John King probably got fired that day for telling the truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgCEZwrc1o8
Printable View
John King probably got fired that day for telling the truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgCEZwrc1o8
I follow world politics and would be extremely uncomfortable if he ever gained any more power than he holds now.
Ron Paul? I'm afraid the guy you want to be worried about is Rick Santorum who wants to post-event forcibly divorce all same-sex married couples in America. Sanctity of marriage my ass. That and overriding individual state law at a federal level.
Oh indeed, I mean a Ron Paul presidency would be just awful - I mean just think of the horrors it would hold? policies like no more foreign wars, only spending what you have to avoid going bankrupt, following the constitution and and allowing states rights, having a strong Dollar backed by gold as opposed to paper which will lead to its eventual collapse, allowing a free internet .... all very, very uncomfortable stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by mdna
The current president? spends like crazy (Greece anyone?), invades foreign countries without the permission of Congress like an imperial monarch, prints the U.S. Dollar into the ground, ignores the constitution and has the federal government intrude on the rights of states which the founding fathers warned against, carries out hit missions overseas (er, trial by jury?), attempts to censor the internet + many more.
If you find Ron Paul uncomfortable then you are utterly insane, there is no other word for it.
No, darling. That means that I have different political views from you. Sometimes it is essential to open your eyes to the fact that there may be people who disagree with you, especially on politics. You have a wonderful day, now!Quote:
Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-
Way to back up your view! 'its my opinion' & 'people disagree with you' - wow really!?Quote:
Originally Posted by mdna
I mean it wasn't as though I was asking why Ron Paul is 'uncomfortable' and you've failed to answer, no, of course not.
Lets take a look here
Ron Paul does not support being the world police, does not support NDAA, Patriot Act, and the war on drugs. The rest of thecandidatessupport pretty much everything i mentioned. Do we really need the Patriot Act? It was supposed to be gone shortly after 9/11 happened but guess what? We still have that. NDAA is some corrupted crap where you can arrest citizens without a trial and place them in FEMA Camps. I'm sure the government in the current state with itscorruption would just label people as "terrorists" as an excuse to arrest them with NDAA law.
It's really interesting. The Convention will be a blood bath and potentially people will be shocked when they find out Paul's true delegate count.It will be one interesting Convention full of political maneuvering and attempts to forge alliances.
Rumours are even spreading that they could unite over a more friendly candidate to the Republican centre such as Jeb Bush (Oh, God!)
Although he is insane to not support separation of the church and the state, it's simply unconstitutional.Quote:
Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-
Other than that and a couple of minor nags he's an awesome guy.
There's some ideas a lot of people don't agree with on him, but hopefully we can all agree that he's a heck of a lot better than the other candidates running for president!Quote:
Originally Posted by Chippiewill