it for individualism? Answer the question this time, I know you can do it.



Where did I say you said it was only for individualism? You can't show me proof of that because there isn't any. I said this:



I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money. I'm not surprised to see you spouting out some random anti-Apple garbage which doesn't make any monetary sense for Apple to do though. Just because you don't like Apple Gomme, doesn't mean they're a religious cult that preaches "individualism" over the corporate objectives of making a crapload of money


In response to this:



They could, but they like to inconvenience their users for the sake of individualism


And neither of us use the words "only do it for individualism". Don't you even remember making that post? Would it refreshen your memory if I told you it was your post with moronic views which started this argument?






Says the person who has been proven wrong so many times in this thread accusing me of putting words in your mouth when you said them yourself (with quotes). I never said you were happy Apple use a different adapter, you did. You're the broken record hell bent on destroying threads, like this one for example.





This is me laughing in your ignorant face, as I direct you to this post:


http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648753#post7648753


You've yet to prove me wrong one time, yet I've proven you wrong with proof multiple :)


This is an example of poor old Gomme making up statements and not having any evidence to back them up.






Oh dear, the capital letters are coming out. You're only getting angry at your inability to read and write properly, by making accusations based on nothing. So, where did I say Apple don't do it to make money and where did I also say you're happy Apple inconvenience their users? You've not answered the quesiton, you keep quoting your posts which makes me wonder if you're arguing with yourself rather than me.




I never misquoted you, you mucked up your argument from the beginning by misreading my posts again and making accusations.


No, I'm getting angry at you repeating that I'm the one "misreading" when you've given me ZERO proof, when I've given LOTS of proof of your stupidity and inability to read:


http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648753#post7648753


:) I'm literally laughing in your face because you make negative accusations and they're 0% true for me and 100% true directed towards you, haha.



One last time, where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users and you're happy they do that?


Are you stupid? I already addressed this in my previous post (which you didn't read). This was never said at all and you're just making up things in your cluttered little head. Do you remember saying this?


"unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?"


My response was to quote myself FOUR different times to validate your theory of what you "thought" I meant completely and horribly wrong.


Your responses are loads of crap if you're not going to read properly.


This is an example of how poor old gomme just can't read at all.



Heck, let's assume my post about consumer protectionism was about this - where in that post does it explicitly say "You're happy that customerss aren't protected by the use of standard power cables" Come on, you can do it... or you can just admit you fail at arguments and resort to petty arguments where you try to redefine the definition of "happy" and rewrite your arguments, despite the fact you can look back at posts on here.


Okay hold on, first of all, and for like the 8th time, NOBODY is happy Apple uses those cables, and it would protect the consumer MORE if they used STANDARD cables.


Second, this quote has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING (LMAO) to do with what I said at all. You thought (for some freaking strange reason, because I never once said it), that I thought you thought the ONLY reason Apple does it is for for individualism, and you thought that because of this:



"I think it's pretty damn obvious based off of those three statements by me in three different posts that I think Apple do it to make money, and NOT to promote isolationism and NOT to only inconvenience users."


notice how I say "NOT to only" only before inconveniencing users, and not before isolationism. I never said in my previous post that you said it was to *ONLY* promote isolationism. This is a classic case of Gomme putting words in HotelUser's mouth.


Clearly you didn't read my previous post (shocker), or otherwise you just lack the brain cells to understand simply English.






Just admit defeat HotelUser, you're seriously looking stupid -.- I probably should of kept with the idea of not feeding the troll, as your pure rage does seem to have effected your ability to read again


This is me laughing in your illiterate face. Just because you "say" you've proven me wrong and that I can't read doesn't make it true. You've yet to show me one piece of evidence to the contrary.


When it comes to you on the other hand, you got nailed for not reading the thread here:


http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648753#post7648753


That's pathetic, give up.



Don't blame me if he gets over protective of Apple. It's hard explaining to a 10 year old where they went wrong in a thread.


Don't sell yourself short now poor old gomme ;)

[GommeInc]

snip
Another lengthy reply again I see ;)

1. Why say I did? It's in black and white that you said I think you're happy Apple only use one type of adapter. How many times do I need to keep directing you to that post? The first time you suggested I put words in your mouth (yet I can't edit other peoples posts) and the next you try to explain what you mean. Explain all you like, I never said you are happy about it. You're literally asking for an argument where there isn't one.

2. You suggested I said you were happy in a post. It's in black and white yet you fail to acknowledge this then accuse me of not knowing what economics is when I clearly have had no interests in talking to Tomm about the economics of Apple's business decisions when we were clearly talking from a consumer viewpoint -.-

3. I think it's incredibly disgusting to joke about Alzheimers and I honestly am losing the will to reply to your pathetic, immature and disgusting posts. Alzheimers is an emotionally and physically draining disease, yet you bring it into a discussion with your potent remarks and lust for unnecessary discussions because you feel the need to protect Apple when there is no need to protect it as it wasn't even being attacked to begin with. It's so low of you, but then again you've always been one to be low. Truely pathetic.

[HotelUser]

Another lengthy reply again I see ;)

Hypocrite as per usual (http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648966#post7648966)


1. Why say I did? It's in black and white that you said I think you're happy Apple only use one type of adapter.

2. You suggested I said you were happy in a post. It's in black and white

Here's my problem with you. You keep rebringing this back up even though I've answered it once or twice...


a) I've made like five posts about the same thing now and you just keep ignoring it (refer to all the above quotes which you've just not read or blatantly ignored)

Unfortunately for you when someone says something and you interpret it a certain way, that doesn't mean that the way you interpreted it is correct. I have explained atleast five times what I meant by what I said and you can either accept my meaning or reject it, not make up some other meaning which I didn't infer to at all. All my explanations are perfectly valid, because it was a rhetorical question in response to something you said.



(unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with.

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)


GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU


ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords

I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)


This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.

.....

I don't know what to do at this point, because I've given you an answer. It's not my fault you don't like my answer and it's not my fault you want to keep bringing the same question up but I think you should stop. I've explained what I meant by it like 800 times in those quotes (some are quotes of quotes (wow)), so you just need to deal with it.




yet you fail to acknowledge this then accuse me of not knowing what economics is when I clearly have had no interests in talking to Tomm about the economics of Apple's business decisions when we were clearly talking from a consumer viewpoint -.-


You don't understand economics because you think companies like Apple do things to ultimately prove points, not make money....



3. I think it's incredibly disgusting to joke about Alzheimers and I honestly am losing the will to reply to your pathetic, immature and disgusting posts. Alzheimers is an emotionally and physically draining disease, yet you bring it into a discussion with your potent remarks and lust for unnecessary discussions because you feel the need to protect Apple when there is no need to protect it as it wasn't even being attacked to begin with. It's so low of you, but then again you've always been one to be low. Truely pathetic.

It's a good thing only one of us is being pathetic and immature :rolleyes:


As per usual, your failure to read is your one and only weakness, and causes yet another pointless discussion in a thread because "you're too serious" and defensive of Apple (this post is evident of it). Point out the part in my post where I said you were happy Apple did this. You would notice I didn't say this, mainly because you cast aspersions and merely make assumptions because you seem to really like pointless discussions and have the ineptitude to read. Well done David, this is thread two you've derailed.

You would notice a -rep which should act as a sign that your reputation as being reasonable and logical in your approach to discussions is in tatters. Also, well done ignoring most of my post yet again and only reading what you want to read (which isn't there). Jeez.

From now on I won't "Feed the Troll", as you clearly have no interest in reading any posts, and I honestly do not have the energy to further belittle you.



--------------------------------------------------------

edit: Replying to Gomme The-Broken-Record was really easy this time. All I had to do was cut and paste to prove his lack of ability to read :)

[GommeInc]

SNIP
And another lengthy response I see ;)

Who are you benefitting with droning on about how I apparently said you were happy Apple inconvenience their users? As we estalblished ages ago, I didn't say that so that matter is no longer relevant. Just give that a rest. I clearly didn't say it, so why carry on explaning it?

"You don't understand economics because you think companies like Apple do things to ultimately prove points, not make money...." - Point me to this post. I never mentioned economics, so how do you know I don't understand it? It's like pointing at a random stranger and telling me they don't understand sex. As I keep saying (but your inability to read overlooks it), I didn't mention it because Tomm and I were not having an economics debate, you came in protecting Apple for no reason and destroyed thread #2.

And mentioning Alzheimers in a thread isn't just pathetic and pointless, it is also disgusting. You are disgusting and incredibly low for mentioning it.

[HotelUser]

And another lengthy response I see ;)



Hypocrite as per usual (http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648966#post7648966)

----



Who are you benefitting with droning on about how I apparently said you were happy Apple inconvenience their users? As we estalblished ages ago, I didn't say that so that matter is no longer relevant. Just give that a rest. I clearly didn't say it, so why carry on explaning it?



Okay hold on, first of all, and for like the 8th time, NOBODY is happy Apple uses those cables, and it would protect the consumer MORE if they used STANDARD cables.


2. YOURE MAKING ASSUMPTIONS IN THINKING I SAID YOU SAID THAT I WAS HAPPY WITH APPLES CORDS BECAUSE I NEVER ONCE SAID THAT MYSELF, I ASKED YOU TO TELL ME WHERE I SAID I WAS HAPPY WITH THE CORDS, IN RESPONSE TO YOU TELLING ME THEY HURT THE CONSUMERS



This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.


This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.


Another example of poor old Gomme not understanding how to read. Me saying that WAS IN RESPONSE TO YOU SAYING "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" do you not remember accusing me of being a hypocrite? Jeez Gomme. Read my now SEVEN other posts which explain what this was in response to.

Get it through your thick skull that I don't think whatever the hell it is you think I think.

----



"You don't understand economics because you think companies like Apple do things to ultimately prove points, not make money...." - Point me to this post.


They could, but they like to inconvenience their users for the sake of individualism

|-)

----


I never mentioned economics, so how do you know I don't understand it?


You don't understand economics because you think companies like Apple do things to ultimately prove points, not make money....


It's possible you don't know anything about economics so I'll spell it out again for you, companies like to make money.


Do you know why I said for individualism? Because I was speaking from the point of view of the customer, which was what Tomm and I were discussing the view point of
I'm a consumer and I think Apple only does it to make money. If you think as a consumer that they do it promote individualism then that's the stupidest view I've ever heard. They do it to make money and they make money from doing it, simples.

|-)|-)

----


And mentioning Alzheimers in a thread isn't just pathetic and pointless, it is also disgusting. You are disgusting and incredibly low for mentioning it.



I think it's incredibly disgusting to joke about Alzheimers
It's a good thing only one of us is being pathetic and immature:

As per usual, your failure to read is your one and only weakness, and causes yet another pointless discussion in a thread because "you're too serious" and defensive of Apple (this post is evident of it). Point out the part in my post where I said you were happy Apple did this. You would notice I didn't say this, mainly because you cast aspersions and merely make assumptions because you seem to really like pointless discussions and have the ineptitude to read. Well done David, this is thread two you've derailed.


You would notice a -rep which should act as a sign that your reputation as being reasonable and logical in your approach to discussions is in tatters. Also, well done ignoring most of my post yet again and only reading what you want to read (which isn't there). Jeez.


From now on I won't "Feed the Troll", as you clearly have no interest in reading any posts, and I honestly do not have the energy to further belittle you.


|-)|-)|-)

----


http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/24021945.jpg

[GommeInc]

I see I've won this argument as you've resorted to using horrendous diseases and insults to win your argument. You did accuse me of saying that I think you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, by asking me to point out in your post whereyou said you were happy they did this and why I think you thought this (Post #37 (http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7647508#post7647508)), accused me of thinking Apple only do it to annoy their customers for the sake of individualism (Post #39 (http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648194#post7648194)) and pretended that my comment about consumer protection was about you being happy that Apple inconenvenience their customers (Post #50 (http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648194#post7648194)).

This whole thread would of been interesting if you didn't assume so much and have a blind devotion to Apple. Tomm and I were quite happily discussing the inconvenience they bring to charging phones (I can't lend a friend my spare micro-USB if they use an iPhone, a few times this has happened). You were the one that assumed economics isn't a factor, when our discussion wasn't concerned with it.

/end of thread

[HotelUser]

I see I've won this argument

Gomme has spoken and thus it must be law binding and true.


You did accuse me of saying that I think you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter

I asked you to point out to me where I said I was happy about it because you asked me if I was the one preaching about consumerism and protecting consumers in another thread. Refer to my following posts where I explain this:

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7649564#post7649564
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7647508#post7647508
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648194#post7648194
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648585#post7648585
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648692#post7648692
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648728#post7648728
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648753#post7648753
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648783#post7648783
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648858#post7648858
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7649403#post7649403
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7649492#post7649492
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7649564#post7649564

So please for the love of god shut up about the quote. I've explained exactly what I meant by it in now 13 different posts and if you choose to reject my explanation that's not my problem and you have to live with that.



This whole thread would of been interesting if you didn't assume so much and have a blind devotion to Apple. Tomm and I were quite happily discussing the inconvenience they bring to charging phones (I can't lend a friend my spare micro-USB if they use an iPhone, a few times this has happened). You were the one that assumed economics isn't a factor, when our discussion wasn't concerned with it.


I'm happy for you that you were happy being a little anti-apple birdie but seeing you think Apple uses custom adapters for individualism made me half hysterically, and I just couldn't resist pointing out the large magnitude to which you were dead wrong.



/end of thread

HURR DURR:


I'm not a moderator, super moderator or member of management

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite

[samsaBEAR]

**** me, I love arguing on the internet as much as the next dude but you guys just need to cool your jets or take it to PMs

[HotelUser]

**** me, I love arguing on the internet as much as the next dude but you guys just need to cool your jets or take it to PMs

It's not even an argument anymore. He keeps saying the same thing over and over and I keep sending him previous posts where I've already addressed what he's said. I'd be really excited if he decided to advance his conversation further, but as it stands he's just a giant broken record.

[mrwoooooooo]

It's not even an argument anymore. He keeps saying the same thing over and over and I keep sending him previous posts where I've already addressed what he's said. I'd be really excited if he decided to advance his conversation further, but as it stands he's just a giant broken record.

you're both a giant broken record saying the same things over and over. no-one currs

[HotelUser]

you're both a giant broken record saying the same things over and over. no-one currs

He apparently does, and he's repeating himself without realizing it, I'm repeating myself by slapping my previous quotes into my replies to demonstrate the fact that he's just repeating himself.

p.s. Your signature is amazing, I hate joff and I loved that scene in the series :P

[GommeInc]

How does me saying I am not a super moderator, moderator or member a management make me a hypocrite exactly? *raises eyebrow* I think you need to look up the definition of "hypocrite" again (and he calls me stupid |-))

Also, you and I were only repeating ourselves because you thought I said you were happy Apple inconvenience their customers (which was disproven immediately) and you think that I only believe Apple do it for individualistic reasons (which again was disproven immediately). The argument only went on for 4 pages because you're hot headed and protective.

[HotelUser]

How does me saying I am not a super moderator, moderator or member a management make me a hypocrite exactly? *raises eyebrow* I think you need to look up the definition of "hypocrite" again (and he calls me stupid |-))


Because you said you aren't a moderator, and then later on you said /end thread. You're not the OP, or a moderator as you told me yourself so you cant close a thread. It was playful of me to say that on my part, yet you take everything so seriously. Why so serious son?



Also, you and I were only repeating ourselves because you thought I said you were happy Apple inconvenience their customers (which was disproven immediately) and you think that I only believe Apple do it for individualistic reasons (which again was disproven immediately). The argument only went on for 4 pages because you're hot headed and protective.

You were repeating yourself because you decided you'd reply to the thread like 8 times without actually having read it. My replies where I reply to you with previous quotes of my own speak for themselves :)

[GommeInc]

Because you said you aren't a moderator, and then later on you said /end thread. You're not the OP, or a moderator as you told me yourself so you cant close a thread. It was playful of me to say that on my part, yet you take everything so seriously. Why so serious son?
And that's the definition of hypocrite... how exactly? So because I said I am not a moderator, and I said /end of thread, that must de factor mean I am a moderator? Where are these powers then? The only amusing thing about it is that yet again you've messed up simple English.

I did read the thread, it was you who assumed somewhere (yet to get proof) that I said you like the idea Apple inconvenience their users, and then went on a rant about economics assuming no-one knows about economic business decisions and basic marketing strategy. I even replied to your posts expanding on this (though expanding is pointless, I never said it, so why expand on something someone never said?) The only proof you gave were links to posts you've made, rather than posts I made. You looked as though you were arguing with yourself, rather than with anyone in particular. And then to try and make yourself look smart you brought a serious, destructive disease to try and win over the thread, when actually it made you look rather pathetic.


P.S. A person can only be a hypocrite if strong moral values or beliefs highlight a quality inferred by the person pretending to be something they are not. So if I said I hate moderators and I am glad I am not one, then I would only be a hypocrite if I actually were a moderator and like them. It would only really work if I said I am a moderator and improve my self worth. If anything the word you were looking for is "liar", because you must be a moderator to say "/end of thread" when clearly I am not one, but even then as I clearly do not have the powers associated with a moderator I must clearly be telling the truth.

<Basic English 101>

[HotelUser]

And that's the definition of hypocrite... how exactly? So because I said I am not a moderator, and I said /end of thread, that must de factor mean I am a moderator? Where are these powers then? The only amusing thing about it is that yet again you've messed up simple English.

The only one (as per usual) who's messed up simple English is you and by arguing this further you're the biggest and most annoying hypocrite on the entire forum.


I'm not a moderator, super moderator or member of management

/end of thread

Remember saying that hypocrite? If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen :rolleyes:




I did read the thread,

And once again I find myself laughing in your face. For anyone who wants evidence against the fact that Gomme read the thread, you need not look further than my posts here:

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7649564#post7649564
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648858#post7648858
and ESPECIALLY http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7649492#post7649492

I should NOT be able to respond to you by just quoting myself, and it's happened a lot now. Your posts are worthless because you just repeat yourself over and over.


it was you who assumed somewhere (yet to get proof) that I said you like the idea Apple inconvenience their users

Are you KIDDING me? Here's what went down (since you're too unintelligent to remember):


(unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

because I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords.

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)


GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU


ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords.

I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)


(unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

because I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords.

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)


GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU


ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords.

I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)

I was responding to something YOU said. It's bad enough that your disease prohibits you from remembering things I say, but dear god atleast remember the things you say to me: "unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?".

I know you're just going to either ignore this, or reply to it accusing me again without giving any evidence to backup what you say, so here is me laughing in your face once more because unlike you I don't say things without trying to actually back them up :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes:

When I argue with people usually they try to use what I say against me, not forget what they've said themselves, not read my reply properly to what they've said and then reply saying the stupidest thing ever.




P.S. A person can only be a hypocrite if strong moral values or beliefs highlight a quality inferred by the person pretending to be something they are not. So if I said I hate moderators and I am glad I am not one, then I would only be a hypocrite if I actually were a moderator and like them. It would only really work if I said I am a moderator and improve my self worth. If anything the word you were looking for is "liar", because you must be a moderator to say "/end of thread" when clearly I am not one, but even then as I clearly do not have the powers associated with a moderator I must clearly be telling the truth.

<Basic English 101>

Doesn't have to be "strong" moral values, and don't you remember what you said poor Gomme? You didn't say you hate moderators, you said you're not one.

Here's what went down:

*I say something which would require moderator perms*

*You say you're not a moderator*

*You say something which would require moderator perms*

*I tell you you're a hypocrite for believing you can't preform moderator actions, and then later on proceed as if you can*

hypocrite, and I don't think Habbox wants you to be a moderator :)

[GommeInc]

I see you've made another lenghty response where you spend most of your time just quoting yourself. I never said you were happy, so stop trying to explain what I never said. You know that point I said where you seem to be arguing with yourself? That post answers it.

So I'm a moderator then? I wasn't aware of this... Go back to school HotelUser, and learn English. I think my point went over your head (but seeing as it's been answered how low you are to resolve to harsh diseases, it wouldn't take much). Point out where I said I am a moderator? You do know my "/end of thread" remark was because you appear to keep repeating yourself and this discussion is getting no where? It was at that, not actually to close the thread. I mean, you would have to be incredibly stupid to assume I can close a thread by saying "/end of thread". Don't you agree?

(The above was a rhetorical question).

EDIT: Also if you agreed you wouldn't of asked me to point out where I said you were happy Apple limit their adapters to only their product (isolationism) and spent 4 pages of this thread arguing with yourself about what you mean by what you clearly said. As I never said that, then the argument is done "end of discussion" (I would say end of thread, but you're too daft to know what I mean by that).

Also, well done on further lowering yourself by now accusing me of having alzheimer's. You know where I said people who resort to that tactic to win an argument are pathetic? Well done ;)

[HotelUser]

I see you've made another lenghty response


Another lengthy reply again I see

Hypocrite as per usual (http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648966#post7648966)


Another lengthy reply again I see

Hypocrite as per usual (http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7648966#post7648966)



where you spend most of your time just quoting yourself.


I should NOT be able to respond to you by just quoting myself, and it's happened a lot now. Your posts are worthless because you just repeat yourself over and over.

It's not even an argument anymore. He keeps saying the same thing over and over and I keep sending him previous posts where I've already addressed what he's said. I'd be really excited if he decided to advance his conversation further, but as it stands he's just a giant broken record.

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=755423&p=7649564#post7649564 ;)


I never said you were happy


Okay hold on, first of all, and for like the 8th time, NOBODY is happy Apple uses those cables



So I'm a moderator then? I wasn't aware of this... Go back to school HotelUser, and learn English.

Quote where I tell you that you're a moderator :S:S:S because I don't.


I mean, you would have to be incredibly stupid to assume I can close a thread by saying "/end of thread". Don't you agree?

(The above was a rhetorical question).

And unlike you I don't fuss over and try to answer rhetorical questions ;)



EDIT: Also if you agreed you wouldn't of asked me to point out where I said you were happy Apple limit their adapters to only their product (isolationism) and spent 4 pages of this thread arguing with yourself about what you mean by what you clearly said. As I never said that, then the argument is done "end of discussion" (I would say end of thread, but you're too daft to know what I mean by that).


I wasn't arguing with myself, infact I wasn't arguing with anybody. I was reating myself over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over because you consistently ignored what I was saying and just repeated your question back to me.

You can't tell me if I do or do not agree with something, you're not allowed to. Only I'm allowed to do that, because only I am me. You don't like that, and you misconstrued what I said, which made yourself out to look like a fool for 4 pages and that's your fault, not mine. Your scapegoat can't be "well you must feel this way instead," because you're not me and (thank **** for me) you can't control how I think or what I say (only how many times I have to say it).



Also, well done on further lowering yourself by now accusing me of having alzheimer's. You know where I said people who resort to that tactic to win an argument are pathetic? Well done ;)

Oh, grow the heck up Gomme, I know lots of people who have Alzheimer's and even have an immediate family members who has Alzheimer's so I'm not going to sit here for one second and let a fool on an internet forum lecture me about the severity of the subject. If you don't like the fact that I'd rather use the word lightly instead of with a full stint of worried depression then that's something you'll just have to deal with, OR send me a scan of your brain to prove you don't have it - you know how much I love people supporting their arguments (and how much I dislike your lack of supporting yours) ;)

[mrwoooooooo]

can a mod just close this thread?