Should they?
Covering all sports - I think not. Women's sports are generally not as publicised as men's sports and therefore less money is made from it so the football teams etc cannot afford to pay the players the same wages.
Printable View
Should they?
Covering all sports - I think not. Women's sports are generally not as publicised as men's sports and therefore less money is made from it so the football teams etc cannot afford to pay the players the same wages.
Womens sports isn't as popular.
and as you sais less monies are availible, and the mens footballing wages are bad enough as it is!
I don't get the same entertainment watching them, of course there is the big problem with the fact they don't recieve much in the way of advertising. That's only because there isn't enough general interest in watching womens sports as much as mens. I always find there isn't the competitive edge from past experience.
It's about business and womens football is not a big one. Charlton got rid of there's and Doncaster Belles are struggling to stay afloat so they can't afford higher wages.
i find womans football is just boring. not to be sexist in any way, but they can just not compete in the way men do. it seems the touches seem unnatural
under risk of being flamed, women's sports aren't as interesting, except obv. beach volleyball.
Simple. Women are genetically weaker than me.
We watch sports to see this strength being put to the test... and as men are stronger than women, it's obvious who we'll watch.
Quoted for truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfsburg
They arent as popular, so less people buy tickets, so teams get less money, so players get less money
Simple Economics.
Well I agree with all of the above.