#EverydaySexualSegregation

http://order-order.com/2015/05/02/ev...afcPh3dhhiJABQ

#EverydaySexualSegregation

https://orderorder.files.wordpress.c...pg?w=540&h=405

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guido Fawkes

Labour are at the forefront of the fight for sexual equality – except when it might cost them votes. So here pictured in Hodge Hill this morning are Tom Watson MP, Liam Byrne MP and Mr Jack Dromey MP as well as Siôn Simon MEP speaking in front of a segregated audience:

---

https://orderorder.files.wordpress.c...pg?w=540&h=405

Wonder what Harriet would have to say about it?

UPDATE: Nigel comments

This is wholly unacceptable in a civilised society: http://t.co/ASdIxtlmB1

— Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) May 2, 2015

Wow, just wow.

More proof if needed that the left and specifically the Labour Party doesn't have any principles other than power. You only have to look at how Labour threw 1,400 English girls to the immigrant pedophile gangs in Rotherham and other towns and cities to see that. They're a ******* disgrace.

If you have a daughter, are a woman or happen to be gay and immigration continues like this then be warned: when it comes to it, Labour will throw you under the bus because the bloc immigrant vote will always come first for them, just as they put the working classes second during their last reign of terror.

Let's hear from our two favourite 'progressive' Labourites @Kardan; and @The Don; and see what mental gymnastics they come up with to justify this.

Thoughts?

Kinda looks like they segregated themselves, the woman on the panel isn't segregated. Are you saying we should not allow people to decide where they sit because its sexist? I thought you were libertarian?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chippiewill

Kinda looks like they segregated themselves, the woman on the panel isn't segregated. Are you saying we should not allow people to decide where they sit because its sexist? I thought you were libertarian?

---

I thought you and more specifically Labour were for women's rights and liberation?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

I thought you and more specifically Labour were for women's rights and liberation?

---

Part of women's rights is their right to segregate themselves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chippiewill

Part of women's rights is their right to segregate themselves.

---

Oh yes because I am sure they segregate themselves willingly and not due to their husbands. But this isn't about me, this is about the Labour stance.

Left wingers and Labour argue all the time for women's rights, had this been a Tory/CoE/Ukip meeting then they'd be up in arms telling us how this kind of attitude belongs back in the Victorian era. So the question is, why do Labour shrink away from arguing for gender equality when it comes to 'diverse' voters?

It kind of answers itself really. Guaranteed 'community'-wide votes and rank hypocrisy.

How is it Labour's fault if the women choose to segregate themselves though? They can't force people to sit places. Unless a Labour party member segregated them then I see nothing wrong with this. All it really proves is that there are some less progressively-minded people who are at least considering a Labour vote.

I don't understand it personally, but if people choose to sit like that, let them be. To me it's pretty obvious that it's the choices of the people in the hall to sit like that rather than the Labour party going 'Men there, women here'. All this shows is that the Labour party are willing to talk in front of an audience that sits themselves in such a way.

Not that I would ever want to sit segregated but if they want to segregate themselves then that's up to them... As a champion of free rights surely you're happy labour didn't force them to sit together?

Easily your most embarrassing, pathetic, small-minded post that you have ever put on this forum, Dan.

This is completely normal in mosques, and - let's now destroy your anti-Islam post, it is also completely normal in countries across the world in churches (some being ex-colonial countries, but then we all know the British were totally for everyone mixing together, right?).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

So the question is, why do Labour shrink away from arguing for gender equality when it comes to 'diverse' voters?

---

Considering the men are just as segregated I fail to see how this represents a gender inequality.

Wake up Dan, this is just another **** Guido post designed to rile up its racist readership.