PDA

View Full Version : Belgium Set To Allow Euthanasia For Children



Jordan
12-02-2014, 12:12 PM
Belgium is preparing for a debate which will pave the way for the lifting of age restrictions on euthanasia and could mean the practice is controversially extended to children.

The lower house of the country's parliament is due to discuss the issue but it is expected to become law.

The plans stipulate euthanasia would be allowed if the patient is conscious of their decision and understands the meaning of the practice.

It also states their request must be approved by the child's parents and medical team, and their illness must be terminal and no treatment to alleviate their distress is available to them.

Last month the Belgian senate voted 50-17 in favour of a law allowing terminally ill children to request euthanasia.

Opponents insist under 18s are not capable of making such decisions but some doctors believe those facing terminal illnesses find a maturity which helps them make decisions about their own fate.

Currently the Netherlands is the only country in the world where euthanasia is legal for children but they must be over the age of 12 to legally end their lives.

But the Belgian bill has no age restrictions. Belgium first approved euthanasia in 2002.

Since then the number of cases has increased every year - from fewer than 300 in 2003 to approximately 1,500 in recent years.

Dr Gerland van Berlaer, a prominent Brussels paediatrician, believes giving youngsters the option to end their lives is the right thing to do.

Demonstrators in Brussels protest against the new law

He says the law will be specific enough to only apply to a handful of teenage boys and girls who are in the advanced stages of terminal illnesses such as cancer and are suffering unbearable pain.

"We are talking about children that are really at the end of their life," he said.

"It's not that they have months or years to go. Their life will end anyway.

"The question they ask us is: 'Don’t make me go in a terrible horrifying way, let me go now while I am still a human being and while I still have my dignity'."

One opinion poll found 75% of Belgians are in favour of the law change.

But there is also a vocal opposition and noisy street protests.

Andre Leonard, Archbishop of Mechelen-Brussels and chairman of the Episcopal Conference of Belgium, is worried about the law being extended to children.

"There is a risk of very serious consequences in the long term for society and the meaning we give to life, death and the freedom of human beings," he said.

"We are opening a door that nobody will be able to close."

King Philippe, Belgium's constitutional head of state, must sign the legislation for it to take effect.

So far the 53-year-old monarch and father-of-four has not taken a public position.

Belgium would become the first country in the world to lift age restrictions on euthanasia....

The Don
12-02-2014, 01:20 PM
I really don't know how I feel about this, if a child is too young to consent to sex or drink etc then surely, in the eyes of the law, they are too young to decide to end their life. Obviously everyone should have the right to end their life, but this contradicts loads of other laws if passed.

Kyle
12-02-2014, 01:27 PM
I really don't know how I feel about this, if a child is too young to consent to sex or drink etc then surely, in the eyes of the law, they are too young to decide to end their life. Obviously everyone should have the right to end their life, but this contradicts loads of other
laws if passed.
Drinking and sex don't really have anything to do with terminal illnesses though and consent rightly differs between ending of suffering and satisfaction of basic desire for pleasure.

This is a step in the right direction imo, I see no reason a child should be required by law to suffer because they are categorised as immature. These children have to grow up faster than normal so it's only right that the sanctions placed on their decisions based on age should be lifted.

The Don
12-02-2014, 01:34 PM
Drinking and sex don't really have anything to do with terminal illnesses though and consent rightly differs between ending of suffering and satisfaction of basic desire for pleasure.

This is a step in the right direction imo, I see no reason a child should be required by law to suffer because they are categorised as immature. These children have to grow up faster than normal so it's only right that the sanctions placed on their decisions based on age should be made redundant.

Didn't really think of it like that, that definitely makes sense, I guess I agree with you to some extent, it just depends really how young we're talking here. Do you think a 4 year old should be able to make such a drastic decision? If they were to follow the Netherlands and set it at 12 and over I would definitely agree, but I think any younger and it becomes a grey area.

Kyle
12-02-2014, 01:59 PM
Didn't really think of it like that, that definitely makes sense, I guess I agree with you to some extent, it just depends really how young we're talking here. Do you think a 4 year old should be able to make such a drastic decision? If they were to follow the Netherlands and set it at 12 and over I would definitely agree, but I think any younger and it becomes a grey area.

Euthanasia on the basis of terminal illness simply should not be regimented by the concept of age. Obviously the average 4 year old is going to be less mentally advanced as, say, the average 12 year old, but my personal belief is that there is no reason to regard them as any less of a person because of it. If a child is autonomous and able to communicate their choice to die in a way that can be properly recognised as an active choice then there is no reason for them to have to suffer a little longer for what seems like parents' and family members own selfish want to keep the child for as long as possible. Remember this change will only apply to those basically at the end of their tether who are going to die either way.

Jordan
13-02-2014, 06:00 PM
Just thought I would post saying it's been passed:


Parliament in Belgium has passed a bill allowing euthanasia for terminally ill children without any age limit, by 86 votes to 44, with 12 abstentions.

When, as expected, the bill is signed by the king, Belgium will become the first country in the world to remove any age limit on the practice.

It may be requested by terminally ill children who are in great pain and who have no treatment available.
Opponents argue children cannot make such a difficult decision.

In the Netherlands, Belgium's northern neighbour, euthanasia is legal for children over the age of 12, if there is parental consent.

Under the Dutch conditions, a patient's request for euthanasia can be fulfilled by a doctor if the request is "voluntary and well-considered" and the patient is suffering unbearably, with no prospect of improvement.

Belgium passed a law decriminalising euthanasia for terminally ill people over the age of 18 in 2002.

Supporters of the legislation argue that in practice the law will affect an extremely small number of children, who would probably be in their teens, the BBC's Duncan Crawford reports from Brussels.

The law states a child will have to be terminally ill, face "unbearable physical suffering" and make repeated requests to die - before euthanasia is considered.

Parents, doctors and psychiatrists would have to agree before a decision is made.

Protesters have lobbied politicians against the changes. Church leaders argued the law is immoral.

Some paediatricians have warned vulnerable children could be put at risk and have questioned whether a child can really be expected to make such a difficult choice.

But opinion polls have suggested broad support in Belgium for the changes.

Phil
14-02-2014, 03:03 PM
Can't believe this has been passed..

MKR&*42
14-02-2014, 03:56 PM
Good. Wonderful decision and I hope the UK starts to follow suit (in regards to legalising euthanasia in general.)

Kardan
14-02-2014, 04:21 PM
Good decision. It's worth noting that the child also needs the parents approval and the doctors approval... So the child doesn't have the final decision.

FlyingJesus
14-02-2014, 04:42 PM
I like how the opposition make it sound like it's a post-birth abortion when it's really just lessening the amount of suffering in the world

Daltron
14-02-2014, 10:44 PM
Very good move I think, as long as it's regulated and monitored properly.

Ardemax
15-02-2014, 03:46 PM
Very good move I think, as long as it's regulated and monitored properly.

Is there really anything unregulated in Belgium?

GommeInc
15-02-2014, 06:17 PM
It's a shame we don't even allow it for adults, let alone children. It's a good idea, and if a child is so ill and they want to die then let them, as sad a thought as it is. Besides, children can consent to medical proceedings so it's not really changed much as far as decision making goes.

Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!