Forum Load Speed

[Aiden]

Can we up the forum speed? So slow! Look at ThisHabbo and HFFM.

http://i.imgur.com/4iX1lS0.png

http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/9444/62gu.png
http://i.imgur.com/A2MuOZK.png

i hope these results are wrong because thishabbo are beating u

what is requests

like do they make it worst

omg no

i could of saved hours of waiting

[MKR&*42]

Would the "Load time" not be the best one to look at Aiden? :P If so, then hffm is literally 0.01 s behind habbox so it's not that large a problem.

[scottish]

Double the size so going to take longer to load, hffm has lowest size and still almost on par with hx.

[Aiden]

i dunno lol but surely they make a difference :O

i don't even get the internet

i don't get how it works like really

how does code even work when there wasnt any code in the first place


OMGGGG MY BRAIN HURTS

- - - Updated - - -

wat does the http:// make different?

looks like a second

http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/9623/ozat.png

[scottish]

Requests afaik is amount of back end requests the page is sending out

So for hxf, it'll request a bunch of CSS files, a bunch of JavaScript files, a bunch of images, google adverts, and so on

[Drew]

The page size is double, and the number of requests is triple that of ThisHabbo though, so it's gonna take longer to load.

[GoldenMerc]

Doesnt help with hotelusers acient coding

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

[Aiden]

The page size is double, and the number of requests is triple that of ThisHabbo's though, so it's gonna take longer to load.

That doesn't mean it's good? Surely Habbox can try to make it better.

[Drew]

That doesn't mean it's good? Surely Habbox can try to make it better.
Yeah definitely, just saying that it's not exactly a fair comparison :P

[Aiden]

Yeah definitely, just saying that it's not exactly a fair comparison :P

It's very fair. Both do the exact same thing. It's not like I've compared it will a company with billion pound servers lol.

[e5]

Habbox is loading the most though so its bound to take loner but being a tiny bit slower with like double the amount is good I think. Dunno what you're on about skandair

[lucaskf390]

Habboxforum page is the biggest(and the most requested), so It will take more time to load, 1 or 2 seconds waiting wont make any difference.

[Nick]

Im sure you are able to wait 1.45 seconds

http://24.media.tumblr.com/1940b14c508206e47ef4352db63c823f/tumblr_n0u2jho8AC1ro4jalo4_250.gif

[xxMATTGxx]

Let's be serious about this, do you have problems loading the forum and threads? I've not experienced any slowness today or within the past couple of weeks.

I can post, edit and do everything else very quickly. So I'm not sure if this is even a problem.

[scottish]

Requests doesn't mean more people are using the page btw.

[Aiden]

Im sure you are able to wait 1.45 seconds

http://24.media.tumblr.com/1940b14c508206e47ef4352db63c823f/tumblr_n0u2jho8AC1ro4jalo4_250.gif

say i load the hxf 500 times a day (which i probs load liek 3958324906)

thats 20 mins a day

x 1 week

140

x 4 weeks

560

x 1 year

6720

thats 112 hours a year

just on load time

[e5]

say i load the hxf 500 times a day (which i probs load liek 3958324906)

thats 20 mins a day

x 1 week

140

x 4 weeks

560

x 1 year

6720

thats 112 hours a year

just on load time

That's absolutely ridiculous and so irrelevant. It really doesn't make a different, at all.

[scottish]

say i load the hxf 500 times a day (which i probs load liek 3958324906)

thats 20 mins a day

x 1 week

140

x 4 weeks

560

x 1 year

6720

thats 112 hours a year

just on load time

1.45 seconds x 500 isn't 20 minutes,

500 loads a day is 725 seconds which is 12 minutes

1 day: 12 mins
1 week: 84 mins (1hr 24 min)
1 month: 6 hours
1 year: 72 hours

- - - Updated - - -

Average page to load is something like 1second or 700ms.

[Aiden]

1.45 seconds x 500 isn't 20 minutes,

500 loads a day is 725 seconds which is 12 minutes

1 day: 12 mins
1 week: 84 mins (1hr 24 min)
1 month: 6 hours
1 year: 72 hours

lol i dont know

but 72 hours is loads still

[Kardan]

lol i dont know

but 72 hours is loads still

Best leave and move to a quicker forum then, although it's not exactly as if you can do anything better with those 72 hours of 'loading time', since you can't exactly do much in a second anyway.

[scottish]

Indeed, google takes approx 1.65s to load so each time you google you'll waste more of your life on it then hxf

[Aiden]

Best leave and move to a quicker forum then, although it's not exactly as if you can do anything better with those 72 hours of 'loading time', since you can't exactly do much in a second anyway.

i could do a lot with 72 hours tho

[scottish]

Then go do it, you waste a lot more than 72 hours of your week on hxf nvm your year. So it doesn't matter.

[Kardan]

i could do a lot with 72 hours tho

Well, for you to get those 72 hours, you would need HxF to have a load time of 0 seconds, so if you want 72 hours, you're going to have to leave the forum.

[Aiden]

Well, for you to get those 72 hours, you would need HxF to have a load time of 0 seconds, so if you want 72 hours, you're going to have to leave the forum.

if i left the forum i would have more than 72 and i dont want that lol

[Kardan]

if i left the forum i would have more than 72 and i dont want that lol

Also worth noting that it's unlikely that you'll load HxF 500 times a day, so you won't get 72 either, so looks like it's a lose-lose situation we have.

[Chippiewill]

Probably something to do with having a million files in the clientscript folder and the whole of jquery being loaded for just coloured usernames.

[FlyingJesus]

i don't even get the internet

i don't get how it works like really

/thread

[Kardan]

e5;

This thread's discussion is clearly going nowhere, so I do believe you should close it.

[Chris]

The forum speed has been fine and seems at it's best compared to what we've experienced in the past.