Log in

View Full Version : World's biggest offshore wind farm with 300 turbines will be built in Lincolnshire



-:Undertaker:-
12-07-2013, 03:29 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2361335/Worlds-biggest-offshore-wind-farm-300-turbines-built-Lincolnshire.html

World's biggest offshore wind farm with 300 turbines will be built in Lincolnshire

- Work on the Triton Knoll site can now begin after the £3.6bn project was given the go ahead
- It will dwarf Britain's current largest offshore facility unveiled last week by David Cameron
- When complete the windfarm will generate enough power for 820,000 homes


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/07/12/article-2361335-1AC5E441000005DC-486_634x440.jpg
Go-ahead: An offshore wind farm off the coast of Skegness in Lincolnshire


Plans to create the world's biggest offshore wind farm off the coast of Britain have been approved.

Work on the massive Triton Knoll site - 288 giant wind turbines off the Lincolnshire coast - can now begin after the £3.6bn project was given the go ahead.

It will dwarf Britain's current largest offshore facility, the 175-turbine London Array in the Thames Estuary unveiled last week by David Cameron.

When complete, the new giant windfarm will generate 1.2 gigawatts of electricity, enough to power for 820,000 homes.

But critics say it will not come without a cost, as offshore power is currently subsidised by the taxpayer at three time the wholesale price of conventionally-produced electricity.

And the scheme is not without controversy. As part of the project, energy giant RWE are proposing building a substation the size of 30 football pitches connected to the offshore turbines, in the Lincolnshire countryside.

Anyone who knows anything about energy and its production will understand that this is £3.6bn (along with costs to the taxpayer with the bills we'll have to pay coupled with future dismantling costs) literally pissed down the drain and flushed into the sea.

I was going to post last week a report that came out by the energy watchdog warning exactly what I and others (aka UKIP and similar organisations) have said for years - that Britain now faces the looming threat of energy blackouts and if not that, a steep continued rise in our fuel and energy bills. And why? for absolutely nothing. None of this actually needs to be done yet our insane government does it - not that it has a choice mind, as the EU largely dictates our energy policy in regards to this area.

Thoughts?

Zak
12-07-2013, 12:15 PM
-:Undertaker:-; can you please enlighten me as to why this is money wasted?

I thought renewable energy was a good thing? Then again I know virtaully nothing about energy or its production.

Thanks in advance! :)

AgnesIO
12-07-2013, 12:35 PM
@-:Undertaker:- (http://www.habboxforum.com/member.php?u=24233); can you please enlighten me as to why this is money wasted?

I thought renewable energy was a good thing? Then again I know virtaully nothing about energy or its production.

Thanks in advance! :)

Wind farms are ineffective, hugely expensive, look awful, and completely useless when the wind is non-existent.

Cerys
12-07-2013, 02:28 PM
Wind farms are ineffective

I don't know anything about energy, but the article says 'When complete the windfarm will generate enough power for 820,000 homes' So unless they're lying, surely this tells us it is effective??
Agreed about the rest of your sentence, though.

-:Undertaker:-
12-07-2013, 04:00 PM
-:Undertaker:-; can you please enlighten me as to why this is money wasted?

I thought renewable energy was a good thing? Then again I know virtaully nothing about energy or its production.

Thanks in advance! :)

A few things basically,

1) Wind farms only produce any real power at non-peak times - peak times (aka very cold depressions in the month of January and February and very hot days when there is no wind like today) are when energy is most needed with heating in all homes across the UK and heating offices, and on hot days there is a power surge similar in size as offices turn on air conditioning to cool equipments (computers etc). So essentially, when they are most needed they are useless.

2) Leading on from the top point, wind farms have never resulted in the closing down of a coal or gas powered energy plant. Not one. And they can't, why? because it is so unreliable (see point number 1) it can never even hope to replace gas or coal stations as they will always need to remain there as a back up. Which brings me to point....

3) Often even when the wind farms are working, the coal and gas powered stations are kept running because of the fact that for a coal or gas powered station to cease production for a period - that takes a lot of time and costs money by having to restart the station again in a few hours/a few days. So often, it's not even worth (either in time or financial terms) turning the power stations off because a) you run the risk blackouts if the weather suddenly changes and the power stations are not online and running ready to fill the grid & b) the costs of stopping and restarting energy production at that plant are negative.

4) Wind farms actually produce a net loss, which is why the government has to buy and operate them - along with paying people hefty sums (of your money) to place them on any given land. If wind farms were such an easy and cheap way to produce electricity, then private companies would be lining up to build them everywhere - but they are not, because they produce a very hefty loss.

5) Wind turbines have a very short life span (last I heard was 20 years long, some may now last a bit longer) and require constant maintainence - all of which costs the taxpayer money. Due to the nature of wind farms, often they are place on top of hills or mountains or even the sea which makes the operating costs of maintaining them very very very expensive.

6) Wind turbines, when we come to dismantle them all, will cost massive amounts to decommission - mainly the ones located at sea as those coastal areas will then need to be made safe for shipping again and we'll have to engage in the underwate demolition of large concrete fulled tubes that will be under the sea bed - again, something the taxpayer is going to have to burden.

7) Spoils the countryside and chops birds to pieces.

If I think of anymore then I will post, but yeah. :P

FlyingJesus
12-07-2013, 04:33 PM
8) The tax on them is massively higher than any other energy source just because it's happening off-shore so it will cause energy prices to rise even more than they currently do just through the supposed lack (lol) of fossil fuels and gases

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!