Man sues doctors for amputating penis

Quote:

---

The lawsuit states that Patterson received consent to perform a circumcision and only a circumcision, and that Seaton did not consent to his penis being removed.

Kevin George, the plaintiff's attorney, said [Dr.] Patterson amputated the organ after finding cancer, but he only had consent to remove the foreskin.

"Sometimes you have an emergency and you have to do this, but he could very easily closed him up and said, 'Here are your options. You have cancer,' and the family would have said, 'We want a second opinion. This is a big deal,'" George said.

---

Source: http://consumerist.com/5054482/man-s...putating-penis

If he'd rather die than have a penis then he now has suicide as an option.

why do people only post sick news find some nice chearfull news

Even if he had cancer, they should have at least just stuck to what they were meant to be doing and then addressed the guy after and said you have cancer in your penis we can do this and this, what do you want to do?