-:Undertaker:-
21-12-2012, 10:19 AM
http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/
What a Good Thing we Said No to Berlin Time
As I pedalled through the pre-dawn gloom to the station this morning, in pelting rain and rather later than usual, I rejoiced that at least the plan for Berlin Time had been defeated.
This scheme would have tied our clocks to Central European Time, based on a meridian a few dozen miles east of Berlin, undeclared Capital of the EU. This would mean that the stygian mornings of this time of year would extend until well after nine o’ clock. This is obviously unnatural and also particularly dangerous to early-morning travellers on foot or by bike.
The corollary, of course, would have been blazing daylight until after 10.00 p.m. in the high summer weeks, equally unnatural and unwelcome to those whose work depends on early rising.
Looking back, it is amazing that the plan was beaten, thanks to a small but dogged group of intelligent and courageous MPs - and I can’t help wondering how long it will be before this proposal rises again from its grave. It plainly has its origin somewhere in the great Blob of Euro-enthusiasm ,for there is no other explanation for the way it is brought back, again and again, to Parliament. Alas, far too few people see through this. Ridiculous claims that the clock change will in some mysterious way benefit tourism and business are made and accepted without any attempt to verify them.
The very name of the last campaign ‘Lighter Later’ was fundamentally dishonest, because it implied that there was some sort of available pool of spare light, which could be tapped by this measure . Of course this isn’t so. If it was lighter later at one time of day, it would be darker later at another.
Just a nice piece by Hitchens here and a good reminder of how sensible and rational arguments won the day in relation to the effort last summer to try and have us move onto Central European Time. I remember the furious debates on this forum concerning this issue and thought it'd be nice to see what people thought now that the issue had been 'put to bed' at last. Glad to say that those of us who didn't back this silly change won the day.
Thoughts?
What a Good Thing we Said No to Berlin Time
As I pedalled through the pre-dawn gloom to the station this morning, in pelting rain and rather later than usual, I rejoiced that at least the plan for Berlin Time had been defeated.
This scheme would have tied our clocks to Central European Time, based on a meridian a few dozen miles east of Berlin, undeclared Capital of the EU. This would mean that the stygian mornings of this time of year would extend until well after nine o’ clock. This is obviously unnatural and also particularly dangerous to early-morning travellers on foot or by bike.
The corollary, of course, would have been blazing daylight until after 10.00 p.m. in the high summer weeks, equally unnatural and unwelcome to those whose work depends on early rising.
Looking back, it is amazing that the plan was beaten, thanks to a small but dogged group of intelligent and courageous MPs - and I can’t help wondering how long it will be before this proposal rises again from its grave. It plainly has its origin somewhere in the great Blob of Euro-enthusiasm ,for there is no other explanation for the way it is brought back, again and again, to Parliament. Alas, far too few people see through this. Ridiculous claims that the clock change will in some mysterious way benefit tourism and business are made and accepted without any attempt to verify them.
The very name of the last campaign ‘Lighter Later’ was fundamentally dishonest, because it implied that there was some sort of available pool of spare light, which could be tapped by this measure . Of course this isn’t so. If it was lighter later at one time of day, it would be darker later at another.
Just a nice piece by Hitchens here and a good reminder of how sensible and rational arguments won the day in relation to the effort last summer to try and have us move onto Central European Time. I remember the furious debates on this forum concerning this issue and thought it'd be nice to see what people thought now that the issue had been 'put to bed' at last. Glad to say that those of us who didn't back this silly change won the day.
Thoughts?