hxhd snq questions

I think we all need to calm down and eat cake here guys.
The quiz was not the best it could have been. It had some topics that were used too frequently (twilight) some topics that should not have been there (alcohol) and some topics that could have been with being included (Habbo(x)). But really it is not a hanging offence to do a bit of a dodgy quiz and I am sure poor Lucky is feeling rather upset when she at least tried to do something good by volunteering to do the quiz in the first place.
Running a quiz is a pain in the butt (speaking from previous experience) and at least she tried.
She has now gained useful feedback in case she ever wants to run the snq again. (Which she probably will not now).

In conclusion, I think she gets the point by now.

Four questions about one topic (which is a bias topic in the first place) is obviously not fair, it doesn't take a genius to work out, I also don't know why you're talking about themed SNQs when they're completely irrelevant...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LiquidLuck.

LOL! I'm the one being sexiest?! Look at the first posts and you'll see what being sexist is. I also like football and I know guys (not gays) that enjoy Twilight. I'm not the one stereotyping. And you're the one continuing this debate that goes round and round, so I guess you do. Google ethos by the way, it's philosophy. And if you think this, then people could complain that questions about the US, are biased against people who aren't from the US, etc.

So according to you, all themed SNQs will have an unfair host? I asked if we could do a themed one tonight, and the answer I got was no, I took it. Also tell me when I changed my actions half way through, please? At the beginning of the quiz I said they were 4 about Twilight (check with Kyle if you want because he quoted it), so don't make up stuff now, please. Also funny thing how could I have changed 16 questions halfway through when I need to first get them checked by managers? And di I create them in what 5 seconds? I'd love to understand how you think I did that. Also it's my fault that many different people knew different questions so they didn't get more than 3 right each? Interesting.

About the bringing up the past thing, I didn't get it. And his name is Forrest, not Forest. That was why. And since in SNQ spelling counts, ''Run, Forrest, run'' is the correct answer.

Also let me know when you see someone with no points winning SNQ within the last 4 questions, even if everyone else has max 3.

---

not bein funny or nothing but some of you are quite old and should prob get a grip and stop getting mad over a younger person having four virtual questions for a virtual item.
it's embarrassin.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Publicised

not bein funny or nothing but some of you are quite old and should prob get a grip and stop getting mad over a younger person having four virtual questions for a virtual item.
it's embarrassin.

---

If you don't give feedback you cannot expect improvement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chippiewill

If you don't give feedback you cannot expect improvement.

---

i am soz but this ain't constructive feedback the majority of it is people having a meltdown over twilight.

tbh i think everybody should just take a moment to chill out, i've only skimmed the thread because there's too much to read. 4 questions based on the same topic (twilight i believe?) is obv unfair like someone said so yh end of. It doesn't take a genius to work out that the questions need to be varied for it to be considered fair.