Jane Collins MEP ordered to pay £160,000 to Rotherham MPs

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-02-2017, 07:13 PM
-:Undertaker:-

Jane Collins MEP ordered to pay £160,000 to Rotherham MPs

https://order-order.com/2017/02/06/u...am-labour-mps/

Jane Collins MEP ordered to pay £160,000 to Rotherham MPs

https://i0.wp.com/order-order.com/wp...40%2C279&ssl=1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guido

UKIP MEP Jane Collins has been ordered to pay over £160,000 to the three Rotherham Labour MPs she libelled about the town’s child abuse scandal. The MPs had wanted £150,000 each, though a court today ruled Collins must may £54,000 to Kevin Barron, John Healey and Sarah Champion. Collins will also have to pay significant costs. A very expensive party conference speech.

This issue (Rotherham/child rape by migrant rape gangs) is probably the one that makes my blood boil beyond all else.

The public comments speak for themselves because you can't silence everybody. We know what happened you FILTHY vermin.

Quote:

So somebody calls out dereliction of duty on a large scale and the ensuing cover-up yet has to pay a huge fine for doing so?

Fucking love this country.

Quote:

I mean why would Labour MPs know about what was going on in their local Labour controlled council? To suggest that only a fool wouldn't have known is just plain wrong.

Quote:

Any compensation for the thousand plus girls who were abused and passed around under Labour's watch?

Thought not.

Quote:

Unfortunately she went up against Islam! Fatal mistake as there was no way she could win! Despite overwhelming evidence available over a long period of time that the Council, Social Services and the Police were turning a blind eye to these crimes she could not win as that would be an admission of guilt by those named above and there is no way they would let that happen.

Quote:

Denis McShane knew and admitted he knew about the sexual abuse but didn't do anything about it because he didn't want to "rock the multicultural boat". What a fine upstanding man he is.

Are to believe he didn't pass such information on to his successor, Sarah Champion ? If he didn't then that is gross dereliction of duty on his part but if he did Champion should not have won her case.

Legally I can't say what I really want to say or would like to see happen - much more than Collins did - but I do wonder what life would be like for just some of the rape victims had the effort of this court case been directed at just some abusers in Rotherham.
06-02-2017, 07:55 PM
dbgtz

There's no evidence the MPs actually knew, hence libel. If she had evidence then there would be no penalty.

No idea where £54k each came from though, seems somewhat excessive.
06-02-2017, 08:00 PM
-:Undertaker:-

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbgtz

There's no evidence the MPs actually knew, hence libel.

:shh::censored:
06-02-2017, 08:16 PM
dbgtz

Quote:

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

:shh::censored:

You realise it's nothing to do with the actual scandal itself, yes?! She accused the MPs of knowing without any evidence. Show me this evidence otherwise you have no case.
06-02-2017, 08:22 PM
AgnesIO

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbgtz

You realise it's nothing to do with the actual scandal itself, yes?! She accused the MPs of knowing without any evidence. Show me this evidence otherwise you have no case.

UKIP have never needed actually evidence for their claims :rolleyes:
06-02-2017, 10:02 PM
FlyingJesus

Evidence isn't important when you KNOW. Like when you're totally THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE.
06-02-2017, 10:09 PM
-:Undertaker:-

If you all believe the three MPs had no idea what was going on in their constituencies then you can believe that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AgnesIO

UKIP have never needed actually evidence for their claims

Many years ago on here I actually posted the rumours of the migrant rape gangs in Rochdale/Rotherham that were circulating. I was called racist, asked for evidence (which usually means a BBC link as though that's the only truth), told I was making it up and so on. Well look what turned out. It was widespread on the internet (if you took an interest) for years before the story broke.

If I am right in recalling, Nick Griffin was even taken to court over the claims he made in 2006. Time has vindicated him.
06-02-2017, 10:35 PM
FlyingJesus

Why would MPs know something that the police didn't investigate

Also since when was Nick Griffin vindicated lmao
06-02-2017, 10:40 PM
-:Undertaker:-

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlyingJesus

Why would MPs know something that the police didn't investigate

Why would actors/actresses/entertainers/politicians know Savile was abusing when the Police hadn't yet investigated

Answer = because you don't have to wait for official confirmation to know something is true. Especially when it is the officials themselves who have covered up or ignored the story meaning they too have something to lose by it going public.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlyingJesus

Also since when was Nick Griffin vindicated lmao

Since the story broke and his 'wild' claims dating to 2006 and before were pretty much spot on.
06-02-2017, 11:46 PM
FlyingJesus

I like that you added "/politicians" in there when it was a showbiz thing just to try making a point... and still doesn't answer the question. If the police aren't taking investigations on and reports aren't being filed, what is there for an MP to find? It's been proven in a court of law that there's no reason to believe that they knew what was happening.

As for Nick Griffin, he claimed that this was happening because "it's part of their plan for conquering countries" and made no comment about Rotherham at all - his rant that you linked about was in Keighley, a couple of hours north of Rotherham and not connected politically

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page