R. Kelly was acquitted of all charges Friday after less than a day of deliberations in his child pornography trial, ending a six-year ordeal for the R&B superstar.
Whole article...
Printable View
R. Kelly was acquitted of all charges Friday after less than a day of deliberations in his child pornography trial, ending a six-year ordeal for the R&B superstar.
Whole article...
Great.
There was a mole on the guys back which R.Kelly hasn't got. He shouldn't be wrongly accused, I'm happy he got off with it.
I wish he'd have been charged.
15 years if he would of been convicted. Ouch!
Same. After all that so called proof and all those delays of the trial - they just used the "there is no mole" defence. :eusa_eh:Quote:
Originally Posted by risque
Probabaly got off because he is famous, as all famous people tend to do. I still have no doubt that Jacko is a pedophile either, despite him getting off.
r.kelly makes me fell sick
With Michael's case, there was little or no juror's conflict, or evidence against Michael doing it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frodo13.
In this case, even the jurors say it was him on tape - which was real evidence.
Micheal Jackson is peadophile and he did touch up them kids, why would you have a 'sleepover' in a little boys house - the boy had bunk beds, and then when the parents check up on them, hes in the boys bed.. :rolleyes:
An requested a room on an award night thingy for him and a boy to be alone with no disturbances, and then jog him up and down on this knee at the show.
ABIT WEIRD IF YOU ASK ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Smooth Crinimal you must really love Micheal Jackon, shame he loves little boys, eh?
Anyways there wasnt any evidence against R. Kelly, because he dosn't have a mole on his back, so how could it be him :S arghhh.
^ Do you not know R Kelly's history? You should read it up because there has been plenty of statements and evidence that should have gotten him convicted. He's a freak, he belongs in the slammer.