Should Inactive Accounts be...
1. Removed from the system.
2. Name changed to make other names free and the owner emailed
3. Nothing, It's fine.
Printable View
Should Inactive Accounts be...
1. Removed from the system.
2. Name changed to make other names free and the owner emailed
3. Nothing, It's fine.
Nothing..Ppl can leave and end up coming back.
they ARE removed after a year or something or they used to be. :]
1. Removed from the system.
They say that the server keeps getting bigger, so why not remove members.
I think though before they remove them they should give the inactive account owners and email stating if they do not active their account within a week it will be removed.
Nothing. When you create an account you should withhold the right to decide how often you use that.
And what if it was staff or something who was moving house and didn't have a connection for a few months or something? Due to circumstances, should people lose their accounts?
I'm talking about a year, and/or 0posts, 0threads.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ostinato
Then why isnt it stated in the thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by Earthquake
Why did you vote on your own poll?
might as well keep it in place. if that person one day returns they may use it. plus it allows people to have more and more intresting names
Because I was putting my opinion in, Problem? It isn't the end of the world ;sQuote:
Originally Posted by urmum