Trump's lawyer filing complaint against Comey's leaks

[Landon]

Quite an interesting testimony seen on Thursday by former FBI director James Comey.

We've learned many things:


Trump did not interfere with the election
Russian investigation was started when Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch met on the plane
Trump and Comey both agreed that Michael Flynn is a good guy
Trump was never investigated
James Comey leaked memos to his "friends" to get to the media
And more interesting information not in Comey's favor


Trump's lawyer said that a complaint would be filed against James Comey because of his leaking of the memos with the intent of reaching the media. Aka, he orchestrated the leaks so that they would be in his favor.

I didn't include much info in this post but there is more to know from the testimony!

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/09/politics/james-comey-leak-complaint/index.html

[scottish]

Guess what you forgot to mention:

- Directly asked to shelve an investigation of Michael Flynn, asking senior White House officials to leave the room before speaking to Comey
- Declined to speculate on whether Trump had committed an obstruction of justice, although description of Flynn case and his firing has established that
- Memos were shared/leaked due to Trump's threat to release tapes of their conversations (Comey has documented every meeting with Trump as he didn't trust him to tell the truth, Comey has worked with several presidents in both DoJ and as FBI Director and has never felt a need to document meetings before - "I was honestly concerned that he might lie about the nature of our meeting.")
- Trump lied on national TV on NBC stating Comey had requested to meet him for dinner
- Stated if there was recordings of their conversation (which he hopes there are), he's fine with them being released
- Trump demanded personal loyalty, that Comey let Flynn go and that Comey state publicly that Trump was not personally under investigation.

From what I remember, he stated in the testimony that trump wasn't personally under investigation but his administration and party were, and ultimately this would lead to the head of the table which would be trump.


There was also the great quote by Paul Ryan 'He's just new to this' and 'probably wasn't steeped in long-running protocols'.

I think some Senators are requesting Trump tell his side under oath and open to the press too, which obviously won't happen.

[Landon]

I think some Senators are requesting Trump tell his side under oath and open to the press too, which obviously won't happen.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/09/politics/trump-news-conference/index.html

[Landon]

Great testimony from Attorney General Jeff Sessions today! Definitely provided more clarity on the investigation.


Attorney General Jeff Sessions, in dramatic Senate testimony, on Tuesday decried suggestions he colluded with Russian officials during the 2016 campaign as an “appalling and detestable lie” -- while staunchly defending his role in the firing of former FBI Director James Comey.

“I have never met with or had any conversations with any Russians or any foreign officials concerning any type of interference with any campaign or election,” Sessions told the Senate Intelligence Committee. “I have no knowledge of any such conversations by anyone connected to the Trump campaign.”

The attorney general addressed the same Senate panel that heard last week from Comey, becoming the highest-ranking official to testify in the Russia investigation.

Democrats used the forum to pepper Sessions with tough questions, at times accusing him of "stonewalling" and impeding the congressional probe.

The normally reserved Sessions showed his feisty side in response, pushing back on what he called the "secret innuendo" being leaked about his contact with Russians and challenging portions of Comey's testimony.

In a fiery opening statement, Sessions specifically contradicted Comey’s claims that he remained silent when the former FBI director expressed his concerns over a meeting with President Trump.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/13/jeff-sessions-denies-russia-collusion-defends-comey-firing.html

[-:Undertaker:-]

I'm not even following it. The whole Russia conspiracy by the left is laughable.

I don't recall any uproar when Obama interfered in our referendum? Or when Obama interfered in the French Presidential election? But the fact that Marine Le Pen takes a loan for the Front National from a Russian bank? Oh the horror! Putin must be behind it. :rolleyes:

Putin is ten times the man in intellect+ability the leaders of the west are anyway. He doesn't scare me... I kinda admire him.

[Landon]

I'm not even following it. The whole Russia conspiracy by the left is laughable.

I don't recall any uproar when Obama interfered in our referendum? Or when Obama interfered in the French Presidential election? But the fact that Marine Le Pen takes a loan for the Front National from a Russian bank? Oh the horror! Putin must be behind it. :rolleyes:

Putin is ten times the man in intellect+ability the leaders of the west are anyway. He doesn't scare me... I kinda admire him.

It's absolutely laughable. Still their way of not getting over the fact that Hillary lost by a LANDSLIDE compared to what was predicted.

As per what Comey said under oath, even if there was interference, which I don't believe there was, Trump was not behind it. He had zero Russian ties during the campaign. Sessions today again under oath said that there was absolutely no collusion.

And before someone says it - if someone lies under oath, they deserve to be punished.

[-:Undertaker:-]

I'd like someone to actually point out to me exactly what it is Russia have apparently done.

*tumbleweed*

[Landon]

I'd like someone to actually point out to me exactly what it is Russia have apparently done.

*tumbleweed*

See the thing is, people say that Russia colluded with the election. But HOW exactly?

[scottish]

There's an FBI report of a few hundred pages which put Russians behind multiple hacking such as the DNC.

Google it I'm sure there's plenty of info.

[Landon]

There's an FBI report of a few hundred pages which put Russians behind multiple hacking such as the DNC.

Google it I'm sure there's plenty of info.

I'd like to know what kind of hacking though? They're fear mongering to get support. I still haven't seen at least a hint as to what method it may have been.

[scottish]

There's plenty of information on various FBI reports, pretty sure some of it details the exact zero day exploits that were used?

[Landon]

There's plenty of information on various FBI reports, pretty sure some of it details the exact zero day exploits that were used?

Educate me

[scottish]

You've proven beyond doubt that is impossible.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/06/12/timeline-key-moments-russia-investigation-election/102786216/
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Don't have the time to find the other FBI report but if you have a look I'm sure you can find it, pretty sure it was FBI.

[-:Undertaker:-]

There's an FBI report of a few hundred pages which put Russians behind multiple hacking such as the DNC.

Google it I'm sure there's plenty of info.

It must be true then.

[Landon]

It must be true then.

He believes in the FBI because Comey let his savior Hillary Clinton off. Trust me, if Hillary would have been locked up, he wouldn't be saying this and he wouldn't be believing in the scandal.

[scottish]

It must be true then.

I'd generally believe an FBI report over you two.

Is there anything substantial that proves otherwise? Pretty sure a mass of IT security specialists have been involved and commented too.

- - - Updated - - -


He believes in the FBI because Comey let his savior Hillary Clinton off. Trust me, if Hillary would have been locked up, he wouldn't be saying this and he wouldn't be believing in the scandal.

I believe in the FBI because I don't have a reason not to.

How did you deduce that Hillary Clinton is my saviour? lmao, if Hillary was locked up I'd be indifferent (hey wasn't that something Trump was meant to ensure happened?).

You really are deluded.

[Landon]

I'd generally believe an FBI report over you two.

Is there anything substantial that proves otherwise? Pretty sure a mass of IT security specialists have been involved and commented too.

- - - Updated - - -



I believe in the FBI because I don't have a reason not to.

How did you deduce that Hillary Clinton is my saviour? lmao, if Hillary was locked up I'd be indifferent (hey wasn't that something Trump was meant to ensure happened?).

You really are deluded.

I still don't see evidence that the Russians hacked. All I see is an FBI report.

- - - Updated - - -


I'd generally believe an FBI report over you two.

Is there anything substantial that proves otherwise? Pretty sure a mass of IT security specialists have been involved and commented too.

- - - Updated - - -



I believe in the FBI because I don't have a reason not to.

How did you deduce that Hillary Clinton is my saviour? lmao, if Hillary was locked up I'd be indifferent (hey wasn't that something Trump was meant to ensure happened?).

You really are deluded.

And to answer to your post in the spam thread that is locked, the only friends you must have are online? You and your social justice warriors and Koran followers.

[MKR&*42]

Landon you really are a fucking moron. I cannot possibly comprehend the fact that you seem to think anyone with a liberal view is an Islam Sympathiser.

I fully support drug legalisation, allowing prostitution, allowing abortion, same-sex marriage, euthanasia, the scrapping hate speech laws, no internet censorship - all liberal viewpoints, but that doesn't in any way equal "Islam Sympathiser". You're literally as stupid as the people who tried to bring Islam into the building fire that occurred today as a result of someone's kitchen appliance exploding; it has no relevance.

Yes this is a reply to the other thread also.

[Landon]

Landon you really are a fucking moron. I cannot possibly comprehend the fact that you seem to think anyone with a liberal view is an Islam Sympathiser.

I fully support drug legalisation, allowing prostitution, allowing abortion, same-sex marriage, euthanasia, the scrapping hate speech laws, no internet censorship - all liberal viewpoints, but that doesn't in any way equal "Islam Sympathiser". You're literally as stupid as the people who tried to bring Islam into the building fire that occurred today as a result of someone's kitchen appliance exploding; it has no relevance.

Yes this is a reply to the other thread also.

Look at the facts. You guys don't want to bomb ISIS. You don't want to secure the US border. You don't think Islam/Muslims are the problem. You don't want to deploy ground forces. In fact, you don't want to do anything about ISIS except apologize for the people that want to.

Yes, this is a generalization. But it's the truth. You are sympathizing for Muslims/Islam. I guess I really am a 'fucking moron' for wanting to do all of these things.

And let's not forget, I am also a 'disgusting pig with no respect for women' as well!

[scottish]

Bombing ISIS isn't effective, it's a waste of money and radicalises more people as there's always civilian casualties. There isn't a certain group you can take out to bring down the 'organisation', so bombing won't do a great deal.

I don't care about the US border, I don't live in the US.

Islam and Muslims aren't the problem, terrorists are.

I've never once stated I don't want to deploy ground forces? If there's groups that can be taken out in other countries go for it.

[Landon]

Bombing ISIS isn't effective, it's a waste of money and radicalises more people as there's always civilian casualties. There isn't a certain group you can take out to bring down the 'organisation', so bombing won't do a great deal.

I don't care about the US border, I don't live in the US.

Islam and Muslims aren't the problem, terrorists are.

I've never once stated I don't want to deploy ground forces? If there's groups that can be taken out in other countries go for it.

There are groups that can be taken out. We know where the big ones at least are. We can do something about it. We can't afford to sit on our asses and do nothing but take in more refugees and then suffer for it instead.

Are you suggesting that members of ISIS are radicalized because we are somehow abusing them? That's what you make it sound like here:


radicalises more people as there's always civilian casualties.

[MKR&*42]

Look at the facts. You guys don't want to bomb ISIS. You don't want to secure the US border. You don't think Islam/Muslims are the problem. You don't want to deploy ground forces. In fact, you don't want to do anything about ISIS except apologize for the people that want to.

Yes, this is a generalization. But it's the truth. You are sympathizing for Muslims/Islam. I guess I really am a '**** moron' for wanting to do all of these things.

And let's not forget, I am also a 'disgusting pig with no respect for women' as well!

But not a single one of the viewpoints I just said has any connection to "not wanting to bomb ISIS", I literally did not say that.

You also don't seem to realise the fact that ISIS has arisen because the west decided to interfere in a war it shouldn't have. So I'm not sure why you think the approach of "let's try again" will work.

[-:Undertaker:-]

I'd generally believe an FBI report over you two.

Is there anything substantial that proves otherwise? Pretty sure a mass of IT security specialists have been involved and commented too.

Umm the Justice system doesn't work like you want it to (yet), you have to prove guilt - it's not that you have to prove innocence.


You also don't seem to realise the fact that ISIS has arisen because the west decided to interfere in a war it shouldn't have.

That's so untrue it doesn't even stand up to the slightest bit of scrutiny.

Exacerbated yes. Caused? No.

[Landon]

But not a single one of the viewpoints I just said has any connection to "not wanting to bomb ISIS", I literally did not say that.

You also don't seem to realise the fact that ISIS has arisen because the west decided to interfere in a war it shouldn't have. So I'm not sure why you think the approach of "let's try again" will work.

I'm talking about the viewpoints the most of you have shown in the past. It's obvious that you're defending their disgusting religion/s.

[FlyingJesus]

Remember guys, if you ever disagree with Landon on one single point you are a liberal feminist who loves terrorism. Kinda scary how he seems to just lump everyone who opposes him into one broad category and ignores individual arguments, almost like what the terrorists do in assuming that all Westerners are evil

[Landon]

Remember guys, if you ever disagree with Landon on one single point you are a liberal feminist who loves terrorism. Kinda scary how he seems to just lump everyone who opposes him into one broad category and ignores individual arguments, almost like what the terrorists do in assuming that all Westerners are evil

No, you don't have to disagree with me. You already are one regardless.

[FlyingJesus]

Am one what? I'm not a liberal, I'm not a feminist, and I don't love terrorism - would absolutely adore being shown how you come to any conclusion to the contrary

[Landon]

Am one what? I'm not a liberal, I'm not a feminist, and I don't love terrorism - would absolutely adore being shown how you come to any conclusion to the contrary

You can call yourself a conservative if you want, but if you were in the US, you definitely wouldn't be one. Lol maybe you have ideology identity disorder.

[FlyingJesus]

Again, would be great if you could actually prove any of your claims at any point. I'm not an batshit insane extremist but that doesn't make me a liberal, and that two-point view of yours where you have to be either one or the other is really rather dangerous.

Pretty sure I know myself better than you know me - kindly refrain from daring to say otherwise, it's extremely insulting.

[myles]

*REMOVED*

Thread edited by Charlie (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not use inappropriate language, thanks.

[Landon]

*REMOVED*

At least I show my face. Either that or you're a *REMOVED*

What a coward!


Again, would be great if you could actually prove any of your claims at any point. I'm not an batshit insane extremist but that doesn't make me a liberal, and that two-point view of yours where you have to be either one or the other is really rather dangerous.

Pretty sure I know myself better than you know me - kindly refrain from daring to say otherwise, it's extremely insulting.

Again. Ideology identity disorder. I'm glad its insulting. You're clearly not a conservative.

Thread edited by Charlie (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not use inappropriate language, thanks.

[FlyingJesus]

Again, no proof to your claim, and congrats on admitting that you're just out to insult people

[Landon]

Charlie; LOL myles called me a downy looking fuck on the post before me, and that's okay!

But I can't call him a tranny. This is the problem with the forum.

- - - Updated - - -


Again, no proof to your claim, and congrats on admitting that you're just out to insult people

The problem is, my insults have basis. ;)

[lemons]

The problem is, my insults have basis. ;)

https://media.giphy.com/media/DuyRke9MmTR16/giphy.gif

the vast majority of the forum will agree that has basis^

[Landon]

https://media.giphy.com/media/DuyRke9MmTR16/giphy.gif

the vast majority of the forum will agree that has basis^

Heh, and I the same.

- - - Updated - - -

It says something when the mod team takes extra care to watch what I say but makes no effort to take care of the obvious things. :P

So far, I am an absolute cretin, a disgusting pig with no respect for women, a fucking idiot, and a **** LOL. I think I've got some other things but this is what I can remember at the moment.

I'd be interested to know what would happen to me if I said some of the shit I got. I'd probably be canned instantly lol

[scottish]

Charlie; LOL myles called me a downy looking fuck on the post before me, and that's okay!

But I can't call him a tranny. This is the problem with the forum.

- - - Updated - - -



The problem is, my insults have basis. ;)

you're only allowed to insult people if it's true, so his comment is valid.

[Landon]

you're only allowed to insult people if it's true, so his comment is valid.

Well, I did say either he hasn't showed his face or he's a tranny in accordance with his fake female profile pic. So maybe it is him :P

[FlyingJesus]

The problem is, my insults have basis. ;)

Aaaaaaaaaand for the billionth time, would love to see all this proof you have

[Landon]

Aaaaaaaaaand for the billionth time, would love to see all this proof you have

All of your text in current affairs (https://www.habboxforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1086). That's my proof. I'd be sitting here all day copying and pasting.

[FlyingJesus]

So yeah no proof, just wild lies as usual. You really bring nothing of value

[Landon]

So yeah no proof, just wild lies as usual. You really bring nothing of value

I gave you proof. And like usual, uneducated liberals cannot read.

[FlyingJesus]

You did not give any proof, you said "LOL EVERYTHING". I am far more educated than you, and still not a liberal. You're embarrassing yourself and your species

[Landon]

You did not give any proof, you said "LOL EVERYTHING". I am far more educated than you, and still not a liberal. You're embarrassing yourself and your species

lol everything? That's the only thing that I say to you?

If you really are a conservative, which I am 100% positive you are not, you are an embarrassment to the ideology that we believe in. You do not represent us.

[lemons]

someone ban this mental case

[FlyingJesus]

Are you even keeping up with your own conversation? I asked you for proof that I'm somehow a liberal despite (oddly enough) knowing myself quite a bit better than you know... well, anything, and you just said "All of your text in current affairs" which is not proof, just nonsense. If you really believe that's proof, you're suggesting that me saying that I'm not a liberal means I'm a liberal. Surely even someone as dense as you can see why that doesn't make sense.

Also again your two-point view of the world is ridiculous and dangerous. It's not a case of either with you or against you, and I certainly don't want to be part of your bigoted school shooter demographic in any case. You personally are a terrible entity who does nothing but advocate for fear and hostility, that would be the case no matter what my political leanings may or may not be, and you being 100% positive about something isn't really worth a lot considering how wrong you are about literally everything ever.

[Landon]

Also again your two-point view of the world is ridiculous and dangerous. It's not a case of either with you or against you, and I certainly don't want to be part of your bigoted school shooter demographic in any case. You personally are a terrible entity who does nothing but advocate for fear and hostility, that would be the case no matter what my political leanings may or may not be, and you being 100% positive about something isn't really worth a lot considering how wrong you are about literally everything ever.[/COLOR][/FONT]

There's the evidence. You're the complete opposite of what I believe.


someone ban this mental case

Please do! I've tried to turn myself away from such a dead and failing forum but haven't found a way out.

[Martin]

There's the evidence. You're the complete opposite of what I believe.



Please do! I've tried to turn myself away from such a dead and failing forum but haven't found a way out.

change password to something you will never remember and log out
don't visit habboxforum.com
destroy your computer


OT: Good for Trump!

[Landon]

change password to something you will never remember and log out
don't visit habboxforum.com
destroy your computer


OT: Good for Trump!

I might. Don't know why you all haven't done the same. Can't see that this forum isn't going to make a comeback?

[FlyingJesus]

There's the evidence. You're the complete opposite of what I believe.

I literally did not espouse one single liberal thought in that post, so what you're now saying is that anyone who doesn't think that threatening to shoot up schools is a good thing is a liberal. Righto. You have the mindset of a terrorist, that is truly worrying

[Landon]

so what you're now saying is that anyone who doesn't think that threatening to shoot up schools is a good thing is a liberal.

Your claims have absolutely no base. At least I gave you a place to look. You're just talking out of your ass. :P

[lemons]

Please do! I've tried to turn myself away from such a dead and failing forum but haven't found a way out.

log off?

[Landon]

log off?

Meaning I keep coming back.

[FlyingJesus]

Your claims have absolutely no base. At least I gave you a place to look. You're just talking out of your ass. :P

Nope. You said in the (now moved/deleted) thread you made that you'd happily accept being a school shooter if that's where life takes you. Interesting that this all started from me joking that anyone who disagrees with you is somehow automatically a liberal, and that's what you've just admitted you think is the case. Wonderful circle of life

[Landon]

Nope. You said in the (now moved/deleted) thread you made that you'd happily accept being a school shooter if that's where life takes you. Interesting that this all started from me joking that anyone who disagrees with you is somehow automatically a liberal, and that's what you've just admitted you think is the case. Wonderful circle of life

You don't have any evidence of this, remember. You're embarrassing yourself. Stop talking.

[FlyingJesus]

You can lie and say it didn't happen if you want, but it's still far more true than your claims that I'm some Bernie supporter

[Landon]

You can lie and say it didn't happen if you want, but it's still far more true than your claims that I'm some Bernie supporter

It isn't a lie though, remember? You have no evidence. And if you have no evidence, it didn't happen. :)

[FlyingJesus]

That is not how truth works lol, more terrifying insights into how your mind runs

[Landon]

That is not how truth works lol, more terrifying insights into how your mind runs

Oh right. That's not how the truth works if it involves me but it is how the truth works if it involves you. Hypocrite.

[lemons]

https://lucyonthegroundwithrocks.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/8951492.gif?w=616

[Landon]

https://lucyonthegroundwithrocks.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/8951492.gif?w=616

Do it

[FlyingJesus]

No dear the truth works the same way at all times, if you can't tell the difference between claiming to have evidence to an opinion (ie: what you did) and stating something that actually happened (ie: what I did) then you have even more problems than I thought

[scottish]

someone ban this mental case

temptation to drop him from db is real

- - - Updated - - -

I'm happy to change your password and email so you can't log back in if you wish.

Also, the only person to embarrass themselves in this thread is yourself and I'm sure everyone (apart from 1) will agree.

[Landon]

temptation to drop him from db is real

- - - Updated - - -

I'm happy to change your password and email so you can't log back in if you wish.

Also, the only person to embarrass themselves in this thread is yourself and I'm sure everyone (apart from 1) will agree.

Drop me if you want. I don't give a shit. I'm not scared lmao